Way Too Scary For Children...

Listen to me carefully. In this world there are things that no media company, not only would not even dare to talk about, their people would literally not be able to psychologically handle the information if they had it.

This week Tennessee Representative (to the US Congress), Tim Burchett explained a few key things to several news agencies, following his participation in a 'SCIF' - which as I understand it, is not necessarily 'being read into' the top secrets, but under secrecy provisions being given access to a 'Secret Compartmented Information Facility' - in this case which was specifically to do with the current Congressional inquiry into whatever the government knows about Aliens and UAP's.

Quote, Rep. Tim Burchett: 'Americans should know
what the government knows about UFO's.'

His direct statement to the news people was exactly what I have told you from several years back, namely, that there is known to be something, but it is outside of the FOIA process because the knowledge and details are in the hands of what he termed 'quasi-government groups' or companies with government funding who were essentially private now, if they 'even existed here at all any more...'

What exactly he meant by that I'm sure I cannot say.

And then he went on to say that unless someone stepped forward with evidence from those groups, it would be virtually impossible to force access through FOIA.

But why would anyone come forward gratuitously though?

Secondly, the whole aspect of 'with proof and evidence,' well what does that mean - that someone is going to give you anti-gravity technology, for example, for nothing?

What I mean by 'way too scary for children' is this: let's say there are some secrets which involve genuine, completely authentic matters to do with at some earlier point, official government engagement with beings not of this planet. (And we'll get to the key point presently).

...All of the currency of any kind of source opinion, of the very raison d'etre at all, of such beings coming here since the 1940's, or at least making themselves known, was always related to the nuclear bomb and what happened during the two major World Wars and the immediate aftermath context of a nuclear threat. No one from any quarter has ever posited another reason.

There is a small amount of factual basis to the insinuation that 'UFO's' were responsible for temporarily closing down some North American nuclear missile facilities.

But what is not made so clear by those saying that the point of their 'appearance' was some concern about nuclear wars - is not so much that they could prevent it, but whether they actually would do so...

Well there are no ancient tales about otherworldly 'agencies' preventing calamity; the stories are all along the lines that the calamity took place.

Sodom and Gomorrah, Atlantis, Tyre and Sidon - these were all ancient accounts of their utter destruction. Ironically, I guess, in the case of Tyre and Sidon, their stone remnants were taken and thrown by Alexander the Great into the sea to create a useful causeway.

You see the thing is this - the phrase 'the nuclear option' in modern parlance does not mean someone is going to use nuclear weapons to overcome an enemy in a battle; it means to blow everything up on the way out because they are actually losing.

When the nuclear bomb was first used, it seems to have been used to demonstrate to Stalin that the West had a very serious means of countering any Stalinist agenda and ambition in the West.

Iran does have nuclear weapons and very sophisticated delivery systems. So does China.

These places are in the first place ideologically driven -, not primarily driven by reason of actual threats against them.

No doubt both of them would argue though and say that 'regime change' is already an open goal by the part of the West that is led by the United States.

But 'way too scary for children' does not refer to these things.

Way too scary would be what you would find out, not so much if you were to see who, just who is involved with ET Aliens in 'private organisations and corporate entities or groups,' what they do, where they are situated -, but by the counterpoint, namely who are those opposed to such groups.

Because there are large scale, national 'arrangements' - some wealthy governments here and there, some 'philosophical' and ideological, even 'occult' you could say (and I'm not talking about Freemasonry in this specific context here) trans-global conglomerates - which are mortally opposed to anything that would give new and advanced power into the hands of a broad cross-section of the man-in-the-street human world.

We are not so much just on the threshold of major global conflict catastrophe, but we are rather close to the introduction of anti-gravity technology and also extremely light but strong materials technologies. These things would radically alter the topography of global economics and politics forever.

Over the next two years, you will see the stepped exposition in the public arena of various new 'advances' in technology (where they come from, who's to know) that will completely overturn governments and government systems all over the world. 

Unless the overlords can tie you to a 'home,' they cannot cause you to fight and die for a homeland.

In the coming weeks, maybe month or so, not a hundred miles from right here, there will be a very special wine tasting thing being held - somewhere - involving a wine of exorbitant price and value. If I can get a cam into there, I will show you a person, or even some people, who are literally of the kind that Rep. Burchett was talking about.

Now just keep in mind, you are only a few people, who come here and read at this place. This is not widespread knowledge and it never will be.

And we can truncate it real quick if things got too 'complicated' for any of us. Not being over-confident either. I acknowledge that when one team takes the field, the other side will also turn up on the day.

Hearing Voices??!

What?!

As people who are generally supportive here of fairly esoteric training programs like the ones provided commercially by the Monroe Institute, and since I certainly talk about some of the elements of those things in detail here - it is very important to create some considerable distance between anything like what is being reported in the news about people who go off the rails and do some really atrocious things (the Lewiston shooter), and sophisticated controlled processes to better and more functionally engage deeper levels of the human mind.

It should be made absolutely clear that there can be no linking the 'hearing of voices' with anything that Monroe Institute-style programs, advisedly speaking, enable.

There's nobody in the world that can tell you
this, other than someone who knows and can
say - Karl 'may have been' for many
years, not only just an 'asset' but an
operative of MI6. But he might have also
abandoned that at some point too...
I'll give you the secret that is 'traceable:'
it is to do with his shirt-makers.
Fact. Inescapable. Ask
Stella Rimmington.
Anyway they were Savile Row...
'Not many peeple noh dat...'

There are also a large number of modern chemicals - for one specific instance any kind of methamphetamine for example - that speed up the signal traffic between neural networks and brain centers, and their connected afferent and fundamental sensory terminating point nerves.

By tampering with the speed of those connections, it is always at least potentially possible, to have the brain cell memories of words and even phrases triggered in the immediate conscious receptive awareness, before any actual proper physical sensory stimuli went off (neural semiotic signal threshold). The jumbling of neural patterns and afferent/efferent responses is common with chemical stimulant use (or abuse, of course).

This can give rise to impressions in the brain of disembodied words and phrases, even whole sentences, being 'heard.'

We should all be committed, intellectually committed, and intelligently fully committed, to the view that we do already have our plain existent senses, and these must be the natural pathway to 'seeing' and communicating with very advanced intelligent beings - and not some other, mysterious pathway that becomes impossible to verify by external and independent, critical observers.

That advanced Alien intelligent beings often choose to behave highly surreptitiously, denying access to verification by others, other people, that is independent observers - is not strictly speaking our etiological problem or even our or an epistemological problem.

The Monroe Institute has as its most basic process requirement in the programs, that there is always someone there with the subject who is meant to be doing the 'targeted visioning.'

That person ideally should be trained to follow rules of objectivity in practice.

This does not mean that the observer should bear a demeanor of continuous gratuitous doubting, such as you would always find with a person like Richard Dawkins - and also de Grasse Tyson. Because that would itself necessarily already defeat the premise of true objectivity: by which is meant that the person there is someone capable of dispassionately recording what is going on, and what was said by the program subject in the 'mind state process' time.

Karl was her stylist at the end of his life.

In the very first place, the point never was to 'see' what was not there, when organisations like Eastman-Kodak's Hawkeye facility and Bell High Altitude Photographics were having specially trained and 'augmented mind state' map readers look at developed film...

...It was to have them virtually subconsciously interpret the images in front of them using what was presumed to be their 'deep mind,' absent from the normal (normally conscious state) doubt fear and anxiety about getting things right or having to 'see' anything at all from the highly classified intel maps and images.

What happened of course, was that they discovered that most of the subjects reported a much clearer set of sensory impressions than what they would normally experience in the ordinary waking state - not a more vague or dream-like condition. 

Like spectral colors that are additive primaries, when they all combine they create 'white' -, then in the same way intensified capacity to sense along the fundamental sensory pathways all at the same time together, as an actual meta-meaning (haptics plus semiotics) connected symphony, becomes something that is much more accessible in terms of a communication style, to super-advanced (possibly Alien) intelligent species.

And that is all that there is about it.

You're expected to hear their spoken voice coming from out of their 'ordinary' physical mouth. Not imagining something that appears to sound like a voice, or having some internal brain impression that seemed like you heard a word spoken or some snatches of words.

'Old school' stuff.

I can easily teach someone, one-on-one, to get to this state of play; but it is both impractical and very likely problematic to try and do such a thing simply on-line, via some 'cold medium' and some text.

It's also not the point that people just follow a process path that someone, no matter how good of a hands-on instructor they are, shows - when the core reality is to do with one's own deep inner outlook on the Universe as something they are living in, being actually present in.

Because most people today, and I say most and I believe it is that - are seeking to escape from their reality! So consequently it is just too easy for people at arms' length (IE on-line and at a physical distance), and un-monitored -, to try and use these kinds of techniques and ideas to get sensations just for the 'ride,' and also of course (flawed) sensations of 'release...'

I mean what kind of crazy person in any case, is hearing voices and then going ahead and following those voices -, when they say 'hey go kill a bunch of people!' 

That's totally nuts.

Actually, it starts to become suspect whether such a thing was even true, or, to phrase it better - just what are we talking about here, when a psychiatrist reports so-and-so claimed to be 'hearing voices?' 

Why would a person merely hearing a voice, then convince themselves that voice was more to be complied with than any other voice?

No I think we can discount that it was just a matter of someone hearing voices. 

If it were even true at all, then what is much more important is what the content of those messages or instructions were, and what then compelled the person to follow any of them.

Even crazy people who are organized enough to carry out major physical violence using tools, are not so random that they fail to follow linear logic altogether. They have assigned a moral content judgment and given a moral value label to their victims. How did they do that?

This whole thing about 'hearing voices' needs to be elucidated better in the media if people are expected to accept that was the only thing that was going on in that crazy person's life and brain and mind.

It's specious.

Also 'old School' but updated. Though actually
I just like the photo composition.

It's specious to think the cause of the deadly mischief was the hearing of voices.

When it comes to engaging with, or potentially engaging with; communicating with -, actual ET Aliens, what is the content of what that communication is...? What is it expected to be, from your side...? What are you seeking from them?

And that leads us all straight back to the greatest texts on morality and ethics and epistemology and mathematics and geometry and physics and aesthetics - the world has ever produced. Nothing less than that will do.

I'm afraid not. We cannot expect to come half-baked here!

Given that there is such greatness in the human background, why would you choose to leave it 'behind at home,' so to speak - when you were presenting yourself as a valid example of the human race to a truly sophisticated advanced other intelligence?

Who would you 'bring with you' as the paramount examples of humanity, to show to some incredibly advanced ET Alien beings: 'Hey, this is what we want to tell you that we are like at our best...' 'And we are not necessarily any single one of us right now as good or as great as that particular example/those examples, but that is our aspiration and our intention (to be like) and how we would like you to view us...'

; )

Did that give you a clue?

I mean did that just give you a really big clue?

Just remember - to avoid being 
hammered by the authorities(!) what we
will sometimes do, is
show 'connected' pics' but in upcoming, later,
posts here so as not to make things
too too very obvious.
Just like what you will find in the below music if you
bother to listen past halfway in...

Are you as to any doubt whatsoever that we cannot deliver here?

Matthew 13:52

LOLOLOL

Were not expecting that, now were you? Tell the truth now.

Trust you actually listened to the music clip in the last post here, right? Because...

Fundamental Comparisons

It is impossible to sell debt securities at virtually zero percent, when the obtaining market benchmark rate for debt is five percent.

Hence what we have going on all across the Western World right now is a fundamental illiquidity of mainstream capital.

And, certainly, that mainstream capital (paying mostly all zero percent coupons) is almost all entirely in the hands, not of private investment banks like it would have been in the past - but in the hands of government via their central banks.

In all the world, the place where
I found the most obvious,
casual and quite overt displays
of real cash wealth among the
people there - was Vienna.

Secondly, the basic and critical intrinsic reason no one is able to sell existing debt (IE not new lines at current rates or ahead of those - as will be necessary) is that governments insisted on forcing (borrowed money) capital investment into building projects and real estate (because these things are immobile and are easy to extract taxes from the 'owners' of) and stone does not produce anything, as the ancient Egyptian pharaohs eventually discovered.

Zero percent... Five percent. Zero percent. Five percent.

Well you will be soon enough looking at some percentage that it would not be advisable for me to say here right now.

And energy prices are going up.

So what happens next?

LOL

Not sure.

; )

'I - am - not - sure - that - I - can - say.'

I guess if you go down this doom-sayer thinking to what looks like its logical ending, you would have to think there is little or no point buying expensive wines - that is, 'investing' in them hoping to realize some kind of profit in the future.

But it is one thing to speculate about what a certain trajectory looks like from a present standpoint, and another thing to say that you know for sure nothing good ever happens from out of the blue.

Plenty of women still wear
opera gloves there.
In Vienna.

As our poet friend set down in verse in the immediate previous post comments section -, you could be suddenly blessed by a gift from some divine source.

That is indeed what the world needs right now. 

It does not seem, on the surface of things that human mortal leaders are capable of discovering any new solutions to literally age-old problems.

But why will you be blessed?

You are certain to be blessed.

You.

Maybe not others but just you.

Coming here you have opened a door - entered as it were, through a portal.

To another place.

Where bits of broken ceramic are all put back together with gold... (The Japanese art of kintsugi).

Shall we invite some people around and offer them the best wine - to be drunk from some kintsugi?

Shall we though...

We shall see.

 

Sinning With Wine

Well, it feels like sinning, anyway...

So you're at this restaurant, see. With people who know you and think they know what kinds of things you can get up to.

It's the sort of affair that someone like John Brennan might attend: there's career local Navy guys in their fairly dry-cleaned and pressed whites...

It isn't like the old days when Commander Bond was an authentic reflection of many people in the Admiralty (of Great Britain).

Royal Tokaji wine.
Last you easily two hundred years.

Today, Barbara Broccoli hasn't got it quite right - she says there is a credibility problem with 'old Bond' in the modern-day context. But there is no credibility problem with Bond; there is a credibility problem with the Empire.

'Here, John Brennan, you like to do transgressive things -. Here's something right down your alley."

Brennan: 'Who TF are you, pip-squeak.'

'Never mind that -, have this, casually vandalize this in three minutes.'

Hand him the small glass filled with its amber-golden thick liquid that definitely has a sulfurous scent.

Actually, preferably it isn't a glass, but a large glass spoon. That's the traditional way of having this thing.

You continue: 'It has taken fifteen years to have this ready for bottling, and this particular one has been in its bottle for a further fifty years. It takes a long long time to ferment and it hardly reaches 2.9% alcohol by volume even at the end.

'You can wreck this now in just two or three minutes.'

When you think about just how long it takes to turn out a very good Hungarian Tokaji (or Tokay), and you think how blithely one downs the thing until there is not even a single beading drop left inside a decent bottle, it certainly feels like sin doing it. I feel guilty about consuming, making something disappear, that took so long to make.

Very old fashioned style.

But there is a great secret here - Dionysus the god, himself caused humans to forget themselves and what they were doing in the moment; Jesus did the same thing when He 'gave out the wine.'

What goes cannot come back...

...they say.

But what would they know, John Brennan?

What would they really know?

Still, it still feels like an act of sinning to me.

Think of the years it took.

You can keep a bottle of Tokay for two hundred years (and people have done) and it is as perfect after that, or even better than, the day it was originally bottled.

Here we are, we humans, taking things that took so long to build, and consuming them in a moment.

Very old fashioned style.

This strange person told me, one time: 'Every mouthful that you take, think about what went into its making, and hope and pray that all of what it took becomes a part of you going forward.'

There's that phrase again. It's a 'Company-speak' phrase btw. Same as 'non trivial.'

Well, let me tell you - drinking the greatest wines in the world of all time is a non-trivial thing.

How do we go forward from here?

They say you cannot take things out with you when you go from here. That's not true. Because in any case, how would 'they' even know?

You need to find out what someone who has gone and come back says about it.

Going forward from here, take things from the past with you.

Nothing good ever just disappears forever. 

Find out what 'all of you' is, what it means - and then take all of you into the future.

 

The High Volume Wines Industry

The word 'algorithm' today has the sense of some mathematical operator (symbol denoting a transformation) in a volumetric or let's say calculus equation.

However, its original source, and from which the word itself comes - namely from the 9th century Arabic Polymath al-Khawarizmi - is to do with finding ways to defraud gold and silver buyers by placing one's thumb down on the scales in a certain prescribed way that always effected the outcome favorably as long as you knew the mechanism of the balance system involved.

In other words, what it means - what its implication is - is how to cheat.

Nakedly, the general online worldwide media that falls under 'branded outlets' as such, declares that it selects the stories to publish as determined by 'algorithms.'

And usually these are so-called 'proprietary algorithms.'

The luxury wine experience.

But a thumb is a thumb is a thumb, and what it is actively and deliberately doing on one side of a balance scales is the opposite of 'telling the truth.'

The unfortunate thing about information versus lack of information, is that even if you could decode the thumb pressing, it would not thereby give you access to critical information because in fact, that was missing altogether in the first place.

All that happened was that a certain 'story' or a line of stories was overly-pushed, heavily marketed, in other words sold to the reader and the viewer - while any work that really is necessary to finding out information especially hard to get information, simply didn't happen at all.

In other words it would be one thing if on the other side of the scales there were actual news and new information available at all - but in fact there was nothing on the other side of the scales.

It takes work to find information that is hidden by politics or by special interests or by someone's guilt. Nobody in the modern kinds of large-scale media pays for that work.

Arguably, it is no wonder that French wine-makers insist on claiming there is some major importance to terroir, on account they cannot factually claim there is significance to actual grape varieties they take the names of and stick on their wines - because there are no such varieties any more; not since the Great Phylloxera Plague of the late 19th century there.

They are all, except maybe for the Bollinger Estates alone (which are in the Grande Champagne region) American root-stock grafted varietals. 

A hundred years into the future...

Additionally, the massive overuse of pesticides and the industrial-scale continuous inserting of nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus, means the grapes produced are anything but coming from something intrinsically unique or naturally spectacular to do with the soils, the climate, or the timing and craft of the harvesting and the purity of the fruit and of the agriculture involved.

Do these massively over-industrialized and super-high volume wines taste any good?

I'm sure I cannot say.

I mean for example, how do cognac producers expect not to have the pesticide residues negatively affect cognacs that are kept in casks or bottles for many many decades?

Are they extracting those traces by some technically clandestine or obscure scientific process using chemistry and machines during the wine-making phases?

Our 'friends' - yes, those ones you know about that we talk about - let's just say 'speculatively' and maybe just using the Monroe Institute 'targeted viewing' methodology, have been to the future and they know what the Louis XIII cognac is like a hundred years from now.

And yes, it is very good (@ then).

Same as it is very good right now.

The Remy Martin Estates make their wines (cognacs) also from the Grande Champagne and Petite Champagne regions and it is conceivable that at least in their case, most of the vineyards even those in the Petite Champagne areas from which they get their best grapes are all intact varieties from pre- the Phylloxera problems era.

Time...

Not all French classic wines are all that good or great, but then not all of them are not great - because some of them are very great indeed.

