Way Too Scary For Children...

Listen to me carefully. In this world there are things that no media company, not only would not even dare to talk about, their people would literally not be able to psychologically handle the information if they had it.

This week Tennessee Representative (to the US Congress), Tim Burchett explained a few key things to several news agencies, following his participation in a 'SCIF' - which as I understand it, is not necessarily 'being read into' the top secrets, but under secrecy provisions being given access to a 'Secret Compartmented Information Facility' - in this case which was specifically to do with the current Congressional inquiry into whatever the government knows about Aliens and UAP's.

Quote, Rep. Tim Burchett: 'Americans should know
what the government knows about UFO's.'

His direct statement to the news people was exactly what I have told you from several years back, namely, that there is known to be something, but it is outside of the FOIA process because the knowledge and details are in the hands of what he termed 'quasi-government groups' or companies with government funding who were essentially private now, if they 'even existed here at all any more...'

What exactly he meant by that I'm sure I cannot say.

And then he went on to say that unless someone stepped forward with evidence from those groups, it would be virtually impossible to force access through FOIA.

But why would anyone come forward gratuitously though?

Secondly, the whole aspect of 'with proof and evidence,' well what does that mean - that someone is going to give you anti-gravity technology, for example, for nothing?

What I mean by 'way too scary for children' is this: let's say there are some secrets which involve genuine, completely authentic matters to do with at some earlier point, official government engagement with beings not of this planet. (And we'll get to the key point presently).

...All of the currency of any kind of source opinion, of the very raison d'etre at all, of such beings coming here since the 1940's, or at least making themselves known, was always related to the nuclear bomb and what happened during the two major World Wars and the immediate aftermath context of a nuclear threat. No one from any quarter has ever posited another reason.

There is a small amount of factual basis to the insinuation that 'UFO's' were responsible for temporarily closing down some North American nuclear missile facilities.

But what is not made so clear by those saying that the point of their 'appearance' was some concern about nuclear wars - is not so much that they could prevent it, but whether they actually would do so...

Well there are no ancient tales about otherworldly 'agencies' preventing calamity; the stories are all along the lines that the calamity took place.

Sodom and Gomorrah, Atlantis, Tyre and Sidon - these were all ancient accounts of their utter destruction. Ironically, I guess, in the case of Tyre and Sidon, their stone remnants were taken and thrown by Alexander the Great into the sea to create a useful causeway.

You see the thing is this - the phrase 'the nuclear option' in modern parlance does not mean someone is going to use nuclear weapons to overcome an enemy in a battle; it means to blow everything up on the way out because they are actually losing.

When the nuclear bomb was first used, it seems to have been used to demonstrate to Stalin that the West had a very serious means of countering any Stalinist agenda and ambition in the West.

Iran does have nuclear weapons and very sophisticated delivery systems. So does China.

These places are in the first place ideologically driven -, not primarily driven by reason of actual threats against them.

No doubt both of them would argue though and say that 'regime change' is already an open goal by the part of the West that is led by the United States.

But 'way too scary for children' does not refer to these things.

Way too scary would be what you would find out, not so much if you were to see who, just who is involved with ET Aliens in 'private organisations and corporate entities or groups,' what they do, where they are situated -, but by the counterpoint, namely who are those opposed to such groups.

Because there are large scale, national 'arrangements' - some wealthy governments here and there, some 'philosophical' and ideological, even 'occult' you could say (and I'm not talking about Freemasonry in this specific context here) trans-global conglomerates - which are mortally opposed to anything that would give new and advanced power into the hands of a broad cross-section of the man-in-the-street human world.

We are not so much just on the threshold of major global conflict catastrophe, but we are rather close to the introduction of anti-gravity technology and also extremely light but strong materials technologies. These things would radically alter the topography of global economics and politics forever.

Over the next two years, you will see the stepped exposition in the public arena of various new 'advances' in technology (where they come from, who's to know) that will completely overturn governments and government systems all over the world. 

Unless the overlords can tie you to a 'home,' they cannot cause you to fight and die for a homeland.

In the coming weeks, maybe month or so, not a hundred miles from right here, there will be a very special wine tasting thing being held - somewhere - involving a wine of exorbitant price and value. If I can get a cam into there, I will show you a person, or even some people, who are literally of the kind that Rep. Burchett was talking about.

Now just keep in mind, you are only a few people, who come here and read at this place. This is not widespread knowledge and it never will be.

And we can truncate it real quick if things got too 'complicated' for any of us. Not being over-confident either. I acknowledge that when one team takes the field, the other side will also turn up on the day.