There will be some of you right now, or maybe for some time already, who have been observing and experiencing the odd few 'incidents' related to the subject matter that has been heavily canvassed in here for quite a while.
Now I don't know about the rest of you, but for me the one aspect that leaps out is just how subtle and nuanced and in some senses 'odd,' 'strange' or even 'mysterious' are the hard facts associated with this material.
Stay away from the chocolates, Jocelyn!
I watched and laughed earlier today as someone spoke of Dr Steven Greer as talking about 'them' as just wanting to come down and do 'kumbaya' with all of us...
There is a word or a phrase, really, that I have heard these 'foreigners' use - which is 'to-gethering.' They don't say 'cities,' because that is not the structure of their societies.
Well you can't get together with anyone who really is of an extremely or extraordinarily advanced intellectual nature, and possessed of massively superior technology which they use as fluidly as we might turn on a tap for water - unless you are capable of mingling on some kind of equivalent arrangement.
You're not really being together, otherwise.
But then let's face some other inconvenient facts here though! We do not really get together with other ordinary human beings - it's always on some basis involving transaction. Never mind trying to be kind and saying 'almost always -,' the truth is it is always transactional.
We are nothing but personal units of consciousness contained inside very sophisticated kinds of biological toys.
We are toys.
Sometimes some guy hands me a toy and tells me: 'Okay, here you are. Now what are you going to do with this?'
Human beings are continuously playing with dangerous things that they are not really capable of handling properly.
Hey hey! That is even worse!
(Notice how cold the glass is though).
When it comes to handling our involvements with other people, then it all comes down to the cultivation of the inner life.
I despair - totally despair - at ever explicitly and outright saying certain things, even here. Firstly as ordinary humans, we regard time as strictly linear, and it just plain isn't.
But it's also totally just not as simple as going down into the Aladdin's Cave and coming out with pockets filled with precious gems and gold - in order that we 'might' then play with toys and not wreck things, or at least be able to pay for the disasters and the clean-ups.
Here's the problem those of you, who, exactly like me, are able to 'engage' and have been doing so for a while already: you know you can go into the Aladdin's Cave. And you know you can get and command the 'toys.'
You know it's real and that the results are real.
Knowing how to tap into both complex sophisticated forms of energy, as well as super-advanced intellects, is what you are going to take practical things from and substance from and apply those things that you will then certainly possess.
There are some things that 'they' will not explain to you. There are things which seem like mysteries, even despite that you are actually manipulating them for practical effects and for personal benefit.
I think it's time human beings, at least those with the intellect, the brainpower to 'go there,' should stop all this diffidence about whether or not to act and 'do things.' There has been altogether too much of this threatening and dictating what you 'should' or 'should not' do. The key thing ought to be if you are able to do a thing.
Honestly! SMH.
This is why the rich kids need
to hire personal fitness trainers.
SMH.
Someone recently asked, well, in fact a couple of people did: 'How come if they can change us mechanistically very easily, unilaterally, and fix us, surely then we don't need to... ...ourselves. Even if we were growing into the systems and structures obtaining here in human society and thereby covering over who we really are deep inside, surely they can find us anyway?'
Well I know someone, a friend right - who is able to -.
Yes it's not a 'good thing' they are able to do.
But it is who they really are. No 'covering.' Just them themselves for real.
And if that friend is you? Then what?
If you have been practicing and nothing has happened yet - you are not doing it right. Very subtle though, I'll admit that. But some of you have had an 'incident' take place.
Very uplifting tune this. This is who we are.
I think there are two separate but related things here, (1) uncovering the true self and (2) fixing that self if necessary. And about the fixing, I didn't mean having the ETs do it simply because they can, but more because they can and we cannot on our own, if this is in fact the case in some instances.
ReplyDeleteMaybe they can 'help.' A little.
DeleteLook into the nooks and crannies where "mediation cannot go." Except you "can't look" there because looking involves seeing as a psychological being, which involves mediated experience. So maybe you should imagine "John" is chasing you around in circles playing "hotter, colder" just to be troublesome. Or perhaps for a moment you could get down with Elon and decide that the universe really is "just a simulation" (well it is insofar as it is totally mediated). From the point of view of the psychologically sound person the universe is a simulation. There, I said it. Also, same goes from the point of view of Marxist Theory.
ReplyDeleteYou have a number of paradoxes available to you then. "Is this universe in which our simulation is being carried out also a simulation? Which universe is the "prior existing reality" and which is the simulated one?" Those kinds of questions can lead to a simulation of the right kind of mental crisis.
Being simultaneously both "I" and "him" is not really a very sound corner psychologically speaking. We wouldn't want that. Think of Smeagol. But when the "guru" says "watch your thoughts and become the observer of your self" we think "oh yes yes this is GOOD." We don't say "that's insanity." Well it's insanity when you're not "in control." But how nice is the alternative, being "the I" that is running around trying to fix everything? For instance, make sure the bathroom faucet isn't dripping so "they" can sleep at night and not endure the torture of drip drip drip.
Is ET a doctor? doctors have a "well mediatable" relationship where they operate as agents on behalf of their patients, who do not have the knowledge to do these things themselves. The problem with this isn't the "potential for abuse," it's that this relationship is a "mediated one" and is therefore "not real" in the sense of "reality of space time and the universe, beyond the stupid idea that everything is a simulation."
There. Is that good?
The Universe is 100% not any kind of simulation. It's real, and you're really in it. And that's the point and that's the whole problem too - if you discover your own power and you use it, well...
Delete"Once upon a time I discovered a rock in my garden, so I threw it through my neighbor's window." Is really not very different from "we discussed it in hot tubs and decided that the universe is %99.99999 likely to be a simulation."
DeleteIt's possible a rare few people are saying 'simulation' when they mean a VERSION of reality (and it isn't even that, though), but the word technically means 'imitation of a situation or process' and 'an action of pretending.' And it isn't any of those things. Younger people who use computer games a lot would love the idea that it is some kind of 'computer-generated game;' so that's what they mean when they employ the attractive phrase that the Universe (by which even then they mean themselves/humanity) is a simulation - a game: you do these things, you get to 'here.' The actual reality is 'you AIM at some things.' It's the aim that is the most intrinsic part of the reality. It's the aim that exists - the result (in the human context) is an effect of moving things around. The aim is the substance of what makes a mind a mind at all. The fact that you are the subject that observes, does not make you more real than the object being observed; it could make you less real, since the object might outlive/outlast, you.
DeleteAnd I promise I got the point about 'throwing rocks!'
DeleteThe universe is not a simulation, but our mediated version of it IS. That's sort of the idea I was pursuing a little bit. Just to see what people say.
Delete