...And I get two messages on my phone, both of them from super-wealthy people committing tons of money to the Autism Project.
 |
| I like it when it gets dark, and when it rains. |
Now. You have to understand, even all of you, probably never have got the 'main-street' version of what is going on with this thing.
The way I present to the 'big end of town' is strictly business, all incredibly conservative, really 'old school' style. There is backing documentation, independent reports (although we are still light on for that at the moment for IP security reasons just now), and forward projections, market size and analysis. All of it.
None of these people with the super huge, and I mean really huge, corporate spend budgets have even the slightest inkling there is this place, this Blog with all of its weird borderline, could be 'occult' talk!
And that's a bit frightening, given that all of them should be able to do these 'deep net' probes of every single thing any individual has ever been involved with.
I don't know whether this actually might an indication of just how 'shadow-banned' places like this, are, in all reality.
It's possible. I don't care to worry about that kind of thing anyway and I prefer that it isn't all that open or public.
The main take-away in terms of these developments is that the scale of funding will definitely increase dramatically at some point in the future and there is still much left to do before any of that can be called in - I would never get this kind of money without immense capital protection strategies fully in place; and that despite that they already were anyway but not using formal big league accountancy input and so on.
But how does this happen?
Well, it does not, cannot, happen the way the text-books tell you, or in any way that you will learn in University economics and finance.
 |
| Don't forget, Drosselmeyer gives the Nutcracker to the girl knowing that it will be broken. It's all about the magic of fixing things; restoring things. |
This is all 'upstairs' stuff. And by that I do mean 'the people up there.' And that is not something the rich folk would like to hear about just yet albeit they will find out about it soon enough but in the right order of things, at the exact right time.
Did I want it to happen this way?
Not exactly - I was pushing to have them (and I have already met these 'people') let me take film and pics of them first.
But then they asked, do you really want that or do you want the money (first).
I include the 'first' because I am not letting them off the hook as far as film images, and good ones at that, go in all of this.
Unlike Chris Bledsoe and his gang, or Steven Greer, I have no way of forcing them to do anything -, that they don't wish to do.
Anyway, what is back on the table, possibly simply because of the new virtually-certain scale of funding, is at least some basic iteration of an actual hand-held spintronics device.
That would be very cool. I think.
But all-in-all, nobody with the kinds of profiles these folk have - the ones with the big big money - would want to know that the golden child they are thinking quite favorably about just for the moment, actually 'believes in' real live ET Aliens he can take selfies with...!
LOL
So much for how to help poor kids with Autism and their parents! That would all go out the window real fast.
The funniest thing though, when you look at the authentic science case - using one particular 'model of Autism neurology' (there are several and no one particularly as yet has asserted total complete ascendancy in the 'scientific' picture) - when you look at the authentic science case in our documentation, it speaks to this idea that humans have an organised neural traffic system, which allows them to filter human-relevant information in, and keep all the informational noise, at bay.
 |
| ...But, I don't want this to be broken at all! |
But an extrapolation of it is that humans also produce a lot of noise themselves, from within their own thinking, from the neural network traffic that goes on constantly inside them - a lot of which is to do with future unknowns, some fears, a lot of risk factors being assessed inside their brains and priorities of action being juggled - gambled about, actually.
People gamble, or they must or need, to gamble, and so juggle priorities of action and meaning, in part because they have not enough information about the future.
Secondly, their society generally is in no way at all, organised to understand the future, but instead to kind of, try and compel it.
And we are looking at this right now when it comes to the US mid-terms. And also with what is going on in the Middle East and also with the Ukraine situation.
Democracies attempt to format two templates, both of which are about compelling the future to behave, in the way either side wants.
Only very vague and often mysterious, arcane, even 'internal polling' (lol!), analysis is done and no one gets to see why exactly, one side or the other decided it would be 'a good idea' to do such-and-such...
For me it would be like - show me the modeling; show me what things look like when you let such-and-such happen.
Real modeling will tell you that it has literally exactly nothing at all to do with energy prices, that inflation goes up - and that is because energy is an inelastic demand curve thing: the more prices go up, at a certain point the use falls off the cliff. And so then the velocity circulation goes down within the domestic economy, not 'up!'
But try and tell that to a politician. Maybe even just try and tell that to anyone - they've all been so thoroughly led by the hand to the edge of the cliff of lunacy... ...that they actually believe nonsense and will argue the thing, and hard.
 |
| What magical coat does Drosselmeyer wear today... |
Inflation goes up because of the demand for currency in the form of debt. And the only people that do that, and are fully addicted to it and cannot stop and go way more than anyone else in doing it - are governments themselves. Period.
The general media is in the business of compelling the future by driving whichever political agenda - as well as social agendas nowadays - they are committed to.
When you look at say, some seemingly very well-known public celebrity, some identity such as 'Cher' for one example -, you are looking at fifty years or more, of a mindset, a 'compulsion template' being soaked into her brain, into her neurology.
So is the neural 'noise' in there, and/or the standard cyclic iterations of one single thought process - going into the 'person?' Is all of that - well, isn't all of that - reflected from her memory cells into her personal consciousness and then coloring that personal consciousness?
Is that the same 'person' as when that person was a ten-year old?
Is that really the same actual person?
I don't want to say what 'personal consciousness' is in here, so that the AI human social-historical 'long language' crawl-bots won't get that description; certainly not from me anyway.
But I do think that the danger of listening to rubbish and thinking it is true and/or real, and not applying extremely rigorous critical thinking to it - well, that is how the 'Satanic' forces of the human material world literally kills off people's souls. Oh yes you can do that.
See, I could be wrong with all of the elements I mentioned above: I could be wrong about fuel and energy and their impact on inflation, I could be wrong about politicians never possessing any real authentic analysis to support their ideologies and agendas.
 |
| The shot composition, the shot composition. |
I could be wrong.
And that is the difference between the application of active thinking, and being led by lies and by propaganda.
But would a good and decent Divine Authority permit the killing of the soul of a 'Cher' or a 'anybody?!'
'Cher' is not immortal.
She is a human mortal being.
You, might not wish to be lumped in with that lot though.
In which case you need to be employing your active thinking mind every day.
'Personal consciousness' is a generic sentient quality. Who any specific personal consciousness is, is all about what you do, and especially what you think.
The Kingdom of Heaven is entered by children - like when Cher was a child when she was ten or twelve or even eighteen. But once you're an 'adult' you cannot enter into there at all.
[This track doesn't go anywhere - well, not until you realize it was the journey all along it was meant to 'go']: