Butterflies Are Not Chaotic

Nicole Kidman says she has a butterfly phobia.

You have to respect people's phobias. These are genuinely traumatic responses to something that is usually quite small in reality. Which is not to say they cannot also be totally toxic and deadly!

Butterflies are generally speaking not deadly at all, as far as I'm aware. Some quite rare butterflies and moths are quite poisonous because when they were caterpillars they ingested highly poisonous plants. But that's an unusual case for the world of butterflies and moths.

High up on the sides of mountains, there are butterflies, and some of them exhibit vaguely similar ways of flying around in groups the way that starlings do and are quite famous for.

One obvious difference of course is that the butterflies are much much slower -, quite hypnotically languid, really.

There is a modern movie 'The Butterfly Effect' which has as its background proposition, this modern concept about so-called 'chaos theory,' part of which asserts that there is a sensitive dependence on initial conditions in a non-linear system so that small changes at some earlier point can lead to very large consequences later on.

Funny though, how time and time again, Hollywood movies will outright lay out something very exotic, completely esoteric really, in terms of its actual source in any text anywhere - but every single time they will twist it to deceive the common public about what the esoteric version actually was about.

...I've been turning over how to deal with certain subjects that a few people here have been talking about off-site, and it has to do with the nature of aesthetics as an etiological matter: in other words what really causes humans to decide something is 'nice' or not nice, and whether this is all just how certain mindsets are in fashion at some times and fall completely out of fashion again at other times.

But this is getting down to the most dangerous kinds of 'brass tacks' here. This is not something you can go into openly, by which I mean one simply cannot expose too much functional truth about it because it can be misinterpreted - and this is exactly what Hollywood did with this 'Butterfly Effect' thing and they did it, as far as I'm concerned, knowingly and with mal-intent.

On the one hand, virtually every religious moral teaching always portrays this idea that we must 'be nice to the worst kinds of people...' ...Because somehow this will revert them and avert the evil that they are doing and 'eventually' lead to 'helping them' become not so bad.

On the other hand, I don't believe that, not even for a second.

You wouldn't 'fat shame' here,
would you, Brits?

You see the most logical ultimate point of 'doing good' to bad people, is to give them maximum information, and that will absolutely certainly and without fail and without question lead to your own destruction.

What are you, completely crazy??

Butterflies are not chaotic and the butterfly effect is not a matter of 'chaos theory.'

'Small changes.' Hmn. 

This is again, this simplistic seemingly deterministic but in fact automata paradigm that they want to use.

The reason it's important for you to write something - is because this is a completely manifested reality effect, from out of nothing but what is going on in your head.

Now this does not mean that 'what you write is going to come true;' it means that what you were thinking, came into hard material reality as some words on some paper.

While billions (and it is literally billions) of human beings in religious groups are still arguing over this kind of question - 'does God have actual limbs, is God anthropomorphic' - you will be better served asking, is God beautiful and if so, is this the exact same kind of thing we say that some people are...?

Butterflies are beautiful in some people's mind - Nicole Kidman is beautiful in other people's mind; people are all people. Therefore Nicole Kidman is a butterfly.

Now.

Things will happen out there in the world.

Doesn't make me fat.
I eat heaps of this stuff!

And you can ask me about them later.

For now, what you need to do, is go out into the city streets, and just walk around until you see a homeless person, or in fact any person in a problematic situation. Realize that they can easily have some kind of sudden positive turn of fate, and which hands them the solutions to all of their immediate problems.

Now... ...Well, put it this way: you have enough space in your head to think about the street people, and so too do you have enough to think about someone you consider worthy of your best thoughts. You know, as in, someone that is very attractive to you. You can surely spend a little more than just harbor the lone simple idea that they may experience sudden positive turns of fate.

Aesthetics are not relativistic ideas.

They are manifested by various forces.

And that is all you really need to know right now, isn't it.

Most atheists say 'I want to see your god, prove to me that any such thing materially exists.'

The light shines, the flowers grow. But the flowers are not the sun.

I hope you just worked out how literally malevolent and sinister what so-called 'atheists' of the kind who make that challenge, truly are.

Let's hide away in the dark...

I hope you got the point.

There is a reason why everyone you see in the entertainment world today is ugly and skinny and as if on death's doorstep. ...Or, they are ugly and misshapen and unhealthily overweight.

FBI circa a hundred years from now (won't exist though, so don't worry) would be very concerned because of the non-chaotic butterfly effect.

You just keep 'watching this space.' And when we re-visit butterflies here again the next time that we talk about them, well -, no doubt we'll talk again about it all. And then you will be sitting at the edge of your seat though and paying attention.