![]() |
| See? How cute I am? How I balance up material things that you want and lust for, with 'weirdo' invisible things you really want! |
![]() |
| Standard Laotian pharmacy sign. |
![]() |
| I like the mansion house. |
![]() |
| See? How cute I am? How I balance up material things that you want and lust for, with 'weirdo' invisible things you really want! |
![]() |
| Standard Laotian pharmacy sign. |
![]() |
| I like the mansion house. |
I have deliberately been avoiding posting pics of really expensive items that people can buy - that is, which are still available around the place today, if you know where to look or are allowed into the Gucci-type shops...
LOL
Hermes is at least, still owned by the original Family, although it is split now between three parts of it all with different surnames.
The question is, shall we write a couple
of letters to a few of you this week?
And probably yes, yes we shall.
Most of the 'big' so-called luxury brands in the world today are owned by Finance Houses, almost all of which are losing gazillions and have done for two decades maybe longer.
How do they run at all? How do they stay alive with so much debt?
Well, that is the question isn't it.
If you take the 'French' conglomerate Kering, this is and always was (don't tell them I said this because they will me sue me for everything I'm not worth) a money-laundering scam/scheme, run by global accounting firms who wanted a way to cheat the French government of residential taxes. What happens in France is that in France, super-rich people live 'humbly,' or at least with the appearance of it, and they let their houses all run down so that the valuations placed on those are low, thereby avoiding the house value tax.
But even that is not good enough - they have to find better ways of making money in France, and avoiding more tax because hey, a lot of them have shares in French wine manufacturers and so on -.
That's fine, I don't personally object to tax-dodging; in fact no less than the great British Judge Lord Denning himself, said that it was every sane citizen's duty to avoid as much taxes as possible.
But what happens nowadays, ever since the 'conspiracy theorists' found out that none of what they thought in their fevered minds was actually 'theory' but instead hard fact -, is that banking itself is a total scam.
So, giving out money as debt to these corporations by essentially, banks which are owned by the same shareholders(!) - sick lol - became a game of just plain, giving out huge swathes of money!!
There's never been any intention of paying anything back. These places are all doomed and the dumb average pension fund holder is going to foot the bill soon.
Thank god none of you can afford
this.
It's meaningless, don't do it.
...Maybe later.
LOL
None of them generate sales enough to get even close to meeting the debt servicing requirements, and none of them makes a profit - they never have and this despite that they literally ruined the brands' core products, short-sold the customers, cheapened the quality - basically destroyed everything.
But where does that leave us? The poor rich individual who wants to go inside an esteemed, maybe even hallowed hall of glamour and glitz, and feel the rush of spending fifty thousand dollars.
Well that's not me though because I haven't got fifty thousand dollars.
Of course my problem with that though - same as your problem now that you come here and read - is that I can get fifty thousand dollars...
Oh yes I can and so can you and so will you.
I have to circularize the 'decision tree' report for the Swiss people that I consult for in a few days, and shortly after that, I will make it available through right here. Believe me, there's just not that many people who even come here for me to bother about saying what wherefore in public, right out in the open.
So now our next problem is, what happens ten seconds after we leave the rich people's expensive store??
We've spent the money, we've got the Gucci bag (or whatever it is that we've gotten) -, and then what?
How do we feel now?
We felt intrepid walking into the store with the fifty in our 'money brick' (I learnt that off a street kid this morning who was trying to steal some stuff in his pockets from a Newsagent's - we still have those here; they don't vend actual 'news' though of course). The kid claimed his pants pockets were big because they held his 'money bricks.' This was when the vendor asked him to show what was in those pockets.
Anyway, never mind, we do have money bricks in our pockets.
And we feel an insane rush as we speak in hushed tones to the service staff and hand them over our fifty thousand dollars (or less I'm just saying, right), and walk out with our newly-acquired Hermes wallet which is empty.
And we know and we don't even care that the counter people are saying 'idiot' as we leave the place.
