Way back when the 'New Age' began, I remember a few early figures who were quite prominent talking about dolphin pods and how they communicated, or probably communicated with all the other members of the pod. You might remember that, so much earlier on still, than the actual incipient 'New Age' as such, the controversial American neuro-scientist John C. Lilly was messing around with killer whales and discovering what has since come to be known in mainstream neuro-science as 'biphasic charge' in the neural system - which is a way that seemingly 'telepathic' communication does go on between various mammals.
But since the early days of what eventually turned into the 'New Age' movement, there has been a clear trend towards an idea which uses the terminology of 'Oneness,' and talks about 'the One' as some kind of absolute underlying truth.
Fundamentally then, an unstated consequence of this 'truth' - if it is true - is that you all have to march in step then, when all the leaders in the modern-day New Age movement say anything. Because after all, all is One, right?
So, here we go again, back to your basic totalitarianism.
No escape, apparently!
It's all very sneaky, really.
On the one hand you have to adopt absolute relativism - there is no such thing as a 'woman;' just the relativistic situation whereby some people self-identify using that word... ...And then, their equality must be accepted.
Western civilization evolved into a position of enshrining 'equal rights' but then suddenly, while everyone was sleeping, this turned into equivalency and equality.
And that means that each unit 'person' is equivalently disposable and interchangable.
Now I have been talking about 'substitute people' but I was not trying to imply these were the same people, just similar-looking people who were requiring to be able to be passed off as a certain individual, and to stand in for them sometimes.
 |
| Archetype certainly, if mechanical only. |
In Jungian psychology there is such a thing as genuine authentic human 'archetypes' - and Thomas Sheridan the Irish occultist has been talking about that recently. And I guess I have been using the idea here of 'substitute people' in the same way a Jungian might say 'archetypal.' But you must remember, the real Jungian does assert these are real beings, not passing examples only in history of simply a particular type of person. Of course, here again, we are tending to go towards the 'Lilly controversial' side of things, and admitting of a rather occult, and esoteric reality.
Anyway, never mind too much about that.
What I was really going to talk about was the symbolism of the pyramid (as it has been adopted into present-era popular symbolism) - and how and why and where that all fits into the propaganda about 'the One.'
See that person's mind behind everything you see going on in the world today, is much smarter than you or I - unless we get some key information.
It's also completely sinister and way ahead of the average person and their idea about 'where things are at.' Let me show you:
It is not a rainbow on the LGBTQ flag.
You knew that, right?
It is a system denying the existence of the ultra-violet catastrophe in physics, because if as a human being you knew it and accepted it and then started to work it out, you could do things to this other person they would not be able to counter at all.
The triangular figure they all use now with the 'seeing eye' is not a structure leading up into real 'heaven' - just like the whole point of Nimrod's building program, the structure leads up to a relativistic 'top spot,' which then becomes the actual material 'heaven' as such; because you cannot know or go anywhere else beyond that, right?
 |
| They're all as happy as can be... None of it is their own actual idea though. They get fed that from somewhere. |
And you, are the replaceable 'equal' brick in the pyramid, which is bearing up those guys up at the top above you, and sitting on your head.
You have no 'equal rights,' which was the original idea. You have 'equivalency.' To be chucked out and replaced with some other idiot.
People casually talk about the so-called Mandela Effect, but we are heading to the point right on front of our eyes, where the kids will think there are only six colors to the rainbow.
And/or, that in any case, 'indigo' is unnecessary and redundant.
So why have it?
Why have it at all?
This sinister mind behind so many things is continuously in the process of taking power away from the human being.
It's quite a brilliant mind though, because it's so almost decisively wicked and cunning and subtle: this figure of the seeing-eye pyramid with the relativistic 'heavenly seat' at the top really is a template of a kind that can certainly be said to be 'intangible yet ideal and archetypal.' And thus it really is a kind of 'god' too. Apart from all the other real gods that there are.
It too exists, and is perfectly self-contained, needing no external other 'god.'
And that means you have the 'choice,' to live in that paradigm, in which 'god' is the individual (the One) at the top, heaven is that position up there, and 'we are all One' is actually quite literally true, so long as you obey whoever is at the top and fall in alignment with their orders.
Do you want to do that?
Because you certainly can, and you have no reason to suppose that anyone outside of that template and paradigm can prevent you, or harm you at all. In fact, since no such external deities exist (right?), 'realistically' the only being who can harm you is the actual person at the top of the material pyramid, and also your own unwillingness to bend to their will. So, you are harming yourself in fact and are to blame for all the hurt in your life.
What I have been talking about here though, is actually seeing - as in, seeing same as you know what that word means anyway - a totally different other set of places and people...
When the present version of the 'New Age' gurus all ask you: "Did you see that message? That was delivered to simply everyone who has their 'third eye' opened?" - you should really ask them back: "Do you mean 'uniformly imagined' something?"
If you see a Skoda Karoq with the number plate - 'ELF' - and a person driving it with a beanie on their head even while it is not particularly cold, and the beanie is pulled down so as to cover the tops of their ears - this is 'synchronicity,' maybe. But it is not 'imaginary.' You were walking down the road and you really saw that. You didn't imagine it.
So that you can put it down to synchronicity, and since you are reading up on all the Jung literature that time forgot, well, then you will have experienced 'synchronicity' in the Jungian sense.
Jung is not going to say you 'saw' anything unreal.
What you made of what you saw is entirely up to your discretion and senses of what things have value and meaning.
However when you get up in a space craft, into a space platform and you see other people in there, well, they might have their own individual senses of what is meaningful to them - and then you will have to negotiate for a position.
When they up there say 'hive mind' that doesn't mean they all think the same things - it means they think using the same acknowledged processes of thinking and the same reliability of hard facts!
The pyramid template or paradigm sells to you this notion that it, has the hard facts and Calvin is telling you lies or fairy tales or fantasies. And, indeed, it does have hard facts.
Except the reliability of those 'hard facts' is relative depending upon the 'One' who is occupying the top position of the pyramid.
I know you already know all this -, I'm just making sure before we move into the 'indigo things.' Which will be very soon here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your considered comments are welcome