Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Saturday 29 October 2016

That 'Silly' NASA Alien Thing

Okay we've all heard about the 'gigantic structure' or 'object' moving through a specific directional trajectory near Jupiter not related to local gravity forces (and therefore theorized to be under sentient 'control' of some kind).

The pictures released by NASA don't show anything clearly obvious to me other than some brighter patch of 'stuff.' It is large but it doesn't look like 'a structure' to my eye. 

And yes it all does possibly tie into ancient scriptural prophecies that are meant to be fulfilled around about, oh, sometime shortly after there are 'floods and earthquakes and disasters and wars and rumours of wars...'

I want to remind you, however, of the actual meaning of the word 'asteroid' (it means 'star-like' rather than a junk of space rock) and also of the probability that the original text Aramaic word 'absinthian' (rather than, as it is now conveyed 'wormwood,') would have had a distinct meaning known to the culture at the time in whose language these words were being written down. 
Yule Time - The Solstice is material darkness; the absence
of light from the material Universe. What comes from
beyond that point lies outside of the Universe.

As we are approaching the soon-enough-to-be deepest darkest part of the Winter - the Solstice - I want to tell you that the common dictionary explanation about the word 'Yule' is also wrong, or at least very superficial and thus to a large extent misleading. 'Yule' is NOT a German word; it is another word that first appears in Syro-Aramaic, yet it itself comes from much much earlier times. It means 'the deepest extent of the dark.' 'Yalda' or 'Yalta.' I guess we should have known what would come of the Yalta Conference!

Now 'darkness' as you know, has no separate existence of itself; it is merely the absence of light.

Even the word just used, 'absence,' contains elements that are pertinent to what I'm about to say. 'A' is a prefix that in Syro-Aramaic implies 'not' something...

'Po' or even 'pos' or 'poth' means a seer or a knower or something seen; the adviser of the Pharaoh was a 'Pothir.'  The ending 'inthian' is massively ancient and is a borrow ending into Syro-Aramaic and was uptaken into ancient and modern Greek: 'Corinthian' - which really doesn't mean someone from Corinth but rather, someone from those who sing and dance and party. And only because the place became associated with such pleasures was it ever conferred to it, the name 'Corinth.'  

'A-pos-inthian' means something never before seen at all by anyone. 

So it could be that there is a legitimate prophecy about the place, of 'aliens' appearing, but then again, knowing as I do,  some of the characters involved in NASA - notably Jack Parsons and the Northrup family - and we should not discount the Busch Family either, there is also every possibility of someone concocting 'an event' that looks like an alien incursion which then causes all kinds of destabilizing effects down here on this mundane little planet of ours.
Impossibly pure 'design' in its first example - the Countach.

But you will be able to tell whether anything that happens - if, that is, anything happens at all(!) - is really 'alien' in origin or only a man-made concoction.

Just look at Hollywood - since when was the last time you ever saw a futuristic sc-fi flick that showed you anything that wasn't obviously a man-made invention, once you turned things over in your mind just a little?

Design is an important part of our modern lives. And there really are very few designers engaged by industry or at the widely commercial level. Design intelligence is a totally rare commodity. Alas though, I think I almost make a mistake there in saying it is a commodity - I don't think it is a commodity; that is just a turn of phrase we all use, too casually in this case, I fear.

No, let me suggest to you that maybe something will happen - in fact TWO things will happen: one, a concocted event or incident, and the second, a real one.

The real one will be like nothing that has ever been seen before.


That 'Silly' NASA Alien Thing

Okay we've all heard about the 'gigantic structure' or 'object' moving through a specific directional trajectory near Jupiter not related to local gravity forces (and therefore theorized to be under sentient 'control' of some kind).

The pictures released by NASA don't show anything clearly obvious to me other than some brighter patch of 'stuff.' It is large but it doesn't look like 'a structure' to my eye. 

And yes it all does possibly tie into ancient scriptural prophecies that are meant to be fulfilled around about, oh, sometime shortly after there are 'floods and earthquakes and disasters and wars and rumours of wars...'

I want remind you, however, of the actual meaning of the word 'asteroid' (it means 'star-like') and also of the probability that the original text Aramaic word 'absinthian' (rather than, as it is now conveyed 'wormwood,' would have had a distinct meaning known to the culture at the time in whose language these words were being written down. 
Yule Time - The Solstice is material darkness; the absence
of light from the material Universe. What comes from
beyond that point lies outside of the Universe.

As we are approaching the soon-enough-to-be deepest darkest part of the Winter - the Solstice - I want to tell you that the common dictionary explanation about the word 'Yule' is also wrong, or at least very superficial and thus to a large extent misleading. 'Yule' is NOT a German word; it is another word that first appears in Syro-Aramaic, yet it itself comes from much much earlier times. It means 'the deepest extent of the dark.' 'Yalda' or 'Yalta.' I guess we should have know what would come of the Yalta Conference.