But how do we feel?
Might take a whole day. Could be a few days. But then we won't feel anything. It's the numbness of the wealthy, see.
But then that actually won't work with us - the numbness. No. On account in the first place we can get more fifty thousand, and in the second place we know stuff about how to feel.
It's called electro-biophysics.
D'you wanna know about that first, or how to make the fifty thou?
New Omega ceramic watches.
I know you want this, Bill Smith.
How many you want?
What colors?
First. Which?
Don't forget you'll be tempted to waste the cash if you don't know how to spend it. Right now you only think you know how to spend it.
Most people I used to know - because I try not to know these kinda people anymore - will immediately, instantly, go to properties and what real estate they will buy (well, 'invest' in because you cannot even get a tin shed for 50 K$'s these days. Prolly can get a decent tent).
So f*ing incredibly boring.
What do I or what does anyone want to know what 'property' someone else is 'going' to buy??
Most of those such people, when tackled on what are they going to do with said property (that they are going to buy), say: 'live in it.'
Do they know how to live?
They are walking into a huge money trap, but then so is Kering and every single politician in the world, on the planet -, especially the lunatic 'globalists,' right now.
A 'money trap' is when they all have currency, and none of them has actual money. And the currencies stop being able to buy real genuine authentic items. It does not mean the currencies all fail - it simply means they are useless in any real terms.
[This is pure Black American Blues; yes it is. And the Poms do it really well. This is perfect imperfection. Too many opine that humans are not perfect. Yeah they are though. You just gotta be able to see it...]:
Big expensive things cost big expensive money.
And mostly, they are useless, today.
You take super brands like Creed or Gucci or Balenciaga, or even Church's shoes...
None of these are owned by their original independent or Artisan Houses - they are all owned by Kering or Prada (this latter of which is also a Mega Financial House, not really a craft and design place anymore) or someone like that; not a genuine authentic craft establishment at all.
The prices are high, the quality is rubbish. Now.
![]() |
| Barker Shoes. Still Family-Owned, still handmade. |
Never used to be that way of course.
Too late. The world has changed and it is never going back.
That is to say, not the names of those things and have them carry the quality they once did.
Paul-Michel Foucault, the Paris identity, was a friend and supporter of the Ayatollah Khomeini - who was a systematic mass-murderer.
Foucault is the most-cited 'academic' in all thesis papers at Universities worldwide today.
There are no significantly economically-powerful segments of public thought, which either voice dissension about materialism itself; for instance, product quality -, or intangible social ideas. They all fall in-line, in lock-step. Some seem like they are 'different,' but they are not. Anything publicly amplified - is fake.
So you are really looking at a wide, and systematic altering of the fundamental ideas which govern society today - political society, economic society, all society.
Despite that I myself might seem to make out that I am heavily involved in the field of ideas, or in fact in the field of ideas only - I am very materialistic. And more than that, I developed a 'mind habit' during the Investment Market World's true peak era of the Eighties, which would by a lot of people, be characterized as an Autistic trait to do with that materialism.
![]() |
| Charvet, Paris. Still real. |
I personally do not like to throw such characterizations around too easily, because I think in today's on-line and Tik-Tok world, there is too much fantasy talk and almost romanticizing of Autism - where people keep up this 'on the spectrum' thing; a bit too much. Yeah well it would be great if all Autistic people were 'just on the spectrum a little bit!'
Moreover blending up a lot of different things takes away from the crucial neurological hidden, unseen, internal material mechanisms that lead to serious Autism - and it's all pretty serious...
But anyway, that caveat out there - what I do is intentionally 'forget' or pretend not to know, that I have something already, when I am waiting to get some other 'important' material thing into my hands.
The reason I started doing all this was after one occasion, when we got in this high tech surveillance expert - who swept the downstairs 'front' office (which actually had brokers and dealers right there so that walk-ins off the street could see what was going on for real and live) - and when he had located and pointed out to me (I was the manager there) four active secret hidden devices ('bugs' as they say), we both went outside and had a discussion away from the place.
