So, Okay, Geniuses...

We are talking 'the Ultra-Violet Catastrophe.'

You've heard of that. Because it's on the news media everyday, right. And besides, just look at what Wikipedia says - Wikipedia, as you all must know, being 'supervised' and 'monitored' by the tyranny of 'evidence' and 'proof' of lots and lots of professional students on campuses everywhere, and University librarians with science qualifications, and of course, most certainly, actual credentialed academics:

They have the audacity to say 'law' and 'formula.'

Problem (Wiki's heading, not mine):

'The ultraviolet catastrophe results from the equipartition theorem of classical statistical mechanics which states that all harmonic oscillator modes of a system at equilibrium have an average energy of kT.'

Solution (again, the Wiki):

'In 1900, Max Planck derived the correct form for the intensity spectral distribution function by making some strange (for the time) assumptions. In particular, Planck assumed that electromagnetic radiation can be emitted or absorbed only in discrete packets, called quanta, of energy. Placnk's assumptions led to the correct form of the spectral distribution functions.'

Now all of that including the diacriticals (brackets stuff) is quoted directly from Wikipedia.

Talk about going round and round in circles and saying nothing but pretentiously pretending that you had.

...theorem ...form ...assumption ...statistical.

All bullshit.

This is at least more honest,
because the left curve says 'experimental data.'

The 'ultra-violet catastrophe' refers to the fact that with a regular logarithmic increase in energy, there is a sine curve (appears 'going backwards,' as it were, because simply the 'x' axis line goes from high frequency to low frequencies) of increasing energy (and heightening frequencies), but around the green/blue wavelengths, the curve suddenly drops off into the ultra-violet spectra, where you would otherwise 'predict' that since the energy is still increasing, the curve should keep ascending.

So. Bullshit. No one has 'solved' anything. People have DESCRIBED the regularity of the packets of energy (we already knew that stuff except Planck - and I love Planck - pinned it down to a number: 'Planck's Constant) using statistical apparent data.

I say 'apparent' because, well - where did the energy go?

No one... ...has solved ...anything.

But we have BILLIONS of dollars wasted on wastrels at Universities, all claiming that they know something they don't know, and clamoring for attention all of the * time and wanting to be feted.

As intellectually 'special,' even 'geniuses.'

Oh yes, the hubris. The ego. The mindless, self-involved utter stupidity.

So - a hundred years have all passed since people actually went into widely-spread print 'noting' that um, er, maybe there was an area of IGNORANCE that required to be thought about.

And what have all the *'s come up with? 'We've solved it and here are some bullshit notations that you don't need to ask any questions about.' ...The first derivative (function) doesn't even work out!

Where are all the missing bits of energy?

Oh, just gone, gone somewhere, they were never there in the first place EVEN THOUGH THE POWER WAS BEING SYSTEMATICALLY INCREASED TO RENDER THE INCREASING FREQUENCIES - but don't worry about that FROM STATISTICAL DATA GATHERED we know they are not there now and you know what, the bits still left behind are also in average energy quanta packets...

Yeah? So what?

'Allah is the Allah and Allah is his name and Allah, well there is only one Allah.'

Okay so 'Allah is Allah and Allah is - there is only one Allah.'

And what am I supposed to take from this, exactly? Allah knows best, but 'SCI-entists' know betterer. Or gooderer, so that you get the point.

I mean for one thing, the 'problem' statement in Wikipedia cannot even be remotely true because 'classical physics' didn't know anything about Planck's Constant until Planck came up with it. Until then, there were still prevailing notions about energy 'trajectories' and certainly virtually everyone thought energy moved in a continuum, not in packets - that's after all, what made Planck's presentation so ground-breaking in the first place. So there could not have been a 'statistical theorem of equipartition' anything otherwise Planck wouldn't have had to invent it! My god. What utter bullshit you find in today's 'modern' 'science.'

Not to worry -, Planck, since he set out the discrete packets of energy (Planck's Constant), could now be pinned for providing the idiots and morons at Universities with a decisive calculus to count up the packets there in blue light, and in the ultra-violet light (and presumably send a monthly recording tally to the campus accountants, no doubt) and into the nothing light - but then alas, boys and girls, where still did the energy go, you know, all that stuff that is 'not there' compared to the AMOUNT OF ENERGY GOING IN??????!!!!!

Now any idiot, that comes up here now, with some trite nonsense claiming that this is what 'academics' say and that they have 'proof' and 'evidence' because their pygmy brains all held hands over it - and expects me to treat that with respect, can go and take a running jump in the lake.

Let me, however, give you a real quote from Herr Planck himself, about a certain moral thing:

"If you are able to gather today 30 such gentlemen, then tomorrow 150 others will come and speak against it, because they are eager to take over the positions of the others."

I'm not going to spell out any exact, precise 'answer' here to what happens to the energy - a lot of you guys and gals here are smart enough to figure most of it out yourself, or at least realize where the fruitful direction points.

The world is about political and social and economic power.

This world, is about political and social and economic power and nothing else at all.

It's 100% NOT about science and knowledge.

Functional science and knowledge belongs to that province where reside people far less venal than what today's crowd have all become.

And functional advanced science - is able to do things that appear indistinguishable from magic...

Back To Not Even Crawling...

One gets into the 'normal social world,' sooner or later, where there are your typical 'school yard bullies...' And then there are the adults who want to tell you about morality and the 'Brotherhood of Man.' And what is it? 'The network of consensus...' The what??

