Because Of This Fact

The good thing about Shirley MacLaine's book 'Going Within,' (and but we are not talking about that alone, in here now though) is that she writes in ordinary English, and it's all easy to understand, and everything she talks about is pragmatic -, not at all airy fairy, which is the way on the other hand, I do like to go usually -.

So far and I'm only up to midway, she does not explicitly reveal actual core techniques - and what I mean by that is she does actually say though (as I am also saying here and have been for a while), there is something very specific and very materially real and physical going in when she practices some kind of 'technique.'  And so that all does involve technique, real method, and I guess science after all.

The cost to have these things, is a few 
bucks.
What you write in there, 
is entirely up to you.

Probably because of the day and age in which this particular book of hers was written, and the market mindset it was addressed to, she does refer to various scientific sources and cites all of them, in a way still though, to just go around the core ideas; in other words she does use a kind of circumlocution but only accidentally and incidentally due to not actually wanting to divulge - I don't believe - the real techniques. For me I think, and I have said so before, that it is a trap trying to indulge people in their addiction to what they think is 'real and true,' aka to modern 'science.'

Modern science however, suffers from two distinct aspects that make it highly problematic in fact - and I know a lot of people will bridle at that. 

Firstly it has never and cannot, address the fallacy of its own 'infinite division' problem (aka 'analysis'). Analysis only works within the set frames of reference for that Gauss Curve of all possibilities relevant to the framed conditions in question, and in view.

...If there are unknown conditions but which are still real and have effects on outcomes, then the process of endless 'analysis' will not deliver the solution of 'knowing' in that case - which is, after all, the thing science claims to want to do. It wants to know the process, understand or see the mechanisms, and repeat for thus 'knowable' results.

And all the time, more and more these days, when Man goes well past the edges of present knowledge, it (science) bangs the desk and claims to know stuff by theory - which it does not actually know at all. People make incredible and gulling suppositions under the names of 'science' and 'academics,' and then throw around the labels they create, to mimic knowledge and facts, claiming that the labels themselves are the facts; which they are not and can never be.

It's just a toy. 
Right?

'Trust the science.' It was a vividly deadly political slogan.

Nobody from that quarter said 'trust the knowledge;' because where was the knowledge?!

Anyway I have completely led myself away from what I set out to talk about...!

The point is that MacLaine says, on the first page of Chapter 7 of her hardback version, which is page 95, that all of the 'mystery schools' be they Eastern, or Christian or shamanic and so on, use a scale just like we know the seven note musical scale, and the seven color spectrum.

But she does not go further into actually how (to operate), and/or what that 'scale set' is.

Which at least leads me to where I was going in the first place, which was what I promised you -, namely that I would explain the hidden bits and what goes on with this 'changing of bread into actual God-physicality(!)' story.

I am going to say these things with total authority here, but you can go to any really 'old school' text-book cleric - especially any of these American SSPX bishops, for example, the ones the Vatican just all 'ex-communicated' (lol) - and ask them about the specifics I am about to detail, and they will confirm them all to you.

I don't think that's a toy. 
I think this one is the 
life-sized, functioning thing.

Except even some of those will not actually have the inside real knowledge but they will certainly know about it enough to tell you in broad terms.

So does water turn miraculously into wine, or does ordinary wine turn into someone's blood.

I mean hey if it does, we can get the 'scientists' to stick their instruments and their fingers into the wine and then the blood, and run tests and everything, and come back with the results.

(This is gonna be a hell-long post this one. Sorry!).

So anyway, to cut it all down, the story of the Bible, New Testament part, goes like this: 

Lights seen in sky, Three Wise Men (or Kings, whatever), bring GIFTS (is important) baby born, stable animals (not important but hey), da de da de dah lots of things go on, then up in the enclosed upper rooms, eat some bread, drink some wine, 'Sorry, guys; I'm about to go and this is the last time I will eat and drink with you all, but see, look, see - see this bread you are eating and wine you are drinking, you are eating and drinking the same stuff with me, so I am just like you, right...'

...Gets killed. Disappears from grave, turns up around the place lots for forty days, then completely goes away -, then back to the enclosed upper rooms, ten days after that (so, fifty days in all, give or take; Ahmad Deedat don't argue!) big wind, light shows up again inside room, splits apart, goes onto and into the heads of people present.

All could be rubbish. Let's examine further.

Chris Bledsoe is half-enough right.

Palazzo Reale, 
in Turin.

You cannot go out into the open countryside, and look up, and try and 'communicate' with say, super super advanced high-tech ET Aliens, but then have something behind your back -.

He's right so far on that matter.

Thinking of Shirley MacLaine's pragmatism though, and disregarding (difficult for me) my tendency to go off into obscure language forms - what makes a 'priest' as in a genuine Christian priest, a priest?

Now I should have said earlier that when MacLaine links Eastern ideas like these with Western ones, I am now going to link 'alcohol' with 'ghee' (clarified butter), and this is about to become important in a minute here.

Okay so everybody thinks they know how this 'ceremony' goes on, at 'altars' and even in certain kinds of Jewish Temple rituals - a 'sacrifice' is 'made.'

That's the standard terminology everybody - all the churches, synagogues, even some Sufi places - use. 'Sacrifice.'

Ah well but no, it's not though. Not the thing that happens or is meant to happen. This, what happens now, is a subversion - just like what happened during the time of the boy-king Josiah, with the Jews - of what is really meant to happen, In part it is because the thing has not been passed down through the actual institutions as a whole, and in part because of other very nefarious reasons.

There are in fact, three 'sacrifices' undertaken and none of them are sacrifices and you'll see why not, in a second.

The main segment of the 'turning wine into blood(!)' (Gewd I love to say that here), is couched in the modern heretical rituals, in the terminology 'offering/offertory.'

Where is the 
Tree of Joy?
And what toys lie
underneath it?

But even so, at that point, in the old school way, they spoke a Latin phrase and the Eastern Churches including the Ethiopian, used Greek or forms of Greek -  but in Latin: 'Hoc Est Enim Corpus Meum.'

'This is my body.' ...My body.

Does not say 'this is your body, Jesus; and I am about to eat it.'

And then the guy up front says 'and those gathered here, by their faith if sincere, you shall reward.'

He never says 'by (his) my faith.' And this saying about priests having 'lost their faith' is a non sequitur.

Priests, real priests, do not have faith - they have knowledge.

And I will show you something now and you'll get a shock. Firstly though, I repeat, the ordinary people have no knowledge, they must rely on their own faith in the guy up there doing the leading, doing the ritualistic performance.

So, the Sanskrit Hindu caste priests (because that's what they are still called, 'priests') take a flat plate, not so much a bowl but it can be a wide open bowl, and they go up the side of a mountain, and they put some ghee into the bowl (or onto the plate) and hold it up to the sky, and if lightning or something like that strikes it and sets the thing aflame, then, and only then, can they conduct further business.

He's just an actor, in a movie. 
But as I have told you
many times - 'Theatros.'
It means something.

In the Latin Mass, the - well what is now called 'offering' - is called 'the Oblation;' which comes from the Latin and Greek 'libation.'

'Oblation' is a gift, not a sacrifice. 'Sacrifice' the word, has something of meanness about it, and miserliness to it; if you ask me.

In the traditional Roman Catholic Mass, there are THREE such 'gifts:' the first which is literally called 'the Secret' and which part is not divulged to the general public at all (I mean, AT ALL, although I am going to divulge it here) - is done the same way the Sanskrit Hindus do it: they hold up the flat plate, called the paten, which has some wine in it, high above their head, and this light is supposed to come down and set fire to it.

Oh yes.

Unless a person has literally had that experience happen when they are practicing the ritual, in front of some observing other person - would be the 'Bishop' say, usually - they will not be made a 'priest.' 

Now look, hey, of course all of these things can be subverted. The Hindu priests are nothing if not notorious for making stuff up.

But nevertheless, that is the actual procedure and the path to 'official priest' status.

This is never shown to the public. The last place this kind of thing went on, in any way that was talked about, was in Venice during the Renaissance and before Napoleon went in there.

So anyway, the thing is, if you are following the logic of the wording here - it's the priest who has become 'the body' not the bread thing-y. And he goes on to say, loudly in that part of the altar ritual - 'and I Iay down my life' (for my people, whatever). And he does that 1. because his buddies have all seen this guy do it, and then rise from the dead (ostensibly according to the narrative account), and 2. they (his long-ago buddies) all had this 'light' show up actually, and go into them, inside them FR - and but then he has too (had this experience).

...They're just 
actors, in a movie.
That's all.

This ritual is all straight out of Plato by the way, although it is well-known and written about by others back then and even the Ancient Egyptians had it. Certainly the Hindus had it; still have it. 

The first 'gift' is called 'Spondee' - which is what thing you want to give to some advanced, in the case of ancient traditions, 'divine' being, that you think they will enjoy. They already have or can have anything you have, but that's not the point - you enjoy a drink, getting drunk, so you want to have them enjoy something along with you.

The second 'gift' is the part where you join with them - like, physically here. That's when you share the wine and the whatever else is going - bread, honey cakes if you are a witch (!). It's all the same thing.

The third part is called 'Choe' where - and this will be confirmed by any old school priest that you can lay your hand, right onto their collar and grab them to answer - the priest also touches the ground with the wine and the bread. Which means the material world and also the Underworld, is given also a 'gift,' but it is from a literal 'divine hand' as it were since the priest has already (ostensibly) been entered by this 'light' thing-y. Or, could be read as 'a human plus a divine hand together.'

So now here's the problem though. So far so good - 'Orbs up in sky,' far away. Easy. Not too scary that.

LOL

If you think, I cannot have these 'lights' show up in a closed room, and film it all, and have your silly 'scientists' examine it all -, you are sorely mistaken.

 

All the stuff that you are seeing in the Vatican, or in more or less any church, in the Anglican Saint Paul's, and definitely in a bunch of Hindu yogi-walla rituals too that look amazing - is all a bunch of BS.

Unless you are Jimi Hendrix, and you set your guitar on fire on stage, and you can play the thing for real - well unless that then it's all just copycat nonsense with no point and no meaning. No substance. Zero reality.

When that girl holds up the torch at the beginning ceremony of the Olympic Games, it's just a bad copy of something.

The bad copy - billions of people all watch and 'follow' avidly.

'If you just give
me ten million
dollars...'

The real thing, almost no one does.

I can take this right up to the ledge for you - you just think hard a moment; seriously. What can you really give as a gift, to someone that you know is so superior in every possible way to you. They have craft that jump through Time and Space. They have those fabulous (IE 'of sci-fi fable') 'Med-Beds' or 'Med-Bays.' They are really good-looking. And they can endlessly 'clone' themselves and go get different, new bodies, more or less at will.

When was the last time you, by the way, you - you, I'm talking to you - actually really enjoyed yourself. Here, on the planet. I mean hey, you want to share the endless bounty of your existence with your 'new friends' right. I mean, you don't want to just lumber them with all of your endless miseries all the time: 'Oh, woe is me, woe is me...' Yeah, really exciting.

It is an existential fact, that down through the centuries upon centuries, this whole thing has been going on like this, over and over. There isn't any 'then later -, on Judgment Day!' LOL

It's EXISTENTIAL - means it is like this, not like that. Means what exists as a material fact now. Thank you, Shirley. And yes, sure, everybody knows you want ten million dollars. (That's 'you' not Shirley MacLaine).

Emperor Constantine had that, and more.

You're looking at the wrong thing - you're looking at the... '...and the rest.' The also-rans. The great big field of losers.

 

It's those who want to tell you 'how it is' so long as it complies with their conditions imposed upon you.

What I said is 'you are the Emperor Constantine.' Or Genghis Khan. Or King Rama.

You are not God - you are the hero, half-way between fully mortal (means you will die and disappear forever) and god. You are the hero on the hero's journey.

Why are you thinking like a loser?

The reason people formulate this stupid question - and it is a completely stupid one - about 'but just give me ten million now,' is because none of them had any kind of really momentous joy, or fun in their lives up till the moment they faced the existentialism of life and the Whole Universe. Really the question they are trying to ask is, please show me the fun, the JOY.

Yes. Hullo!

Back to the Tree of Joy. Was never the Tree of 'Life.' Life is already what you have. Joy is what you want.

Cassavetes: 'Show me the magic.'

And for those silly enough to push their argument - you show me which bit in here is incorrect, non-factual, unable to be supported by evidentiary proof: I did not say I cannot have the Orbs show up for you - I said I'm not altruistic in that way. For me it's about real desire to do stuff.

If you want to know what makes me function, makes me do stuff, go watch Cassavetes in his 'Tempest' when he says 'Show me the magic.'

You have to be able to feel it, when he says it. Understand his meaning there.

If you 'get it' there, when you watch it, you won't say to me, 'But just if I just had ten million dollars!' Bleating.

...And those of you who still have not looked up and seen those things in the sky yet. SMH. LOL

They're there, dude.

You see them but the one time and you'll freak out. And you will totally back off quick!

I don't think there's any particular hurry though. I am personally sick and tired of 'scientists' saying anything at all. I could go grab any one of them and kick their heads into a different Time Zone at Maximum Warp Speed - if I could care less.

In life there is the Emperor Constantine, and Julius Caesar, and Shirley MacLaine and her like - and the rest; the rest are all NPC's. And that's another EXISTENTIAL FACT. Professor Jason Arday - turned out to be an NPC. Oh yes yes, looked like everything but for a long (enough) time.

Wealth, Substance, And Secret...

There is literally no substance to be found in any of the World's Religions today.

Rather, there is a lot of substance to the thought that most of Mankind moves like great shoals of bait fish, manipulated by outside predatory forces, and by clever sinister intellects driven by the desire to extract everything that is available, from the bodies and the work and efforts of those corralled humans.

Mount Ventoux in Provence.
Suspiciously like Mount Hermon
where, by repute, the 'Angels Descended.'
Allah, by the way, turned Zorah into the 
planet Venus, because she drank wine
and had the two Angels 'Harut a-wa Marut'
also drink wine with her.
Wine is haram; to the Allah.
Not sure why. Just is.
 

Additionally, instead of responding to this continual insistence on this standard 'unproven scientific hypothesis' slur made against anything that exposes the fraud of modern society and 'life' (such as it is), I will simply ask you to notice if you can, all the occasions where some break-through or novel idea, was very quickly taken over by large moneyed interests, but always with the effect of depreciating its actual function and then disallowing open access to the mechanisms involved - the quick implementing of what is now readily known, as: 'gate-keeping.'

But what I would even go further to say, is that indeed and in real actual fact - people, humans generally, all or at least most of them, are able to 'pick up' concepts without having to read some written dissertations on those subjects at all. Whether they are doing so simply in context of a social environment, and thus 'picking up' on all of the things going on from periphery cues, as it were, rather than words and linear packages of systematic logic, is moot.

And it doesn't matter. The result is the same. So the evident fact is they can do it. And they can do it very fast!

In other words, you - for example - might come up with some brilliant idea, a new idea, a new thing; but just as soon as you do it, the whole world already somehow knows about it. The run-of-the-mill conspiracy theorists will aver that for sure your phone is listening to you, or that your computer is logging key-strokes and these are going to somewhere nefariously.

And that all may be true too.

It doesn't matter. Again. Does not matter.

Your wine, sir...

Jura, perjura, segretum prodere noli.

'Swear, fore-swear and reveal not, the secret.' This is the unyielding oath of the Council of Venice.

At the same time, they also had another saying: 'la bronsa coverta.' And this meant that someone was carrying a glowing ember within them, that they covered.

...But what you don't know, and have never been told, is that they, the Venetians, especially those of the ruling classes and the 'ordinary' upper classes, also had 'strange rituals' with which they denied access to even their thoughts, their mind, by outside, what we might call today, 'remote viewers.'

Oh yes they believed in all of that.

Now by the way, shouldn't it be, that the Roman Catholic Church in particular, should possess some ritual, wherein you could actually see this 'descent of the cloven flames' actually alight on the heads of its designated members?

We will talk about it, but 'hidden like a glowing ember.'

Petrarch wrote about his 'Descent into the Valley Below.' Or sometimes it is simply translated 'return to the valley.'

This was about a certain enlightenment, an epiphany, that he had, when he climbed to the top of a mountain - Mont Ventoux, in the South of France - and in which moment he realized that going back down to the world, and understanding how to deal with his own feelings about the world and his own reactions to situations and people, was going to be much larger of a 'mountain to climb!'

Before I can write like 
Petrarch, I need all 
of this.

Petrarch coined the phrase 'the Dark Ages' to describe the situation of Europe and his world generally, at the time. And he is said at least by intellectuals of worth, to be the person most singularly responsible for initiating the Renaissance when he found the speeches of Cicero in a set of texts brought to Europe (in Liege, Belgium) by scholars deserting the invaded Constantinople - invaded for the first time by 'homeless' (as it were because they had been kicked out of Spain) roaming and marauding Andalusian Muslims coming from Spain. 

My own grandfather albeit from Venice and Ithaca, was a medical doctor trained and licensed in Belgium by the way, and some of my father's aunts were owners of very prominent beer manufacturers there.

And since I have already side-tracked myself with tall tells and true, of my own family history - at least I should explain to you that this famous 'Dame Gertrude Bell' who started the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the British F.O., had a bunch of sisters, and their mother was a 'Shields.'

And that makes them all related to the infamous Lucrezia Borgia. Just saying.

So yes, not only do I count at least three known Popes in my own direct ancestry, but along one side there were all of these most infamous people like the Borgias and so on. Er, what that means is that are there probably more than three Popes in there.

Anyway, you don't want to know about any of that.

What you want to know about is how to make a million dollars.

And we'll get to that.

That's Van Cleef & Arpels 
around her neck, right?
Is the 'Alhambra' motif.
That's what they call it.

You see in the very first place, just like things were at the time of Petrarch, we are living in the middle of a 'Dark Ages' of our own. And I do not think finding 'the speeches of Cicero' all over again, or anything like that, is going to procure a Renaissance in our time.

It was not that - during the first Dark Ages - the ruling groups lacked money. No, they had plenty.

Today though, these 'ruling' groups do not have any money. They have currency. And they already have real power (which is how come they have 'currency').

But it is the fact of no money, which is ultimately behind the Darkness...

'Currency' just drives things that are current. Money buys other stuff. Stuff that simple currency cannot buy.

For example - there is no amount of currency, that will procure access to the cenacle, inside which we can evidence those glowing lights, those embers, coming down on your heads.

LOL

Make no mistake, even right now, we have given all of you enough clues, enough hints as to tools and bits and pieces of cool stuff, that you require... ...with which you will make huge sums.

But you do need to learn to set about to do things, though. Just like Petrarch.

And there is not a single one of you who have commented in here, that lacks the power of words. And ideas.

Plan for, and set out to, do.

Whether we find wealthy patrons with currency or not, who can say. To say such a thing would be to know the future.

[Best possible over-the-ear headphones, of course; from about 1:20 in - makes its move, even the Angels fall. Or dance at least]:

 

'Ichor' Involves A Parallel System

There are many people who indulge in what they think is 'Eastern Mysticism' and its techniques of meditation, and these people actually experience 'seeing lights' in their head.

But it could be that they are experiencing random firings of electrical activity in the Occipital Lobe, which is then interpreted via the optic nerves and processing as 'lights' or a light.

Some people with epilepsy also have similar experiences of seeing 'lights' that are only in their head.

Real pic from a real person who
was in Spain last week.

The human being and its psychology, is so complex, and also so independent as a single unit 'person' regardless that we all participate in a 'society' containing lots of other 'persons,' that it can be left to its own devices; to its own intrinsic 'mind-set' as such, and never need to use or to rely upon any actual outside or 'higher' assistance.

And that indeed, is the condition of the human race and it has been so for thousands and thousands of years.

And that's a big problem, because the one thing that can be exploited, is just that intrinsic alone-ness and practical existential independence, so that someone can lie extensively and quite ludicrously too, but have that lie be accepted by broader society because of the 'scaling up' effect of having many people accept and believe the lie or lies so that a powerful social force folds back onto the individual and causes them not to want to risk separation from the seeming safety of the group.

Today, this matter has become so deeply entrenched and so luridly manipulated by those desiring to have and to keep power, over a slave populace with its slave mentality - a herd, so to speak, of blind, unthinking units - that even the simple aspect of the safety and security of women has been completely lost within a 'normal' functioning society.

The whole idea of female safety and security has been twisted into - 'is there a dwelling...'

All of modern banking and finance and even the broader financial equity markets, boils down to just one thing - physical 'property;' that is, buildings, structures, foot-prints of land.

Communications and the practical logistics of moving things, including the use of energy - revolves actually around only property and nothing else. Governments build hospitals but they cannot cure cancer.

Everyone is getting progressively sicker.

Real pic from one of you
here: Perisher Valley
(ski fields), 
New South Wales, 
Australia.

If you look at the real quotient of social IQ it is dropping towards 'Nil;' Cambridge Professor Jason Arday killed himself because he could not stand the spotlight of being found out for the liar and fraud and non-intelligent/non-intellectual, that he actually was.

So - sick and stupid.

Society at large.

Yes human beings are biological mechanisms. We have bodies. Obvious...

We have minds, but do we?

No; we do not. We have the concept of the 'mind' and we certainly know what that is and what it ought to be, but we in standard common daily behavior always confuse it (the actual real concept) for social programming.

Our parents - who we trusted - told us to 'pray' and then we found, if we became occultists and satanists, also to 'summon,' to 'call out' (in Arabic the word is 'dua' which means to summon or to call out).

And sure, because all of the modern Goths and 'Satanists' think Satan is so amazingly powerful, they expected to gain power when they summon some demon - but if they are summoning the guy across the street, who is a convicted liar and murderer, then they are hardly going to get what they were actually seeking. Are they??

The human body has its blood system, which carries oxygen, which is relied upon by the nerves in order to fire electricity - and then what we do is preserve and maintain ideas and memories in our head, based on those nerve firings, but more often than not, in line with large amounts of absolutely stupid, ridiculous and completely false, items of social programming.

The flow system of the 'mythological' (by whose account?! lol) Ichor, also underpins 'nerve firings' using electrons and light - this is all well-attested in the Ancient Writings, not that these really gave great swathes of technical understandings accessible to us or even, to anyone.

Not a real pic from anyone I know!
That's for sure.
Well, it is a real pic, but...
You know...
We don't got one of these
right now!

But the guaranteed difference between human ordinary blood flow, and what the human's senses tell it through that system -, and what the human's brain processing ends up 'concluding,' is that Ichor cannot manufacture some kind of 'idea-belief' not in keeping with hard reality and logic and therefore, Truth.

In 1738, when Nadr Goli Beg of 'Persia,' invaded India and ransacked the Hindustani palaces, stealing vast amounts of jewels and gold including the famous 'Koh-i-Noor' diamond (which he later on traded with the East India Company, which is how come the Windsors ended up with it; they never stole it. Nader - his Anglicized name - stole it), he took back also a very ill-omen'd artifact, the so-called 'Peacock Throne.'

In fact he even broke that original apart and sold off bits and pieces in order to have more 'money,' and over the decades many different people in Iran re-constructed various versions of it. Apart from being just a thief, he was a criminal vandal.

Today, there are several mosques and shrines to dead people, and also the 'National Museum of Jewels' in Tehran - all of which have variations of the 'Peacock Throne.'

Not to be confused with the Peacock Angel of the Yazidis, this Peacock Throne is and always was, explicitly, the Seat of Satan. There is even a huge temple/shrine in Iran containing nothing but mirrors on all walls, floors and ceilings - and this is because the Devil likes to see himself, only. 

Muhammad Bagher Ghalibaf is quite literally a descendant of Nadr Qoli Beg and the only reason for the differences in the spellings of those name parts, is because of modern Shi'a arguments with the Arabs of the Hijaz today as to whether or not there is actually a 'Q' at all or only two different 'G's' in the Arabic alphabet.

Is real enough!

The CIA arms of Monroe know very well what to attack in Iran in order to cause total panic and confusion there...

And none of that really helps you but what you can adduce for your own benefit is the following: you will never and I mean never, 'enter into Heaven' with your normal human blood system and all of its highly flawed 'ideas' built on the sand castles of liars and thieves.

When you call out to a known liar and a thief and a murderer for help, you will get used and you will feel used; stolen from, harmed -. You will not be helped.

Once you learn the pattern, however, of Truth and of Geometric Fact and of Pure Logic, then, you will know who to call out to, what the character and nature of that Being is, or those Beings, are.

Nadr was murdered by people envying and rivaling him from within his own circle.

...And you can put that in your bank.

[This is what is called 'Progressive' music - as a genre. This track doesn't go anywhere, doesn't seem to really say anything, and takes a couple of minutes to 'intro' even... All in all, is only for the die-hards who know what such stuff is about]: 

 

Flying Through The Time-Space Portals

I do not believe those people who committed certain 'stories,' certain ideas, onto carved stones and monuments in Ancient Sumeria (Mesopotamia) were actually the people about whom those narratives pertained.

No. These were 'written down' (IE carved into stone) by humans later on, albeit they carried genuine memories forward and maybe even had some direct knowledge and experience but of quite different people.

Right now, rather than go too far into any of that, I just want to look at one element only, and in order to do that, I will once again go to the much much later on writings of people who had literally no involvement nor real knowledge whatsoever, of the basic situation. However, because they took charge of one of the two or three major strands of the Ancient Manuscript Cultures that were still being preserved up until then, they naturally drew from those real sources.

This is the final draft of the submission
to some super wealthy funders
of projects like our Autism one.
And believe me, there is nothing in
it anywhere even near 'woo woo' or
weird!! LOL
The lesson is, we have to keep our
feet on the ground, right?

When the final bastion of the Byzantines (the Persian Empire had imploded a little earlier) fell, supposedly to the 21-year old invader Sultan Mehmet II -, the result was the splitting up in one direction of the existing preservation cultures of scholars, of the Roman and Ancient Greek literary sources (to the West, which region eventually benefited by creating aircraft and rockets and going to the moon and medical science and all of this), and the holding hostage of what the Arabs thought was the more important (because Muhammad hated the Jews and rivaled them, and massacred large numbers of them who opposed him) literature, namely the Hebrew and Coptic/Egyptian sources.

The fabricated idea that 'alchemy' was proto-modern chemistry and therefore it was the Arabs who donated that to the world -, that is, modern chemistry and medicine, falls in a great big hole as soon as you see that Galen and others spoke and read Greek not Arabic, and the influence of Oriental medicine and herbal and inorganic proto-chemistry came to the West from China and India. Same goes for mathematics and geometry; all of that came from India not the Arabs, although Arab writings do contain some transposed-into-Arabic, Indian concepts.

The reality comes into focus when you understand that so much of the Egyptian Coptic and even fundamental Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writings - are in the form of magical spells - and consequently, virtually all of Arabic Islamic culture also follows that pattern, because it takes from there. Namely, it is verses to be recited, chanted, like magical spells.

Most of you will know that much occult 'writing' is written in reverse, and also, that many ancient written languages often altered the direction of their writing depending sometimes on the differentiation of actual names versus connective words, other words... ...And sometimes the writing was just plain backwards.

...Except little do the poor
rich people know, what
we are exactly, planning!

Most Muslim children today want to believe there really was or maybe even still is, such a thing as a flying burak - some kind of supernatural donkey-creature but with wings so that it can fly.

Well...

The fact is, there is. ...Such a thing.

Except its correct word/name is 'Karub,' the plural of which is 'Karubi' or 'Karubu.'

See the word is misspelled in the Hadiths. Because originally, in the actual sources from where they got the word and the concept, it was written backwards - as is usually the case with magical script.

Again, Sanskrit too has a similar aspect - I'll explain using this example: the word 'Mantra.'

'Man' (the Sanskrit word part of 'Mantra') means the specific emotional vibration pertaining to a given thing - and 'Tra' means technique of doing, or 'craft;' we can say, also 'art...'

But the reverse of 'Man' means the outward 'name' of a thing - what you call it by - its 'Nama.' And when you fully internalize it, as the living, thinking, emotional and fully sentient being that you are -, it becomes a 'Man' inside you; a vibration. And that is why you vibrate - aka chant - a Mantra.

Sumerian winged
Karub.

...Now, remembering what I had said earlier here that the people writing these things down in Ancient Sumeria were not the actual people about which the subject matter is concerned - but later people, ordinary Earth human people from ordinary Earth human societies here.

And so their (only meaningful to them) way of depicting their way of understanding what was going on, was to make out that these Karubu flew into the portals... They observed certainly that birds could fly and used wings to accomplish that, so they drew wings onto the four-pedestal 'creatures' that went into time-space portals.

And basically this is much the same thing that the Hebrews also did, when they depicted some supernatural beings on the outside of their so-called 'Ark of the Covenant.' ...Which they also called 'Cheruvim.' And that actually also shows just how Hellenised the Hebrews were since 'B' is pronounced 'V' to the Greeks. Obviously, it is not 'Cheruvim' but derives from the Sumerian Karubi.

But the fact is, none of these people know what they are talking about, despite of course, they have spent thousands of years propagandizing that they do, and that they alone - do.

Jews do it. Muslims do it.

They both do it and they are both very adamant about it.

Except neither of them is able to evidence either a flying burak or a flying Cherubim with wings.

Now moving along to what might seem like an unconnected theme - the matter of Shirley MacLaine and her excellent book 'Going Within.'

This time around I have only got up to around page ninety to this moment.

The souffle rises
but ever only
gently, and slowly.

And in the chapter there, or maybe the one before - I haven't looked - she introduces the phrase 'pragmatic functionalism' and says this is what she goes by. And, in that along with pretty much everything else I've read in there thus far, I go along with her.

Because unless you can 'evidence' a flying Karub, and you have some actual functional point to even do so, well, what are you really on about?!

Yes. I'm with Shirley MacLaine on all of this.

So far most of her book is a discussion on meditation techniques that she discovered and was using back in that era - which was, specifically, the so-called 'New Age' era.

The one thing that is really quite amazing about how she writes, is that she always cites source scientists and psychologists by name, and often also their publication/s, when she uses their particular pertinent concepts that she is drawing from to make her own points, and underpin the material authenticity of her approach to 'meditation.' She even outright explains this is not quite what she is doing - 'meditating' as such; she just says she tries to 'go quiet,' let her brain relax and go quiet.

It's no super big deal.

And she goes out of her way to say precisely what I have been saying here now for some time - it is essential to preserve a strong physical condition despite that of course we can all have medical situations that crop up from time to time. And also to have a brutally realistic materialistic outlook! Ergo - PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONALISM.

If it doesn't work in your life, it ain't no good; throw it out.

She goes on throughout her writing to reiterate that the more you practice, the better you get and the more direct results you achieve. And that is another thing I agree with.

And there are good reasons for this: for me the most significant one is that 'they' need to check people out, be very sure they won't totally freak people out, and also that people won't get wrong ideas -  ideas that they (humans) are, or can do, more than they are and can do realistically in the circumstance in question (us, humans, in Earth, right now).

Next post, will be real 
pics taken by real people
who read here!
Of real places where they are
(or just recently were).

I have read here and there on the net recently, where people have been doing some of these Chris Bledsoe or Greer techniques, and had (or claim to have had) 'Orbs' turn up in their homes, inside a room -.

All I can say is, if you have that happen to you more than likely you will wave your hands about your face in fright and go - 'Go Away!' ...And think that you were having a waking dream or something. Maybe an hallucination.

Take it slow. Take it along easy.

Things happen.

...They happen all the way to the time-space portals and flying buraks and anything and everything else you could ever possibly just 'imagine!' LOL

All I absolutely really know for sure, is that 'they' have a much more advanced social and technological set-up than we do right here right now. And that humanity on the Earth, is nothing more than an hermetically-sealed laboratory gene/DNA iterative project, the point of which is to separate some pretty bad stuff over a necessary lengthy time, that is mixed up within 'human' DNA.

And there is little really of any of it, to do with 'invisible,' non-material or simple metaphysical things - the whole thing is fully material and completely real and so you will utterly get the shock of your life if you realized, one day, that 'a' particular person standing in front of you, is not just any simple ordinary 'human' person at all...

But the only road to that, is through a stable, progressional, and generally-speaking rather slow introduction to everything. Just like Shirley MacLaine says.

 

 

Like A Child Trying To Prise Open An Adult's Hand.

So, as I say here over and over - it's ridiculously difficult for me to talk about certain things because I am very well aware they will fall entirely outside of the general experience of most of the public at large.

I have not worked out exactly why things are the way they are here.

And I have never been told in any formal way, anything about it.

I know, as I work through this book by Shirley MacLaine, that she is dickering around with 'telling/not telling' that she too, is able to get up into spacecraft. Oh yes, it's all in there, if you know how to read between the lines.

The Aegean dawn...

Nobody who does this kind of thing is able to convey everything to those who are not (yet) able or cannot remember any such experience.

Which leads me to one of the key factors: we all rely virtually totally, on our 'memories' that come from our plain senses and all of those signals going into our organic biological material memory cells.

And so if I asked any random person - 'Hey, do you remember anything from before when you were born?' They will mostly go 'no.' And that's because the only 'memory' access they have right now, in the ordinary course of their current daily lives -, is from their current body's brain cells and memory cells and structures.

When it comes to the things that MacLaine says, and talks about in her book - these all are couched in the standard terminology of 'meditation practices' although I think she extends what that means for her. And she makes a very clear differentiation between her body, and its daily material living reality -, and what might be happening in 'another body;' and in another realm altogether.

But I've been trying to force these 'other people' to give something - something completely simple and easy, in order that normal ordinary people can readily access these other places and spaces.

But see, we all start off as 'ordinary normal people -.'

When I try to 'prise open this hand,' so to speak, I'm not getting a blanket hard 'No' about it, but there is a reluctance and one that I am finding some difficulty getting an explanation for.

Lots of individuals in the mythologies all over the place, succeeded in acquiring some 'Amrta,' or 'Ambrosia' and giving it to humans - and in one instance it was even on account of the compassion that the demi-god had for the suffering of humans.

'Oro Metallizzato.' 
That's the name of the
'restomod' and tuning specialist 
company.

And even so, even then, in that situation, in what we would all judge as a noble motivation - it was not acceptable.

I put it to these 'other people' though, 'Hey look, it doesn't need to take several thousand years to understand and prove that humans on their own are generally bad judges of anything and everything, very morally and intellectually deficient when confronted with enticing if otherwise very potentially bad, choices. Why are you spending so much time, leaving them on their own and seeking to prove the already pretty obvious?'