He said he was pretty sure he had already found at least seven devices, and did I want him to continue. I said, no. And then I said, in fact leave them all in there and don't do anything; we'll use it against 'them.' Whoever they were.
So then after properly instructing everyone privately who was working in there, we spread a lot of 'disinformation' quite easily and it worked really well.
But then, one additional consequence was that I personally became more or less paranoid about accidentally saying anything out loud that I considered really was important to keep close to ourselves - to the extent then of deliberately burying it in my head! Until some key moment and secured place (or that we thought was secure).
Many times the conversation went: 'So what was it you were going to tell us that's really important?'
...And me: 'Give me a minute, I'll have to remember. Oh yes. The sky is falling down and we're all gonna die unless we run like hell right away...' That kind of thing.
We made it out of the Eighties Global Stock-Market Crash, not just alive but in quite some coin.
Virtually everyone else I knew outside of our little group died, went to jail/went bankrupt and died.
But I am a materially-minded person. I like stuff.
I like good stuff not necessarily expensive stuff. And I am very 'Autistic' about it - about how I get it.
You cannot 'get' a decent few kilos of Gold or Silver at any given and sudden moment on the spot -, and then make a killing ten days later when the prices went up suddenly. First of all it would mean you had a whole bunch of cash liquidity to buy the position.
On the other hand it is quite easy to get a big position by buying very small amounts very consistently. And that way all you need is left-overs from your own weekly Gin-and-Tonic budget.
But what you have to do is just forget about the fact that you are doing it at all!
Right now it's time to think about other things, and talk about other things - one of them being this complete destruction of quality everywhere.
You know, you go around and look at all the people around you, and I guarantee you the one thing you will notice if you look - all their clothes are drab and designed to 'fit in,' to not stand out - and that includes the people with dyed green or pink or mauve hair. Those people are fitting right in, to the Derrida/Foucault insane asylum place that they all come from (Harvard and Yale and Ox-Cam et cetera).
![]() |
| Beautiful. Better in a museum though of course, than around Los Angeles. |
In other words what they succeeded in doing was destroy the quality of the human person themselves.
Suddenly, when you observe there are no real human beings left around, left around you - but that maybe there might be one or two somewhere, and maybe even around you somewhere but as yet you haven't see them - you will instantly come to terms with Robert Pante's great 'How Powerful People Recognize Each Other.'
It's actually not hard, is it.
Being garish is not how. Being different is how. But only ever so slightly different that it escapes the attention of people not even looking that acutely in the first place.
It doesn't take a lot of money. But it sure can make you a lot of money.
Once two of you (or more!) get together, Holy Jesus Mary and Joseph!
![]() |
| Believe me, Jesus returned tonight. He was in the kitchen of the guy who made this. I know. I ate it. |
You know the thing is, real human beings are real, very real.
But we live on a planet now, where the whole topography of so-called 'human' society is not human at all but artificial and driven by politics built by thieves and liars and they have indeed made a slave race. And these guys all think they've gotten away with it too and have driven the real human race right off the cliff, and heck, yes so they have done too - to a very large extent.
And but what that does though is make any real topography of real human beings so much more powerful and visible but only to other real humans.
Each real human - and this means you - is 'a Mount Kailash.'
![]() |
| ...We still haven't left the Turkish hammam for the present moment. |
![]() |
| WT -. Is that Persian Blue Salt with your buddy there, Haliene? Are you s'posed to be telling people about that?? |
![]() |
| Detective of love. Looking for just one real heart-beat. |
![]() |
| Prodding, and touching, and all of that. |
'...knowledge of self.'
I am quoting Shirley MacLaine here from over 35 years ago.
And I think even she makes the point later on somewhere, and that I would re-state here too - well, but whose fault is that? It's not 'technology's' fault, or the fault of so-called 'AI.' It's our own fault - for those of us who have been caught up in the whirlpool and continue to allow it to remain that way.
![]() |
| What do we have in our bag today? The human being is like a bag, or a person with a bag. There's all kind of stuff in there... |
Yet there are some really fundamental preconditions that make for that situation ever developing at all: there are tons of people for whom the only way they can achieve a personal sense of security, or internal security, is permanent cynicism. That way they never have to risk being seen or revealed as actually foolish - for example, when they are engaged in relating to other people individually.
If they do that at all, it is furtive, hidden -, never to be revealed widely.
And they give over their own moral responsibility, so they presume, to science, or technology, or the external authority of a religious institution and to 'dogma.'
And of course by far the biggest issue being that they do not even risk themselves to their closest - or seemingly closest next human soul and almost always, equivalently, not even to themselves.
So it's all pretense.
Mounted on a public platform of 'science' or 'rational behavior' or of course simply 'practical skepticism...'
And it's absolutely brilliant, how humans carry on, because they are so convincing!
When you talk to them about what they believe, they tell you straight lies, that they know are based on falsehoods, and they swear black and blue they 'believe' it all. And on that level of necessitous social lying, they do believe it.
So this whole 'for the minute' edict about human empathy - coming from this pathetic Spielberg latest thing, really proceeds from a groundless assumption; namely that all humans and all human cultures on the planet are roughly-speaking, you know, more-or-less... ...the same.
![]() |
| Spielberg wants you to have empathy. Empathy with what, though? In the clear waters, you can see, what trouble is in there! There's Gin in there. And you can't even see it! |
In no sense at all is that true (that humans are one monolithic creature you can 'empathize with' generically or generally) within the scope of internal psychologies and intellectual mechanisms - regardless of the fact that human beings appear similar in bio-mechanical make-up, and sinusoidally as a surface moving 'object.'
They are not similar or even alike broadly, neurologically or spiritually, and I have a lot of difficulty thinking they are at all similar 'consciously' - meaning inside what they claim is their personal consciousness.
The human race is nowhere near comprehending what it means to have 'knowledge of self.'
Ask anyone to 'describe the Self.' You will get fifty thousand different answers.
In Islam - so that's already 2 billion human 'souls' - this is (the Self) 'a slave.' And it is happy to be a slave to an unseen, non-human, non-physically relatable 'Being,' that is not material; at all.
In Silicone Valley, this (the human Self) means the minion of the Almighty 'AI.'
To the Vedic Scholars this Self is entirely distinct to what Buddhists want to say. To the humanist scientists I have no clue what they are describing and I don't really care to know.
So how are you going to force an 'empathy' for things totally contradictory to whichever 'standard' position on the self you or your social-cultural/religious programming is dictating to you and that you 'claim' to 'believe' is true about yourself.
![]() |
| This is a real place. In Antalya. |
In some instances, nay frankly it's all of them except most don't admit it - they will even put a knife to your throat if you deny their perspective with any degree of intensity or seriousness. Thus we all become endlessly jocular. I know I certainly do.
Just look at the large numbers of commentaries on the internet right now 'reviewing' this Spielberg disaster: the first thing it has revealed to me, is just how absolutely lacking in actual personal material first-hand experience, thus knowledge, of ET Aliens, all of these people are exhibiting!
And yet all of them have been in the public's eye for decades talking about the subject in many cases - what did they ever really know?
Yes - so-and-so met such-and-such military guy, who said his friend Joe's first cousin worked at Area 51...
??
I said I was involved formally with the Unit under Thomas C Schelling of the US Defense Science Research Board's actual engagement with ET's.
Nobody ever contacted me from anywhere. Heck, yeah sure I have met Stan Deyo - he thinks I am a 'Men-in-Black!' LOL
Everyone (almost everyone) I knew also from the real organisation/s - are all deceased, or 'disappeared.'
You know, one of the really big problems to do with having anyone from the old days actually turn up and volunteer anything in a big way - is that politically, a lot of things have 'moved on.' The US Government is not in a position to admit things, for example, about the criminal dictator, Harry Lee, and people nowadays will simply not admit that any of it (which are, the facts!) are or can possibly, be true. Except they are true. It's intrinsic to many Cold War and post-WWII political 'things,' that none of this 'we have Alien tech' stuff, can really come out. Partly because absolutely, those who really did have actual 'engagement' and official programs involving such 'beings' totally left the government framework altogether. And for good reason. Same reasons they would have right now today for 'keeping in the background.'
Last night I was myself up in a 'UFO' - what most of you all call a 'UFO' anyway - and the pilot in there was showing me how he was able to shoot a 1 centimeter long, oblong object floating in Space. From probably about ten Space miles away.
![]() |
| I don't know. I've never seen an Alien or a UFO. Have you? |
...So it is not easy for me to 'talk to (all that many) people' about real stuff!
LOL
Oh it's real all right.
And yes I know what's going to happen to the 'IRGC.'
So what. The news cycle moves every 24 hours and it jerks around from one speculation to the next, impatient for 'key events' to be officially and publicly announced.
And everyone's got a focus on 'the problem' and who is at fault; who to blame for anything/everything.
You - I mean actual you you - will graduate from the next sucker to the 'AI' Allah, or the last sucker to the just plain medieval Allah Allah or the Byzantine Bureaucracy's 'Jove/Jehovah' the second you move from looking around for someone to blame, and looking at 'all the problems,' and talking to the next person about how cynical you are and what the problem is today...
...to how you yourself have found a solution to something, anything, that actually concerns you personally.
Look, let's be real here.
You only really care about you. I want you to care about you.
When you start caring about you, and you do stuff for yourself that gets you to where you will be really and truly internally satisfied without lying to yourself - then, regardless of that Shirley MacLaine thinks then you will 'begin to start' being beneficial to others - I am saying that at least you will exist at all. And then that becomes worthy of protecting.
And unless you reach that place, why are 'the Gods' giving a damn about 'you' anyway?
You cannot say to a God, a Divinity with All-Knowledge of the World, and of other sentient life-forms:' I am happy and thankful (IE 'to you, Oh Divinity!') - when you are lying, to yourself and thus then necessarily also to them.
You lie to a God and see what happens. I challenge you.
![]() |
| This is a human-made thing. Any good? What do you think? |
So the typical nut-job MFA and 'science graduate' must necessarily permanently feign cynicism, because they simply cannot afford to tell the truth in case they got found out 'if' there were such a thing as a real 'Divinity!' ...All of their wives and 'romantic partners' are in exactly no different of a position as the 'Divinity' of which I was just now speaking!
You know, a long time ago, there was this thing in the Medieval 'hamam' culture of Antalya (is from 'Anatolia' of course, and is a city in Turkey now) - where they used to make steam, big huge swathes of mist and steam, and primarily, color it with dyes...!
And only then afterwards, infuse it with scented oils. Or rose petals, and so on, whatever.
The point was that they believed in the Djinn (Genies), and they held that these sent little animal-like beings into the unseen space nearby to a person (unless they were right there themselves...), to disrupt or influence the decisions and the mind-state of that person.
But the Medieval Turkish hamam wizards, also thought that, well -, virtually that one frequency, could not be sustained in the presence of a conflicting or sufficiently different other frequency. It was in fact from these kinds of thoughts (mostly people like Ibn Haytham; he writes about it in those actual terms) that Newton ever got his ideas about the spectral components of visible white light - and of course proved it using his glass prism.
And so, the hamams had two processes - one where they just plain filled the place with colored mist, and some claimed they were able to 'see' strange Djinn-world 'animals' flee from that colored mist. And the other where the person perceived themselves as surrounded by a specific colored mist - and then they sensed, felt or 'suspected' if there was some dissonance, as it were, in any region in the mist. And then this dissonance after a while, left.
Put it this way - I tell you all of that, to tell you this: do stuff for yourself.