The Inks Extension Text/s

Ah so, it's basically completed. And I'm really happy because I was able to extract the really crucial aspects of how and why these preparations really work. See that - really really really.

I'm not sure whether we should go even one step beyond where we're at right now (not that you have seen these latest pieces) - and I probably will, now that I think about it.

See there's two very interesting aspects of the strands of thinking that have been (luckily) not lost to us, and brought to us by Al Kindi and then later by Ibn al-Haytham and then on through Roger Bacon.

It's fake, it's modern,
but it is atmosphere, you
have to grant that.

Bacon was a stupendously brilliant scientist, but he also had the reputation of literally being a wizard - whatever that means. In his day he was referred to as 'Doctor Wonderful' or more like, if I translated and interpreted what they meant:  'Doctor of Wonders.'

He made a translation of the major Arabic occult work 'Sirr al-'asrar' (Mirror of Princes) and there is no way people then or now, in the general run of things, never mind if they were from academia or not - would ever be able to understand what is being said in those works.

There is just far too much overhang now, from 'sci-entists' who are really intent on keeping the value of the highest ground of knowledge to themselves for mercantile reasons - to gain any intelligent discussion from open public sources about either Roger Bacon or his best written works.

Whether you actually believe a person, for instance, like Immanuel Velikovksy, or not, it is more profitable to examine why he was coming to the conclusions that he did come to, but then advanced as his propositions about religious myths, really.

All the modern-day scientists who would even be prepared to render an opinion on Velikovksy always default to the standard 'he made things up' as their fundamental criticism. And that indeed he did, too!

But it was not why he was being moved towards that kind of 'sci-fi/fantasy/myth explanation' direction in his thinking. He wasn't 'making things up' because he was pathologically creative.

He knew - as in actually literally did know for a fact of language and etymological science - that for example, the Book of Revelation explicitly contains the Vedic chakra system, fully intact and exactly as the Vedas themselves say.

You didn't know that, did ya?

So in the same way, it's more profitable to look into what sources Roger Bacon had, and acknowledge that he, rather than say Richard Dawkins today, actually knows, reads, and understands the ancient languages in which texts by Aristotle and Parmenides and then Al Kindi and so on - were composed originally.

Not fake at all.
Also modern.
Pretty atmospheric, 
you also have to admit.

Dawkins has no such language knowledge or background. And neither did Descartes for that matter. So why are you believing their stupid nonsense??

...As opposed to anyone else's stupid nonsense?

Dawkins doesn't know what he's talking about. He acts as if he does, and he can sound convincing to the ignorant, but he's an egocentric charlatan with a big platform in a modern era of 'platform-ism.'

Look. Let me give it to you with both barrels here.

The reason it is called 'The Secret of Secrets' and 'The Mirror of Princes' is because it is the complete methodology and actual practical guide and steps to doing those things for which 'Pharaoh' was accused by the JOOOZ of Moses, and earlier Nimrod in Babylon when he tried to 'ascend the tower to the Throne of God in Heaven...'

And what were those guys accused of being able to do?

See the thing you have to get around just in terms of logic, is this - Jews all agree there was a Moses (of the exact type of identity they all claim; I don't agree with them but I would only be splitting hairs about it with them anyway); archaeologists all agree there were Pharaohs and they were politically powerful and hugely wealthy and they all agree there are 'pyramids' (which were built by ignorant primitive Egyptians idiots with no machines or instruments and just slaves, right? LOL).

But then so what of it anyway?

The Jews' story is that Pharoah was no more than three feet tall and had magical powers. Go ask them. Go and ask any actually learned Jew in their own traditions, in the Talmud and the commentaries of the Torah, and see what they tell you.

He had funny grey skin, big black eyes that transfixed people. And this is simply according to actual Jewish writings.

And he was a 'wizard.'

This was made using 
a recipe of Al Kindi.

Logically you have to get around the fact that he was so bad, that the JOOOZ all wished to escape his clutches. Nimrod was so bad, that Abraham or the proto-JOOOZ wanted to escape him and 'God' actually smashed up his 'tower.'

So why are you believing the other end of the fairy tale but not the seminal causative part?

You want to 'demarcate' between 'sci-ence' and 'wizardry' why...? Because now you tell us 'wizardry doesn't work...'

B**ers! You are a liar.

You 'sci-entist.'

You are scared that people will do to you what Pharaoh was able to do. What Nimrod was able to do. What Aristotle said (if you presume he wrote the 'Secret of Secrets' - the real book of that) that the actual knowledge of Hermes was able to do.

If 'wizardry' as it is being called by the malefic 'sci-entists' is so pathetic and non-functional why not just let people try it, see that it doesn't work and is nonsense, and it will die its predictable natural demise?

Oh oh, but but, you will waste so much time and energy er, er, er, wasting your time, chasing all of these crazy ideas and notions. So, jury in, Roger Bacon is wrong. Never mind we've stolen every single one of his practical ideas. But he's just, just wrong. Now stop going there. Don't look in there.

Sorry that's not good enough.

But but, people will exploit the naive, and use propaganda and lies and the media to, to, er, to get their way even though it will not be based on sci-ence.

And, as Fauxi told you 'we are science.'

Listen. What these fools know about science is nothing at all.They know about lying and politics.

The flames are slowly starting to burn
the crepes...

The minute one 'Bacon' somewhere just whimsically 'takes out' some prominent identity, then you will find the headless chooks all running around the chook-pen, squawking.

Me personally I'm trying to focus and concentrate on making you guys some money here.

That's what I'm focused on.

It's very difficult too, because I don't even know what 'money' even is right now!

LOL

Look if the modern 'sci-entist's' dichotomy of subject matters - the so-called 'issue of demarcation' were genuinely and honestly being rendered by those 'sci-entists,' then you would not be left with the same problem of the reality of the opposition to Moses; the reality of the anti-public stance of Nimrod; the reality of the psychology of what those 'sci-entists' fear.

Because they fear something. And that fear comes from its reality, not its fantasy, because after all, the 'sci-entists' are the last to 'believe' in phantasms and unreality anyway.

The opposition is both real and its power is real. There's ya problem right there.

So what's real about what I am telling you?

How about everything.

My friends in the Islamic community always ask me to produce a Djinn for them.

Well, just make sure you read the up-coming new text:

(Do I ever let you down with the music? Nope. Never do. ...You got to get to about 2 minutes in, using the tools given by this new text. Meanwhile, however... ...you just listen).