Nobody is cheating at Remy Martin, or at Bollinger. And there are some others too, where the standards (Bollinger instituted a formal 'Charter of Ethics and Quality' in 1992) are very high.

If you want to invest in wine - or in cognac - definitely start where the standards are very high and the ethics are genuinely held as completely important to the makers.

Because you certainly will not be told by the general media anything about people's real ethics and standards.

The fact that they employ algorithms already tells you enough.

Waiting some time into this track, is rewarding... (For the impatient, from around 3 mins., in):

Risk Multiples/Returns

Not forgetting that all of you here (right?) have been acquiring silver for some time already...

And I did say 'acquiring' and not 'buying.'

Right?

Because you have been, right?

Well why are you worried about missing out on the presumed coming rises in the price of gold?

The future has already arrived.

There is a huge difference between making yourself feel good by buying some gold and locking that away nice and tight -, and actually making some real money.

I am the last person to deny the value of going to some rock-solid vendor and getting some gold every now and again.

But the 'value' in doing that is entirely personal and fictional.

There is no mechanism in the global monetary topography that would allow for the price of gold to be released towards its true currency value - not while Basel III and its after-effects are still shaping the economies everywhere.

We are at the exhaustion phase of Western Civilization.

And what this means is that every knowable risk premium is already priced-in prior to open market exposure.

Secondly, and in some ways even more critically important, is the fact that society has developed a dysfunctional mentality about enforcing official, usually government-sanctioned 'tickets' on recognized ownership of anything of perceived value.

This is why, for instance, virtually the whole community is nowadays 'powered by pills.' And not energized by life.

You require to have an official licence telling you that you are well.

Otherwise you just don't believe it.

The past is in a bottle...

You have to have some 'official' notification

telling you that you are rich, or else you won't believe that either. 

And one of the main pressures in society that is there to convince that you are unwell, and not rich, and lacking in energy to do things - is of course the simple fact that governments and their economic systems are there to push you into doing more things than you really need to (be doing).

Time - your time - is given a premium and then sold back to you.

Yet this insane mindset itself turns everyone's (including the governments/'authorities' - whatever they are supposed to be and certainly hold themselves out to be) vision downwards to the immediate present and not very far into the future.

Way off into the future they all cannot see - lol - are things that will give you more money than you ever dreamed.

The single biggest reward multiple you can get is from investing in a personal account targeted towards the coming 'regenerative dentistry' revolution.

You will make uncounted millions there from mere pennies that you sock away now for that.

And do we here, while we're on it, yet have that 'cognac not to be opened for a hundred years?' 

You know, that we are moving into the Digital Silver Dirham account?

The simple things in life - 
are not so simple as people
think.

I dunno. Maybe.

We won't be making any 'official' statement until the interest rates go much much much higher than they are right now.

And will they do that?

I'm sure I cannot say. Because, since we are now oh so very 'regular' around here and pretty much mainstream of a Blog place, we certainly cannot talk at all about going into the future and all of that kind of science fiction nonsense!

Goodness me!

We wouldn't do that.

Beyond Basel III

Basel III was (still is -, and still is in full operation too) a set of international agreements between banks, ratified by governments through various legal (legalistic) means to supposedly mitigate risk within the international banking sector. 

By 'international banking sector' the participants simply mean to do with the flows of money via global exchange processes, which are ultimately sovereign moneys ( belong to countries/nations). And by 'risk' they mean anything that stops a particular currency from finding a market at domestically and politically acceptable rates of exchange - as what happened when the Oil Crisis of the late 1970's took place.

It's traditional and it looks good.
There is no point though, thinking to stuff
it with paper notes - money - to take to some
Swiss numbered deposit account.
Those things are not only not possible
any more, but they are a pointless
exercise!

However by the time of Basel III, all previous pretense of actually having national currencies maintain authentic independent and objective 'hard value' was totally abandoned. 

The creation of a completely new asset class - mortgage-backed securities (aka 'securitization of debt') - which was deemed literally to be a 'Tier 1' capital asset (which is utter BS in any realistic sense), meant that instead of standard traditional universally-accepted capital assets, an entirely new and in financial economics, completely fictional thing (MBS's) was being used to say that a national currency had a hard core liquidity underlying all of its paper out on issue.

As Gregory Mannarino just said earlier this week, there are no new trades happening in banks, no new inflows of cash, no meaningful or realistic earnings and way too much debt outstanding - aka the sector is bankrupt.

When we consider the idea of multiples of value, it is impossible to think that the fact that the Canadian government has recently issued more than eight times the amount of paper (un-backed currency notes) to GNP, unlocked from the faked capital values of bank stocks and MBS equity capital and any other of several similar financial nomenclature things - will see market realizable gains in prices of anything that you can invest in. 

Instead you are bound to see catastrophic losses and falls sooner rather than later...

Unless, that is, the Basel Accords as they stand today, find some way of forcing Saudi Arabia or China to accept worthless Canadian bits of paper whether digital bits of something or actual paper/plastic slips of something designated as 'money.'

