Gold And The Rule Of 72

So, the 'Rule of 72' is simply the calculation you use to find out how many years it will take to double your investment given the Nominal Return you had/have.

You take the number '72' and divide it by the Return number.

Gold went up say, 5% from its average during last week to late Friday night in a fairly sudden if, frankly, belated reaction to the Israel/Gaza situation.

It will take you 14.4 years if you keep doing that every year from now on (succeed in gaining that return).

Free to read, here: https://www.inkitt.com/stories/scifi/1131199

The Trophy Wine

The problem is not the rate of return you got late last week, the problems - and there are at least three of them - consist of the opportunity cost factor together with the lack of interest returns on gold holdings, and the uncertainty ('infinity' risk) of forward price speculating.

The outright fact is, it is the benchmark Bond Rate which is determining all other investment considerations at the present time. Thus, the Risk-Free rate of return is already more or less 5% and that is a guaranteed 'locked in' return; it is not speculating for a return. So, back to around 14 years but at least that is set in stone - or as set in the financial granite of economics as is possible under our current regime of economics and banking.

Still not enough for me though.

I want to double my cash in a much shorter time.

These things are some of the
elements of aesthetics in design.
They are static items.
When they become dynamic, they are...

The 'hot zone' for an increase (again) in the Bond Rate is from now till New Year, when no one in the mug public (and hence the media) is looking or sufficiently caring.

It is still an act of speculation, to assume that for sure the interest rates will be once more re-set upwards over the next three months.

But at least superficially, whereas my 'friends' tell me that gold is no certain bet in any meaningful way (means cannot go 'gap up' or enough up to give someone with a moderate amount of capital a worthwhile 'comparative rational investor risk' lift) - it is nonetheless clearly obvious that prior to the next round of interest rate Fed moves, gold is not a bad place to be, if one goes by the standard folklore about gold and wars.

Yet, if you are given the information that allows a person to penetrate through why and how the Fed is able to suppress the gold price at all, and over such a long period already, it becomes more than clear what the true dynamics are in current markets and in the price of money and costs of capital.

Which leads me back to a theme that few will credit and most will observe is merely a way of me being ironic:

Am I personally in touch with actual real-life, physical material ET Aliens...?

Oh yes. Absolutely.

'To go where there are temples, 
in which the gods really dwell,
and see them as they really are.'
'For the Kingdom of God is
like a child...'

But I underscore this aspect now, once again, and will continue to do so going forward - it is just not a matter critically to do with 'process' at all. If it had to do only with process alone, then anyone and everyone would be in contact with advanced super species.

Hamas would, Bibi would, VV would; everyone who could follow a process would.

And humans are not stupid. Well they are stupid but not so stupid that they are unable to follow a fundamental set of process steps.

To cut a very long story very very short, the 'secret' - if such a thing can even be termed a 'secret' - is contained in one of the versions of the Enoch accounts. ...It has to do with the golden-colored, self-illumined oil or something, that a being who was described as 'frigid to touch' anointed Enoch with, following which he was then able to see the main Being on the Throne whose light would have burned him up otherwise. Around the Throne, were a large number of other beings in glowing white robes, with light coming from them as well, continuously singing and making music and also four 'living creatures with eyes in all directions.' Bad translation, wrong concept being given, but I am simply re-stating what words you will find, supposedly as accurately translated from the original text.

The Universe is a huge big place with lots and lots of things in it.

There are definitely quite malign Draco Reptilians in existence around the place.

Slight correction - the Universe is a place with everything in it. Everything you could imagine, is in it, somewhere.

And that's the point.

I am hoping that I am writing all of this for people who are looking for satisfaction in their lives.

People who are not going to rest before they attain their hugest fundamental internal goals. People who are not going to be satisfied with being shoved off to one side intellectually or any other way, if they posit a stupendous, almost outlandish, aka 'out there' goal.

I am here to tell you that is the only goal worth going for.

What's the point having a Destination Wine if you don't accept the reality of the destination that your internal being is continuously calling for?

This is an idea of symmetry in design, but
it is very complex symmetry.
But it is symmetry.

The reason most people don't get to that reality is because they have compromised on the elements of the goal. This is why you get subterfuge from politicians, deceit from bankers, relying on the past from religious preachers and dictators of religious ideologies - none of them can show you the 'ultimate ideal goals' in the present.

But they want the power and the glory.

If you deny the internal psychological desire that you have, to reach these seemingly strange peculiar goals (by ordinary common human world standards) then you are deliberately lying to yourself.

And people do that. And they do it with ease. And at the end of their lives - they also die. And they will have realized nothing at all.

And that's it.

Oh yeah I know the counter position that people say about 'all the more cherishing what they had.' LOL

I recently mentioned that there is an ancient Greek written verbal text (not a stone monument) describing the double-helix DNA structure - to some private finance chat board people. And not one of them said 'Hey, how come these guys back then were able to describe such a thing at all?!'

What I got was twenty-five different statements about all kinds of things, none of which mentioned what I just said. They just all sailed right over the top of it.

So I don't actually expect people to realize the whole point of what is being said in here, in these pages.

I'm just doing it because I am having fun.

Idiots talk (as if they even know what it is) about 'evidence' all the time. When confronted with it though, they would kill women and children to get away with their own lies and to make a citadel for their own preexisting intellectual position.

Part of the lyrics are: 'Sat watching the screen. Will hope return?' LOL 

Be careful of the volume at the start. Lyrics not till around half way.