I just got a letter in the mail from one of y'all here - and boy, was it a thrill just to handle it, turn it over in my hands, look at it...
For a start it was a letter with some intent, in the sense of the ways people in maybe, the Renaissance, wrote messages to people quite some distance away. Hey, it's in any case getting like that 'post-men' are more or less 'pony-express' people these days anyway!!
LOL
![]() |
| Trying to avoid dark themes. |
It's all so adventurous.
...Meanwhile, initially I was going to mess around with a few things we know from insiders about Epstein, to do with what 'Pizza' and 'Grape Soda' really mean. You must realize very well that the pop rumors flying around everywhere are not necessarily exactly the whole truth, despite that they are worrisome enough.
And then, when I read through the comments on the last post here, I thought nah, that's more important.
I do think Chase Hughes has a lot of good information about how the brain functions in practice, especially when it comes to stress and patterns and 'predictability.'
He says - and I agree with him - that the reason the Borg 'establishment' wants to make everything unpredictable (you will recall how 'change' and 'change management' were big mantras over the last few decades) for people, is to deliberately create unstable patterns and thus 'human sensitivity' (emotional) compacted time-frames. They do it in order to increase the stress levels of people so that no one has the time and the brain space to think - only to react.
The situational conditions may not be predictable, but the human reactions will be.
'OCD' is a way that humans provide themselves a stress reduction strategy because they try to make a recurring pattern take shape - and that gives the nervous system and the body, predictability. Predictability makes people feel safe.
The trouble of course, is when outside forces make people adopt bad patterns - and that is the same thing in the end, as 'Stockholm Syndrome.'
You feel safe, but you are not safe.
![]() |
| Unfortunately today we have a very dark theme. |
Rather than preempt what is the substance of these production notes and even some of the film shooting script itself, I might just leave it there at suggesting we all watch a ton of Chase Hughes and absorb those understandings for now - and move across to 'Pizza' and 'Grape Soda.'
You have to remember, that in real history the 'Illuminati' (the originating Bavarian Illuminati) existed only for a very short time. It began formally in 1776, but was dissolved (also formally) by 1779; by 1780, there were so many 'split off' and independent variants, that the most prominent European one, when it tried to bring in a 'new' Constitution for the 'Secret Order' from Freemasons in London, it was 'seen through' and it's members too, disbanded.
The myth narrative is that the Illuminati continued on though, but that is not a fact.
The whole objective of the Illuminati at its inception, was to be a secret group that would insert itself into the European aristocracies broadly, and especially into the Roman Catholic Church in particular, in order to subvert the power of that group.
The Bavarian Illuminati in fact was born out of a German Jesuitical (Catholic) University at Ingolstadt, completely rooted already in esoteric Catholic rituals and occult systems - but which became disgruntled when their University 'commission' was removed by one of the Popes, very likely because such had already intuited (or learned through their own covert agents) the mindset of the people involved (this, prior to the actual institution of the 'Illuminati' themselves).
![]() |
| 'Secular' technology. Religious adherents, though. |
The very wealthy Bavarian intellectuals had complete control though, of the funding for the University and so proceeded without sanction (meaning without any authority to teach from source texts largely coming from Vatican - aka 'Roman Imperial' libraries) or 'religious approval' of the Vatican.
This is precisely the same thing that occurred with Oxford and Cambridge, who, despite their pretensions of some kind of 'Christian' ethical basis (they call various 'schools' after Christian historical identities) and even pseudo-religious foundation (there isn't any) - are completely atheistic; were then, are now.
'Pizza' is a substitution term for the 'Holy Eucharist' in the Roman Rite, as is 'Grape Soda' for the 'sacred wine' (aka 'Blood of Jesus...').
And, they - the modern iteration of this Illuminati Cult - have 'priests' (High Priests, as they call them internally), who wear all-white attire during their cult ceremonies, and all-black or mostly black, when they are in 'profane' gatherings (means 'just for the dumb public').
Ellen DeGeneres is one of those 'High Priests.' So is Tom Hanks.
It is very likely that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of the Illuminati, but that he had a lot of access to them and knew the people involved and all about them because he was part of a parallel intelligence organisation monitoring the base for all of these cults - which base is every single academic campus on the planet now.
![]() |
| He was a Professor, before he was a President. That's an upside-down Cross. Yes. Is. |
His - Epstein's - use of the 'coded' terms mentioned here, was sarcastic, and essentially between himself and other people in business and industry, media, marketing, and politics, entirely not inside of the 'Illuminati' organisation.
Who is inside of the Illuminati though, are also people Jeffrey Epstein had at his house in New York often - people such as Sir John Sawers, the then head of MI6.
Of course none of this, what I just said here, is going to fly with anyone who reads the pop media and all of the online/internet chat places and pod-casters and so on. They want to believe that 1. Jeffrey Epstein was the Illuminati, 2. He was a Jewish MOSSAD agent and operative, and 3. He ate babies and so did everyone who knew him; and they drink blood.
Hey... The problem with that is all Roman Catholics believe they 100% for sure do eat one particular baby - IE 'Baby Jesus;' and they also 'drink His Blood.'
This cult, the Illuminati, as it stands today, is an anti-religious, anti-Christian specifically, Freemasonic, Devil-Worship cult that exists to control you. And to make money out of you.
It has nothing though to do with actually thinking about being 'Anti-Christian/Anti-Jesus' or anything like that in 'religious/deistic' terms because - and you yourself can tell this logically - it has no concerns that 'God' or 'Jesus' or anything, really, like that, exists.
It's only 'Anti-Christian' because it was anti-the European Houses which dominated money and power over the last thousand years or so; and to which extent it is also dedicated against the Rothschild's! ...For exactly the same reasons.
![]() |
| Everything speaks. |
It doesn't work for the Rothschild's and it was never begun nor instituted at any stage by the Rothschild's, any of them.
The Rothschild's are not the Illuminati, and the Illuminati, is not the Rothschild's; those are two different things. Some parts of 'the Rothschild's' do bad things some times. And it is impossible to distinguish one branch of 'the Rothschild's' from all of English Freemasonry. But again, 'the Illuminati' is a different animal.
The conflating of this infamous 'masked party' at one of the Rothschild's castles near Paris, in 1972, with the modern Illuminati, was a very convenient marketing and branding tool subsequently to implicate them - because of the iconic symbolism of the masks and the celebrity people wearing masks, and the 'night scenes' and the 'darkness' of the whole adventure.
But does anyone really and actually kill babies (or adults too) and eat them, as in are there actual cannibals active in either the Rothschild's or the Illuminati?
Well, none of the Rothschild's owns or runs big freezers where there are cadavers kept...
But, all of modern academia does.
And you will not accept that because you went to those places, and/or you send/sent your kids to them. And God forbid it is actually, you, who are involved - or at least implicated through blind and ignorant assent...
Police don't just get to go on University Campuses to 'investigate' either, you know (maybe you didn't know).
Oh yeah it's real all right.
![]() |
| It is not materialism that is the problem. |
Trevor Moore, the guy who sang about 'the hunting down of failed young stars on islands or through remote land by the rich for sport and cannibalism' - who died after falling from the top of some stairs, gee, I dunno, but -.
Epstein is long dead and gone (or in Tel Aviv which means he is gone!). So why do you think the MSM is so intent on still shoving this narrative down everyone's throats endlessly, and all of the crooks in Congress and the Senate too?
'Look over there, look over there. Not here. Over there.'
My cousin who reads this, is now going to ask me: 'What does Satan look like? What does Lucifer look like? Does he look like this Baphomet thing-y?'
I am old enough, and so are you, to know who the Reverend Jesse Jackson was, and he was not anything to do with anything those all-black clad people up on that big public stage, all talked about...
In fact, in recent years, Jesse Jackson was never on any big public stage - but they all were.
You don't need to look for what 'a' Satan looks like. You need to be able to recognize the mindset -, and the first sign is, lying.
And by the way, Chase never mentioned this, but CIA 'people experts' all know that another sign of someone lying and who hates you when they are pretending to like you or even to love you, is when they push their tongue against their front teeth when they speak and seem to 'th' sounds and half-lisp, like the way a lot of real Southern people's accents sound when they are authentic, although that is not the same sound nor is it the same thing as those who are faking that and who are tongue spitting inside their mouth; that's because the real Southerners had French culture and custom and language influences.
...I do my level best to steer away from dark themes - but it ain't easy in these times.
