Why is it that there are lots of human beings who want to assert that they are anything but animals? They do all the same things that wild animals do - but then they arrogate to themselves a moral superiority or the, I dunno, glistening alba candida (or 'candidior,' if you go by different people) luster, or glow, of the brightest of the angels. Whose common name we all know...

The work of sophisticated animals.

You see, the thing is, if you start out from the humility of being on the same 'natural footing' as ordinary animals, at least you will not expect the hunters to say 'I beg your pardon' when they too, do the natural thing, and kill you. ...Which is what they do, as hunters; which is, namely, to kill you. Unless you are a hunter too, then there is a question of contested space.

Just because one 'knows' what moral good or evil is, does not in its own right give one the attribute of moral superiority.

And just because someone might have moral superiority does not absolve that person from being cautious in wild areas where they are not necessarily among their own.

So here we are, back to the stage of not even crawling.

So let's do that though, why not?

The network of consensus. This is the thing, that allows a mistake to transform into a commonly-held belief, and then to become an acknowledged science 'fact,' and then to be recruited as a reason to try some stupid nonsense, without regard for real consequences, on account, no one by that time sees the consequences because they all have bad information and are most intent at looking across at one another, and like the pygmy minds (apologies to actual pygmies) they are, all hold metaphorical pygmy hands together in consensus with their brother and sister self-involved, self-approving pygmy minds.

Seriously. Can't believe these people. This 
is from an Emirati Airlines brochure that I got sent.

Is that what that is, 'network of consensus?' You explain to me why it isn't that. And please don't come with your crap about how 'peer review' ensures that mistakes are not proliferated.

And then, while you're at it, Doctor McBride - not to mention one Stephen Fry Esq., - why don't you mount that other canard about 'how come bad things happen to good people...' While you are contemplating the limbless victims of the Thalidomide fiasco...

Well I'll tell you part of the answer: you ain't 'good people,' sonny.

So you want the super duper advanced intelligent ET Aliens, to turn up in your living room, so that they can discuss with you - 'network consensus.' How about they kick your ass, instead?

Okay, how about they kick someone's ass, pretty much in front of your eyes, to give you a salutary warning? Would that do any good? Never has in the past...

'If,' (though) 'you don't succeed, Mr Wint...' 'Try, try, try again, Mr Kidd.'

More Larch - Nothing To See Here

While some of us down here have been 'bush-bashing,' through virtually non-existent tracks and trails, far, far away from the nearest sign of human life (isn't that right Bill...) I have been spending time with some lady professors from France - the Grenoble Institute, to be precise. Cannot really give the exact precise location or the names, since we've all got the emails - which were, by the way, sent out just before the 'Q' thing died away a bit, just prior to the Mueller Report. Hah! Let's see what happens now, though, now that 'the Confusion' begins...

Walpole River inlet. Literally is no one, within
hundreds of miles in any direction.

'The Confusion.' What is 'the Confusion?' The Confusion is what you will see ensue, everywhere, more or less absolutely everywhere, right in front of your eyes over the coming twelve months leading to an absolute disaster around the globe.

Of course, there are always 'Doom-Sayers' all over the place.

But this is not about 'doom,' this is about confusion.

Everyone's so certain, right - always so certain. Why, I mean, just look at what transpired even here, in this tiny backwater of a nothing spot: comments arrive, making absolutely sure, that there will never be any 'disclosure' here.

And what could we possibly disclose, anyway? ...I mean, hey, I am not Professors Yafaev or Royon, you know!

I don't know all that pages and pages of 'notation' in gibberish designed to let you know that you don't know what they know.

They are so smart, those guys - not like you or me - because they are 'scientists' aren't they, kp, and, they have proof and evidence, right?

Actual view, over the back fence,
at Lamb Street

Cannot voice healthy 'skepticism' about anything they say. No sir, Mr. Tibbs. Virgil. No sir.

The Hadron Collider, operates on something called the Regge Theory, which is two things: one of all, it is just a theory, and two, it is based only on statistical analysis of data from which they are deriving all of these 'theories.' None of the theories are functioning formulas or equations like the Planck Constant, for instance.

Nonetheless, the Large Hadron Collider cost $4.75 billion dollars to build over several decades and costs hundreds of millions per year to run. And this is all 'on the strength of theories.'

And what is the point of the Large Hadron Collider? Well it ain't what you think it is, that's for sure. And it ain't anything like the conspiracy theories say, either (see? more theories anyway).

There is an 'intellectual' phenomenon that has the world by the throat and has done for some years now, and if it were not also evident here, there was a chance we might have been able to slip something out there quietly without anyone either making a fuss or adding more dross to the world's funeral pyre of bullshit 'notation' by 'scientists' who are taking godzillions of taxpayer dollars to dress up funny and masquerade at Universities as something extraordinary and special - which they are not - and who confuse you with their interminable and meaningless 'notations' in order to copy and to look like Albert Einstein, who started the fashion in the first place, for all of this utter nonsense on white-boards or chalkboards that goes on forever and leaves you less informed than you were before you started listening to these moronic drones.

Not this house, but they are all,
like this house.

Anyway, back to this mansion I have been hanging out at recently. It's tucked away in a place called 'Lamb Street' South Perth, and you can't really 'see' that it's even there from the basic kinds of typical 'suburban' streets and houses around the location.

It would be nice, and offer some kind of salutary warning, to idiots, to stop doing what they have been, if say, a huge meteorite smacked them in their faces and everyone got to see it on YT videos. But sadly, when actual disaster strikes, it's usually because people could not care less about a lot of warnings that people have been giving over a lot of time anyway, and because the idiot drones want to keep on doing what they have been and will always want to, no matter what.

But you don't need to be confused, unless you are that person who needs to make a political, or a 'social anthropology' point while the headlights of the on-coming train are rushing at you from the opposite end of the tunnel and you think this is 'the light at the end of said tunnel.' It is, but it is rushing to meet you at a hundred miles an hour from the opposite end of where you are... ...standing.

Or, to put it another way, is a series of pomerons coming to collide with your ass.

Because, I mean, hey, without looking up Google Search, you know what a pomeron is, right? And I mean you.

The Middle Of The Summer Here

And since we have been taken further and further away, down a path of no return - that is, no turning back from a certain destiny - it is appropriate to mention at this juncture, that where I am right now, it is just past high summer, a time when the evenings are not so hot anymore, not so cool either, but charmingly, rather magically pleasant.

Nothing at all is happening in the grand mansions; there are no fancy parties, no charity events this year.

Andrew 'Twiggy' Forest the local China-money godzillionaire, is complaining that not enough is being done to advance hydrogen energy technology.

One of our friends, 'Bill Smith,' has been meandering his way through the deep South Bushland regions, near to some decent fish-able rivers, in an expensive SUV.

Nothing, really, nothing at all, is happening. The world is quite still.

In the warm air and glim light of the fireflies, many a human head has been transformed to that of a donkey...

Act II, Scene II.

...I wonder who will be able to find their way through these darkening woods, now.

One road this way, one that, a path here, a path there.

'Now the shadow lines are drawn; 

'All roads uneven but they meet.

'Beware! All you who cross the shadow paths, for in the Shadow World  the Shadow Lord is King,

'And fate for you, a rusting iron gate.'

Evans-Pritchard

E. E. Evans-Pritchard was a leading twentieth century anthropologist whom Wikipedia describes as 'instrumental in the development of social anthropology.'

He was Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford University from 1946 - 1970.

Fundamental to all modern systems of politics - and how political strategists and their financial backers drive the process - is the understanding described by Evans-Pritchard as 'segmentary opposition.' This is an idea which says that opposed social and political groups suddenly find solidarity in the face of external perceived threats.

"Well I'll be... Yer jest like one of us,
aincha Virgil?'

If ET Aliens had have landed on the Capitol Mall two years ago, and said: 'take us to your President,' 75 mill plus 1 additional person would have all mailed in a message to the Aliens - 'Not my President!'

Today, only 75 million other people would shout: 'Not my President!'

All the same, the working theory that is currently being used by people who could possibly procure a kind of scam 'visitation' ('visitation' by the way, in English, means a ghostly apparition and not, someone just 'visiting') by ET Aliens, is that were they to present the ET Aliens as ghastly and inimical to humanity - then according to the theories of Evans-Pritchard and others, it would act as a 'unifying mechanism' with which to underpin the establishing of a genuine global leadership with all the legal powers and authority of government with armed services and police.

You would suppose, not that one actually knew, certainly, but using rationality and common sense, you would suppose that super-advanced ET Aliens would have knowledge about 'social anthropology' at least as good as E. E. Evans-Pritchard, and likely, a lot better knowledge.

Nothing like Michael Jackson...

I'm certain that it would not be pleasant for me to meet ET Aliens of the kind recently suggested here by the most active recent comment contributor - that 'might have' landed in Ruwa, Zimbabwe - who looked like Michael Jackson and who had really big heads and very large eyes. Uh-uh; not me, 'no thank you Virgil. I mean, Mista Tibbs. No thank You!' 

In The Heat Of The Night: 'No one EVER comes here and visits me - not even ET Aliens, Virgil.'

Well, Rod Steiger's character never quite said that... LOL

And Sidney Poitier's character never quite managed to say this line, either: 'Because if they did, Sheriff Gillespie, you and I both would want them to pull whitey down off the Hill...'

When Major Ed Dames Met The Alien

By now, it will be pretty clear to all of you who watch television, or YouTube, that the first key move of all modern propaganda is to establish within 48 hours of any given significant event, who 'perpetrated it,' if it is something superficially negative - like for instance, the events of 9/11.

And then, second-up, as fast as possible, numerous astro-turfers go into play, laying down suppressive narratives or making derisory comments about whichever important or expert figure they want to switch the narrative away from.

For example, when retired General Stubblebine went into the media to say that according to his analysis of vision and photographic after-shots, no 'plane' went into the Pentagon, immediately thereafter a tremendous amount of the American media went into trying to discredit Stubblebine. Within ten years, George Clooney featured in a sarcastic representation of Stubblebine's career, in the 2009 film 'The Men Who Stare At Goats.' The movie itself was made both with the technical assistance and later, the public approval, of propaganda arms of the US Military and various active military commanders.

Stubblebine's last mission command, was as global military director and head, of all high altitude (by that time it was more than just 'high altitude') photographic analysis.

He retired at age, decorated, and with honors.

One of those under his direct command earlier on, was Major Ed Dames, who had been engaged in programs and projects which to this day I cannot - and nor can others - actually detail, but which were given various cover stories. 

Ed Dames is excoriated widely.

All yours, Bill. 'Jimmy Brings.'

As you know, the Covid-19 Relief Funding Budget, had several side-issues that were related to its being passed, one of which is this famous/infamous deadline (looming in the next few months) by which time the DoD and Combined US Intel groups all must render a report on what they hold on ET's, UFO's, and ET Aliens.