Now 'darkness' as you know, as no separate existence of itself; it is merely the absence of light.

Even the word just used 'absence' contains elements that are pertinent to what I'm about to say. 'A' is a prefix that in Syro-Aramaic implies 'not' something...

'Po' or even 'pos' or 'poth' means a seer or a knower or something seen; the adviser of the Pharaoh was a 'Pothir.'  The ending 'inthian' is massively ancient and is a borrow ending into Syro-Aramaic and was uptaken into ancient and modern Greek: 'Corinthian' Which really doesn't mean someone from Corinth but rather, someone from those who sing and dance and party. And only because the place became associated with such pleasures was it ever conferred to it, the name 'Corinth.'  

'A-pos-inthian' means something never before seen at all by anyone. 

So it could be that there is a legitimate prophecy about the place, of 'aliens' appearing, but then again, knowing as I do,  some of the characters involved in NASA - notably Jack Parsons and the Northrup family - and we should not discount the Busch Family either, there is also every possibility of someone concocting 'an event' that looks like an alien incursion which then causes all kinds of destabilizing effects down here on this mundane little planet of ours.
Impossibly pure 'design' in its first example - the Countach.

But you will be able to tell whether anything that happens - if, that is anything happens at all(!) - is really 'alien' in origin or only a man-made concoction.

Just look at Hollywood - since when was the last time you ever saw a futuristic sc-fi flick that showed you anything that wasn't obviously a man-made invention, once you turned things over in your mind just a little?

Design is an important part of our modern lives. And there really are very few designers engaged by industry or at the widely commercial level. Design intelligence is a totally rare commodity. Alas though, I think I almost make a mistake there in saying it is a commodity - I don't think it is a commodity; that is just a turn of phrase we all use, too casually in this case, I fear.

No let me suggest to you that maybe something will happen - in fact TWO things will happen: one, a concocted event or incident, and the second, a real one.

The real one will be like nothing that has ever been seen before.


Friday 21 October 2016

If You Thought You Knew Conspiracies...

Well I guess the interesting thing about the Wikileaks email stuff is that it basically confirms every single thing the 'conspiracy theorists' have been saying all along. 

It was not so much that there were a few 'wild theories' about the place, but there was a sustained and very firm belief voiced by a large number of people about the criminal corruption of the recent political 'holders' of the White House, and of a number of government agencies under them. It is difficult now to 'get around' the factual basis for these allegations.

But I must tell you all is not (it never is, is it) exactly as simple as we might initially think.
Afternoon tea...?

Yes of course it is crystal clear now that there has been large-scale unethical behaviour and compromising of ethics in senior government officials and elsewhere 'highly placed.' 

None of the revelations of the last few weeks ought to have surprised you - you've seen them all before albeit in the guise of mere 'conspiracy theory.'

The apparent 'fact' that an email - which is a written or at least printable document - provides 'evidence' has altered the media's discourse from mere conspiracy theory hinting, to direct and open challenges to various specific individuals over their precisely detailed errant behaviour.

And so, it seems that 'evidence' has moved things up a notch from just 'conspiracy theory' talk all the time whenever these opaque and possibly sinister matters are forced into the media's lap.

But I want to take things right up into the nose-bleed conspiracy nutjob stratas. I want to discuss the 'what if' aspect of the space alien references in the leaked emails. It's clear the media and even Wikileaks themselves have soft-peddled on some of the items, and the inwards emails to John Podesta are not exactly evidence - not those that we have seen so far - that the government really believes space aliens exist and come and visit us. What they show is that the government leadership group is open to extended talking about the matter; they give it some time when you would think they would have no time for it at all.

However I am going to tell you something now that no one else has ever discussed openly or in the public.
A host of the heavenly stars

There are certain aspects of the - let's call it 'talk' or chatter - in high government circles, about external to this planet, alien intelligent life, which proceeds from ideas and especially 'phrases' and terminology, that is taken for granted by all the 'obsessed' (if you want to still say its a conspiracy theory) when it comes to UFOs, and also by just plain ordinary government and military officials too.

For example, certain words we all think we know mean one thing - like 'asteroid' for one good instance of this - actually have more than one meaning. And, let's assume again, that there are space aliens, and that they have at some stage or that they sometimes still do, communicate with certain designated officials in government... As far as all of the 'conspiracy theories' go, space aliens are concerned about nuclear war, and in some other 'theories' they wish to dominate or exploit us. Sometimes we hear they give us technology we have to back-engineer in order to understand. 

But I can tell you of one subject of 'talk' about which you will probably be familiar - there certainly are military and NASA teams who concentrate on so-called NEO's that is, 'near to Earth objects' that might have some risk of hitting us and causing a lot of destruction. 

