No, I am not departing from the direction previously discussed.
But seeing as how this is one of the most significant, and problematic areas for human beings, I am covering it in a thin tissue of cultural myths, in order to lessen the danger.
What danger?
Well let's go to the Wikipedia to see what utter trash and nonsense they are going to spout on the matter...
Here we find them right off the bat entertain complete idiotic and fanciful, even way off the trail nostroms purporting, I suppose, to be some kind of deep, psychological truths.
Lam dang, ho lam dang, lam dang ho lam dang. (Lantern, oh lantern). Is pronounced 'lum tongue.' LOL |
'It most commonly takes place between family members or friends.'
It does?
We are looking at the page titled 'Human bonding.'
Pretty soon in the Wiki article, they try to refer to Plato, then Spinoza and finally Goethe.
Brilliant. All nonsense.
Misquotes stuff, misunderstands everything - all utter rubbish.
I mean Plato, for one, never said, and never could have said 'people engage in a process of developing close, interpersonal relationships.'
'Developing?' What does that mean?
Making something happen that isn't already there?
Because that's what Wikipedia wants to have it be.
But if you go to the developing process of a photograph, for instance, the light has already done something to the exposure, and then by using chemicals, we can arrange the pre-existing image to reflect onto and then appear on photographic paper from the negative.
Nobody 'develops' a photograph out of nothing from something that was not already there in the negative.
This is the same lunacy that the Big Bang nonsense spouts.
If Richard Dawkins can show where the actual principle of the triangle 'evolved' from a rapid expansion of energy, then we can start considering his friend Stephen Hawking's mindless gibberish called 'the Big Bang.'
These guys all default to 'Oh it just happened, and then we smart humans noticed afterwards along the way that there were such things as number and shape and geometric principles and so on.'
And then they'll make it even worse: 'And in some other dimension, and completely different Universe... ...well, the geometrical principles and rules are all different; except of course we can't know how or what they are because well, that would be in a different Universe.'
LOL
August Moon Festival is when Artemis, the Goddess associated with bows and arrows, comes down to the Earth and spends time with young maidens and also some young males too.
In the Chinese legend, Chang-e's husband, Hou Yi (or Houyi), was granted the Elixir of Immortality as a reward for shooting down with his bow and arrows, nine burning 'suns' that were destroying the Earth - but a wicked demon called Feng Meng, masquerading as an apprentice in the skill of archery under Hou Yi, killed Hou Yi and attempted to take Chang-e by force, whereupon she drank both drafts of the Elixir of Immortality and ascended to the Moon and the heavens where Feng Meng could not reach her.
Feng Meng is still here alive, on the planet Earth.
Chang-e, although she resides on the Moon, is somewhere on its reverse side, in a palace which cannot be seen except by other immortals. Further, when she comes down to the Earth, she does so with great magical protections, and renders Feng Meng indisposed for a short while, although even so, in reality, and in spite of her appearance at public festivals and parades, when she actually attends with small circles of her young acolytes, she will be there in disguise.
Thus, you can see, that whilst Chang-e has never been one to go out and exact revenge by using death - since that would be slightly unfair, since she herself cannot die - still she is wiser than to simply appear too openly or without a lot of protection. Feng Meng cannot risk attacking her while she is being venerated and surrounded by the public, since Feng Meng's strategy to continue his demonic rule on the planet, has been to convince people that he is benevolent towards them; which he is in fact, not.
Chang-e descends herself personally in a very open and obvious way though, whenever some notable person or great public figure has attained to an old age as a genuinely benevolent ruler but is about die -, because this is in harmony with the principles of longevity and its ultimate form, which is of course actual immortality, in fact. Thus, Chang-e will escort that person to another abode, away from the cares and troubles of this world. In this kind of situation, Chang-e is guarded by the great warriors of Heaven, who will smite Feng Meng severely if he attempts any wrong-doing.
And none of this need concern us in the slightest, really, except we should note the subtlety of the prosecuting of affairs, by this Goddess, as a good example to us of what we ourselves must do, when exercising the certain limited magical powers that we nonetheless do have.
Thus we can 'go out' to peel back the veils from already existing potentials between ourselves and a small handful of others - yet we must do so without being suspected as to what we are really doing.
And hereth endeth the first-eth lethon - of our lessons regarding how to enable dendritic connections between ourselves and some others, and to procure long-term potentiation of the two-way communication that goes on with dendritic connection activity.
And to summarize the lesson - nobody need know what you are doing, except you yourself, and eventually that specific other person or people.
Chang-e has a hand signal to notify her followers that she is there. It is in the shape you make with your fingers and your hand when you want to throw a shadow image of a rabbit.
Yet at the bottom of the article there is mention made, of people using molecular bond as a model for the human type. We know that the weak hydrogen bond found in water is very much a question of resonance, tunneling, and whatever manner else of yet to be discovered things. Imagine the batshit craziness of a single glass of water.
ReplyDeleteThe really disturbing part happens when you realize that Chang-e and Feng Meng secretly meet weekly to play poker. Or is that "meet weakly?" And that they've been carrying on this ruse of being "at odds" since the beginning of time. Houyi was from this point of view a kind of innocent bystander.
That's all just pointless mediation though. I wouldn't throw kindling on that fire.
Well, speaking of fires. Let us turn our minds to the Yule this year. I fear, peeple miss the messig of Krismiss; that is why it is call-'ed 'Krismiss,' because peeple miss the messig of it. Especially this year. Long liv thee Kingg!
Delete