So, we posted lots of instructions, although I'll admit, much of it was couched in such vague terms that you couldn't say it was ever all that explicit - but nevertheless, some people should have 'uncovered' a few experiences of that rare and unusual kind to do with the strange reality of the world, of the Universe, or everything else sentient in it -.
Yes there were one or two, not much more than.
But nowhere near what you could say would justify the start of a new cult!
LOL
![]() |
| A small mansion in Paris. |
Thank God.
The problem - well, one of the problems - with doing stuff that is totally out of the ordinary, as in, demonstrating some material reality, some actual hard physical effect, or 'event,' is that you will very rapidly find yourself becoming a cult; we'd all be in danger here of becoming turned into that. If not by ourselves, then by outsiders - people new to the story.
And that is not a good idea for lots of reasons.
As it is, soon enough here there will be videos being made of people doing things...
I mean, like as in, for real for real with 'Aliens.'
Oh yes.
But Calvin, why don't your friends just turn up on the White House Lawn??
I myself hardly ever think about what I am about to talk about now - which is 'the meaning of (human) life,' or 'Who is God/Where is God.'
I can sort of explain that by just asking you to look up into the clear night sky (if you have one of those now where you are) - and noticing just how huge it all is!
I mean it's really huge. And there's lots of stuff in it.
There are enormous amounts of 'other' places with humanoid kinds of life there.
Suddenly reducing 'God' to simply one monoclonal antibody, as it were (lol), just relating specifically and exclusively to humans here on Earth alone, is dubious of a proposition in terms of an exercise in logic.
![]() |
| Depends how you make it, but could be quite Ambrosial. |
'God' must be a whole huge and rather complete system; integrated, self-integrated, never arguing with 'itself,' and with arms and agents spread out everywhere.
What I 'know' myself personally is not equivalent to everybody else's human experiences; neither, strictly speaking are yours. They might fall into some kind of alignment somewhere but they are not exactly the same thing from one person, to any other given person.
The quality of someone's whole life experience up to the moment the 'assessment' is being made, becomes the dependency upon which their own perspective determines what their impressions are, what their own individual personal feelings are. And yes, things can and do overlap - but individual people's lives do not actually overlap in our world here, that we can just make such broad assumptions.
You know yourself, you watch the videos on YouTube -, so many adults say one or both of their parents were 'not great' and that they have been 'wounded' by their childhoods...
But then you have someone like myself, who had an extremely privileged childhood.
My idea of a 'parental figure' is totally different to what so many other people carry around in their heads. I know that.
So on behalf of all of those 'standard normal ordinary human beings,' who deserve access to the best information and the best ways to access knowledge of the Universe - other than from the latest Science Publication - I asked 'my friends' what I would otherwise consider a fairly pointless question (for me; it's pointless for me).
I have to presage the response, though, by adding what I am sure I have talked about before somewhere - namely that the typical modern (and it's only a modern thing, because it was not always so) 'scientific' style of 'analysis' is in fact completely logically very flawed indeed.
If you split something which is dynamic and in motion, up into ever smaller parts, in order (so you presume) to be able to 'understand it' scientifically and perfectly - you will be up against the Fallacy of Infinite Division.
If you split the motion of some 'particle' or wave into ever smaller 'pieces' to analyse them - you will never in fact actually reach the target of that moving object...!
Modern thinking 'covers' this (they suppose) by using the words 'the principle of continuous motion.'
But they don't know what that means. They just say it.
And then as if by saying it, this means they understand it.
For me it's just indulging people to forever be giving them, or forever be talking about, mechanisms of action, how a thing 'works' per some small part of the whole arc - aka the 'Quanta.'
Yeah, 'Quantum Physics' is rubbish. Well, it is when it comes to actually discerning why what is going on, is even going on at all.
You see, I was assuming that by now at least a few of you had have 'gone to the White Room,' seen what was going on in there, not necessarily have understood much of it, but at least have come back with some experiences to talk about.
And then, flowing from that for sure the next question would have been, should have been - well where is this 'God' that we have all been told about, where is Jesus right now, what the heck's He doing??
![]() |
| Iso Grifo. A true Classic. Made by the man who made the first Lamborghini engines. |
...Wherever He is that He is. (Okay that was a joke... Get it; some will easily get it of course).
Right now today, there is this huge big argument within the rank-and-file of the so-called 'Roman Catholic Church.' It revolves around the contention that maybe, the Seat of the Pope in the Vatican City is in fact 'vacant' (Sedevacantism), or worse that the current 'Pope' is not a Pope at all, and is not just an Apostate but an outright Diabolical Agent and a Heretic.
I don't think many even 'great Church scholars' link that passage in all of the synoptic Gospels where Jesus and his men were walking through a wheat field on the Sabbath, and the Pharisees accused Him of breaking the Sabbath.
But the thing is this - He was walking through a wheat field.
Not 'it was on the Sabbath.' So what it was on the Sabbath.
Demeter is Mistress of the Wheat.
The 'Bread' that people would really care about, is not just any kind of bread with modern 'emulsifier' and 'folic acid' added - but some kind of totally supernatural bread that literally gave life and made people live forever.
That is what goes on with the so-called 'Eucharist.'
But then that would make it no different to the Ambrosia of Heaven, that the Gods all ate and loved to eat. My own ancestor Tantalus took some Ambrosia and that was fine, but then he tried to distribute some of it to the ordinary humans around the place, feeling compassion for them. And apparently, most or all of the other Gods really got mad with him!
I'm not convinced that is actually the whole story, but it is the one given to people today.
Ambrosia is very easy to make, to acquire. And it comes from here on the Earth, not high up anywhere else - for example, up in Space, or in 'Heaven' whatever. It is gathered from here, and taken up to there.
So we'll talk about that over the coming few 'episodes' and I personally do not have a lot of fears for the wrath of the Gods - on account I am not going against any of them in this.
After all, it was not me who altered the 'Eucharist' thing that for centuries upon centuries the Catholics were perfectly content doing, unaltered, in the firm belief it held some sort of mystical, power; even to give people 'life after death.'
Me personally I would like more a guarantee of life now and more life and then more life and so on.
As for money and life, well I will just draw your attention to the massive fires in Bordeaux France, and just ask - how much all that wine and cognac you were stockpiling prior to '2026 vintage wines' might be worth now, d'you think...
You know, in context of 'a silver coin in the mouth of a fish.'
But don't worry, if you missed that - there's plenty more of these 'opportunities' ahead.
So anyway. 'Ambrosia.'
At least the Orthodox churches still have the large plates of wheat ears, which the people nibble on during their carry-ons.
Ambrosia is not made from wheat - that is, you could have wheat in it, but it is not that.
You all know, because we already briefly went through the thing with Homer's Cave of the Nymphs, so for sure there is honey involved.
And there is fruit.
Let me just stop here though and just say this - for pretty much all of you, you will not suddenly 'arrive in that Heaven' and there is Jesus or Muhammad or Allah or anyone.
![]() |
| It's all true. All of these 'stories' are true. |
But after you eat the Ambrosia you will be able to go to really wild (I shouldn't say it that way; it's not 'wild' in that sense!) houses, places to live - 'mansions.' Which is how the Bible describes it. And there's other people there but not many.
Really not a lot at all.
And given how long the human race has been around here, for goodness sake's - you would think that a few, quite a few people would be able to go up there, be there (a lot won't come back down here, and who blames them!); there's not that many at all.
[Would Jules Verne have approved of this piece of music which pays homage to his story? Dunno. Haven't asked him]:






.jpg)

















