Hearing Voices??!

What?!

As people who are generally supportive here of fairly esoteric training programs like the ones provided commercially by the Monroe Institute, and since I certainly talk about some of the elements of those things in detail here - it is very important to create some considerable distance between anything like what is being reported in the news about people who go off the rails and do some really atrocious things (the Lewiston shooter), and sophisticated controlled processes to better and more functionally engage deeper levels of the human mind.

It should be made absolutely clear that there can be no linking the 'hearing of voices' with anything that Monroe Institute-style programs, advisedly speaking, enable.

There's nobody in the world that can tell you
this, other than someone who knows and can
say - Karl 'may have been' for many
years, not only just an 'asset' but an
operative of MI6. But he might have also
abandoned that at some point too...
I'll give you the secret that is 'traceable:'
it is to do with his shirt-makers.
Fact. Inescapable. Ask
Stella Rimmington.
Anyway they were Savile Row...
'Not many peeple noh dat...'

There are also a large number of modern chemicals - for one specific instance any kind of methamphetamine for example - that speed up the signal traffic between neural networks and brain centers, and their connected afferent and fundamental sensory terminating point nerves.

By tampering with the speed of those connections, it is always at least potentially possible, to have the brain cell memories of words and even phrases triggered in the immediate conscious receptive awareness, before any actual proper physical sensory stimuli went off (neural semiotic signal threshold). The jumbling of neural patterns and afferent/efferent responses is common with chemical stimulant use (or abuse, of course).

This can give rise to impressions in the brain of disembodied words and phrases, even whole sentences, being 'heard.'

We should all be committed, intellectually committed, and intelligently fully committed, to the view that we do already have our plain existent senses, and these must be the natural pathway to 'seeing' and communicating with very advanced intelligent beings - and not some other, mysterious pathway that becomes impossible to verify by external and independent, critical observers.

That advanced Alien intelligent beings often choose to behave highly surreptitiously, denying access to verification by others, other people, that is independent observers - is not strictly speaking our etiological problem or even our or an epistemological problem.

The Monroe Institute has as its most basic process requirement in the programs, that there is always someone there with the subject who is meant to be doing the 'targeted visioning.'

That person ideally should be trained to follow rules of objectivity in practice.

This does not mean that the observer should bear a demeanor of continuous gratuitous doubting, such as you would always find with a person like Richard Dawkins - and also de Grasse Tyson. Because that would itself necessarily already defeat the premise of true objectivity: by which is meant that the person there is someone capable of dispassionately recording what is going on, and what was said by the program subject in the 'mind state process' time.

Karl was her stylist at the end of his life.

In the very first place, the point never was to 'see' what was not there, when organisations like Eastman-Kodak's Hawkeye facility and Bell High Altitude Photographics were having specially trained and 'augmented mind state' map readers look at developed film...

...It was to have them virtually subconsciously interpret the images in front of them using what was presumed to be their 'deep mind,' absent from the normal (normally conscious state) doubt fear and anxiety about getting things right or having to 'see' anything at all from the highly classified intel maps and images.

What happened of course, was that they discovered that most of the subjects reported a much clearer set of sensory impressions than what they would normally experience in the ordinary waking state - not a more vague or dream-like condition. 

Like spectral colors that are additive primaries, when they all combine they create 'white' -, then in the same way intensified capacity to sense along the fundamental sensory pathways all at the same time together, as an actual meta-meaning (haptics plus semiotics) connected symphony, becomes something that is much more accessible in terms of a communication style, to super-advanced (possibly Alien) intelligent species.

And that is all that there is about it.

You're expected to hear their spoken voice coming from out of their 'ordinary' physical mouth. Not imagining something that appears to sound like a voice, or having some internal brain impression that seemed like you heard a word spoken or some snatches of words.

'Old school' stuff.

I can easily teach someone, one-on-one, to get to this state of play; but it is both impractical and very likely problematic to try and do such a thing simply on-line, via some 'cold medium' and some text.

It's also not the point that people just follow a process path that someone, no matter how good of a hands-on instructor they are, shows - when the core reality is to do with one's own deep inner outlook on the Universe as something they are living in, being actually present in.

Because most people today, and I say most and I believe it is that - are seeking to escape from their reality! So consequently it is just too easy for people at arms' length (IE on-line and at a physical distance), and un-monitored -, to try and use these kinds of techniques and ideas to get sensations just for the 'ride,' and also of course (flawed) sensations of 'release...'

I mean what kind of crazy person in any case, is hearing voices and then going ahead and following those voices -, when they say 'hey go kill a bunch of people!' 

That's totally nuts.

Actually, it starts to become suspect whether such a thing was even true, or, to phrase it better - just what are we talking about here, when a psychiatrist reports so-and-so claimed to be 'hearing voices?' 

Why would a person merely hearing a voice, then convince themselves that voice was more to be complied with than any other voice?

No I think we can discount that it was just a matter of someone hearing voices. 

If it were even true at all, then what is much more important is what the content of those messages or instructions were, and what then compelled the person to follow any of them.

Even crazy people who are organized enough to carry out major physical violence using tools, are not so random that they fail to follow linear logic altogether. They have assigned a moral content judgment and given a moral value label to their victims. How did they do that?

This whole thing about 'hearing voices' needs to be elucidated better in the media if people are expected to accept that was the only thing that was going on in that crazy person's life and brain and mind.

It's specious.

Also 'old School' but updated. Though actually
I just like the photo composition.

It's specious to think the cause of the deadly mischief was the hearing of voices.

When it comes to engaging with, or potentially engaging with; communicating with -, actual ET Aliens, what is the content of what that communication is...? What is it expected to be, from your side...? What are you seeking from them?

And that leads us all straight back to the greatest texts on morality and ethics and epistemology and mathematics and geometry and physics and aesthetics - the world has ever produced. Nothing less than that will do.

I'm afraid not. We cannot expect to come half-baked here!

Given that there is such greatness in the human background, why would you choose to leave it 'behind at home,' so to speak - when you were presenting yourself as a valid example of the human race to a truly sophisticated advanced other intelligence?

Who would you 'bring with you' as the paramount examples of humanity, to show to some incredibly advanced ET Alien beings: 'Hey, this is what we want to tell you that we are like at our best...' 'And we are not necessarily any single one of us right now as good or as great as that particular example/those examples, but that is our aspiration and our intention (to be like) and how we would like you to view us...'

; )

Did that give you a clue?

I mean did that just give you a really big clue?

Just remember - to avoid being 
hammered by the authorities(!) what we
will sometimes do, is
show 'connected' pics' but in upcoming, later,
posts here so as not to make things
too too very obvious.
Just like what you will find in the below music if you
bother to listen past halfway in...

Are you as to any doubt whatsoever that we cannot deliver here?

Matthew 13:52

LOLOLOL

Were not expecting that, now were you? Tell the truth now.

Trust you actually listened to the music clip in the last post here, right? Because...