E. E. Evans-Pritchard was a leading twentieth century anthropologist whom Wikipedia describes as 'instrumental in the development of social anthropology.'
He was Professor of Social Anthropology at Oxford University from 1946 - 1970.
Fundamental to all modern systems of politics - and how political strategists and their financial backers drive the process - is the understanding described by Evans-Pritchard as 'segmentary opposition.' This is an idea which says that opposed social and political groups suddenly find solidarity in the face of external perceived threats.
 |
| "Well I'll be... Yer jest like one of us, aincha Virgil?' |
If ET Aliens had have landed on the Capitol Mall two years ago, and said: 'take us to your President,' 75 mill plus 1 additional person would have all mailed in a message to the Aliens - 'Not my President!'
Today, only 75 million other people would shout: 'Not my President!'
All the same, the working theory that is currently being used by people who could possibly procure a kind of scam 'visitation' ('visitation' by the way, in English, means a ghostly apparition and not, someone just 'visiting') by ET Aliens, is that were they to present the ET Aliens as ghastly and inimical to humanity - then according to the theories of Evans-Pritchard and others, it would act as a 'unifying mechanism' with which to underpin the establishing of a genuine global leadership with all the legal powers and authority of government with armed services and police.
You would suppose, not that one actually knew, certainly, but using rationality and common sense, you would suppose that super-advanced ET Aliens would have knowledge about 'social anthropology' at least as good as E. E. Evans-Pritchard, and likely, a lot better knowledge.
 |
| Nothing like Michael Jackson... |
I'm certain that it would not be pleasant for me to meet ET Aliens of the kind recently suggested here by the most active recent comment contributor - that 'might have' landed in Ruwa, Zimbabwe - who looked like Michael Jackson and who had really big heads and very large eyes. Uh-uh; not me, 'no thank you Virgil. I mean, Mista Tibbs. No thank You!'
In The Heat Of The Night: 'No one EVER comes here and visits me - not even ET Aliens, Virgil.'
Well, Rod Steiger's character never quite said that... LOL
And Sidney Poitier's character never quite managed to say this line, either: 'Because if they did, Sheriff Gillespie, you and I both would want them to pull whitey down off the Hill...'
I made this decision already once, while having a particularly vivid dream. Before the days of seeing strange satellite-like lights in the sky stop moving mid-arc and make a dozen or so changes in course before stopping for good. And hence before I started watching all the wacko stories about alien lore and "tall whites." In the dream I was aware of a being that was very attractive and long and thin all over, and was sort of approaching me in such a way as to interface with my nervous system. The experience was going to be immeasurably pleasurable, I could tell before it started. I woke myself up from that immediately. No thanks, I'm not buying your insinuations and you can stay out of my head.
ReplyDeleteI'd rather meet the weird looking ones. One of the children from Ariel is on youtube as an adult saying she hopes she has the chance to finish the "chat" she started on that day when total mayhem broke out on the playground. She said the encounter was hypnotic but that she clearly felt the sense that the being 3-4 feet in front of her "knew a lot, and especially a lot about the planet"
I can almost guarantee that a 'visitation' won't be by the Greys, as they have insufficient melanin to fit the meme.
ReplyDeleteUnless the aliens are intended to be evil, in which case the Greys may do.
And you believe that the real galactic beings are preparing for this "visitation," planning to become closer here in some sense not well understood? That seems to be the lesson delivered in these pages. Sound right?
DeleteIf Helen Sharman is to be believed, they're already here, among us (in some manner.)
ReplyDeleteA 'visitation' would be some sort of false flag by humans, done for some nefarious purpose. That's my take.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2020/01/06/first-british-astronaut-helen-sharman-aliens-exist-live-among-us/2822777001/
So. It seems like at least one of you here would know what a 'weird-looking one' looks like if you were to see one?
ReplyDeleteLOL
And yes, if any mainstream media-led, official 'visitation' takes place any time soon, it will 100% be a false flag.
Let me put it this way - if YOU, any one of you reading here - had an encounter with one of these rather strange, highly diffident creatures, I guarantee you no one will listen to your story unless you also had accounts of large or shiny space-craft flying over-head and that a bunch of police also saw and had been tracked by radar. And then, it will be relegated to another 'story' about someone mistaking a weather balloon and ingesting some substance.
I will just go back to what I said a little earlier - what COMMON GROUND do you, or any of us humans, actually HAVE with truly advanced intelligent physical material beings that can appear and disappear 'at will' or at least technically at will.
In all of the various narratives and 'fairy tales' (let's say) that people have presented over many decades in recent(-ish) times, does anybody actually SAY what ET Aliens want, or is it just all of this rubbish about 'the planet, the ecology, man-made pollution' all the time?
Because I can guarantee you that the CIA took John Mack's longitudinal studies of 'abductees' and have a good strong idea about what the 'objectives' seem to have been expressed as being in there. But you will never see that anywhere.