However I've got to tell you something about this that you will read or see or hear nowhere else: the word 'asteroid' does not actually mean what you think it means, that is, what we all commonly take for granted that it does mean.

'Asteroid' as a word has never formally been defined as a piece of rock or ice or other hard object that is floating around in space or on a path through space. The word actually means, in Greek: 'star-like.'


And what this means is this: if your were to read, let's say, in the Bible, that a star-like object will proceed from somewhere and land on the Earth creating 'disaster,' it might not mean an actual hard object... It more means 'star-like' as in those bright light bearers that descended over the shepherds out in the fields guarding their flocks by night. Star-like is a Greek phrase which means a being that is from the heavens and is very bright, or angelic.

And so, if you were to come across a current conspiracy theory to the effect that an asteroid is to fall into the water near Puerto Rico this month or so, causing havoc to Florida and the vicinity of - this might not mean an actual physical hard object falling to Earth. In those ancient writings we now say this is sort of an augury thing being talked about, albeit admittedly the Greeks and Persians also regularly personified these virtually astrological 'signs' and 'forces' and talked about them in terms of there being some intelligent force behind them, like a divine spirit, or sometimes they said, 'a god.'

Whichever way you choose to look at it though, I will guarantee you we are not talking about a hard physical piece of rock from space falling down into the atmosphere and crashing onto the Earth; which is what everyone thinks. 





If You Thought You Knew Conspiracies...

Well I guess the interesting thing about the Wikileaks email stuff is that it basically confirms every single thing the 'conspiracy theorists' have been saying all along. 

It was not so much that there were a few 'wild theories' about the place, but there was a sustained and very firm belief voiced by a large number of people about the criminal corruption of the recent political 'holders' of the White House, and of a number of government agencies under them. It is difficult now to 'get around' the factual basis for these allegations.

But I must tell you all is not (it never is, is it) exactly as simple as we might initially think.
Afternoon tea...?

Yes of course it is crystal clear now that there has been large-scale unethical behaviour and compromising of ethics in senior government officials and elsewhere 'highly placed.' 

None of the revelations of the last few weeks ought to have surprised you - you've seen them all before albeit in the guise of mere 'conspiracy theory.'

The apparent 'fact' that an email - which is a written or at least printable document - provides 'evidence' has altered the media's discourse from mere conspiracy theory hinting, to direct and open challenges to various specific individuals over their precisely detailed errant behaviour.

And so, it seems that 'evidence' has moved things up a notch from just 'conspiracy theory' talk all the time whenever these opaque and possibly sinister matters are forced into the media's lap.

But I want to take things right up into the nose-bleed conspiracy nutjob stratas. I want to discuss the 'what if' aspect of the space alien references in the leaked emails. It's clear the media and even Wikileaks themselves have soft-peddled on some of the items, and the inwards emails to John Podesta are not exactly evidence - not those that we have seen so far - that the government really believes space aliens exist and come and visit us. What they show is that the government leadership group is open to extended talking about the matter; they give it some time when you would think they would have no time for it at all.

However I am going to tell you something now that no one else has ever discussed openly or in the public.
A host of the heavenly stars

There are certain aspects of the - let's call it 'talk' or chatter - in high government circles, about external to this planet, alien intelligent life, which proceeds from ideas and especially 'phrases' and terminology, that is taken for granted by all the 'obsessed' (if you want to still say its a conspiracy theory) when it comes to UFOs, and also by just plain ordinary government and military officials too.

For example, certain words we all think we know mean one thing - like 'asteroid' for one good instance of this - actually have more than one meaning. And, let's assume again, that there are space aliens, and that they have at some stage or that they sometimes still do, communicate with certain designated officials in government... As far as all of the 'conspiracy theories' go, space aliens are concerned about nuclear war, and in some other 'theories' they wish to dominate or exploit us. Sometimes we hear they give us technology we have to back-engineer in order to understand. 

But I can tell you of one subject of 'talk' about which you will probably be familiar - there certainly are military and NASA teams who concentrate of so-called NEO's that is, 'near to Earth objects' that might have some risk of hitting us and causing a lot of destruction. 

However I've got to tell you something about this that you will read or see or hear nowhere else: the word 'asteroid' does not actually mean what you think it means, that is, what we all commonly take for granted that it does mean.

'Asteroid' has never formally been defined as a piece of rock or ice or other hard object that is floating around in space or on a path through space. The word actually means, in Greek 'star-like.'


And what this means is this: if your were to read, let's say, in the Bible, that a star-like object will proceed from somewhere and land on the Earth creating 'disaster,' it might not mean an actual hard object... It more means 'star-like' as in those bright light bearers that descended over the shepherds out in the fields guarding their flocks by night. Star-like is a Greek phrase which means a being that is from the heavens and is very bright, or angelic.