Now unless they give you details and make at least some serous references to the 'High Altitude Analysis' Unit and Major Ed Dames actual meeting with an ET Alien, then the reports are not merely 'incomplete' but an outright, outrageous lie.

Ed Dames is still around but his life is in some danger.

Because Ed was told something by the ET Alien and following his report the Military chiefs scattered like hens in a hen-house with a fox in there on the loose.

And they basically split into two camps, with the predominant camp being peopled by those who have since virtually completely taken over the running of the United States.

Now our recent friend to these pages, KittyP, has given us the perspective that he doesn't 'have a view' on 9/11 and although I am sticking words into his mouth, no doubt, if I hadn't already framed things in terms of what the most senior officer in charge of all photographic analysis has already said - he would suggest 'there is no EVIDENCE...'

Yes there is evidence. There is evidence that a cruise missile was targeted at, and flew into, the Pentagon.

And there is top-flight analysis saying so as well.

I like these, myself, but Jimmy said 'no can
do; not for the bush, right?'

With regard to Major Dames, he was given some very brief but astounding 'information,' you would have to call it, regarding the expansion of the use of satellites orbiting the planet into the thousands (which has happened, of course) and the problems and risks that would ensue from relatively rare kinds of solar flares which would disable those satellites, which the people of the world had by that time all become reliant on in their lives.

Ever since the Dames meeting and that specific 'information,' those who have been on the inside, have created a 'cover story' so that people who were not on the inside, would not be able to maliciously exploit the situation that 'could' eventuate - namely, the destruction of the satellite networks system.

But the real reason some certain people detest Ed Dames, is that his story of the so-called 'Kill Shot' is a cover for something.

And I would be very surprised if you were not able to at least speculate on what that is, KittyP. Go on. Have a go at it.

Where The Three Roads Meet

One of the biggest difficulties in getting straight-down-the-center-line reports of anything significant these days, is the sheer overburden of utter nonsense which somehow gets a huge platform anyway or is thrown onto the pyre of 'academic research.'

There are so many 'competing theories' or hypotheses about any given (new) subject, that no one will ever work their way to something that a sufficient number of objective inquiring minds can look at and form a consensus about - far less 'prove' with science.

Christopher Hitchens was a great speaker and he had what I consider a decent British accent, Richard Dawkins has a very poor, lower class accent in my view...

The fact that one has a good accent, or that one has some University credentials, still needs to be taken in perspective with what actual things they say: Hitchens verbally pouring scorn in his tone of voice onto something absent of any actual supporting argument, means that he doesn't have an argument!

Dawkins is oft heard to use the phrase - 'there is not a shred of evidence...'

During the Vietnam war, USAF radio operators in C135e's, would take down messages, all crystal clear and accurate and fully verified later on - and yet, the equipment through which they were claiming to hear the transmissions, never recorded any such messages. I know this as a personal matter of experience with several people in that official area. CO's knew, and CO's used these messages, but no reports were ever officially filed, other that the CIA did have knowledge of it because the word got out and there were soft inquiries made.

The reason people like Russell Targ and others drifted into the California 'out there' scene, is not because they did not have a basis to go there. They did. But in the first place, 'meditation' and that kind of thing, also gives people some psychological support that they can 'control' something at least about what goes on with the stuff they have been meddling with.

This morning I went down to a major Department Store - I know where it is located, it's been there since before I was born, and there is substantial confidence that I have, that when I go to that address, it will actually be there.

Guess what? It was there too.

There is no such similar clear-cut stable location - any formal publicly-known address - to which you can send messages and have ET Aliens (for example) respond to your questions, and then, that presumes they care to or even want to at all.

I mean - look at it this way, and which is a much more significant way to look at it (given recent well-known incidents): you are the US Navy, and the ET Aliens have been messing with your missions and operations. Now, you just want to get a direct, cogent, official message out to them.

How do you go about doing this?

APB? All channel broadcast? What?

There is no way.

You and I, we just want a 'show-ground' ride and some whiz-bang 'evidence' for our eyes and ears - we don't have any technical, military operations agenda or 'serious' standing.

Ah but, you see, the Monroe Institute does have technological ways-and-means to contact, to interface. It basically consists of micro-level EMF scanners and some digital magnetic field propagating computers. Except they carefully look at even those people with a stack of money who want to go into their programs, and not everyone gets a go at the machinery, regardless of money.

...I am trying to find a way, to 'hand across' something substantial, but also avoid divulging the science and maths, which is at this stage absolute top secret stuff. What I can tell you is that CERN is well off the trail, except they have deadly dangerous high levels of energy being exploited, and it could lead to accidents - but some American scientists have been down the 'hot paths' for decades. And it involves ideas stemming from Planck stuff and 'sine curves.' Wikipedia (and I'm not going to link that actual entry here) when dealing with the key subject, says 'the problem was solved by Planck when...' No it wasn't. Planck described something, he did not explain it. Planck's description in the related thing is just a derivative equation, it's not a formula.

Okay, let me go at a complete tangent.

Blue lava volcano in Indonesia

Snakes can 'see' blue and green colors. And, they can 'see' down into the UV range at nighttime.

It is fundamentally incorrect to say their tongues flick to 'pick up odor molecules' because there is no such mechanism, not even in our own sensory system. They pick up molecules, yes, but these are only first-stage filtered by the sustentacular cells - they don't transfer truly critical information at all.

