Crawling 101

I was really tossing up whether or not to link in the video down below to 'La Religieuse' a short prose poem by Serge Lutens about a 'vue' of some moments arising partly from when he was a young boy attending at a class in his school (although this was more specifically covered in another poem). And then to do with some other future episode the narrator relates to some idea about 'religion.' ...Or 'beliefs.' In the end I decided, yeah well, I shall.

Like any work of major art, you can read a whole lot of things into it, and people may well have vastly different feelings and perceptions about what is being communicated in the video.

Superficially, the video is also an advertisement - after a fashion - for one of Serge Lutens' commercial 'high cut' product lines.

Serge is himself quite an 'occultic' person; or, occultic personality.

So it is appropriate to use him as a 'clothes horse' on which to layer certain rather occult ideas, if they in fact, originate from some of the more obscure Judaic and Christian narratives.

You see... ...there is this very fanciful subject of the so-called 'Fallen Watcher Angels' who were sent away to Hades and there imprisoned for all Eternity. Except they were not.

In the writings of the Apostle Peter, Jesus Christ descends down to Hades and preaches to those imprisoned there 'who sometime were disobedient' and those that repented He allowed to be released - but only at 'the End Times' when another angel was to be sent down to open the Gates of Hades for those who had repented.

In physics, 'flux' is a transport phenomena - and the word was first introduced into differential calculus by Sir Isaac Newton. Newton was responsible for the inverse square law of the density at source, of energy flux at a given distance away.

This of course says something along the lines that energy density is the inverse of the (energy measured at the) square of the radius (distance from origin).

Now one 'problem' with this in terms of what present beliefs about geometry are, is that there is a distinct implication here entailed about the so-called 'squaring of the circle' problem - which is supposed to be impossible.

Newton's Inverse Square Law

...I'm not going to bore you with any details, but although Newton's inverse square law is a calculus linear measurement function, if you could predict angular momentum frequency (EG EMF) squared inverses too, then by 'neural de-coding' you 'might' be able to dictate into people's brains whole packets of data and even thereby generate exact predictable feelings.

And that's just one thing you could do.

Now, I don't suppose you'd know where that idea just came from, would you? Maybe I'm so smart I just thought of it all by myself.

Just continuing down this speculative path for a minute... ...maybe if I had such technology and calculating methods and processes, I could do things inside people's heads and they would not even be aware what is going on or why they are thinking and feeling a certain way. 

Unlike your typical visual semiotics and ordinary propaganda methods, people would not have to 'see' anything at all, or read anything or be told anything - they would just have palpable feelings that of course, they would not doubt since these were coming from inside of their own selves, as it would seem to them.

Now I know that these so-called 'Fallen Angels' got into a whole lot of trouble for introducing just such previously unknown sorts of ideas and processes to the backward and primitive, unsuspecting human race way back when.

What would be the complete ambit of moral complexity to this kind of thing?

I certainly couldn't presume to know what that was. And I most certainly would not be so foolishly arrogant as to think that I already had some kind of internal moral compass that was so superior that I could create some kind of 'school program' that taught it to others! By logic I also must conclude that I could not whatsoever think that the 'Law of Moses/Code of Hammurabi' (which is used by Western Courts and Judges to guide them to rule over men) would suffice since according to the standard narratives, these were not what the 'God' who is said to have given them to Moses (in that instance) originally actually gave him!

Moses, from my recollection, sent these back to Jehovah for editing and outright modification, did he not.

Who will we 'learn to crawl' from?

Of course this is not much of an issue to those who have no 'occultic insights...'

The end there is that he basically tells 'the youth that is with me' that what is falling down from the sky and covering everything over with white, is... ...the snow.'

Unless you know a lot more about Serge Lutens and his ideas and beliefs and some scant detail of his own life story that he 'allows out' from his other expressions, it's impossible for me to tell you what he means when he says 'the youth that is with me' and most people, even very artistically-educated ones, always jump to a complete wrong conclusion about it; which he never dispels though, either.

But if you use your own 'film critiquing' knowledge, and break this down, you will at least recall in the short story that he is looking at himself in a mirror - which of course has its own several 'literary meanings' by much tradition over thousands of years. And then, certainly, there is a fairly basic 'Tao,' black-white, mirror image, knowing, naiive metaphor in play as well.

And everyone can come to their own personal individually satisfying conception of what he is trying to say.

'Learning to crawl' is just this. Of course you can stride out onto the icy lake if you want to, and take confidently to the icy slide that decides who the next Doge of Venice will be (when there was a Doge of Venice!). But I would crawl gingerly out onto the glassy surface of the iced lake... And I can recite to you The Cratylus cover-to-cover word-for-word from-beginning-to-end off the top of my head. Which I already guarantee you is more than what those who have memorized the Quran word-for-word and can recite it have done. They, don't even know what 'The Cratylus' is.

Moreover I absolutely guarantee you there is not one single living soul on the planet in any Art School, or University Art faculty either, who can do it either but for sure they know more than what I do about what Serge is saying, right... 

...Which is why I suggest that you should not mess with Fallen Angels. Even if you think that because you are a high-ranking member of some well-established Freemasonic Chapter it will give you adequate power and that you possess enough Wisdom and Knowledge to control what you have conjured up. Ha!

What a laugh.

There they all are - out in the middle of the lake, on the ice, and banging around.