What Inhibits Me A Little

Okay so I'm attempting to set out a 'target.' Something that, if you simply look towards 'it,' you will not fail to maintain a true course towards much much greater freedom from the usual so-called 'cares' of life.

Those cares are really, impositions by malicious figures in high places - I don't mean 'spiritual' or unseen 'high' places; I just mean governments and officials who are acting in ways to preserve the status quo for themselves.

But then, when I try and think about explaining such a 'target' it turns into an exercise of further and further explanation, not simply just a description of a thing.

The Cartier museum.
Is this 'authentic?'
An authentic expression of
'Cartier?'
Maybe. Dunno.
Plays to the China market of course.

I could 'describe' it and no one would know what I'm talking about.

On the one hand I tell myself (justify it this way) that I would tend to have and to have had, fewer interactions with people generally in my life (and so am not used to communicating easily), but then that's not true at all! 

So it's not true that I cannot communicate normally...

However - 'normal' is what we do when we are following a script.

It's a 'social script' that we are mostly all employing all of the time.

The reason that certain actresses (and it is mostly actresses, the men are stock characters on the whole) get type-cast, for example, in the romantic roles, that drag an emotional response from everyone, is that they know the script very well. And they get away with it because down to the eyebrow raises and the 'dumb-innocent-surprised' looks, they have that all down pat.

Most of them are pretty smart and they will tell you outright that they are inhibited in real-life relationships because of the constant expectations that strangers have of them on account of the movie-world dialogue and that, although it is sometimes authentic, the rest of who they are is taken as inauthentic because it does not meet up with the expectations!

I just watched a short video from some neuro-scientist who had 'found religion' and so on, and his ah-ha moment was when he realized he was placing an expectation on his own Autistic kid that that individual was 'following a social script' and was not actually feeling anything for his father... 

'Second-hand' store in
Florence.
Is authentic.
There's no agenda anymore,
so it is authentic now.

According to him he heard a distinct voice in his head (when he was searching for 'God') and it said 'and that's what you're doing to me.' 

So really, the question is this one - are we all behaving just like Autistic people in our interactions within human society, and following a script that has been given to us?

To be reasonable about things, it's not so much - 'give up everything and come follow me,' said the Lord God (Muslims all declare that nowhere did Jesus say He was God, Worship Me... LOL ...And that they know for sure because they were all there, right).

It's that how much 'of ourselves' are we having to necessarily give up, in order to obtain the authentic center core personality of who you are.

Most people will immediately riposte 'Oh no, if only whoever is out there, space Aliens, gods (with a little 'g') God the Big Thing, other -, just would make themselves known clearly and obviously to me, and stay there long enough for me to do some science on it (I had to chuck that in because I do that) to prove it.'

Then, I would be authentic; or else I'm sure enough that I am authentic enough to just be allowed to ask to see something clearly for goddamn once!

And what if there is a 'Space Beacon' around here somewhere, more or less running everything, and male consciousnesses go through the Great Pyramid, losing whichever bits of their false egos cannot fit into the ever-tightening space of the hypothetical 'spirit' passage on the way up, until there is nothing much left at the top and they get ejected into the next life - down here. And the females via the next-sized one, and so on -, including animals.

It's a script.
It's fashion.
It's just a scripted social
compliance thing.

And so, none of them remembers all the bad things that happened to them caused by others - around whom they still have to live down here, and they also forget everything bad they themselves did.

And it's all just a 'machine.' And it works.

But it's still a machine operation.

And what say if it is all like that on every single planet across the entire Universe that has sentient intelligent beings living on it?

Because people are all inauthentic.

You think not? How many ideas do you have in your own head, that you believe, that actually someone told you, and you don't even know that person? But you still cling onto that idea, that belief, as if it is 'yours,' and worse still, you do things because of it!

Unless and until you own, and I mean really own, who you are - then you ain't goin' nowhere.

...So, yes, there is a parallel system going on, and 'maybe' you can jump across into that.

What I can say with absolute certain knowledge - as in I know it and am able to demonstrate it over and over at will if I wish - is that the Universe is far more complicated, more complex, than people generally believe to be the case, and there is an amazing array of creatures around, some highly intelligent, some fairly similar to humans, and they exist right under people's noses and within their plain eyesight.

But there is a strict and rigid separation between the two kinds of 'worlds' as it were. You can pray all you like to any thing at all that you conceive is a higher power - and it will not answer you. And because of that most people, by far most -, conclude there must be no such power, no such Being, no such Beingness.

Recipes are also scripts,
but...
They are substantial
and you eat them; eat the results
at any rate.

Well certainly Richard Dawkins cannot tell you what will become of him after his death, and neither can Stephen Fry or deGrasse Tyson et al.

And so they conclude a certain thing and everyone is meant to accept what they say, what they have concluded. Because it is 'scientific.' So they say.

Well but actually it's not scientific though, is it? They do not know something, and then, draw a positive conclusion from their ignorance instead of just saying 'I do not know.'

My problem is not that I do not know, but that I am finding some difficulty saying it outright to people who might just as easily react to it by walking off their jobs!

LOL

Walk off your job you may do, but make sure you know who is the one doing the walking though, right.

Make sure it is the you you. The real one.

Make plans for you.

No script in hand that other people wrote for you. No expectations as to what you will find.

Only the expectation for authenticity. Which is the only coin you own.

Certainly I could describe 'it' - the target place, some kind of 'high end' people meeting place - and no one would know what I'm talking about.