And so, if you were to come across a current conspiracy theory to the effect that an asteroid is to fall into the water near Puerto Rico this month or so, causing havoc to Florida and the vicinity of - this might not mean an actual physical hard object falling to Earth. In those ancient writings we now say this is sort of an augury thing being talked about, albeit admittedly the Greeks and Persians also regularly personified these virtually astrological 'signs' and 'forces' and talked about them in terms of there being some intelligent force behind them, like a divine spirit, or sometimes they said, 'a god.'

Whichever way you choose to look at it though, I will guarantee you we are not talking about a hard physical piece of rock from space falling down into the atmosphere and crashing onto the Earth; which is what everyone thinks. 





Monday 17 October 2016

Chinese Government Arrests Crown Casino People

Ah well. What did I tell you?

Poor old James Packer, eh?

Never called me, that's for sure. I could have told him to watch his back.

Not so funny now, though, James, is it...

I have been completely forthright and even, explicit, right here in this very Blogspot.

Anyone who doesn't know what I'm talking about hasn't been reading here over the last, oh at least year or more!

Enough of this sad affair, though. It doesn't really interest me any longer except to say that if this is the way the Australian Security Intelligence Services 'protects' its own country's top ranked, wealthiest of citizens, then they can all go and get f*.

Did they not know? Did they not care? I dunno. I don't care anymore. It's not my problem.

It was of interest to me once when these clowns tried to steal some stuff from me once upon a time. I recall what happened next but I can't say. Anyway it all ended up 'being finalized' in New Zealand.

The house of cards all came tumbling down, as it were. 

Soon, better, prettier things to talk about. 

Friday 7 October 2016

The Dark Arts

Someone was encouraging me to read some of the 'official' journals of modern psychology yesterday - which I did - and I think I was supposed to be 'amazed' or something by what I was reading.  

Now you people ought to regard yourselves as 'awfully' lucky because I sometimes say things here - not knowing what any of you are like, or even look like - that I would never say to the vast majority of people who ever talk to me face-to-face.

I have had the personal experience, of having worked inside one of Australia's largest Merchant Banks during an era in which there was every man and his dog from everywhere, including especially Academia, coming in and talking about money for research and projects. And in this environment, occasionally, very occasionally, you would encounter one person, or one thing or project, that would have the attention of some important people.
It's just a trainer, it's the new Boeing T-X,
but it is a beauty.

Now in a 'field' of defense contractor representatives whose names were of this unlikely nature of things: 'Willard something The Third!' and 'Jake de-something very fancy,' and 'Tiborg von something else again...' in this environment, when a guy got 'picked up,' by the 'industry,' trust me, strange things happened and there really were black limos in the dead of a very dark night and so on.

One such individual had the surname 'Prevenslik' and much more than that I'll not say but he literally disappeared 'without a trace' other than to confirm to friends that he had been 'given' a full laboratory facility on an island somewhere in the Mediterranean, AND an incredible sum of money. And no one ever heard from him ever again. There was another instance of a guy who was given a blank cheque by FOUR large international accountancy firms joining together over him - but that was all to do with a, um, I can't say, but it was a financial matter rather than any kind of technology.

One of the things that arises in my own experience as carrying with it a red flag, is anything to do with AIDS research or Third World programs for AIDS drugs or testing. Clinton Foundation? Anyone? Anyone? 'Nuff said.

Prevenslik had nothing to do with this but right now, I can tell you that one of the real 'hot' areas of development at Harvard has to do with micro-drones.

I am a great supporter of this (micro-drone) technology and I don't worry about loss of privacy and all of this.
No comment!

You know, if you are a clever person, and can exercise your own imagination and run a few scenarios by yourself, you might realize that sometimes - well in fact all the time - it is better that certain inventions or innovations and developments do not get out into the public so that they can be used with the element of real surprise about them; used against violent criminals, murderers, even serial killers and the like, and they can save a lot of lives of unfortunate people who might otherwise be at serious risk and danger without the availability of the equipment in question.

There is a Japanese inventor who has a complete digital holographic process in a full functioning stage. And this is another of the sorts of people who you will tend to hear little about for a long time while the Military and other official types exploit what he has.

For me though, it is still of much more interest to know or try and understand what is going on in the brains and minds of the truly aberrant who yet manage to get under the guard of people and escape detection while they practice their insane ideologies unimpeded by anyone.

If you could tell, and I mean scientifically say for sure without conjecture, from signs at a distance, about the insanity of an individual, it would be an important understanding; we are not there yet, though, I don't believe.

Being insane or being too easily manipulated are sometimes two sides of the same coin, though.

I don't want to have to rely on advanced and even somewhat risky technology or weapons to stop a person after they have gone out of control. I want to get out of the way before, or be able to stop them and destabilize them enough to stop their plans before they do a lot of damage.

I am interested in technology, but I am more interested in psychology.