Serge Lutens is an interesting person. He has lived for many years now, far away from Paris where his two main studio/showrooms are - one which is literally inside the Palais Royal in Paris - in Marrakech.
The Palais Royal is a former royal palace (of the Sun King, eventually) albeit it was built ostensibly for Cardinal Richelieu to begin with, and currently is the headquarters of the French government's Ministry of Culture.
Serge Luten's birth and early childhood is slightly shrouded in mystery, but at minimum it is known that both his father and mother were in diplomatic roles in Europe.
He says himself that he had a 'complicated' relationship with his mother and the standard Euro-snob narrative is that he himself is gay.
I cannot say that I personally like his graphic designs or his photography in the sense of 'like;' 'am attracted to.' The images are very different to anything that resides anywhere near the obvious conscious surface of my own brain, or even anywhere down deep and dark, and/or in any of the undergrowth in there(!), so far as I know.
But having listened to a number of his interviews in the french language and in English too, and read some of his writing, what strikes me is his extraordinary ability to feel.
And so then I go back and look at his photographs and design work and wonder at it.
And then when you turn it in your hands, you realize that it is wonderful. There are no answers in any of it, at least not to me because well frankly, I am not that smart - certainly not that kind of smart that those art critics and others are, who can explain to you what all these things mean. Or 'might' mean.
To me they don't have any obvious meaning. It's just that I am watching someone say something to the world of other human...
...Oh, but wait. Did I tell you that CIA has a file on Serge Lutens?
His friend - 'the man with the golden gun...' |
It's probably a little lost in the back archives now, but it was a very special thing back when Marilyn Monroe was alive, and before that. Serge worked with some pretty clever Japanese industrial chemists, and all of them for the American Secret Service just after the war.
...I was going to say 'of other human beings,' wasn't I?
Yes. Sometimes great artists can speak to the world of other human beings and say something - but then, it is not always heard or understood even when it is heard.
I mean, you too, do want to say something to others, right?
What is it, that you want to tell them?
Some psychologist-types say that Serge wants to tell the world he hated his mother, others that he loved his mother. I mean seriously though, who cares what anyone thinks about their mothers! Because, after all, right, we are animals evolved from the primordial slime and we just sleep and digest, and feed and breed. And then we die. We have exactly no depth of feeling at all about things that have passed; we have not depth of feeling - other than what is in front of our greedy little eyes right now or in our lusting imagination for the near future. And if we 'miss out' on over-powering someone nearby, and having and exerting control all the time, we get angry. And then we do something bad against others. And this doesn't stop us from being angry, but at least we can tell ourselves that we 'have power.'
We have no art. We are artless.
But we have Netflix and 'Game of Thrones.'
And the throne in Paris is officially 'unoccupied,' and in any case it is contested by two or even three claimants.
The carnival ride - Kitty's 'carnival ride.' lol |
Serge has his showroom in Richelieu's old buildings.
Everything is permanently in transition and knowledge is only relative.
Perhaps 'Black Lives Matter' will shortly take over the administration of the Palais Royal and kick Serge Lutens out.
And the transition will take place and any knowledge of why it ever was that Serge Lutens was so great will evaporate.
Serge made this perfume once, that had the scent of gunpowder in it, like you have drifting all around you when you are at the carnival area in Paris at nighttime. ...And candy floss. And women's iris butter lipstick. Marilyn's style of lipstick.
He also did another one as well, a homage to Marlene Dietrich - called 'La fille de Berlin.' After, 'Ich bin ein Berliner,' I guess.
Serge had a friend one time - a crack-shot with a rifle.
Things are all different, of course, these days.
Nobody does any bad things noh moh, right?
Deep inside, way deep deep down inside of people, are they really quite angry and resentful of so many things - or are they traumatized and numb by what life has dished out to them. There is a mass human psychological problem issue, isn't there? Maybe it isn't people's fault either - because so much of it is just 'external bad things happening to them.'
This is a dangerous place, this human world. Serge Lutens has more or less run away and hid.
I think... Here is what I think - I think that inasmuch as I do know for sure that there are far superior intelligent beings from distant stars, and they are hereabouts at least; and far superior than ordinary human beings (and it is an interesting question a poster here made, about how they got there at all, to that position of advanced moral reasoning if not from a 'similar' evolution process that the human race thinks it is on), I think they are not all that interested in 'saving people' just from themselves, as it were.
I mean, if you are able to solve your own internal conflicts and angers and come out of the whirlpool of life with some balance and the ability to be socially interesting without all of the risky patterns of conflict and aggression that human beings have tended to exhibit rather a lot down through history - it would be better for humans to do that than to have it 'done for them' by some other lot, surely.
I don't need to caption this, seriously do I - all of you over 55? |
But I think there has been enough history already to show that there is no 'process' of moral evolution' going on via the presumed 'dialectic' or 'two-polar conflict dynamic' that is the standard condition of human society and always has been.
This thing we are witnessing right now over the election of the US President - it is all about a passive-aggressive psychopathology.
What people really want to do - on either side - is to shoot someone. Lin Wood already voiced that and he has a platform but a zillion other 'little' people have said as much all over social media.