When people widely sweep these 'there is no evidence' accusations, well here is one that is true but no one wants to admit it: there is absolutely zero evidence that chemical molecules are the actual information transfer process for our sense of smell. They are part of it and the dichroic electron spin function of the molecules is the real information transfer process. No one has exhaustively researched this area up to this very instant.

Snakes 'see' blue and green to catch their prey and they flick their tongues to 'feel' whether the prey is alive. Because electron spin changes when things are dead - or synthetic.

Why they 'see' UV is because they are deadly afraid of what is there 'hidden' in the ultraviolet range...

Typical California 'woo woo' place... Cute, but.

When Sponge Rob expresses the average person's sentiment that we haven't got any power - you can kill a snake with UV. Any snake. Or reptile.

You can, or at least in the ancient mythological religious narrative, someone did, slaughter Sodom and Gomorrah with sulfur from the skies - which burns blue, by the way.

Sulfur burns blue because the heat is so hot, and the thermal frequency so high, that it is in the blue color of the spectrum.

Ordinary calcium burns purple or violet. Things go systematically ('maybe...' lol) on a curve from low frequency (red colors) to higher frequencies (blue+), right? RIGHT? Nod nod wink wink.

Yes. This is called 'alchemy.' Alchemy is, as you know, a way that clever scientists, disguised what they were saying to unwanted eyes. It's not some silly way to make gold from out of lead!

What is the physics of 'where the rainbow ends?'

The Fairy Queen tells something very specific to Thomas Rhymer in the poetic fairy tale. She does not say the wide road leads to Hell, what she says is 'here is the wide road of the Wicked...'

The Earth - the human race - is a crossroads. It contains all things, converging right here.

Things That Really Happened

In 1956, a concert in Moscow of Swan Lake, performed by Maya Plisetskaya, resulted in the KGB running through the audience to stop people from applauding too loudly, and literally dragging some theater-goers out of the theater kicking, screaming, and scratching.

For years, the ballet company had been suppressed by the senior bureaucrats for being 'too erotic' and the opera music 'mutilated.'

Two years later, in 1958, at the Papal Conclave, the first pick of who should be 'the next Pope' went to Cardinal Siri of Genoa - who, as soon as he had received the vote, also got a slip of paper from 'a foreign emissary,' which said (and this is confirmed from numerous reliable authoritative sources and never has been denied by anyone) that if Siri accepted, he would immediately be killed, and all of his family and friends would be killed as well. In fact, the actual closest person to the whole affair, reported that the message was even far worse than that, in that the Vatican City was being threatened with a nuclear weapon!!

Today, I personally don't worry so much about suppression by the general media on matters political - I worry about the fact that you will not find one single photograph or reference on-line anywhere, about why a great French fashion designer like Yves Saint Laurent, was so famous.

...Instead, what you will find are many references to his homosexuality, and of course, even the gigantic investment bank which owns his label today, never refers to his actual name, but only to their products as 'YSL' using a branded logo design to express the line.

This year, the Pantone Color of the Year, is 'Ultimate Grey.'

What made Yves Saint Laurent really famous on the world stage, is that he designed for Plisetskaya and also for Marlene Dietrich.

Yves Saint Laurent and Plisetskaya

In the case of Plisetskaya, he radically altered the usual 'red and black' palette for the productions of Bizet's Carmen Suite Ballet, and during one performance only, at Covent Garden, the costumes were all in Yves Saint Laurent's (later) trade-mark colors of grey, white and yellow. This was such a truly shocking departure that it scandalized the press, but was so amazing visually, especially when presented by Plisetskaya, that Saint Laurent's fame was fully established in the paramount Western fashion capital of London.

If 'the big thing' that present-era global socio-political elites want to shove down everyone's throats is homosexuality, then why though, is there this much much deeper level subtle criminality to do with mutilating the history of what actually made those significant figures - who may indeed have been homosexual - who they became?

Why suppress the very exceptional incidents themselves, that placed those figures onto the world stage - and to be acclaimed for those particular elements of their work?

You can buy a lot of expensive rubbish from LVMH under the brand label of 'YSL' but none of it is what Yves Saint Laurent was famous for. 

What the psychological manipulators are trying to do, and very successful on the whole, is convince you that it was the homosexuality, that was important, and not the work or the ideas that those people had.

Dietrich wearing Yves Saint Laurent

But let me assure you of this - if you decide tomorrow, that you are going to be 'gay' when previously you were some other thing, it will not make you Yves Saint Laurent!

These miscreants that run all of this agenda, are not supporters of homosexuals or homosexuality - they are abusers of homosexuals, denying them their own history of actual creativity and innovation and achievement, supplanting all of that with 'industrial scale' political semiotics and propaganda.

At schools, you will be taught that you have the right 'to be gay...'

You will never be told you have the right to stick it in the faces of the Politburo elite or the global agenda elite, or that you can distinguish yourself above the pack and ahead of what your puppet-masters have planned for you to do. You will never be told that you can be unique and self-made, or at least 'self-actualized.'  

Actual gay people who think that the 'gay rights political agenda' or the 'rainbow movement' is going to enhance their rights or their lives - are fools.

Thomas The Rhymer

"All Hail, Mighty Queen of Heaven! No equal ever before I have seen"

"Nay nay, Rhyming Thomas. That name is not for me.

"I am but the Queen of Fairyland, and I've come to visit thee."

...And riding off the both of them together, over hill and dale and desert wide as far as the eye can see,

Until at last the Lady spake: "Dismount thee, Thomas, now, and mark you well,

"For wonders I shall show you, three."

Schiehallion, Scotland.
'Schie' means 'fairy.'

The Oak

Just kidding.

The Larch.

The...

...LARCH.

The Larch.

 

The Poplar

The Poplar tree is a common deciduous plant of the cottonwood family whose general name is also applied to the common Aspen.

Poplars are often grown as ornamental trees - but they must be planted a long way from foundations, as their roots are powerful, vigorous and invasive.

The wood of the poplar is light, durable, close-grained and highly flexible -, all of these characteristics also being shared by the willow. 

Poplar wood was highly favored for the construction of shields since the wood was very strong and durable, difficult to penetrate, but much lighter than oak.

If you are considering making wooden shields for warfare, consider the poplar as your go-to choice for the wood.

Or, if you are considering entering the viola-making trade, poplar has long been a much prized timber for this craft.

In fact, you could easily surprise your foe, by advancing upon him in the dead of night, screeching away at your beautifully-grained viola, whilst at the same time presenting it forward as a shield, and then bashing him over the head with it when you are close -, the strong flexible and durable poplar wood bouncing happily over his thick skull, and no doubt scrambling his normally very keen senses, perhaps rendering him with a severe case of anosmia at minimum.

The Poplar.

'Back to the lumber-yard, Danny.' (Chevy Chase)

Number One

The Larch.

The... ...LARCH.

Wood from larch trees is distinguished from wood from other conifers by being on the one hand a soft wood but waterproof and durable. Siberian Larch is also a very dense wood as well as strong.

Although a soft wood, larch wood is also quite heavy. Thus, considering its rare combination of soft to work, but dense, heavy, waterproof, strong, and durable - wood from the larch is unique.

It is also very high in calorific density and therefore makes one of the best fire-woods available and one of the few soft woods genuinely useful for this purpose.

The Larch.

A mighty fine tree providing a mighty fine timber.

Siberian Larch forest in Spring

Siberian Larch forests would seem quite pleasant to walk through in the Spring, it would appear, from photographs.

I have not, myself, been through any Siberian Larch forests, either in Spring or at any other time of the year - although I have, unfortunately, been through a Russian Birch forest on the apron of Winter and that was rivaled only by many stiff and rapid walks through St James's Square in London in the middle of Winter and many a night's walk down an Austrian Alpine road from a nightclub where I was playing in a duo - along with another young fellow from Khancoban, New South Wales (which is in the Snowy Valley, as you would know).

I must say, interestingly, I always found St. James's Square by far the most bitterly cold place, as the winds pierce somehow right through even multiple layers of clothing and there are little to no windbreaks presented by any of the trees there, which are spread far apart. Indeed, why it should even be called 'St. James's' anything I'll never know, since the statue there is of William III.

It is of course, in, the district of St. James, but the park originally belonged to Henry Jermyn, the Earl of Albans, and not really King James at all.

In fact, St James's Park was never ever originally known as that at all, but rather, it was Pall Mall field.

Siberian Larch forest in Winter

St. James's Square is sparsely lined with Plane trees, which like the Maple, are completely leafless in Winter, making the bitter winds all the more unimpeded through the park.

The English Plane tree is of course though, not a Maple, but a Sycamore.

...So. No Larch trees though, at all - in St. James's Square.

The Larch

The Larch is a tall, coniferous, type of pine tree - growing to almost fifty metres in height. Most conifers are evergreens however the larch is deciduous, dropping its needles in the autumn.

Cedar trees - the cedrus (which is often termed the 'true cedar') - are evergreens.

Larch branch

Larch trees are grown mainly for timber and they have few other uses at all, even though they are usefully waterproof without treatment. All the same, they are not recommended as building materials in free standing walls close to wet ground because they are susceptible to rising damp and all of the attendant problems associated with that.

There are numerous trees called 'cedars' but these range across several different species - although all of them have aromatic wood. Cedars contain a lot of inflammable oils in their needles and bark and are consequently regarded as a fire hazard in summer. 

The Eastern Red Cedar, is really a species of juniper native to eastern North America.

Certain kinds of Chinese cedar are highly favored in China for coffin manufacture, and consequently they have almost been over-exploited out of existence.

Eastern Red Cedar

Real Chinese cedar coffins these days are highly-prized, luxury items much sought after by wealthy Chinese.

Korean chests, are also made from cedar wood. 

Camphor wood is also from an evergreen tree, but this is actually a type of Laurel tree, not pine.

The Surge

I guess for me and my 'friends...' LOL

...well -, they encourage me to think this way, okay. Hell I don't think like this on my own. Because, I usually read academic journals and all that good stuff they (mostly) all do down at Richmond or Boston Tech Supplies or wherever you 'Lacan-ites' and Roland Barthes devotees all congregate these days, behind your screens and whatnot. I kind of, well parallel you, Kitty.

Anyway, for my friends and me, we think that too many people are in love with technology. This is really the main reason that y'all want to meet and greet with the ET Aliens - basically to grab their technology and to kill people with it once you get it, who are against your 'ideas' and 'philosophies.'

In the dark, in a fog, ten miles off...

And that is also partly why you're not going to get anything but much more interestingly, you are not going to get any 'major scale demonstration,' either... ...as far as you know.

You see, what happens after you see it anyway? As one person recently admitted himself, 'there is always going to be someone who will game the thing.' Immediately people will all suddenly 'behave themselves' and like the snakes they all are, their real intentions will be beneath the surface - hidden to absolutely no one with half the intelligence of any of my friends, but covered over nonetheless.

So that is not going to happen.

I'll tell you what is going to happen though.

Of course, groups like today's huge 'soup plate' CIA are very misunderstood not only in the broader public's mind, but in fact, within large chunks of the organization itself.

'La Cantarella...' ...not what you think.

It was the gay Oscar Wilde who really first insulted someone by referring to his intellect as akin to a soup dish - it was not Irving Stone, whom Wikipedia credits for saying the same kind of thing.

Today's CIA is full of gay people. John Brennan is gay.

So here - if you're really all that smart, here is what is about to go down. It won't happen all at once, and in fact, it will just seem like sequences of phenomena. And sequences of phenomena, are, not necessarily anything about 'cause and effect,' right? They're just happenstance. Mind you if I named names, some people reading and monitoring would rush around like chickens with their heads cut off!

Not to worry.

What film is this scene from?

LOL

That'll help you if you know.

Still in all, I doubt whether too many even at the 'thinner air' parts of anywhere you know, serious, will be able to piece together enough of the puzzle to comprehend that the surge is on.

The day any of you morons scratching your gay academic heads out there, feel it inside your guts when you are listening to a stone killer, will be the day I... ...oh boy, I could drop a phrase right now but I'm not going to.

It's all about the day after, not about the day that you think you achieved some pathetic little 'victory.' And the day after that and the day after that.

This is the End Game, not just the Big Game.

What do you reckon? Which giant falls first...?

Gays For Christ

Ha!

Gotcha.

I could take a very cheap shot and just say that Ferdinand de Saussure and Roland Barthes were gay Freemasons...

And I will do that, take the cheap shot and say it.

Saussure, 1857 - 1913, and Barthes 1915 - 1980 were easily more influential than Goebbels in procuring for the world of academia and politics, this basic strategy of political semiotics and 'scientific' propaganda in which, as Goebbels supposedly said: 'the truth is the greatest enemy of the state.'

That Freemason literally worships the Devil, this we know from all of the 'ex-Freemasons' who tell us so - but what is the particular evil of gays?

God killed them at Sodom & Gomorrah, right?

Does not God approve of pink Lamborghinis?
LOL

Well, actually - no. 

The destruction of Babylon and later, Sodom & Gomorrah, were for the same reason:

"The inclination of their hearts was only evil continually." It doesn't say anything about people's sexual proclivities being the actual reason for the 'wrath of Jehovah.'

I'll be even more blunt - it wasn't even Jehovah that actually carried it out; it was a couple of 'beautiful-looking' strangers with pepper spray or something that 'sent the men at Lot's door blind.'

When people say 'agency' it should be remembered that the two beings in the Biblical narrative, were intending to spend the night out in the public square. And the final decision to destroy the place must have been left up to them - since, let's say, in the wildest of all possibilities, they had have been treated so decently 'in the public square overnight,' that they may have had to restrain themselves from such fun with the photon torpedoes or whatever they might have had.

The ordinary human people, though are not anywhere near as decisively cautious and careful in who we obliterate - we slaughtered at least a quarter of a million people in 1945 at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and realistically, it was a lot more than what we are proud to admit in Wikipedia.

You cannot in honesty say that a gay person like Elton John 'does evil continually!' He preserves and curates very important art works, he sings and composes amazing music, he is a very hard-working stage performer, he gives a lot to charities quietly, and isn't known for 'raping good-looking young strangers wishing to spend overnight down in the town square unguarded.'

How about really wild fuchsia then?

So it isn't a logical proposition to hurl being 'gay' at Roland Barthes or Ferdinand de Saussure as any kind of 'sin.'

The Cratylus doesn't do the things that Saussure's written lectures all do - the Cratylus simply presents three main hypotheses and lays them out without actually dictating which of them is the only one that is true or real about the history of human speech; whereas Saussure dictates very assertively, particular things off of sweeping presumptions about race and the way people said things without the slightest bit of proof and evidence for any of it. We do not have recordings of how primitive man made sounds, nor do we have any such thing for any later time either, up until the modern times of Marconi.

Saussure is grossly racist.

And he is a major sophist.

Superficially you might say he is a product of the blooming of the post-Enlightenment era, but I choose to pursue the occultic path as far as Saussure goes: he is a Babylonian demonic personality. If this kind of talk was good enough for Jack Parsons and Aleister Crowley I don't see why you shouldn't allow it for me...

As you will recall, Babylon's eventual fate, was to be confounded by a prodigious incapacity of speech...

But what that really means is not that they were not able to make sounds, or for those sounds not to be intelligible, but that their 'magical occult' ability to employ semiotics and perverted meanings of words... ...was destroyed.

I mean sure, one can always choose to rather get back up onto a bicycle with a broken wheel because that is what one is used to over a long time and have adapted one's life and lifestyle so to do. Instead of using a brand new shiny bicycle that you have never seen before...  

Today's media and all of modern academia have the magical ability to lie and get away with it and be believed.

Right now there are no 'two beautiful strangers out at night in the town square' and certainly no photon torpedoes issuing forth with flames of supernal fire, either.

Anosmia - real anosmia - is the inability to sense what Serge Lutens is saying.

You know, the average Muslim, or at least, the standard Islamic narrative (which 'has holes in it' by the way, in case you haven't heard the scholarly ruling of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi last year) believes that the angel Jibreel (Gabriel) does all of this mass destruction and retribution and slaughtering stuff; but that is nowhere suggested in the Torah or the Bible. Gabriel is just a deliverer of messages from 'on high.'

New Age Christianity, or progressive Christianity, is uniform in its agreement that God is a God of Love only, and that all followers of those ideologies must not ever indulge angry sentiments and only be forgiving at all times and not seek destruction and all of this other action-packed drama.

Of course, this type of Christianity also accepts that gays and so on are not specifically condemned by God. The overall idea is that somehow, by just focusing on 'nice stuff' all the time and forgiving everyone always, you can attain 'apotheosis,' I guess.

But this disallows God from owning any amount of the dark, in which case, 'God' is not really 'God' at all, but a limited form of supernatural thing.

'Evil' is not the dark, not darkness.

'Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot...'

'Whose hearts inclined to do only evil continually,' is when people simply must just get up onto that 'bike with the broken wheel' at every turn and at a cost even to their own self-honesty.

Evil is assiduous intent to create a lack of clarity in others' minds that you want to take advantage of.

I came across some views that claim to have researched it, and conclude that only 7% of the history of Mankind covers times of peace, and that the rest of the time Mankind is at war.

Well maybe Man was created in the image and likeness of God but this is evidently a mirror image: God is only 7% destructive.

But He is destructive.

How's your sense of smell these days? First time, these beautiful strangers messed with people's vision...

'Lot - bar the door behind thee.'

New Exercises In Crawling

Here is an exercise for which I will provide the answer by the end here - but, you should 'Google Search' it first before consulting the answer below (which in any case I might simply provide in the comments section later):

From where, does the phrase 'a horse by any other name' come?

Google Search, please.

Most casual observers regularly say, when it comes to ET's - where are the official sources claiming they exist?

Walt Disney and Wernher von Braun

Try the following - 

Jack Parsons - problematic, but still (Jet Propulsion Labs CALTECH - aka NASA)

Russell Targ (the world's historically leading primary researcher into lasers and masers)

Dr David Hawkins (the Manhattan Project)

Christopher Mellon (DIA)

Michael Collins (NASA astronaut)

Edwin Aldrin (NASA astronaut)

...really, you can go on for pages, and categorize those listings into those who say they know for certain, and those scientists who say they believe on account of the statistical probability and so on.

What you will very soon encounter, however, when you look into any or all of these people, is that they spend just as much time and energy talking about 'god' and 'religious beliefs' and meditation and 'mind matters,' you might say - as they do actual hard metal shiny disc-shaped objects with little green people inside them.

And I'm going to tell you why that is.

Early August 1945, the United States government, led by President Harry S. Truman, dropped the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Hiroshima bomb was dropped August 6, and the Nagasaki bomb on August 9.

Nagasaki

Beforehand, all of the chief scientists, chief technicians and chief engineers began compiling a letter to Truman, indicating that they were not in favor of dropping the bomb on civilian populated areas first, but recommended a detonation high overhead as a warning.

Edward Teller, the man most responsible of all for the successful manufacture and functioning of the nuclear weapon, refrained from adding his name to the letter, having been encouraged by J. Robert Oppenheimer to leave the decision in the hands of the better-informed political leaders in Washington...

Afterwards, Teller said his decision not to sign was a mistake.

Dr David Hawkins' role in the Manhattan Project, was as a highest level communications liaison officer between all of the scientists, many of whom were notoriously difficult to relate to when it came to 'normal' other people, and exhibited some irascibility even at the best of times anyway. Hawkins was a mathematician of some regard among the top-line serious professional mathematicians but his main game was psychology.

Later on, Dr David Hawkins owned one of the most successful and lucrative commercial psychology practices coast-to-coast in the United States, and that was even after he went into virtual retirement from that to concentrate on 'meditation.'

Much later on still, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, there were a set of incidents, which dovetailed into vague concerns that had been being voiced by a number of high-placed scientists and some military people as well, that they had been contacted by ET Aliens and told outright that there were to be exactly no future actual using of any nuclear weapons whatsoever and that if it were ever attempted again, there would be the most dire consequences - literally carried out by ET's against whoever was trying to use nuclear weapons.

Veda Naga

The series of incidents, consisted of warnings that nuclear secured facilities would lose all electrical power, even from the localized backup sources, at a specific time - and that is what eventuated. It is from that that sprung quiet inquiries as to how real such warnings were and whether or not they really had come from Extraterrestrial (IE Alien Intelligent Being) sources.

The moral dimension regarding the uses of nuclear weapons was already a driving force behind the widespread interest that so many of those who had worked on the Manhattan Project, as well as other top secret mainly weapons research programs - had begun to show in things like Eastern moral philosophy and Buddhism and all things 'Good versus Evil/God versus 'not God.'

Dr David Hawkins has interesting available work out there, which goes into this subject of 'I versus other I,' but his work also shows a lot of his own pre-commitment to Buddhist philosophy and ideology, really.

Dr Steven Greer, prominent ufologist.

Dr Steven Greer, who is not specifically from an actual CIA or military project or program (although he also has had some 'near-to-fully-official' involvement in related official research, at least, since his projects at moments received CIA and Military funding), has a very strong interest also, in meditation and the moral dimension of ET Alien encountering.

Now, here's my point - if you are unable to find out where the statement I outlined in the first paragraph above came from, and let's submit that neither will the whole entire information resources of the CIA itself either be able to say, and the whole panoply of US academia, then - what is the point of any of you pretending you are even close at all to being able to engage with ET Aliens because you are smart enough to?

You are not, smart enough to. Yet.

So, what's the answer? (And why is it important, of course...).