Words As Technical Things

The thing about AI is that it can be constructed to be some super-pedantic, always technically-accurate corespondent to the living human being.

Humans are not technically accurate in their language and in the exercising of what they claim is 'communication' at all. 

Many big organisations like NASA and IBM and so on, literally train their people to speak and to communicate in very strictly accurate ways. Superficially it's a good idea, and it has served to achieve many beneficial results. But of course it's also a way of subverting truth and manufacturing false realities.

Blessed are the poor in spirit,
because they don't need really
expensive things to be happy. 

Humans themselves by nature are not pedantic at all, and nor are they particularly accurate in their verbal communication styles.

You can even prove this by observing that they even have 'art' and music and theater - all of which are forms of communication and none of which fulfill 'mathematical' accuracy paradigms at all. And yet, often, societies will elevate art and theater and music and poetry to better and more accurate systems of actual communication between people.

So what is going on?

And how will you construct AI to achieve these actually socially better, certainly more preferred ways to communicate?

I want to give you an example that will seem pretty strange:

People, human beings, generally do not understand what they are saying when they say 'God.'

'God' is a word which technically means 'Whom you worship.' So it is about your volition.

'Divinity' by contrast, is a label for a set of necessary definitional qualities.

Christians worship Jesus - this is a true statement. Was or is Jesus 'God?' Well that's actually a different question - because they do indeed worship Jesus and they also say that Jesus was a man and a mortal, so -, as all Muslims everywhere challenge: well but how can they say Jesus is acknowledged by them to be a man and a mortal so how then is He also 'God?'

See the thing is they don't necessarily say that He is God - for example some sects literally clearly say that He is not; for example the Jehovah's Witnesses (though how they can witness 'Jehovah' no one can say) say that Jesus is merely the leading angel being. This is a well-known form of Christian heresy but it is what they maintain.

Blessed are the wealthy women,
who wake up in the morning,
and someone brings them
a Mimosa cocktail.

So they don't equate 'Jesus' literally with 'God' but then they still do 'worship' Jesus.

And that's fine - the two things are sustainable because one thing is a fact of your volition only, whilst the other thing is necessarily required to be a fact or else or literally be a false thing.

You see your volition is not ever false: you willed, intended to do a thing. Well that's a fact. It's only reliant on what you intend/ed to do.

But is Jesus actual 'God?' Well now that's dependent on a fact that is external to your own intention!

He either is, or He isn't. That's an external objective matter.

It's not about simply whether you say it is so, and nor is it about whether some book says it is so and that you are showing your loyalty to that book...

You can be loyal to 'The Prince' by Machiavelli, but that doesn't make you an honest person. In fact, it will make you a deliberate, skilled, and intentionally expeditious, liar.

You can be loyal to the Quran but how do you know that this is actually a book from actual, real God so that you really do need to be loyal to it?

Super Aliens, those ET ones who come here from very far away in natural distance - are they apt to be technically pedantic always, or only; or will they have the same range of methods of communicating that humans do, but know which ones to use in which contexts?

Factually you can't actually worship Jesus right now for real because He is not here. He has left someone behind here - this is an invisible Spirit Being. It's easier for mortal minds to think okay an invisible Spirit could be 'God;' rather than say that a physical, mortal human person who can die is somehow also literally-speaking 'God.' That latter is not so easy.

Blessed are the...
Well, just blessed.

The invisible thing is here obviously; it is invisible so you can't see it(!) so therefore obviously, this invisible thing is obviously not visible... So it's 'here-ness' as an invisible thing, is indeed 'obvious.'

You can't see it. Which is the way it is supposed to be.

LOL

So therefore vast numbers of Christians get away with this nonsense because by their own paradigm and claims about their religion, they don't have to visibly evidence this 'currently present' God because it is invisible by definition.

See that there though, is very easy of a thing to play around with... I mean lie about.

The problem is when you introduce the technical word 'Divinity' into the affair.

Well then if you say Jesus is God then He sure can turn up here right now in your room, because God by definition 'can' do anything. 

If you say His Spirit is God then He too can show up right now in your room in front of your eyes, for the same reason.

And if you say some other form of or format exists outside of the whole entirety of the physical Cosmos and that this too is 'God' then that too can evidence itself to you right now. For the same reason of its capacity to be able to do anything.

The matter resolves, I'm afraid, very much into the von Daniken model: Jesus literally 'went away' materially and physically, in order to actually do something (which is spelled out what He is doing, in the texts).

You are not 'God' and so, you do not have 'God vision' in order to be able to see 'that' version of God, and nor are you sufficiently 'psychic' I suppose you could say, that you can 'see' this invisible 'Spirit' thing.

Will Jesus eat fish curry?
Fish curry is 'God-level' thing you know.
What do you suppose - God 'knows'
how good fish curry but He has never
actually eaten any??
LOL
My friends, be careful of strangers
coming to eat your fish curry;
for some of you have in that way entertained
Rebel Alliance agents in disguise.

The only 'thing' that you are technically able to see, is a physical material 'being' and in this particular example, it is not 'Lord Shiva' we are discussing (although that could just as easily be used) but 'Jesus' the human physical person.

You would be able to see Jesus. If He were here.

And He is not here. Not physically. This we know and can be reasonably sure of.

You cannot technically just 'go to Heaven' anywhere and see Jesus - if... ...you would be at that time a human being; a physical material human being and Jesus was not also the same 'up there' (a material being). And yet, that is what the standard orthodox (meaning mainstream dogma) of Christianity says. It says that you will be a material physical person. Therefore you will be material, and Jesus will be also material.

Text-book Christianity is not that you will go somewhere invisible and 'spirit'-structured - but that you will be physical and materially existent.

And that's a logical problem for all or most modern-day Christians because there is no way around the 'Star Wars' model of things now. Well it's not exactly Star Wars because Star Wars never expounded any 'physical immortality' proposition.

In Islam, Jesus will return at the Damascus Gate and fight with 'Dajjal' who is standing behind that gate with 70,000 Jews armed with swords; including 'Dajjal' who also is armed with a sword.

Well good for them!

I don't even need to be Jesus, because I can take ten drones and wipe the whole bloody lot out in five minutes. That doesn't make things worthy of being a 'God-level' story.

I'm telling you all of this because there is something under way right now in Europe that will be construed to be potentially a 'moral cause' for World War III.

Although the 'independent media' is using the term 'UK Royal Navy Seals' to say who carried out the Nordstream sabotage, you all know here that for years we have been saying 'Five Eyes' were carrying out major clandestine underseas (highly illegal) activities. You know this - you've read it here when it happened before. So they are by no means at all official 'UK Royal Navy' as such.

A 'God-level' story, is: 'ten thousand X-Wing Fighters off Rebel Alliance mother-ships' is close to a 'God-level' story. And nothing less is.

Stop looking at old books and thinking with olden day brains!

We stand at the threshold of a gigantic and nuclear World War. I am trying to take you to the point where you fully challenge all of your beliefs and find out which of them really are substantively and factually completely true. Jesus (or ET Rebel Alliance Aliens) might not easily turn up for you. And that's only because you're not trying hard enough. 

On the other side stand the modern rational pragmatic and political atheists. And you will be dying for them unless you have the help of those who have X-Wing Fighters. Make sure you are settled in your mind about this!