This is also ancient and traditional,
even a bit rustic you would say - 
and you could have the experience of it;
if you had a wooden floor to sleep
on, and an eider quilt to throw
into an empty room...
Empty room of old wooden house =
ten fifty hundred-ty million dollars!
Who cares what counting is?!

When the Iran Revolution occurred back in 1978 and then the Oil Crisis quickly followed which saw Middle Eastern countries refuse to 'roll over' their US and other bond holdings on maturity, demanding these be met with real money such as gold - cataclysms happened with global markets and equity values and with whole national economies.

Today we stand on the precipice of the exact same phenomenon except this time, national currencies have not only no hard-core backing in the static sense, but they have debt to many many times what they could ever hope to claw in annually via revenues from net national outputs. 

The real pricing of things which can be and are really sold, absent of the last forty years of falsified national currency accounts, always reflects the balance of true scarcity with actual demand.

In the place of that, for the last forty years at least, multiples of value have been witnessed mostly in asset classes where the Basel II and III credit creation 'dollars' have been intentionally flowed: mortgage-backed securities and hence, real estate and everything tied to that.

Is it too much to expect that when the re-adjustment takes place, these asset classes will also show their multiples going back down?

It is too much to ask for.

Governments will do anything and everything, and in this case it will necessarily be illegitimate things, to make absolutely sure the public who were led into believing this insane phenomenon of 'free money' and never-ending upswings in real estate 'values,' do not experience any hard reality setting in on them. 

I am horrified even thinking what this extended insanity might turn out to be...

But armed with what was just said, it will be clear enough to you what things are happening when they happen from now on in. And for sure you can take a view about whether it is possible to gain any advantage from the new directions for growth multiples.

For me, I will be falling back on very old school concepts of limited supply things, and the inevitable pricing of those, in the face of real demand.

First of all, our thinking has to adjust
to a completely new and different
world.

Digital assets, software assets, and thus AI-related anything - are all commoditizable and in no way at all capable of being locked up into very limited supply scenarios.

AI-based real estate research programs, for instance, are operating right in the area of the highest multiplication of value on core worth as supported by governments and the mentality of Basel III - but they cannot be relied upon to reflect the downside multiple factor implicit in the coming economic and financial Doomsday environment simply because, as I said, they are not capable of being kept unique and/or limited in supply or in people's access to them. Besides which governments will not allow there to be a nominal Crash in the prices of real estate.

Of course there should be, but there won't be. Instead, we will have a two-money environment - one where fictional figures dominate all thinking, and worthless bits of 'official' paper are used to manufacture an apparently 'viable' marketplace consisting of vast sums of 'money' being 'traded,' and another where a very small range of very limited supply goods and maybe some services command multiples of value and for which very different kinds of money are used to pay for, and be paid for these things.

This is almost impossible for you to envisage prior to when it actually happens before your very eyes.

And this will all be even while governments pretend it is not happening.

...I suppose one really great big, no - the truly great big secret, is how to have utter and complete happiness, and have every material thing you want, while the rest of world goes quite mad, and governments ride off into the sunset with their politicians and bureaucrats and officials driveling on about 'rules-based' junk and jabbering with total nonsense-speak about silly things that literally do not even exist. 

What exists is - and as I have talked about here before - the black flags of Khorasan, have gone up on the Al Reza Mosque; and that means the likelihood of a nuclear 'event' is er...

The Context For Gold

When I am being the ordinary 'layman-in-the-street,' so to speak, about global markets and money, I look at gold and think 'Oh wow, I just love it and how safe it feels to me, and how solid and how real and how, well, there.'

And then I ask our 'friends' because one of the readers here posed the question - to supply some perspectives on what is possible, when it comes to the price of gold.

So here's the issue: first we require a knowledge and understanding of the history of modern global banking, from the origin of the Bank For International Settlements in 1930 at the Hague Conference, to the first Basel Accord (Basel I) in 1988 and then through Basel's II and III - to date.

In the olden days, when Bahnhofstrasse,
Zurich, actually had real private banks.

The BIS was started to organize the Treaty of Versailles payments to Allied Countries from the German Nation after WWI.

The incipient genesis of the Basel Accord was very probably the Oil Crisis of the 1970's. This crisis is written in standard mainstream history accounts as coming from the 1973 Yom-Kippur war, and then followed in 1979 by the Iran Revolution (although there were plenty of things to do with Iran and the Middle East leading up to that final signal event).

If you look back into those key events of global banking and money history, what you will see is that the only people who were intended to benefit from the initiatives (which were all ratified by the participant countries via actual banking laws), and the only people that did benefit - were national governments and absolutely no one else.

Arguably pre-1970's Oil Crisis automotive design had never been better and never was exceeded afterwards, and with the eventual destruction of the Bretton Woods Agreement and the abandoning of the gold standard by the Richard Nixon Administration, gold became the manipulated item of governments, and no more was the independent test for government and national (currency) solvency.

As the layman in the street, we love to look upon gold with a childish fondness.

But it is a static financial medium. It sits in bank vaults and does not physically flow anywhere; never has done.

And when there was real
meat and potatoes in classic
Paris restaurants.

Sales taxes are employed by governments to skim from circulation velocity - in order to gain revenue to fund government borrowings (debts). But the most rapacious appetite to take money from private sources is by way of land rates and capital taxes on property...

This is because for one thing people who buy real estate buy a capital sum (assumed to be priced-in over many decades), and consequently the through-going land rates are at the term capital value (assessed) and so the money to government is also pro rata of capital value not high volume commodity prices...

The price of gold, regardless that the gold is said to be an item of capital (a material thing that can be held over a long term without depreciating its relative economic value), is only the static 'first sale' (first taken as being a Markov Chain event), and not the presumed multiple of value that real estate and properties are all priced at.

Consequently, there is really no 'value' for governments in gold and the gold trade at large. 

And so once the money system itself is merely a function of governments and agreements of governments (and not absolute in specie solvency or 'backing'), then those agreements are bound to favor those transaction classes which hand easy and continuous flow revenue back to governments - and disfavor all others.

The so-called 'cycle' of interest rates (which is really the cycle of money injected into the economy via debt), goes from the moment where lots of core multiple of value dollars are first injected, through to the stage where the taxation and land rates collection is exhausted on those injections and their secondary circulation (properties reach an impossible and unsustainable pricing level and there is not sufficient base currency - M1 - to allow for any more purchasing at those price levels).

Believe me, I have been
deliberately not 
posting pics of super-cool
stuff - because I want people
here to save their cash and not
go silly buying super-cool
stuff.
If people told me, no no, we can
be trusted not to go stupid, and we have
stax of cash anyway - well, then
I would post pics of stuff you would be
simply amazed by.

And then, the cycle is renewed by massive new money supply through the injection of new credit in wholesale (bulk credit) which happens when government bonds are issued at a huge discount thereby creating the future or maturity projected value upon which credit is created in the meantime.

The Basel Accords together with the Bank For International Settlements processes are there to look at when the international flows of internationally accepted money hit any red lines for liquidity - not at whether or not paper money is safe or genuinely backed or any such thing!

And the gold is still sitting in your bank vault. It is not flowing anywhere.

So even if huge geopolitical crises hit, it is not the price of gold that will react with any multiple of value being obtained.

If the oil and general energy prices really do go up appreciably (more so than they already have been) from here, it is in the property and real estate markets and in consumer price inflation where the multiples will hit home. Because that is where the flows are.

Of course you can buy gold because it seems to have some stable pricing compared with say, computers and micro-chips, or sugar or newspapers.

Also it doesn't deteriorate like butter and milk do.

It doesn't deteriorate but to be very frank it can be made to 'disappear' from the eyes, and evaporate from the hands, of government and their tax-collectors - whereas land and properties do not disappear and can easily be captured into the revenue vacuums of government.

The Pavilion Restaurant
in Zurich. Where all the politicians
and banksters go.
Beautiful place. Food is um,
um...
Expensive.

When the Swiss really were safe and solid bankers, it was in the first place because of the William Tell aspect of the private person finding the strength and the means to take the hands of government off their necks and off their purses.

Be fully assured of this - at the next juncture when governments need to find ways to fund their limitless expenditures (and that will be during this quarter and well prior to Christmas), for absolutely sure and certain they will do it by inflaming a fantasy that the public all-too-readily will swallow, about land and real estate and properties. 

And not about gold.

Meanwhile a lot of people will be bound to lose their shirts in the property markets that were the result of the last currency cycle credit expansion. There can be no further credit expansion of that cycle: that cycle was commenced back when Basel II was abandoned so that countries did not need to have any actual hard-currency backing at all, with the immediate result of new (and more-or-less fake) 'free money' (ludicrously low interest rates) being issued and artificially driven into real estate and those holders are now all exhausted and have no more money to buy anything or pay for anything or even fund their land rates and capital gains taxes. The 'money' has all been spent (used up). Petrol prices are up and interest rates are up and everyone is over-extended anyway. In other words the economies are all broke.

There endeth the lesson for today. But over the coming epistles (lol) we shall deal with where the ludicrous multiples will occur, again - be they 'up,' or, as is quite necessary also, 'down.'

Gold And The Rule Of 72

So, the 'Rule of 72' is simply the calculation you use to find out how many years it will take to double your investment given the Nominal Return you had/have.

You take the number '72' and divide it by the Return number.

Gold went up say, 5% from its average during last week to late Friday night in a fairly sudden if, frankly, belated reaction to the Israel/Gaza situation.

It will take you 14.4 years if you keep doing that every year from now on (succeed in gaining that return).