If a super advanced ET Alien went and visited Serge Lutens, in Marrakech, or when he was having lunch at El Buli in Spain when that was still there, would Serge want 'technology' to go shoot someone - he has enough cause, from what I understand of his life - or would he want some advanced ideas and some insights into new things to make?
I mean I want to ask about "Shared agency." It is also *really obvious* that if such a thing can be achieved by free beings (not enforced through some protocol, for instance) then the universe as a physical place would be completely connected. "All points in time and space" to quote a phrase used by the ET enthusiasts. And hence "travel" and the exchange of information generally within the universe would be trivially a part of experience. No need to build a time machine.
ReplyDeleteSorry, that was lengthy, I just wanted to make sure the question I wish to ask is the question in fact being asked.
It happens to be the case, that Orthodox Jews, believe in two things side-by-side, that are often viewed as mutually exclusive, opposite things: They believe that some people ARE evolved literally from apes, and that some others, are not.
ReplyDeleteThese are genuinely complicated subjects and issues that you raise - it would seem that 'shared agency' is applicable to let's call it the sci-fi meme 'Borg hive mind.' But that is in fact not so - the ordinary Borg just comply and the Borg Queen makes all the ultimate decisions.
'Shared agency' might also imply necessarily 'free will' and yet again, this may not even be so either. This is so complicated. What I mean by complicated is that people will not be used to some of the ultimate ideas that could be considered.
I am very reluctant to say what I think because you are closing in on some serious serious issues. With serious serious consequences.
'Information Theory' for those who might be reading and who are 'simple sailors' is the study of information in all of its states of transition from apparent randomness to quantification, then storage and then communication - and it relies on a novel modern use of the ancient word 'entropy' in order to describe the decline back to disorder or randomness again, of 'information.' It's a closed system or a solipsistic paradigm, because it has no means of dealing with non-data segments of the Universal Venn Diagram. It has plenty of - well, theoretically, ALL of, the quantification mechanisms and processes, and none of the qualification ones.
ReplyDeleteFor instance, 'Information Theory' cannot explain duality, cannot explain unity, cannot explain spatial triangles other than by means of resorting back to calculus arithmetical definitions. What does 'alone' mean in 'Information Theory?' Ostensibly, according to Information Theory one is not alone if one has the heart, the stomach, and the brain to 'communicate' back to your consciousness, that you are 'alone' in some other sense. And that is perfectly useless to the person who is feeling that they ARE alone because their heart, stomach and brain ARE telling them they are alone.
What does 'Allah is one OF' mean to Muslims in their standard Islamic narrative; they say it every day but what does it MEAN to them? Nothing because their brain is not working on the level of needing a meaning to it.
Sure things can be inevitable if you possess a set of fixed rules and iterate a process until the boundary conditions are met for whatever pre-set label the rules intend to affix for any pre-set definition. This is how we get 'algorithms' after all. An algorithm is a statement that controls the outcome.
'I think it is inevitable that,' is an algorithm statement.
Certainly, it is absolutely true that in 'one Universe of outcomes' the 'Queen is just the inevitability of such a system becoming gamed by someone eventually.'
And then, in another Universe, 'Zen' meets the Borg, right...? LOL
But no doubt, you might want to play intellectual tic tac toe with this.
The next thing you are going to tell me, is that a slip-skin grape can make a good Champagne too, if you just stick it in the hands of good German lab technicians or those ones Mondavi has out in Napa Valley or Russian River... Right?
ReplyDeleteConversation of Slip-Skin Grape with itself: 'I, I, I can have shared agency with White Burgundy, honest! I have a fruity sweet fleshy insides, and a strong-colored dark purple skin. Just try me, put me in a barrel with some Cote de Nuits Pinot Noir and we will get some truly great Champagne, just you see.'
Meanwhile, Paris wine taster tells you: 'I tried this thing and got a headache and it hurt my head and then I heard voices.'
The (false, I believe) Legend of Dom Perignon - 'I drank from this dusty old vat, and I was, drinking stars.'
You: 'Ah, you cannot tell the difference between a headache and Champagne.'
The Israeli book that everyone HAS to talk about - me included - is only in Hebrew right now, but it is co-authored by a fiction writer, which automatically undermines a certain amount of the credibility of what is being said in it. Thankfully, as far as I'm concerned, because of the kinds of objections raised here and you are not alone by any means, in making these sorts of objections.
For, human beings come in many varieties, all of which are valid as far as I'm concerned - but 'wine-maker' is inclined to toss slip-skins onto the fire heap and moreover burn to the ground and till over many times, all the ground on which slip-skin ever grew. Now if you want to meet this fate, by all means 'investigate' further into the shady realm of 'ET' anything!!
We should be - in your case - talking about those guys in the other place, if you recall, who vociferously voiced intense and I do mean intense and rather angered skepticism about: 1. Gold, 2. Silver, 3. BitCoin over the last ten maybe even more years.
Do you remember those guys? What was wrong with their brand of thinking, that they were so unable to read the obvious?
I trust, you are ordering that latest BMW now. Or similar.
I cannot order one myself, because I have some pre-commitments to other purchases.