David Icke - The Right/The Wrong

Maybe it would be better termed 'the missing parts' or even 'the deficiency.'

Meanwhile, just as an aside, here - extracted recipes from Yuhanna ibn Masawaiyh's writings in Venice: 'Writer's Block Drinkable Inks'

The FULL Drinkable Inks narrative text 

(If this is not free to read in your location, well just read one of the other free titles under my titles at Kindle, and let me know and I will get you a link to the 'off-platform' free pdfs).

NB. Commercially-available dried ingredients may not in every instance be as potent as the fresh ingredients.

Hey I kinda like David Icke. Any time someone goes 'out there' and says 'lower astral plane demonic Satanic Reptilian evil conspiracy' well, give me more.

He even says that people like Bill Gates and Fauxi and Soros are just demonically-possessed zombies.

Cool!

It's all very nice and it's making me go and find a beer from some stockpile my cousin sent over to me...

But we can't all just sit pushing our backs deeper into the sofa from the cinematic thrill of it all, and drink beer and eat nuts and then fall asleep knowing that Icke has 'outed' the evil Satanic global conspiracy for us, because and then so what...? Okay it's nice to be nodding and have someone else on the big media platforms (he is on them, don't you worry about that) nodding back for us so that it feels like we have company in our cherished stupidity, but where does it leave us? We're still all stuck in the same place, in the same predicament of having to comply with moronic zombies who are not even vampires. 

Vampires at least, wear swish clothes.

Lake Lefroy in Western Australia.
This is just a tiny fraction of it. It is so large
it's bigger than some countries.
I've been there. Those islands in the
distance literally look
when you are standing there, like they are
floating in the sky.
It's quite amazing.

 

And in the mornings after, we still find that our blood has been sucked again overnight anyway and will be sucked all through the day as well.

David is doing what the whole nine yards of the 'system' has always done, has continuously done, for thousands of years - he is committing some pretty basic fallacies in front of our eyes and getting away with it because part of what he says is true enough.

He is not a sinister figure though as far as I'm concerned, and I don't think he's doing anything 'adverse' on purpose. He sees his role as that of alerting 'the common mind' to a fundamental problem.

But you - you who read here - do not represent 'the common mind.'

You want the solution. You already know about the problems.

The two big ways the truly sinister people try to fool - well, succeed in fooling - people is the 'confusion of the inverse' fallacy, and the 'elicit conversion' fallacy.

Muslim apologists do it all the time: 'Christians say God is Jesus.' Well but they don't though; they say Jesus is God. The issue is that the definition of one word is about the meaning of it as a descriptive (and thus all of the characteristics and qualities that describe 'it') and a title; while the meaning of the other word is just someone's name and identity for a particular given space of Earthly time in context that this is to do with 'God' manifesting or projecting as a human person for humans to 'see' using their human senses and intelligence.

The woke and social thought police do it all the time - and that's because they are part of the sinister conspiracy of the demonic.

Back to a bit of reality, okay?

If you listen to an interview of Rose McGowan, the words and the phrasing she uses, although okay it is highly critical of males, still doesn't sound particularly as if she is criticizing 'the male' as such. For instance, she says the Academy of Motion Picture Directors is made up of over 90% males, and mostly white males.

So that is not the same thing as saying that all males throughout the world are wicked, cunning, conniving, or sinister, and white(!) - because logically 'the Academy (of MPDs)' is just a small restrictive group 'of males.'

But the woke crowd will use almost the exact same words and phrasing that McGowan does but it will mean an entirely different thing in their mouths.

Let me give a better example:

The Greek philosopher Speusippus is claimed by modern academia (although how they would know I am not quite sure) to have taken over or 'inherited' Plato's Academy after he disappeared - although they will never ever say disappeared, just as they will outright lie and say 'Oh Lycurgus (the Law-Giver of Sparta) was a made-up mythical person who never really lived' (on account that he too 'disappeared').

And they will quickly add that Speusippus disputed with Plato's Theory of Forms.

Well but did he though?

No he didn't.

He simply pointed out (what is also missing in the Icke view of everything) that Plato never taught that the Forms, separate though they were from material reality, did not contain all of material reality. And that is a hugely significant point about what Speusippus was saying. But no one in modern academia has seriously read either Plato fully, or Speusippus and so they don't even have that much depth of the required and necessary knowledge to distinguish the real point of what Speusippus said. But by repeating it without explaining it, it is made to seem that somehow the person who took Plato's Academy forward was both contradicting Plato and thereby exposing some kind of mistake or defect in the teachings of Plato and of course, therewith you can undermine all of Plato because he is made to seem 'just another, any old other, ancient thinker.'

Get away from there, Bill.
I know you want to go there.
LOL

What Plato himself actually said, was that it was going to be difficult or impossible to teach ordinary people, or to say to them, on account of which too was the actual reason Pythagoras never taught those exact same higher level things except to his disciples who had been with him over fourteen years - that one and the same seemingly contradictory things were able to exist simultaneously!

Well that is not the way modern academia wants to have you believe what Speusippus said about the Forms.

Icke says there are possessed - as in demonically-possessed - people who are organized as a conspiracy against the average human; and who then exploit people and make vast amounts of wealth and rule in perfect luxury and dominion.

And presumably, there is nothing you can do about it. Well he doesn't say what you can genuinely practically do about it.

Of course it's all true. What he says. Well, partly true to sufficient of an extent that it hits home to the intrinsic sensibilities of people who know darn well that the media and governments and certain corporate entities and institutions are total malevolent liars.

With us, it is 'jam today.'
Because we are the real deal,
and that makes all the difference.

But you see, if it were really true that the Forms were separate and entirely distinct from material reality as such, and that 'they were incorrect' or incorrectly conceived by Plato - as they claim Speusippus said - then for sure you would have no means to counterbalance the wicked evil 'demonically-possessed' conspirators. And those people would have you believe it too, since then, you would not bother to reach forth your hand, and take of the fruit of the Forms, and use, and benefit thereby.

Would you?

'For in that day you shall surely die.'

But who though, who 'shall surely die?'

It is insane to want to believe or even to think and suppose from the logical perspective, that let's say we do have really amazing advanced civilizations out there elsewhere in the Galaxy and out even further than - but somehow we 'need' it to be the case that 'heaven' is where then, exactly? And why would it necessarily be 'better' than or even different to, what 'ordinary' massively advanced cultures of real physical people were able to achieve and attain to...

The Forms are real. Reality is real, but it's also complete. And there's your missing link.