And Mack as you know, was killed by a drunk driver.
Your question about common ground is important, and deserves a to be posed in a context where it is not purely rhetorical. You have already suggested that people look inward, proposing they "watch" the lights they see when their eyes are closed. It was a really good suggestion and I find it hard to believe you don't already know the answer to your question about common ground. I can tell you that the light you see there is not created solely in the retinas. That you are able to "watch" the inner workings of your perceptual apparatus when you are not using it for the thing you tell yourself is its purpose, is important and something everyone should be encouraged to do recreationally, starting at a young age.
DeleteIf you wish to find common ground where it does not seem to exist it is perhaps better to examine the internal psychical narratives. It might be helpful to consider Evans-Pritchard's work on voodoo to see how such narratives function in "others" with whom we lack common ground. It is however not easy to extrapolate.
An important clue comes with the realization that the "you" and "I" of the "personal" psychical narrative is not in fact the author, only apparently so. This is because "agency" does not exist in beings, but moves through them and between them. Once you realize that 1) the psychical narrative is a work of fiction, however firmly rooted in the senses it relies on and that 2) the person it seems to define (yourself) is not in fact its author, you will have taken a step closer to freeing a part of your mind that can be used for another purpose. Whether you will in fact be able to exercise this faculty "when it counts" in the moment you are confronted with truly alien beings, and whether common ground might miraculously appear, is subject to question. It remains "to be seen" and this fact should generate within you great excitement and expectation. The fear that what will emerge is your own sense of inferiority is exactly what it is, fear. A fear held by some other being not truly yourself, authored there by the ill will and selfish intentions of a long collection of yet other other beings, who themselves are each of them as you are when you are afraid.
What is certain is that if you do not practice, it will not be there ever, barring a miracle. The "alien" no matter how advanced, can not "place it" inside your mind through an act of hypnosis. It can not be given, and yet is not generated either. It can only arise and is not subject to the "advancement" of the mind it exists in as an intellectual force.
This is the answer provided to me through a number of mundane coincidences after I briefly decided that such beings exist and desperately wished to "ask" them what it is like to be "them."
I will not endorse what you have expertly said here, as something that I necessarily agree with nor think is actually true, HOWEVER, its frame is certainly true and the propositions you presented are tenable.
ReplyDeleteOne reason I go into the 'occultic' is because there are bound to be enough people around with more than just the 'Late Night Movie' background of knowledge about what really goes on in 'organised,' major, occult institutions, and just to cut an awfully long story short here - I can readily say that the Vatican has its own history to do with the dark occult!
The so-called 'mummification' rite or ritual of various well-known 'Egyptian lodges,' let's just call them, installs into the individual acolyte, another 'ego...' I would say it's that; a completely OTHER ego. The fact that people actually do experience certain things in these rites and rituals does not make them 'desirable' on the basis that they are 'good because they are real...' If you see what I mean.
What makes a thing justifiable, in your mind, once we have gotten past the 'is it real' part?
You know one of the great difficulties all of these people like Targ and Dames and others have always had, is that they KNOW what is inside some of these 'Greenbaum Project' documents - we KNOW what the objectives of actively present ET Aliens are. But how do we break it nicely to 'people' and far far from it being the case that people would 'panic,' it's governments that ARE in a panic right now about it.
Brother, why don't you just indulge the exercise of setting down in print for yourself, what it is YOUR objectives are...?
Really. Honestly. Because if the ET Aliens, being advanced intelligent beings as they in fact are, are actually more honest than you or 'governments' - then someone has a big problem. That problem being, when do you think you might want to start to change? Because why do expect 'them' to change??
You know, here's a funny thing. Given that we all assume that these beings really ARE advanced with a superlatively advanced amount of technology at their disposal, how come they have not better hidden or disguised what it is they are taking from here? They could have done it. They've NEVER hidden or disguised what they are doing. And 'we've' never wanted to look at it objectively. And those who have, quickly stepped out of the military or official posts with official responsibilities.
The 'game plan' is for much longer than you can afford to bet with as an individual human being. I regard the Salida Colorado incidents of 1995 as true and real.
I've decided not to consider my personal "objectives," however the warning about honesty is a good thing.
DeleteThe salida 1995 video seems to show a much larger object viewed through a smaller opening. I've always been really turned off by the analysis of these images where people try to deduce the actual shape of the "craft."
I would think that the ability to make an object move around in space in a physics defying sort of way would be concerning, but the idea that such openings could be created anywhere would be a truly frightening challenge to military/intelligence style security.
From the perspective of the beings who can make these things happen, the fact that energy can travel through in one direction or another would also be concerning. So a nuclear bomb exploding in a relatively not dense environment--so energy not being absorbed by matter as quickly in the atmosphere versus underground. That might be a concern.
on the other hand the same effect can be seen in videos of spider webs. so.
Delete