Free to read, here: https://www.inkitt.com/stories/scifi/1131199

The Trophy Wine

The problem is not the rate of return you got late last week, the problems - and there are at least three of them - consist of the opportunity cost factor together with the lack of interest returns on gold holdings, and the uncertainty ('infinity' risk) of forward price speculating.

The outright fact is, it is the benchmark Bond Rate which is determining all other investment considerations at the present time. Thus, the Risk-Free rate of return is already more or less 5% and that is a guaranteed 'locked in' return; it is not speculating for a return. So, back to around 14 years but at least that is set in stone - or as set in the financial granite of economics as is possible under our current regime of economics and banking.

Still not enough for me though.

I want to double my cash in a much shorter time.

These things are some of the
elements of aesthetics in design.
They are static items.
When they become dynamic, they are...

The 'hot zone' for an increase (again) in the Bond Rate is from now till New Year, when no one in the mug public (and hence the media) is looking or sufficiently caring.

It is still an act of speculation, to assume that for sure the interest rates will be once more re-set upwards over the next three months.

But at least superficially, whereas my 'friends' tell me that gold is no certain bet in any meaningful way (means cannot go 'gap up' or enough up to give someone with a moderate amount of capital a worthwhile 'comparative rational investor risk' lift) - it is nonetheless clearly obvious that prior to the next round of interest rate Fed moves, gold is not a bad place to be, if one goes by the standard folklore about gold and wars.

Yet, if you are given the information that allows a person to penetrate through why and how the Fed is able to suppress the gold price at all, and over such a long period already, it becomes more than clear what the true dynamics are in current markets and in the price of money and costs of capital.

Which leads me back to a theme that few will credit and most will observe is merely a way of me being ironic:

Am I personally in touch with actual real-life, physical material ET Aliens...?

Oh yes. Absolutely.

'To go where there are temples, 
in which the gods really dwell,
and see them as they really are.'
'For the Kingdom of God is
like a child...'

But I underscore this aspect now, once again, and will continue to do so going forward - it is just not a matter critically to do with 'process' at all. If it had to do only with process alone, then anyone and everyone would be in contact with advanced super species.

Hamas would, Bibi would, VV would; everyone who could follow a process would.

And humans are not stupid. Well they are stupid but not so stupid that they are unable to follow a fundamental set of process steps.

To cut a very long story very very short, the 'secret' - if such a thing can even be termed a 'secret' - is contained in one of the versions of the Enoch accounts. ...It has to do with the golden-colored, self-illumined oil or something, that a being who was described as 'frigid to touch' anointed Enoch with, following which he was then able to see the main Being on the Throne whose light would have burned him up otherwise. Around the Throne, were a large number of other beings in glowing white robes, with light coming from them as well, continuously singing and making music and also four 'living creatures with eyes in all directions.' Bad translation, wrong concept being given, but I am simply re-stating what words you will find, supposedly as accurately translated from the original text.

The Universe is a huge big place with lots and lots of things in it.

There are definitely quite malign Draco Reptilians in existence around the place.

Slight correction - the Universe is a place with everything in it. Everything you could imagine, is in it, somewhere.

And that's the point.

I am hoping that I am writing all of this for people who are looking for satisfaction in their lives.

People who are not going to rest before they attain their hugest fundamental internal goals. People who are not going to be satisfied with being shoved off to one side intellectually or any other way, if they posit a stupendous, almost outlandish, aka 'out there' goal.

I am here to tell you that is the only goal worth going for.

What's the point having a Destination Wine if you don't accept the reality of the destination that your internal being is continuously calling for?

This is an idea of symmetry in design, but
it is very complex symmetry.
But it is symmetry.

The reason most people don't get to that reality is because they have compromised on the elements of the goal. This is why you get subterfuge from politicians, deceit from bankers, relying on the past from religious preachers and dictators of religious ideologies - none of them can show you the 'ultimate ideal goals' in the present.

But they want the power and the glory.

If you deny the internal psychological desire that you have, to reach these seemingly strange peculiar goals (by ordinary common human world standards) then you are deliberately lying to yourself.

And people do that. And they do it with ease. And at the end of their lives - they also die. And they will have realized nothing at all.

And that's it.

Oh yeah I know the counter position that people say about 'all the more cherishing what they had.' LOL

I recently mentioned that there is an ancient Greek written verbal text (not a stone monument) describing the double-helix DNA structure - to some private finance chat board people. And not one of them said 'Hey, how come these guys back then were able to describe such a thing at all?!'

What I got was twenty-five different statements about all kinds of things, none of which mentioned what I just said. They just all sailed right over the top of it.

So I don't actually expect people to realize the whole point of what is being said in here, in these pages.

I'm just doing it because I am having fun.

Idiots talk (as if they even know what it is) about 'evidence' all the time. When confronted with it though, they would kill women and children to get away with their own lies and to make a citadel for their own preexisting intellectual position.

Part of the lyrics are: 'Sat watching the screen. Will hope return?' LOL 

Be careful of the volume at the start. Lyrics not till around half way.