So okay, I get this bare minimum response...

1. Not all humans on the planet are allowed to know and to see;

2. And there are forces at work here, engaged by the humans themselves (some), that are very underhanded and used against the rest of the human race, not even because those doing it are taking any benefit from the advantage, but because they are delusional;

3. Those who 'may' get some 'access' to much more advanced people (who by the way, are right here, on and around the planet - plenty enough of them), will want maximum answers instantaneously, to complicated questions. And that's fine and expected. But just be fully aware that as soon as you get that access, you will much more acutely notice the ponderous style of the common human world, and see that it tries to work actively against you. And you will then have to be operating on two planes at once. And you'll end up not being happy with that and either become a hermit of some sort, or at least steering away from people as much as possible. Because the different realms are much much superior in every way.

...And you will end up going, 'How stupid, even insane, are these humans?' And none of them will be listening to you.

Really malevolent and twisted people like the 'Heaven's Gate' Cult, somehow, adopt a ton of outward symbology that speaks of some kind of 'knowledge' of many possibly related matters.

And you have to make sure you are not drifting into weird and crazy things, while researching weird but not crazy things! 

Bernhard Roetzel,
German menswear
expert.

Lots of very 'accepted' people and groups are quite crazy and tell lies like you wouldn't believe - but they are welcomed in ordinary society...

Right now, there is a narrative being pushed by Tunisians, that King Melqart was married to, or 'pursued' Io (who was a mythological figure from Egypt). And they are doing that, to obscure the actual historical fact that Melqart is more closely linked to the Jews (!) than the Arabs and/or Muslims at all.

Most Muslims think that Mu'awiya I was the First Caliph after the so-called 'Rightly-Guided Ones' - but neither Mu'awaiya I nor his son Mu'awiya II spoke Arabic!

They both spoke Greek.

And they were exactly nowhere near at all - the current ideas about where 'Arabia' ever was!

Where 'Arabia' is said to be now, was called by the Romans - the Deserted Place, the empty place; not any place where 'Arabs' actually lived (at the time).

And, the whole world, due to very forceful and completely false propaganda, believes that the Renaissance in Europe began because certain Arabs 'introduced' ancient Greek and Roman books to Italy...

In fact, it began, when the Arabs sacked Constantinople and the learned people there, took their books and scrolls and so on - to Florence - away from the Arabs.

Now at minimum you are talking 2 billion people right now who will not be shook away from this stupid and credulous false belief.

More 'golden brown' 
(chestnut!)
stuff.
These are what's known as
'shadow-ribbed' socks.
The French call them 'Veinised.'

But so as not to continually seem to beat up on the Arabs - if you said to virtually the same, and if you include the 'Western culture' people, number of Westerners, putative 'Christians,' as it were, that the Bible actually calls 'Jesus' Ton Hyios Tou Theon - aka 'Dion-Yson;' which is Dionysus - you will get screams and howls of 'burn the heretic.'

'Dion-Y-son' or 'Yiosos' simply means THE Son of God. 

Now this same figure, this same identity - this 'Tou Theon-Hyios' - this 'Jesus,' says: 

'I will give him who stays strong against the world and all of its difficulties, the Morning Star.'

He means Eos.

I mean He actually says 'Eos' so why are we trying to impute some other, some different meaning?

If you want to know what the Quran actually says, you have to have a copy of the Mu'awiya text...

Tonight, when you sleep, in your suffering, and in the emotional echoes of your battles against the world, imagine - I say imagine because that's what you know, that's how you know what to do - a vine start to grow and enclose itself around you. And the jeweled fruit of its sinews start to appear to you.

Stretch thee out thou hand, Oh Aladdin, and take thee, and eat of these fruits.

For in the morning, by the glow of the rosy fingers of Eos, stretching herself out to touch whosoever is in the world that is there to greet her with their mind -, many things will be made known to you.

In the big Churches, they burn strong incense. And they have music. Because the Angeloi like it. Except they don't have the right music these days; so the Angeloi don't go there anymore. They go to you. They go to your place. And have you prepared to receive them? To see them. To touch them.

Oh Genie of the Wonderful 
Magical Lamp. Bring 
for me one of these things.

Don't forget, Shirley MacLaine is a hundred years old this coming year. Did she discover the 'Ambrosia?' And believe me she will not 'pass away' like all that many people you know. So watch carefully what happens...

Open the Cave of your mind at the rear - behind your head, and allow the Light from there into your 'Third Eye.' You do not see out of your Third Eye. You send out 'light' from it and this light is cast upon everything and returns to your eyes showing you many things, disclosing them for what they are. It is either the light of your own invention that you send out though, derived from your own thoughts; or it is the True Eternal Light of the Entrance of the Nine Nymphs (as per Homer). 

'And in those days they (the Angeloi) will be sent out to the whole Earth, to those who will receive them...'

'Peter,' He said. 'Do you love me?'

And Peter said yes of course. But He said, 'No - do you really love me?'

[You can really turn the volume up hard on this]: