It's not a good idea just yet to blurt out what kind of highly specialized knowledge people who have been here for a while now, have acquired, both from their own life experience, and then that augmented by some ideas about human social systems and structures and dynamics that have been canvassed in here.
I say that because to be premature in this particular field is a catastrophic mistake for anyone to make.
This is not the attire of an investment banker. But it might be the attire of another kind of real banker.
At the same time though, we are all of us (well, mostly all of us!) living in the world, within normal human society, and therefore we have roles here - or, we have adopted certain roles.
But because it soon becomes clear to those around you that you possess knowledge far superior to what others have, then you will also potentially - not always, and there is plenty of risk that some people will feel very envious - be asked to help with various ventures from time to time.
And because you will be able to apply what you know into the practicalities of life and also of business - you will end up making money for others, and thereby also for yourself.
It may not be so clear right away - but how it will unfold is that by natural osmosis of your knowledge versus the relative ignorance of others around you, wherever it happens to be that you are, there is a pressure that is created - and people will recognize you possess key knowledge and you will be asked for help because of that.
Over many decades the world of something called 'investment banking' has completely taken over the upper echelons of money trading...
I mean this is just sheer nonsense because there is no such thing as 'investment banking.'
What I mean is that 'investments' on the scale that people like George Soros want to pretend that they are doing it and it is thus 'happening' - are really based on his/their privileged access to government and central bank capital, and has nothing at all to do with real investing in real markets where it is a matter of actual supply and demand.
Not bad, not too bad at all.
Where it was an actual case of real supply and demand, the Beijing China government people obliterated Soros and everyone else including Bill Gates, and they only 'entertain' fools like Gates to get on the inside of the American department of state and its thinking through him.
'Banking' is about taking money from a flow of it, and managing it into owner's profits.
And yes sure, there are money flows simply on account of central bank stimulus and 'bail-outs' but these are not what's called economic money flows... These are just 'monetarism' flows.
Not only that they are bad - negative, deleterious, destructive - flows.
The Russian government now today sells a million extra grains of wheat a day (probably more than a million but I mean it to depict that each little tiny literal grain, has money value...) and somebody pays them for it.
That is 'money flow.'
Don't kid yourself - you possess knowledge far in advance of most people; knowledge about them.
You know how they think.
You know what they are thinking.
You know their every move - what they will do now and what they will do next.
You know about the pains in their joints, the drugs from doctors in their systems, and the breakdowns in their minds.
You have them in your hand.
And if you don't believe that nevertheless you will find that this is how it will be. And they cannot escape.
You live your whole entire life, nothing at all really 'unusual' happening there. No spaceships, no 'visitations' (don't forget, Christmas is coming and the actual English definition of the word 'visitation' is what happens to Scrooge when the ghosts visit him).
Interestingly, what happens to Scrooge also includes strange 'missing time' - time being played around with: first he goes back to his childhood, then he sees a parallel time in which 'things might have been,' he goes forward to a potential future of great personal misery; and then he returns to the present but it is nonetheless a present that seemed to have skipped back a day so that he has 'gained a day' and not lost any time in his life.
Nobody commonly suggests that A Christmas Carol is science fiction. Or that it is even necessarily science fantasy same as they do not equate The Nutcracker Suite's writer E.T.A.Hoffmann with science fantasy or fiction - and yet that is what is occurring in many of the works of Hoffmann and in this particular work by Dickens.
And yet we have all of the elements of the modern-day 'abduction phenomenon' fairy tale: Scrooge gets abducted, he seems to be able to float around and see things, albeit accompanied with specific direction and intent by one of the spirits (so he's not merely having any old out-of-body experience, and explicitly Dickens goes through the whole question of whether Scrooge is simply having 'a bad dream'), and then he comes back with a totally new moral direction in his life. And - he has moved around in linear time.
Disadvantaged by such an enormous deficit of knowledge of practical science compared to extremely advanced civilizations, the human's only admirable aspect is that they are literally dripping with feelings of need and also want.
Rising up from what would be bathos, some humans try to fly all on their own even if it is for just a short duration above the ground.
The way they do that is to have an optimism that is not completely rational.
Voltaire described that in his novel Candide.
Some critics hold that Voltaire was openly making a mockery of optimism.
In the professional sophistry of Athens, 'pathos, ethos, and logos' were the three critical ways to influence people: pathos being when you sought to influence them by appealing to the emotions, ethos when you appealed to status or authority, and only logos when you were appealing to reason alone and building up logical arguments.
When women go to high tea, right - they don't get that it is a big sarcastic joke being in a Queen's chair like this. They mean to say - 'well, yes, this is where I am supposed to sit.' I don't think they even care less about the finger-food and the actual tea! That's Alisha in Kent.
Except logical arguments sway no one on this planet.
And that's really what's quite cute with humans. The human society itself is not in any way constructed along the requirements of logic, but only of mechanistic necessity when that is seen as valuable!
Mechanistic necessity is only a minor part of the realm of logic.
Sentiment arising from what is truly good - is also logical. And some people have that kind of sentimentality in them.
So those are the ones most likely to be 'picked up.'
Not all people, of course, whose emotions and sentimentality are uppermost, are actually attractive to the extremely intelligent, and advanced.
But Scrooge was a good man at heart. And that made all the difference.
Some people are not good.
I am hoping and trusting to some extent, that some of you here have been carefully reading those old ancient books I once talked about with specific reference to the actual 'ET Alien' question - and I do not mean books by Homer. Because if, if you have been doing that, you may be picking up on tiny little hints every now and again, about the devastating nature of those capable of being devastating.
The verses in Isaiah have been widely mistranslated, which seem to say that God is the creator of 'evil.' The word actually is 'devastation.'
I am hoping that at least some of you will know that the Mahabharata (the book by Vyasa), ends with God announcing to Arjuna that he should take the field 'alone, and unarmed....'
The logic of this is that 'you' are being overcome by an equal though qualitatively better 'being.' Thus the events are not based on 'authority,' and nor are they based on the requirement to provoke fear as though fear is something relevant in absolute terms. They are based solely on existential fact. And also on moral fact as an existential piece of logic and reality, although not obviously seen by the eyes of ignorant people - who 'rush headlong into the jaws of death, unsuspecting of their devastation.' We just don't normally witness actual divine retribution.
You have to live with the color, you know...
But it is also existential fact that humans can have completely valid emotions too based around facts in their lives. The idea that an advanced civilized species will not support valid human emotions - is misconceived.
From all of the wider understandings of human society, there is no presence here, and nor has there ever been, any actual beings, call them what you will, who have any kind of 'extra-worldly' power or origin. There are myths and legends of course, and there are religious stories of the past - but none of these are taken as unequivocal historical reality by anyone. There is not understood even by religious people, to be any presence here, for example, right now of those types of beings who once a long time ago annihilated Sodom and Gomorrah and the rest of the five 'cities of the plain.'
And there isn't any, is there? At least, you have never seen them, right? They are completely unnoticeable. Sorry sorry, I mean they don't exist. Right.
Yet... ...This is also the requirement of logic, that they are not seen.
Human sentiment, when it is completely valid, is supportable - you will be okay; things may look and they may be terrible, for now, and they will indeed get a lot worse too, but you will be fine:
'They' are located at ESA-L1 at the orbital point oriented to the first nearest triple star system. There is a major matter transfer well there. NASA knows about this; everybody knows about it who looks up at the sky and into space - the European Space Agency (which named the first Lagrangrian Point), the Russian Space Agency (Roscosmos), the Japanese, Chinese... Everyone.
The Congressional Committee making inquiry into all of this stuff is never going to talk about the fact that many telescopes and cameras are continuously pointed to there and have plenty of filmed evidence of 'things going on,' which is not to say that for the most part they can 'see' anything or film anything visible at all. But there are other means of tracking and these systems have lots of signals being recorded on them.
Basic transport.
The other people who of course, are the people at the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope at Mount Graham, which interfaces with LUCIFER - the Large Binocular Telescope - which is a near infrared array from Teledyne.
The person who can tell the Congressional Inquiry all about what the Vatican, and the CIA have seen, is Daniel Sheehan, the lawyer representing Lou Elizondo. Sheehan also represents some Roman Catholic science and philosophy organization interests.
As far as this theorized on-going current 'Disclosure' project that is pretty-well attested by experts including Elizondo - and here we are talking about 'Disclosure' by whistle-blowers, essentially, but who are all organized among themselves to break the news one way or another, to the public, that the government is fully aware - Sheehan is one of the lead figures who is systematically releasing new information regularly. That is to say 'new to the public.'
In the latest - new - upcoming text I will be posting up around the place in the next week or so now, it will become clear what is behind everything from an ancient historical narrative perspective, and it will be quite astonishing.
Fauci? No - Machiavelli. No statue this time...
There is a certain 'edge' that people I think have been missing for hundreds, no, thousands, of years to do with what in Biblical terms are called 'angelic beings' even despite that the Jews themselves should know things are not so airy fairy like people all suppose.
But a smart person who has read the sections about the Guardians in those old Greek texts, will be able to work something out from this upcoming new text about why 'beings from the heavens' at least in a standard modern Judaeo-Christian mindset, have been given this nice sweet, benign character...
Hah!
Watch... And learn - plenty of different characters, only one really dangerous one:
The three main 'Cosmic moral questions' that humans ask, and are entitled to ask are the following:
1. Why do really atrocious things happen to little children when Jesus Christ Himself said not to do bad things to kids?
Honestly, they're not the world's bestest ever drinks at all. But I've been doing these over the last couple of days - blackberries are in season here. de Toulouse-Loutrec apparently liked these.
2. In our problematic world, where is the absolute unequivocal proof for the existence of a Perfectly Good God? And if He is Good, how come He let the Devil live after that 'war in the heavens?' (See: Star Wars canon, I guess! If you don't want to refer to the Bible, which amounts to the same thing if you translate it properly). In other words though, where does 'Evil' originate from at all?
3. Is there really any hope and why can't these super-beings, be they 'gods' or just 'men from advanced places/civilizations' just cure everything and solve a bunch of stuff and 're-organize' humans to not be 'evil' and just turn up obviously and in material fashion and have it all happen? Why can't they just turn up now? Why can't Jesus re-appear tonight? Or today?
Well I am here to tell you some truly terrible answers to those very good questions.
I can answer each and every one of those questions, and all of their minor parts, in such ways as you would be left awestruck. And those answers would be ones you have never heard before and in all cases you could even 'reach out and touch.'
And then you would all leave your jobs and rush off to some mountain retreat or such like, and point lasers into the sky and what-not.
NASA communicates using visible lasers...
LOL
But before you go laughing sickly at how crazy that is, just understand this much before I render any kinds of specific answers at all - Jung got it right when he expounded on the idea of the collective deep unconscious.
See the problem is that you are all connected whether you like it or not.
So-and-so's mother did not die when they and they alone were a child - that is a part of all of your human condition/s, and if it is not a personally experienced conscious thing in most of you, it is certainly nevertheless shared as part of the collective unconscious in each of you. And that is because we all do personalize other people's tragedies as our tragedy because we have the quality of empathy. And that is only one factor about it.
It is not right to say - as many people now do say - 'you cannot know what I went through.' And it is not right not only because people can imagine and place themselves in the shoes of others, but because the collective unconscious is a real thing. It's not a real 'metaphysical' thing; it's a real real thing.
This business of pretending the collective unconscious does not exist is another attempt at dividing up the human spirit, if not the actual human race.
It's a way of splitting people up and away from themselves and each other.
Now this should, if you are very very smart, start to give you a little inkling of something super-important that goes to the basis of the answers to those questions - and that is it has something to do with energy.
'Nothing can be created or destroyed absolutely, but it changes its form from one state to another.'
Now look that doesn't mean Evil can somehow be changed to 'not Evil.'
But we're going to advance another one of these written text things soon, which is so unbelievably exotic you are really going to think okay okay where is this all really coming from now, because this is not human stuff; this is way outside of up-till-now human knowledge and experience and expertise.
Well I'll tell you!
I have been going up to a huge satellite not far from the Moon, but which is evidently not visible to most of the equipment looking up at the skies and into space.
...And by the way, someone else here has been too.
Luke is the only Gospel in which this idea about Jesus forgiving those who murdered Him occurs, and it contains those well-known words '...Forgive them for they know not what they do.'
It is a bit unfortunate that the commonplace meaning that has been assigned to this is do with this incredibly Pollyanna kind of all-forgiving attitude that Jesus of Nazareth had, or is interpreted to have had.
The reality is that this phrase contains at least two separate meanings and implications - firstly, yes, it says something about forgiveness, but secondly, it is a statement of philosophical fact.
'They know not...'
Through a glass, and not so darkly.
Well but hang on a minute, the Jews and all or most of today's mainstream Christians all teach that Adam and Eve knew Evil.
Well did they or didn't they?
You can try and work around this problem by saying that the phrase itself can be intended as only an immediate reaction to a particular egregious act, namely, that it was actually God Himself these people were killing (and let's not get too caught up in whether this is 'God' or the 'Son of God' because the word really is 'Divinity' and not our modern Germanic-English word 'God') - so 'they knew not that they were killing God...' (And I suppose it would have been all right then, if they had just been killing anyone else, right?).
Whereas they were in fact, doing Evil, because Pilate himself declared Jesus innocent of the alleged crimes in question, and Pilate was Roman Law. They were doing it, but there was someone behind them knowingly pulling their strings. And you can proved that with the other words there: 'Now is the hour that the Ruler of this World is cast down.'
So I don't think we do have a problem with the actual text. We have a problem with people making up false stories about what the text could mean.
What I want to do is give crystal clear direction about where and what...
And part of that is being able to convey the understanding that you are not Evil, and you do not on the whole do evil things and nor do you intend to do them.
Ah well, we will not be travelling to Paris anytime soon!
But this world is kept in the grip of evil schemes and systems and people are held in here, but not only that, there are half-alive people who are exploited to maintain operations, as it were, and they are not even completely human in the sense of what we are all taught to believe that a human is, or that their full capacities extend to having them be.
So there is genuine Evil here and it is trying to rule all things.
It's much smarter than you are.
And it is far older too.
You see, on the one hand Jesus 'went away as on a journey to a far country' but on the other hand He is right at the door.
Well... Which one?
The key is in the word 'as.'
Herb salad for the poor vegetarians here. ...God I don't even dare to tell you about this roast beef roll and Paris dip that I had last night.
'As if on.'
It's useless and pointless waiting without direction or guidance as to what you are waiting upon, and the Evangelicals all think they are waiting for a return in the clouds of this guy in white robes with other white-robed beings bearing harps, I guess.
The text makes it clear what you are waiting for.
Anyone? Anyone?
...It's not so much that there is an incredibly advanced high tech satellite heading towards Earth.
But I intend to talk about such things next up.
For right now, the question is, upon what next thing are you waiting?
Someone in the comments section of the YT video here said this track filled him with so much optimism.
When I say 'timing' I am referring to the nuclear strike that will be happening in Poland, near to Lviv which is in the Ukraine fifty miles from the border with Poland.
This matter is so complicated and the danger of explaining too much about it here way too high, so for right now anyway, we'll have to be satisfied with factoring in that the Polish government passed new laws relating to a 'catastrophic natural event,' last month. So the window of risk for the thing happening is already underway, although we might not have expected anything to have occurred during that month ahead from the time the laws were put in place, fundamentally because the planners will tend to give themselves some buffer in which to make any modifications and real-time reactive re-assessments.
Coming from quite a different place to most human thinking about the dynamics of wars and the way human beings look at such large-scale moral matters as are implicated in these huge conflicts and even great historical changes in society, we are not here taking things from the perspective of ad hoc unfolding, you could say, of human moral civilization...
You see, taken from the standard Judaic (Masoretic aka 'Laws of Moses') perception, humans were these innocent, untainted, morally blank things, and then Adam/Eve/Serpent/Apple - God said 'don't' but people did anyway and then, you have the development of moral character.
There is no way of telling what 'Good' and/or 'Evil' actually means before the 'Fall' and thereafter, the only religious-philosophical standard is failure to just do whatever God says...
Now that doesn't really make any practical sense if one is going to suggest that at any point Mankind was 'allowed to have,' moral agency.
Maldon salt. Each original crystal is shaped like a tiny pyramid. You get these on Mars you know... No you don't. Was just kidding and being stupid. They make the pyramids in a factory near Essex, England.
And I'll explain that better right now:
Okay fair enough you might be a good Muslim, or a good Christian, a good Jew and therefore for you it's adequate to say that you should - not just that you must, 'obey God.'
But 'should' is avoiding the basic question about how and what specific details this all entails.
For example, Adam never had an Apple iPad and Moses never had an Android Tablet either.
So then when they (means 'humans/Mankind') did get those toys, then do they just ask God now 'okay what is the moral teaching about how to use these things?' Because the point really is that if it's all only about seeking God's decision, then in every new situation, at every point of a new innovation, some new piece of technology never before seen, there is no internal frame from which to make agency judgments as the individual who is responsible for the moral decision.
And that gives the lie to this story about 'the Fall of Adam' and Adam and Eve eating the Forbidden Fruit and all of that - because that story is really an assertion of nothing but the mindless unthinking acceptance of obedience to someone and something outside of one's self as a human being.
Really, Adam could not have 'fallen' because he did not have personal moral standing and agency in the first place to have 'fallen' from.
And this position of things is proliferated still today, with Islam, which explicitly is slavery and submission to Allah. There is absolutely no gradation of judgment of moral decision with the lives of humans in Islam - Allah literally predestines people and consigns them to Hell or to Heaven (with Houris).
They make this in Woking, which is not anywhere near Essex, I don't think.
This is not in any way a real or a realistic reflection of human life however, and how intelligent people can accept that this narrative is any kind of official edict from an actual Divine Mind is utterly absurd in the extreme. But, people - billions of them - do it all day long and it is not restricted to Islam but is to be found in virtually all of the law-based religious philosophies.
But the far bigger problem with the basic 'Eden' moral 'Good/Evil' narrative is this, and worst of all it is literally within the text itself - there is a massive problem with the story on logic lines:
'And you were counted as first among the Cherubs who stood before God the Most High, and from the day you were created the timbrels were made for you (the express meaning of the phrase according to all Hebrew sources, is that whoever this being was, whether you say Lucifer or Samech Mem Aleph Lamed - IE Samael, he was the leader of the angelic choir and heavenly musicians).'
Now that's a problem though.
Because music is not morally neutral.
Which means that for sure, in logic Satan, the Enemy to Man, knew long before Eden's Fall what Good and Evil both were and knew how to compose those in mixtures -, just as we humans all, in life do some rash and stupid things, some actually bad IE 'evil' things, and some good things too.
Man, sometimes I can just handle a coffee and that's all! This one has 'happiness' and 'Dreams' on a coaster under it. Well that'll do.
So did that mean that humans when they were just 'Adam and Eve' never heard music at all before? Or really does it mean that Good and Evil are not exclusively simply obeying God, but they exist as a set of intangible Universal primary idea forms (just as musical modes pre-exist music or song composition), that can be used by any agent with sufficient active intelligence in a given set of circumstances, in other words in dynamic contexts of particular and often if not always different competing forces and pressures and interposing objects resolving into a moral outcome (IE moral judgment).
Clearly 'Evil' cannot be part of God and so the idea forms themselves are not part of God as such, but are something propositional and intellectually-derived as, not a phantasm, but a theoretical form, real only when manifested in actuality, in material events and their outcomes.
Human morality, or lack of it, the practice of nation-state and government and political evil is not an ad hoc unfolding of anything in new circumstances, and moment-to-moment dynamics.
It is something that comes from a deliberate, intellectualizing about well-and-truly pre-existing absolute idea forms; pre-existing to any human person's given life, or lifespan.
The only way Adam and Eve could have morally fallen, is from that moment when they were genuinely and realistically able to intellectualize from moral forms which existed outside of themselves.
And then, the situation still demands them to have chosen the wrong ways from those moral forms. And why did they do that according to the Bible? Because of curiosity, if you simply go by the superficial metaphor of the eating of the Forbidden Fruit. So curiosity is evil then, is it? Or results in evil. Well we know that sometimes it might or can, but does that mean that it always will - no. So the standard teaching taken from the Bible Book of Genesis is clearly wrong.
The way people have been looking at this is like the way some insurer would look at accident risk: curiosity sometimes kills the cat, so let's assign a risk factor to it and then damn you all to Hell.
This is ridiculous.
Here is the Truth:
There is such a Being that you can call 'Satan.'
And he knows about moral Good and Evil and really, you don't; at least not in anywhere near the depth that he does. And he has taken the decision, the terminal decision, to employ actual Evil in order to counter literally the Power and Position of 'God' - who is also a real Being.
And in fact the only thing that is standing in his way, is you. And that's because you could have real moral agency at the same time at which you started to gain real material power and technology too.
Which means that it is not God alone that the Devil has on his hands to fight - it's also potentially you, but only if and when you wake up to what you can do.
The Devil is not dead. He has not yet passed away, certainly not from this planet.
And that means that you are exposed and very vulnerable because if he finds out that I have been talking with you, and between us we put some power into your hands, you're in big trouble!
'Truth' must be: everything is true and correct, not just some things. Yet it is very clear that religious ideologies and most branded systems of thinking contain some truth blended with a lot of other things.
I personally would not make a big deal of paying money (or not paying any money) and imputing that this necessarily implies that you are or are not, getting truth; you might always get some truth. In the end everyone of mature age and mind must use their own intrinsic discrimination to see what something amounts to when considered objectively.
For me I see something like the Monroe Institute as being something particularly suited to retirees who want to go somewhere and do something different to just heading off to some Caribbean beach and so on.
In the olden days...
The systems used in there are definitely not inauthentic at all and they are very good at achieving some 'perception capability' goals.
My own direction over many recent months here has not been to focus on 'meditation' or various techniques that could be construed as being more or less 'meditative state' things.
What I am really trying to point out is that okay so guys are stepping out of the forty-foot long US Navy-filmed flying craft.
Then what?
Okay they are way more advanced than you - than 'us;' than we humans. They have better, more advanced technology and much more complex, sophisticated styles of life and forms of society.
But we, who are we? Just who are we expecting them to meet?
So Jesus returns tomorrow night, right, but some dozens of age pensioners at my local pharmacy ask Him, fairly nicely, though many pretty tersely and impatiently too - 'Please just can you wait around a bit while we get our scripts for our drugs on which we are very addicted, filled?'
'We'll hear you, hear what you have to say and all, but actually we don't want to be really healed as such, because this is who we are. We are chemically-dependent, angry, impatient, arrogant and self-important beings, who in fact know more and better than you anyway. But yes, yes, you are super-powerful, we know, we know...'
Red snapper, fennel and smoked tomato broth.
Or a couple of thousand mother-ships turn up and every one of the ten billion human beings are assigned their own individual case officers, who will patiently listen to their whinges and whines and complaints, and give them very advanced high-tech solutions and a guided tour of the space ship, whatever... ...Maybe even their very own 'Star Trek-y' sort of attire, perhaps white like the angels wore in the Bible narratives.
Is that how things are happening; going to happen?
Do you think?
2 Thessalonians 9: 9 - 11:
"...every sort of evil that deceives those that are perishing. They are perishing because they refuse truth."
Perishing.
Means dying, going to die; be dead.
And dead is dead. In the Bible, especially the New Testament, this does not mean 'go somewhere and be judged.' It does not mean 'sleep with Abraham.'
It means dead.
Can the US Congressional Inquiry into the little white US Navy flying things produce an ET Alien (upon subpoena to give evidence before it) to appear there or anywhere?
No it cannot.
And Jesus is not going coming back there either.
Doesn't matter how many subpoenas they send to Him.
The problem for the general world is not so much that He may or might not, or that He will be going some place else and having fish dinner at your house, maybe...
It's that little white Tic Tacs carry heap big fire-stick in them.
Back in the olden days, when America actually had the technology and the ideas and the mentality to make this.
KP is always, and I do mean it seems that he is always preoccupied and absorbed with spending money but mostly, with not spending it, but I know that it only takes a tiny turn in your mindset to ask ET Aliens for some cash before they insist on showing up for real. At least then you and I will be able to entertain them and have the calmness to keep quiet when it comes time to shut up and just listen and stop telling everyone 'wot fer' and 'what we all know.'
'Sci-entists' no doubt, absolutely no doubt at all, want to sit around 'with equivalent agency' and compare notes sweetly and see just how smart they are given that they are coming from a fairly 'new' civilization here on planet Earth... ...Compared to the slow-learner Aliens who have been around for so many hundreds of thousands of years - in order to get this far as they have evidently gotten.
NASA will have Michio Kaku interface with the ET Aliens to represent the US Government and Academia.
...Because like, obviously they respect y'all, right. Academics simply must be respected! Afterall! I mean to say!
Not like they have been looking at humans for a long time already and have plenty of individuals' DNA in tubes somewhere and have monitored the whole thing and don't know already enough about who Michio Kaku is and all his little brothers and little sisters are, and who the government is, and what they represent, and whose interests.
When you drop something on your toe, some nerves there send rapid signals up and into your spinal cord which relay them into your brain so that you will feel pain and go 'ouch ouch ouch.'
And then, when your brain establishes that you have observed the pain in your toe, it sends back down some different signals which block the pain signals because these have served their purpose for the time being. Theoretically, the brain is assuming that once having noticed the pain, you are going to do something about it.
...So -, there are two sets of signals whenever someone experiences some pain.
The second set of signals, stimulate internal Morphine (aka 'endogenous-Morphine;' endorphin) and also Dopamine so that you can have a cleared pathway for signals to be sent down. Dopamine is not a 'feel-good' neurotransmitter, despite that people say that it is - it is a pathway clearing neuro-chemical, which allows endogenous Morphine to be actively sensed in the neural system.
Sleep capsule...
Any time at all, that something 'bad' is happening to your body, nociceptors send signals of pain or discomfort to the CNS, to the brain, so that you will do something to alter the situation.
Sometimes, the 'bad' thing is so tiny and subtle, that really really micro-sized nociception happens...
For example if a Yogi holds their breath, the organic system thinks something not so good is happening, and really tiny signals are sent to the brain to tell it to please start inhaling air again.
And when air is subsequently breathed in again, the brain sends out those signals which block the nociception signalling - in other words, very tiny amounts, way too small and too subtle for scientists to observe just yet although they could do it if they looked which they have not yet done -, of Dopamine and endorphins to tell the body and the brain: 'Okay this is good now, this is what you want to be doing, so keep doing it, and here's a little reward for you.'
When you look at a freshly bloomed flower, it is another good thing that Nature and your body and somatic mechanism wants you to experience, so there too, small amounts of Dopamine and endorphins are pumped through your neural circuits.
Thyme, mushroom, and sherry soup.
However, if you are given endless regular jolts of problems, trouble, negative stimulus and pain, then what happens is that ever greater amounts of Dopamine are required to clear the nerve pathways of all the conflict and also the conflicting signals, and ever higher amounts of Morphine are required for you to feel 'okay.'
This is what your boss and your 'job' is doing to you, your family, maybe even your wife or your husband, and certainly the pharmaceutical/doctor industry and the whole of politics, the media and all of modern society. The whole thing, the whole lot of the players are just there to proliferate this lunacy -, someone having designed the thing to get you to become used to trouble, suffering and pain, and to become addicted to whatever sources of Dopamine stimulation that there are around for you to 'get.'
If you have a bunch of money and can afford to go along to a Monroe Institute program, then they will have you begin 'supervised, targeted remote viewing.' It won't be just any old remote viewing - you will be monitored electronically, and supervised and have targets to reach for with your enhanced systems of vision.
So in the same way, 'trance' can indeed be some vague and relatively pointless exercise, and even, it could be something which someone has deliberately tried to put you into 'the state of' in order to take advantage of some exposed mind state then, or vulnerability due to the removal of a certain amount of executive function.
I guess in a trance...!
Or - it can be a targeted, highly-controlled and well-understood process, to enable very specific mind harmonics to be activated (EG particular brain wave frequencies), and a systematic sending of blocking signals which disable all of those modern social inputs that are jamming your ability to perceive what is going on all around you - all the good things.
You did not notice, for instance, that some flowers give you endogenous Morphine-like sensations...
But why, since Nature is so well-balanced and does everything for a purpose, does it let just, well flowers, seemingly gratuitously provoke endogenous Morphine in your neural network system for no other causal reason of material gain or because of an after-effect of the exacting of pain in an accident, and as an amelioration for that?
Well, that and many other questions you can ask Jesus, when He returns, because afterall, He was was the one who said -, claimed, that such things were an expression of wealth far greater than anything King Solomon had or had to offer.
: )
Okay, well I can tell you too though.
But I won't just yet because you won't believe it just right now. Some of you might; most of you won't.
But if we go back to the matter of trance music, which is where we started this article from, then this is about having the mind's frequencies fall into very specific patterns that relate harmonically to the ability to have full perception of important emotional and spiritual matters, and having the audio energy (to some extent you can even say 'white noise') block out wasteful dissonance and contradictory, unnatural, or chaotic neural signaling which is generally being driven by the pressures and the tempo and the apparently important demands of 'normal' modern daily life. You will not 'die' just as the result of going deeply into these kinds of trances. But oh yes, the world that you have been experiencing up until then most certainly will be killed off.
It's a zombie world that you are living in, my friend. You are 'living,' that is, surviving in a dead world; in a place that is trying to create automatons and keep people mechanical and dead like automatons. By doing what you are being shown - advisedly, and confidentially - you will be resurrected from the world and live, and moreover, like the gods you will live forever in a condition of great wealth.
Am I saying this of my own account? No I am not. Jesus Christ said it first: 'For consider the lilies of the field...' Now either He was lying and a knave and not God or 'Kalimat Allah' (The Word of God), or He was telling the Truth and you should be listening to that and not to some idiot in this Earthly world who wants to boss you around and tell you 'how it is.'
Yeah I know. Hard it is, to have faith that allows you to live like the lilies of the field. But here, we have the solution for that challenge as well.
Okay this is a highly problematic thing, because let's just be a little conscious that some people want to be more involved with humans and general human 'society' than they are right now, rather than slip away out of it as such.
The real problem is something I have been grappling with for months now, as I think about what will become of someone who, let's put it in these terms 'hits the Set-For-Life lottery.'
I am watching right now, a program on local television about several people who had fairly sizable amounts of money in their self-managed superannuation accounts, who had been defrauded of the lot - so, in one man's case, that was 200,000 dollars in one go.
People just don't get it - and they never will. This is not a 'yoga' thing. But they have turned it into that. Stupid stupid human beings. You can't stop them.
Now for me this expresses part of the problem. As someone literally from the investment banking area (or more specifically for me, the merchant banking world), and who was also for a while in a special projects team in a central bank, modestly meaningful sums of money like that in the hands of your average person today is an accident waiting to happen.
So let's just shift away from specifics about money though, and use some highly mythic language and metaphors, in order to re-state the basic problem.
You have seen, I'm sure you have seen, those Sumerian monument etchings that depict some weird bird-headed being with what looks like a pine cone in their hand, standing above the Tree of Life image.
Now all of these modern 'New Age-y' and public commentators of ancient mysteries want to tell you this is about the pineal gland and so on.
No it's not.
It's about planting seeds.
Our life is an existential reality.
Our 'present' moment is a hard, sensed, tangible reality - it exists, we know it exists, because we feel it in the moment now.
'Death In The Nile' - the most recent one. It descends into soft porn in parts and that's about all that it has to recommend it. Still, man has time on his hands, gets into trouble and fun and more trouble... That's pretty cool.
Our past was an existential reality but it too, can turn into a mixture of hard truth and fabricated 'reality of ideas' because people can believe false things their minds invented about the past, and yet, that impression then becomes 'true' to their immediately conscious, existential 'now' selves. So the past is misty and not hard reality.
The future is not a hard reality at all.
We cannot plant seeds in the past.
We can only plant a seed right now.
You might think your future is not great, based on what your present situation is right now.
And that is not the way things really are.
'Tomorrow' something bad or not great is due to happen - let's say...
Tonight, you are free to do things for which there will be no consequences that can fall upon you because your ship is leaving for distant lands tomorrow, where you will be going to the front lines with your platoon.
And so you do things in the moment with abandon.
Suddenly, in the early hours of the morning however, you come upon a large treasure that is yours to keep and to dispose of as you will.
Tiffany design, silk velvet modern Venetian scarf. Okay so you have one, and you're wearing it to your late night cafe place. No one notices and they wouldn't understand what they are looking at anyway.
You no longer really need to go off with your battalion (initially you had to do that because you are only the third son and your earldom does not extend to sufficient money to provide even for a subsistence back at 'home') - because you now are independently wealthy. And so feasibly, you can just go AWOL completely now.
It is not immediately clear which particular 'seed' you planted that grew into a different fate for your life.
But regardless of that - and we will explore it later on here sometime - a huge problem with you or anyone having a staggeringly powerful means of living in significantly more materially well-supplied circumstances, is that you will be in some coffee place or restaurant or anywhere, and around you will be the people who lose masses of money to fraud or who truncate their lives through poor lifestyles, or make themselves miserable through heavily pressured workloads and all of that attendant problematic symptom which is the nature of today's world and the so-called 'lifestyles' of all the people in it.
You cannot change them, though.
You can offer to them all you want about advanced technology, be it with laser systems or quantum electrodynamics or any other thing, but they are not interested in part because they don't see the point anyway but more importantly they do not 'have the time' to look at things; certainly not anything you're going to be talking about.
All they know is what the CDC just screamed at them the last time they did that, which more or less would have been ten seconds ago in their lives via an SMS to their 'smart phones' - maybe about... ...that Metformin 'aids' the diabetes condition (it doesn't), or that they are 'iron deficient' (well they probably are but not for any reasons any modern doctors tell them; modern doctors' reason will be: 'your time is up there is ten minutes left on your consult/pay your bill on your way out).
You might be able to 'take yourself out alive.' You won't be able to take any, or not very many others out of here now.
I love the tabletop here. Don't you just love the tabletop? Man I love that tabletop.
It's all too late and gone way past the point of any kind of widespread retrieval.
That's what I think. And I've tried to think of it more positively - and cannot.
Nah it's actually not what I think. It's what I know.
'I would a solution now I want a solution now I want a solution now. Don't tell me things take time and don't tell me to do anything. Doctors have drugs and pills and injectables.'
Me: 'Yeah, you're the person who just lost 200,000 dollars though right? Because you are smart and everything you make judgments about is right.'
LOL
Bill and I we say we've lost stax of cash every now and then too, but we really haven't. We made some money first and we acquired some knowledge then next and we never lost any money for real. What happened was we witnessed some atrocious things, some egregious criminal acts by governments and operatives and other associated people.
I'll let you know if or when we ever lose any money.
And I'm trying not to be arrogant!
This is off Angel Falls' YT channel. Her real name is Agnieszka Wasilewska. We'll play one of her vocal songs soon here. Her trance music stage name is 'Angel Falls.'
The City of Masks, the Ruling City-State, The Serene Republic - Venice.
The Venetian Lagoon, which is the main entrance into the major islands of Venice (there are lots and lots of little islands there) is a very misty, even foggy place all the way from late Autumn right through Winter during which it can snow pretty heavily.
This is just the superficial 'Venice.'
History is vague and foggy about who started it and how the State of Venice was started.
The standard local Venetian story is a myth of their own creation, even though it contains parts of the truth: one of the princes and chief advisors to the king of Troy (Priam), by name Antenor, left Troy when it fell and took many of his people with him and settled in the Venetian islands and founded the City-State jointly together with the local 'Veneti.'
Now there is one problem with that, and that is the unsuspecting aspect about the local Veneti.
Nobody can really say, in terms of what all academic historians, even modern ones, are able to agree upon, about who really were the Veneti.
The point of what I am about to say, is that it is not necessary to exaggerate or romanticize the actual outward City-State of Venice; the Republic of Venice was no better and no worse than any other place, and in fact, the so-called 'Council of Ten' got quite out of hand as far as wielding actual power over the citizens and nobles of Venice towards the end of the Republic, when Napoleon invaded there and took it over completely.
The Veneti.
The secret of Venice is to do with these mythical, or at least legendary people - the Veneti.
These are the Adriatic Veneti we are talking about here, and not the Gallic Veneti, and the latter's real name in any case is Beneti, except linguistically there are connections between Veneti and Beneti - which we will endeavor to explain something about shortly.
'Beneti' means the friendly people.
'Veneti' also sort of means friendly people, but with a much harder spin - these are people that somehow can make you passionate, and lusty, and have a strong desire for something or someone, or some people! And that is because they are literally the children of Venus.
It is impossible in our times to say with any 'credibility' that the children of Venus are in fact the Arctic Elves themselves, and that they originally lived in a place not accessible by humans, and where there were actual giants whose descendants later on became the Vikings.
Yet this is so; this is the case.
The king of the Hyperborean Elves - Nausithous - led his people away from the progenitors of the Vikings, because of their lawless behavior, and established his kingdom in Corfu, but in secret, covering where they all actually lived inside of magical mists.
The true way to say 'Veneti' is like how you would say 'Wendy.' So these people are the Wendies.
Carriages in Winter....
And some of you right here are about to become Wendies, because the Veneti are a magical race and people can be taken into their number from out of the human race but they will be altered.
The 1985 movie 'Santa Claus - The Movie' contains some intriguing elements for me because I am not sure where the writers got their information from but it is authentic: in the movie, the Elf character played by Dudley Moore claims that the Arctic Elves are actually known as the Vendicum...
And that is close enough to the reality of the matter.
And, in the movie, two children are allowed to stay in the North Pole where they will eventually become Elves themselves.
...Behind the surface of the Venetian culture - which in any case was riddled with plenty of intrigue, although mostly of an entirely Earthly and material nature, be it political or economic, was the presence of the Veneti. And that is why the practice of wearing masks so much of the time became firmly established. The Veneti did not wish to be seen for who and what they actually were by most people - not unless they wished themselves to be seen. So they were always wearing masks when they went into the public or attended some gathering.
New music coming out this week. Is called 'Is It True.' LOL. Oh yeah. Could it be? Is it really true?
When Napoleon took over the Serene Republic, and by which time already the dominating layers of society there had lost their ability to control their wealth with equanimity, just like when the Goddess Astraea - who Hesiod said was the last of the gods to dwell always among men in the Golden Age - found that when human behavior had at last become too disgusting for her, she left more or less permanently for her home planet - the Veneti also left Venice for the same reasons and went into hiding in other places around the world; and they did not return to Hyperia, as that in fact was no longer fully intact ever since the Great War between the Gods and the Titans (or that is, most of the Titans though not all of them).
Anyone who thinks I am kidding around here is in for a very big surprise.
Played this track below before. Never will lose its power though.
