MacLaine Details 'The Gate'

Okay so Shirley MacLaine does get right into detailing what she exactly does. It's in pages, from 113 - 115.

I've stopped there today because it was quite a nice surprise, basically to observe that - well, definitely from my point-of-view - she really knows what she is talking about!

Her book is total canon as far as I'm concerned. It out-flies all of these big major world religion texts like the Quran and so on, by as far as from here to the immediate next Galaxy at least.

Silk hot air balloon 
models, in a restaurant
in Firenze.
The Renaissance
people developed air
travel, from basic
ideas they got from China.
They never 'flew to the
moon.' But they thought 
about it.
Their 'thinking' though
was not silly or only
'imagination.'

None of these other things, apart from a very very few -, go even anywhere near to giving out actually clear, simply-worded, detailed explanations either of the internal human psychological mechanisms and actual sources of dynamic human intelligent energy - or any authentic understanding of the material nature of 'soul.' They're all obtuse and when you examine them closely with facts and with the benefit of modern scientific knowledge, they turn into very obvious deceits; if highly contrived, very clever, as well as long and turgid of course.

I haven't read, this time around, any further just yet, but I imagine, she is going to get into just where it all leads you...

And that's just the logical next place following her actually detailing the techniques of the mind that are necessary in order to 'go somewhere.'

Meaning, to go beyond the animal-brain and reflexive responses that are simply immature  and animalistic.

Now here is something hugely practical and highly valuable, if a bit (nay, often it is a lot and then it can become depressing) provoking of the deep cynic in a person -, when it comes to using the processes that she is discussing (and that I have been discussing here for some time):

It will become so so easy to look at another person when they are simply even just standing, sometimes, but definitely when they are talking, and 'see right through them;' to who they are inside, what bits and pieces are in there, and what is missing.

A great example of this is this recent addition to the American political stage - Abdul El-Sayed.

You will see him very often, look away and slightly up to your left on screen (which might be his right in real life unless the image was reversed in the camera/digital vision), when he is constructing some answer to a question about moral and ethical context and justification for something, whatever thing he was just being asked to comment about.

All of these people, are incomplete beings - they do not have the function which takes their own personal consciousness including a self-consciousness 'up above to see down far ahead and back into the past and report to the Ego, facts, reality and complete objective truth.'

That same lineage 
produced this.

Instead, what they are doing is resorting to a manufactured internal image of 'good and bad' a moral template if you will, and the ethics of that -, from within the mind-created imaginary 'scenery.' And then, however, all of these people, 'join mental hands,' as it were, with all others who share that imagery, despite that it is a made-up one, entirely imaginary.

But it is like a realistic painting, full of elements and color and extreme detail - and this makes it seem real or all the more real, you could say.

The problem is that almost none of it is intrinsically rooted to outside hard material realities...

You see, you can't play around with hard external material reality and pretend those things are different to how they are: jump off a very tall building with no harness and you will fall, and then you will die.

That is a 'hard outside material reality.'

Muhammad, however - the Prophet - flew to the moon...

Well just how did he do that, though?

Shirley MacLaine is not going to tell you she ever did that by 'imagining' it, or thinking it, and then, somehow, actually, she physically just left the ground and 'flew to the moon.' For example.

Even the Apostle Paul never says that kind of thing - even he says 'I don't know whether in the body or in the spirit' (that 'I did such-and-such;' like fly away somewhere). He was convinced though, that 'it' did happen, or something happened that left him with particular knowledge, based on facts. 

And so the process he does not know - and he says he doesn't know.

Juliet Prowse. She was also with 
Shirley MacLaine in Can-Can, and had 
a cameo role in that.
She's a British Indian, part-South African 
born in Mumbai.

The point is, it would helpful to any person using their brain, to hear the methods, and in our present time - as I have attempted to outline to those of you who have asked - scientific bases for how any of these things can even be regarded as 'real;' whether only psychologically real, or materially, real.

MacLaine uses the word they had back then in the Eighties - 'visualize.' 

I don't use that word, on account that the militantly stupid and ignorant but still insistent that no such things can exist, always steer the meaning of that word to 'back to the imaginary;' that is, what is only happening in the imagination.

But when they do that, they are neither understanding what the word imagination is, and what things the imagination can provide (create, for instance, be creative), nor what the process of thinking, by contrast, entails and is.

Shirley MacLaine is going to tell you, thinking, when it is properly done, is a process of electro-chemistry, micro-electricity (electronics), and energetic dynamics and a hard material physical, if dynamic, reality. That is, in this specific context, of how she is talking about doing it, using it, the brain, and mind - it is not 'imaginary' at all!

...Not an imaginary thing. 'Images' are in any case, only a very small part of what is going on here.

Again, unless one is regularly doing these sorts of things, those things MacLaine talks about and details in her book -, it is not necessarily easy to just 'accept' that they are all true things and real things.

But, taking that example of El-Sayed, and he is only one of a swathe of modern people that do it - you can literally see him, via his eye movements and his face, how it is constantly frowning on the one hand as if to say - 'trust me I am a serious person' - but really, he is frowning because he is actually thinking about matching words, what he is going to say, with the images constructed in his head!

British India, 
because this is the Raffles, 
Jaipur.

And that is different to when, say a Shirley MacLaine says 'I saw' this and this. Because she does not mean 'she made up' or that she 'imagined' or that she invented, but that she literally has a faculty of seeing, and has true inner vision, but not any 'metaphysical' thing: she actually can literally see. ...With her eyelids closed.

And then the reality of it is that what she sees adds up to factual things, objective, hard material things with hard material consequences.

Imaginary things regularly fail to add up when it comes to our waking hard material physical reality.

The process is about energy, real actual organised, internal human sensory and sensory field energy - and because it is really driven by real actual energy, there are always necessary 'output' events -; effects, consequences, results.

It's Physics, not Metaphysics.

Muhammad never flew or went to the moon. 

Shirley MacLaine has done and can do.

Because the human micro-electric circuitry is highly-composed, highly-organised, structured, integrated - it is a thing, a single thing made up of lots of parts. That, is the 'individual human conscious being.' The human material body and all of its bio-chemical components and systems, are only there to provide more or less raw sense input data ultimately into the mind.

I shouldn't really do this, 
because I know some people 
go out and buy stuff like this!
This is not that expensive though.

The simple material body then, is not 'you.' It is the sense data provider. And that is, all it is.

Whereas Abdul El-Sayed literally has no concept, certainly no experience of, an-other 'body' or energetic organised integrated structure, he has got to resort to a self-misled notion about reality which is merely just a set of templates, memories in his material brain cells animated by the bio-chemistry while that is still happening - to refer to his 'template' of 'reality' - by contrast a complete and advanced-consciousness person, can always and continuously refer to immediate direct energy signals, coming to them faster than the Speed of Light, which are harmonically vibrating (or not as the case may be; they could be generating dissonance) with their own personal integrated energy field structure ex-the material body.

Shirley MacLaine - the real one, the one 'inside' if you will - cannot die. Muhammad already has died. The problem with 'Muhammad' is that there is a clear dissonance in his ethical narrative: nobody needs to repeat 'programs' to develop muscle-memory for enslavement and autonomic slavery. The truth and the reality is the complete opposite of that! 'Seeing' Truth is seeing God. Talking about God as if you know but know one else does - is deception; often deliberate deception enforced through guilt and demands of honor and faithfulness and unthinking blind loyalty. That's the essence of spiritual DISSONANCE. In fact it's the ultimate dissonance for and in the human soul.

Anybody who really has some 'touch' with their own healthy inner being, so long as it is indeed advanced, will feel the difference between harmonies, and dissonances coming from ideas.

There is a really strong dissonance often, with what political people say and do, and your own inner integrated structural field. There is a really strong dissonance, between words coming off a page, and your own inner common sense!

The justifications that are always thrown at the unsuspecting, the totally innocent in the matter, by the extremely malicious and underhanded, every politician and tyrant on the planet that ever walked - are always along the lines of 'believe me/trust me' -  you are nothing, I am everything; God spoke to me... And, 'you are disloyal!' ...Don't you feel guilty?

LOL

The fact is, a thing either is, or it just plain isn't.

There isn't any 'untouchable text' or special words that make up for the difference. If Shirley MacLaine's view is correct, you will be able to get the Orbs to turn up (at minimum!) - and more.

Ah, but doesn't the Book say not to put The Lord Thy God to the Test?

Well who made this character 'God' though?

The Christian Bible (for one good example) certainly does not say not to put Him to the Test.

In fact it says, 'Go on then, if you simply have to stick your fingers into this Flesh and feel the wounds and the blood, well go on, then.'

At least you can't go buy that
though.
It's way too expensive.

And that guy did and it was all there as specified.

(And that's the point - stuff needs to be real. It can't be this forever fairy tale narrative stories and words all the time with no hard manifested reality).

Yes it must have been a bit of a shock, no doubt.

People, human beings, are all, mostly all, just so backward...

We have spent a couple of years now in here, talking about the harmonies.

What I like about how MacLaine writes in her book - and I think it is totally her doing the actual writing, not some 'after-market editor aka ghostwriter' - is that she is succinct, practical, completely pragmatic. She flawlessly went from 'seven colored chakras' to 'body language' and, thirty-five years ago, pre-empted me on what I am now saying about Abdul El-Sayed and how he talks. She goes on to explain why a fit body sustains that shape on account of the 'inner energy situation' primarily, and well before anyone goes to the gym to work out. 

It's not just the brain's 'mind-set' that is there, that has to be in place; there is the necessary balance in the subtle energetic 'body.'

You guys really need to work hard on sticking your fingers deep into the flesh. Getting those Orbs to appear for you.

You can do it. 100% you can do it.

Frightening people by telling them 'Oh you are going against God' is first of all a lie, second of all it is an outrageous lie, and third of all it is deliberately designed to hold them back from reaching out... ...their hands to the Tree of Life, and eat of its Fruit, and so, Live Forever.

The Tree of Life is the Harmonies. The Fruit are the Melodies.

Here is the real story: But if you eat of the Fruit of the Template that you yourselves made up, in the Garden of your own Mortal and Deficient Minds, in the Tree of your own Imaginations and those of the miscreants who lied to you, and pretend those things are 'Good and Evil' instead of to really ascend Above and see the Reality - you will surely die in that very day!

And that's the Fact.

Go on. Keep risking that I am wrong. See where you end up.

Put your hand out, and take the Real Fruit.

'...And then Satan took him to a high place and said Behold, all of these Earthly Kingdoms I will give to you, if you but bow down to me and become enslaved to me, and worship me.' And people always ask where in the Bible did Jesus say 'I am God, Worship me.' He didn't. 

[This is by Yasin Guven - 'All About Melodies']:

First, You Locate The Gate

I think it's often... no, virtually always, totally lost from the public's mind, that certain ancient texts talk about now effects; and not, as many people think, 'later' stuff - as in, at the End of the World, come so-called 'Judgement Day,' et cetera.

In the Book of Mark, Jesus turns up where the whole remaining eleven (now it's only 11! Jason Arday has gone killed himself...) are having dinner - meat, as I recall it says - and He upbraids them for their disbelief at those others (who evidently were not the main direct male followers either) who said they had seen Him alive and physical and quite well. I mean fair enough though, right? This was a huge claim originally being made - 'Yes, I will die, and then, I will turn back up alive for real.'

Prolly just some Turin
restaurant.

The dying part, evidently, all of them could readily come to terms with!

After all, there was a lot of dying going on - and no question, the Romans could do it, that is, kill anyone they pleased. Same as, pretty much, the IRGC are doing now today in Iran to their own people (well, not 'their own people' of course because 'their own people' are only the Arabs albeit many have been there since very ancient times, and even then, only the Muslim Arabs).

We make a very big mistake, when we fail to understand how any of these 'manuscript cultures' of the past actually worked.

It was - extremely expensive making manuscripts! 

The actual oldest - for example - 'book' written in Hebrew was found inside one of the caves that the Taliban blew up in Afghanistan, and it was a book of a few short prayers, and some poems, dating from 'only' 1200 years ago. Long long long after any fairy tale notion of 'the Bible' ever being composed in Hebrew...

Although this book was clearly of a religious and worship nature, there was literally nothing in it that bore any resemblance to what is supposedly the Old Testament today.

The Septuagint, was commissioned by a massively wealthy Egyptian Emperor and King, Ptolemy II of Alexandria.

A single sheet of music manuscript paper, on which Beethoven would have written out his music - would be out of a folio worth today's price of a government bond in the nominal thousands of face value 'dollars.'

So - not cheap, any of this.

Nah, is actually
in Firenze, Florence.
Not Turin.

The Arabs that eventually conquered Syria and all the way up to Tashkent, Uzbekistan, where some of the most exquisite Arabic art of the conquest period, may be seen today - had inherited the entire external armed might of the by then defunct Sassanian Empire.

And so they were not broke, and they also inherited the whole entire 'manuscript culture' social infrastructure left over by the Sassanian culture. Ink, paper, craft manufacturing, skilled craftsmen, implements, leather covering technology -.

But then along with that, they also inherited the knowledge base.

All of these groups though, the Ptolemaic Egyptians, the Romans, the Sassanians, certainly the Byzantines, all of them had the core idea that what was written down in these expensive commitments to ink and paper, both of memory and of cultural belief - was the basis of formal Law to be spread throughout the citizenry and the slave classes; down to even how merchants from foreign lands would be treated.

And so, to enforce in the credulous and uneducated minds of the ordinary people, how important those words written down were, they were told the words were backed by some Divine Authority.

Even today, literally on the Arms and Flags of the Windsor usurpers and puppets of the City of London Freemasons, it says 'God and King.'

Well but how 'God?' How do they know God has any part of it? When did actual 'God' arrive and place His or Their actual imprimatur on anything? ...In England.

Why not 'Arthur, King of the Britons and his Divine Dragon Cambion Merlin...'

See, very hard
to have 'faith'
nowadays when we
have the super-wealthy
and their 'sky-decks.'

Would make more logical sense in the 'British' story and to an extent they preserve that through the symbol of 'George and the Dragon.'

But then they just as quickly say, that, is mythology, if folkloric; and local.

...Look, what I'm trying to say is preserved inside some of these ancient texts and stories, which are really no more than fairy tales on the whole except they are forced onto the common ignorant public as 'God-sent,' are a small few really correct ideas that came from somewhere real, and were incorporated holistically into the bigger picture, as it were.

Mostly, these 'true things' (they are true, I'm just placing the phrase in inverted commas to highlight and separate them) come via the etymology, via the words themselves and their ineluctable root meanings.

If we go back to the example of Mark there, this God 'Jesus' (not His real name back then, but close enough and quite functional today for us all the same) appears after His Death, to a tiny handful of quite unsuspecting people in the broad run of the narrative - that is, those people are not handled inside the texts as anything absolutely extra-special. 

Maybe Mary Magdalene, understandably Mary the Mother; that certainly makes some sense...

But there were others, not even named!

Shows how special they were to the writers... Not.

But then leave all that aside,  what you actually get that is clearly underscored - how that Jesus tells the closest followers that they have been idiots, more or less. (He didn't say that, I'm implying it). ...And then, He makes a really huge statement, and this is the one that goes missing from the mindset, generally, of all those people following this religion:

He says, here are the signs that shall follow those people who do what I have told them - 'they shall touch the sick, and these shall recover.'

What?!

Yes. Very difficult to 
force yourself to 
hold a 'faith' in something
unseen, and not yet
delivered.

Uh-oh. There goes the doctoring racket.

Except not though of course, because - go back to the few and the small and the virtually unknown and the not noticed.

...It's only a very few that can 'do it.' The rest have to resort to doctors.

So let's now jump all the way forward to that thieving and heavily plagiarizing manuscript culture of Jason Arday, sorry, 'the Arabs' and see if there is anything in there that nevertheless and despite that the whole thing is more or less complete made-up nonsense designed to bulwark the moral authority of various warlords and post-Empire scoundrels (what they were, too!) by stealing from the past and imposing all of that moral over-structure onto the dumb unwashed masses - let's see if there is anything that is left in there, if not intact, yet actually having real meaning and practical functioning relevance.

Well...

See, this word 'Jannah' that today's Muslims all think means 'Heaven.' Well it doesn't.

It means the Unseen, the Invisible, the Hidden. None of these people even ever went there to see it - what was in there. So-called 'Muhammad' claims to have and it (what he says Heaven is like) is just a repetition of bits and pieces of Apocryphal books of 'Enoch' around at the time. You'd think considering he is the outstanding Prophet of All-Prophets, that he could do better than just copy other people's stories word-for-word and pretend they are his own account in his own words of what he saw... And tell us what he himself saw. Except of course he didn't see anything. Because he never went to 'Heaven.'

I have faith, that the 
human mind, is able to 
find a doorway,
into anywhere and
anything.

That's if 'he' even existed at all. We have a record of some real guy 'Kuthum al Ameena' who was later on conflated into this 'Muhammad' character by a ruler called Mu'awiya commissioning his own writers to do this 'manuscript' thing.

Anyway, not the point.

There is a whole saga today's Muslims have interpolated from the wording about what they are calling 'Heaven,' in which they have this phrase 'Jannat ul Firdaus' - supposedly, a tree, which grows in Heaven.

But they have jumped to a linguistic conclusion from those two main word components of the phrase: 'Jannah' means Hidden/Unseen/Secret, and 'Firdaus' does not mean a tree, but rather, it is an enclosed garden in which certainly there could be trees.

And then, this new 'manuscript culture' has shoved two strands of more ancient folkloric narratives - the one being that Jesus is the Living Vine, who has both gone into the Underground (the Underworld, really) which thing is mentioned in the Gospels where it is explicitly stated, but then, the vague un-deciphered words 'Saba Lamah Chthon.' Which is actually Ancient Greek and means that the God is opening (e-ftha, or simply 'i') a gateway (i-Lamah - the Lamassu are Guardians of the Gates) and placing His roots into Chthone, the Underworld.

...And like the actual fairy tale of Jack and the Magical Beanstalk (none of these things are 'fairy tales;' they are true things, but psychological or metaphysical), the God-Vine grows all the way to the 'clouds' aka into Heaven.

'Jannah' is from the same root word from which 'the Jann' (people) comes - or, you will more recognize, a single Djinn (genie). 

All of these things are from an Unseen World.

They cannot be seen by mortal eyes.

Heaven - a place you can get into and you can see - is an Enclosure, enclosed entirely from the mistakes and problems of the human mortal world. And there is a way in, an entrance, which is a gate the same as you might see somewhere on the outside along the perimeter of a thick, manicured and high bush wall of some rich person's maze garden in the French Riviera. Something say like the Rothschild's Villa Ephrussi in France.

Firenze Fashion.

Well but Heaven is not in the Rothschild's mansions. And the Gate of Heaven is not along any of their outside walls.

But I will go back to Mark.

'The signs that will follow all those...'

Now. The signs are there now. It does not say 'that will follow them later at some point at the End of the World' and so on.

But then also clearly, they are not in the hands of just everyone.

Naturally, even the most ardent of 'followers' will doubt it though. They did before. And Jesus 'upbraided them for their lack of faith and their doubts.'

Yes we do have a great amount of 'modern science' today.

Of course it's also much easier to find a doctor than it is to find the Gateway to the Enclosure of Heaven. 

Psychic Force Multipliers

You will have noticed how that over recent years, perhaps going back even some decades, there is a certain 'frisson' that has left the scene generally.

If there were any fun and excitement left in the markets, Oliver Stone would have spun off another couple of 'Wall Streets.' But he won't be able to do that - there isn't any such thing as 'Wall Street' anymore; at least not anything that bears even the slightest resemblance to all of that.

Yes, symbols.
But the semiotics of what, 
though?

But we already 'know all the problems.' There's nothing but problems everywhere.

Basically, the sky is falling down.

I know I won't be able to deliver too much of the solution in just this piece, but we can make a decent enough start.

It's important to understand, to begin with, that across society as a whole, psychically forces become multiplied when large swathes of the population all get driven along together, by some particular interest, some attractive proposition, some prospect  - of gain.

The standard thing throughout history, is that a process of 'Chinese Whispers' happens. Someone hears something significant, possibly quite valid, but then when they pass it on, lots of trouble-makers and just plain, poor listeners, enter the affair -. 'bad hearers' as it were, carry the story on, and it all becomes a jumbled up mess in the end.

Symbols and iconography and ritualistic practices take shape and develop very early on - in the broader society - and these become part of this phenomenon of 'psychic force multiplying.'

People feel, a certain way, inside. They gravitate to the symbols, not the actual ideas. 

And the whole process drives an emotional tie to the 'thing;' whatever it is.

Look, to bring it all down-to-earth - the semiotics of Wall Street included braces worn with hand-stitched shirts with monograms...

But then, it is not true to say the symbols are completely disconnected, to the core concepts. They may have been very connected. And they would have been at least somewhat connected.

The taste, is not yet
all lost...

When a society loses those connections, however, to what immediately previously they broadly-speaking held to be important - then the whole place goes 'flat.' The meaning goes from social motivations as they had been.

'The thrill is gone.' A song title from the legendary B.B. King.

And the problem with that is, the big institutions - the banks, the political parties, all of it even scientists and academics - can no longer trade on what they had previously assumed were the guaranteed needs, wants, and desires, of a community.

But students of David Ogilvy will recognize right away, the more significant aspect of it all, beyond that you can no longer assume and take for granted what you previously did, when it came to selling something...

And that is that the feeling, the emotional need, has departed.

If you yourself get sucked into that sense of draining away the life spirits - you will literally end up feeling drained!

For indeed you will be psychically drained.

Energy moves. It goes down through the paths of least resistance, down to the pools of containment. And it is from those, that upward pressures can flow through small diameter nozzles -.

What instigates the high energy feelings, the psychic forces that drive motivation - is, not cyclical novelty, but elliptical novelty.

Every Season has a distinct 'spirit.'

Montmartre Winter, 
will never be like this
again.
And Winter is coming, 
though not the one people
expect.

Down here right now it is the opposite of what it is for most of you - it is Springtime now, and the 'mass formation' of the blooms is because of an intrinsic natural energy. You can definitely pick up a psychic force from it.

'Force' is, in engineering, Mass times Motion.

Right now, in human society right across the planet, people think it will require a huge (as in, a large mass of) force, to move the people, or any specific individual come to that.

Whereas it is a laser cutting tool that is required.

And for that you just need to focus the output effects of a small mass, imposing its gravity, up a very thin tube.

The greatest Empires in history, on the planet, began more often than not, from out of the pages of some book.

I think I am one of the only people in the history of the human race who say that Cicero was a thief and a plagiarist.

Even so, you could do a lot worse than to acquire a copy of 'Catilinarian Orations' and tuck it under your arm and head off to your local Starbucks (or better), and study every word that is contained within.

...Placing the stress on the word 'contained' there.

For the pool contains the water.

And you place but the small tube beneath the mass of liquid, and from thence it flows up the tiny pipe - to the outside world beyond.

[This thing is another that doesn't really make too many moves until at least 2:10 in. But nevertheless, listening with good headphones right from the start, teaches one to have patience, when waiting on magic]:

Show, Don't Say

The saying is 'show, don't tell.' And it is applied to the subject of writing as you know.

Basically, the idea is that you don't simply tell in words that some main character feels a certain way -, but you show it through the range of acts and actions, maybe also some surrounding symbols which hint at various aspects and nuances, and narrative effects that make ready sense to people, and sometimes even that are outside of their usual experience too, but which their sensibilities may grasp through intimation and a resonance of their own feelings.

Only very rich people, 
can afford something like this.

But right here in this piece and right now, we are not trying to practice creative writing (although this is going to form a key part of the subject being discussed), but outline ideas that will have some practical value and even some potential deep as well as current 'social/economic environment' meaning to all of you who come here regularly -.

And so what I also mean is that perhaps it is not a good idea to simply say - either in here or to people generally in your own daily lives - what it is you yourself can adduce from reading this here. And you will or ought to be able to understand what is being said, because you have already become familiar with a lot of the ideas that are regularly talked about in here - but that will probably not be all that easily grasped by any outsider, that is, someone who has not had that exposure already or necessary background as to what is going on.

We are living in a day and age, in which the economic concept of 'scaling up' has taken such hold of people's minds -, especially governments' thinking and planning too throughout the world, that in particular governments, because they have enabled this process of 'infinite debt creation' through the putative 'money supply' (which is actually not money but currency specifically) - the exclusive means to (seemingly) the 'making of money' (meaning 'profits') is to artificially inflate costs and prices of all economic targets (shares, real estate, factors of production) thereby blocking out, 'crowding-out' as some people call it, independent individual agents and leaving only the cartel banks, governments themselves, and their backed 'funds' to have access.

This is the interior of the
Mansory Carbonado X 
Damask Limited Edition.
Feel, the Alcantara...

All of these big, or 'high-end' consumer luxury product manufacturers - think Ferrari, Hermes, Richemont (founded by a South African businessman Johann Rupert in 1988) in all of its guises, also Kering and LVMH, all of that sort of thing -, sell only to money 'leaking out' from the scale effect of infinite money printing. Consequently they themselves don't really make true sales, but are servicing criminal fraud at a large scale but they don't look at it that way, of course.

What I mean by saying they don't make true sales, is that they don't genuinely have rare or scarce items by natural exclusivity of design, manufacture, growth or creation of the actual items they have on offer - but they fabricate an artificial scarcity through themselves having privileged access to this 'infinite fiat' and so they have huge plants and expensive equipment none of which represents true rarity or craft luxury.

Their products are not really unique.

Instead they have high-end 'market placement' through 'product positioning' by design - literally of the structural fraud that they themselves participate in, of the infinite money printing scam against the ordinary citizen taxpayer, to the so-called 'elite' few.

But these people are not smart.

Le Procope in Paris. 
Voltaire, I believe,
went there a lot, and 
wrote there too.

They are organized and they are criminal-minded (even though they will never admit it publicly), and that is all they are.

And then, the hugest gap in their own mindset, the absolute complete flaw in their whole personae - is that they are all greedy and envious people inside.

So they crawl after genuine authentic rarity, exclusivity, true organic uniqueness and worth.

...Sometimes it is better to just let things slowly unfold, and then, when things 'are there,' have appeared, as it were, have already actually become existential realities - it is all too late for the idiots to try and cram their fake money schemes into the spokes of the turning wheels.

My friends, we are living in a true Dark Ages. 

Of this there can be no doubt.

Many, some say most if not indeed all, students in today's Harvard Literature classes - are illiterate. And they will stay that way. I noticed one of the online reviewers (I think 'Liza Libes?') of modern literature, just this week howling about how pathetic this year's Booker Prize List was, and how it once again was replete with 'post-industrial,' 'anti-oppressive,' 'post-modern/post-feminist feminist' titles and subjects and themes.

She went on to 'joke' (she wasn't finding it funny though) that she overheard a conversation between a girl with beetroot-dyed hair and a girl with green hair in a Barnes & Noble, in which one had said that 'Of Mice And Men' was racist... Against the mice, presumably.

But we cannot ourselves here just denounce things -, endlessly criticize and critique.

We must act. And we must do.

'Endlessly criticizing' is more or less the same thing as 'endlessly printing (fake) money.'

...And by and by, when things are already too late and the shining horses of King Augeas too far gone from their golden stables to be called back in, then we can 'understand' in the perfect vision of hindsight, what just transpired in here.

The house where Petrarch
lived.

Oh my rich Elites! What wonders are these shining horses of the great King Augeas! And how richly disporting they are, in their fields of lushness and verdure. 

But to put one simple bridle onto one of them, and to call it your very own, and you will be lauded throughout the world as a true sage and a person of distinct wealth and glory.

Far be it from me! (...a verbal Anabasis as you know) To talk price among kings -.

But to keep it extremely simple for those of you who, like me, require much explanation all of the time (I do! Trust me; I do) - I would not hesitate to go acquire thee of a small volume of empty pages. And do thou fill thee, a small and modest quill for thyself to have.

Just this week I was mildly humored by a sudden flurry of interest in something I had completely forgotten - had totally erased from the front shelves of my tiny little mind - with a whole bunch of curious people asking: 'Is this true??'

I believe Napoleon was 
defeated, in this year - 1805.

Well heck I don't know! I had to go read the thing myself just to acquaint myself with it at all!

Or 'again,' maybe; I don't know. I don't remember where it even came from...

This thing: Movie Not To Be Seen For 100 Years leaked script 

LOL

It was quite funny.

Seemed so to me, anyway.

I almost fancy that at the time, I edited out some name 'Jason Arday' out of the thing.

Because I had no idea as to the meaning.

Page About Hundred And Ten

So.

Shirley.

Yes. Well she kinda does say exactly how to operate these things.

She does it on page 113, the first page of Chapter 8 of her book. (I took a quick glance ahead of where I really am).

Oliver Stone actually did
film this scene, for the movie,
but took it out for some reason which
he tries to explain away.
It was eventually available
in online ads for the movie as 
'a deleted cameo.'

Put it this way, you can guess it all - there is something absolutely huge and key no doubt, that she leaves out as far as I can see. And I think she does know, though, what it is; she just doesn't fully say.

I think this is not just a good book, nor still yet 'just' a great book, it is actual canon on the so-called 'Chakra System.'

To some extent I personally hold to the idea that yes, it is probably better that individual people 'discover' for themselves exactly, precisely, what this 'absolute secret' thing is, because then they will own it. But you can work it out yourself: she says 'pulsations,' and 'vibrations' and you can think um... ...Mach Loop speed-of-sound; think - what front-line modern military jets do. Er... Um... ...And more.

But if I leave off all of this 'oh, big secret' talk and just move on to the - just as significant - other elements -, well she does a very good job of covering the concepts that there are seven 'tones' if you like, that 'handle' various particular aspects of the human actual functional living context. Where she's gotten all of this from, she herself doesn't appear to say in the book so far - but she definitely has gotten the right understandings and they very definitely are from authentic if 'modern-era' India Sanskrit Upanishad teachings.

Look, frankly, it's not as if this will give all people in the general run of things, access to anything special, or lead them to create great personal wealth, let's say. The whole of India is nothing if not testament to that fact. Albeit, Pakistan is way down the list of material wealth and national development, compared with modern-day, present-day India. So India is not all that poorly off...

The point of it all is that if a person is astute enough, then, they can access other things - not this particular thing; this thing about the Chakras is only a doorway, or a pathway.

Where d'you think this is?
I'll give you three guesses.

In fact, to make that point more strongly - even all the current 'authorities' on it, talk about something they term the 'Stellar Gate Chakra.' In Sanskrit this is something like 'Vyomanga.'

Well, um - Bill Smith, you will recognize the similarity there: 'Vimana' - 'Vyoman-ga.'

So yes, this is the 'flying vehicle' level thing.

Now I'm not going to say anything about it. I will leave things as they are, as the 'authorities' want to have them. ...I don't think they know what they're talking about. But I'm not going to try and disabuse anyone on it.

All that I will say, is that all of it, all that is in the MacLaine book, is pretty much exactly in line with what Kory M., and Chris Bledsoe and all of them, are currently talking about. So, if MacLaine is rendering things accurately in the first place, and if what she is saying has some basis in some kind of correct and also real ancient knowledge, then of course, only naturally - you will be getting these flying Orbs showing up all over the place! Bound to...

LOL

Where I think MacLaine is not just on good ground, but this makes her absolute canon for me -, is that she continually stresses the importance of pragmatism, a practical, functional approach to all of it: it needs to actually work materially. And she adds with a prominent tone of instructing - that a person is required to do what they would ordinarily be expected to do, if they had no 'external assistance' from some sort of 'weird' and quite mysterious, virtually invisible procedure that was going on in parallel.

You think you know the 
world, right?
Where is this?

...She mentions the 'Soul Star' level.

Now well, see, this is how you can have actual real miracles occur.

So long as you are maintaining still, all the things you are supposed to be doing, using normal human material processes and systems.

I will tell you the reason for this, and it is not the one that is commonly said. It is because humans are living in, like a 'fountain of time;' where they are now, is different to where they will be as a species and a civilization, next. IE Where you are now, is where you are supposed to be and you are supposed to be using those things that are here and now. 

Because if you don't you cannot 'progress' in a linear way to those next and new, phases.

Some aspects of those 'next/new' phases are literally 'created' by you, as in - they never existed at all, before; they don't exist in some 'Akashic,' 'outside-of-time' place. They just plain don't exist!

Until you have created them. The fountain of water - this living thing - rises, and things tumble up at the peak; but then entirely new things emerge also.

If all of us only ever resorted to the 'Star Chakra' all the time, then we would 'create' nothing ourselves - we would just be accessing something that already exists, and re-iterating it here all the time.

Where this is, is this is
Gaza. All of it is Gaza. Today.
Not some other time;
'before some war or other.'
Today. Exactly right now today.
Because you know the world, 
right?
I could explain to you, why there were 
all these camps and fairly 
'informal' dwellings, and you 
would likely just not believe it.

Our life is permanently about creation. Whether here in this world, on this planet - or anywhere.

It's what we do. It's who we are.

I think they are, the modern people, not Shirley -, mixing up the 'Star' or 'Stellar Gate' Chakra, with the Soul Star and where that is receiving its energy and 'light' from. I'm not saying any more about it though. It doesn't matter anyway, what people merely believe; it matters what actually works.

Oh you will literally see a light, like a star or starlight. It can be for only a very brief moment or two, but you will see it, experience it. This is different to the 'Orbs' high up in the night sky; not so different but if you experienced it/them right near you, you would faint from shock and fear.

Once you have become quite familiar with the methods, or let's say, the methodology that speaks to these 'inner vision' (for the most part) things, one of the most significant and practical things you will be able to do, is 'read' other people, read all of the people around you. And it won't be good or fun,  because you will observe just how many NPC's there really are and you also will no longer doubt that that is what they are, all they are. 

The way these 'people' act is that they can perform actions which make them appear to have empathy with others. The problem is - they cannot connect with anyone for real. Not only that, they literally do everything in their power, to make sure that no one in society connects with anyone for real.

Bronzo Zante-colored 
Lamborghini.

All human governments are dominated by 'Non-Player Characters.'

But whereas NPC's in a computer game do not have much power or any great effects - in the real-life human situational context of these kinds of NPC's, they are literally the most powerful 'characters.' 

Unless you connect with the so-called 'Soul Star.' And then you can overrule everything and everyone else.

Which is why though, these ET Aliens and 'super-consciousness' individuals, are all part of a 'hive-mind' or at least 'Total Mind Council' body of some sort - they don't kill each other. They don't kill themselves. So they are very particular about who and why and when...

...They are going to kill. 

As I have said now for about at least the hundredth time here already - you will see this kind of 'killing thing' go on.

It's about to happen. On the world stage.

[Goes on a bit until a bit after 1:20 in]: