EHang

Well okay so Nancy went to Taiwan.

Right now in selected futuristic industrial park cities, the government of China (CCP Beijing) has established complete integrated digital wireless air traffic control systems, which allow the operating of 'Autonomous Aerial Vehicles.'

There are literally thousands of these vehicles presently lined up in warehouses, and a number of them are already in operation out in the actual real world.

'Real world' I suppose, in this case being delimited by the 'futuristic urban centers' definition though.

Real thing, really flies, by automated control;
you can fall asleep quite safely at the wheel
if you like.

We are living at a time when the mind of man, is turning from the pages of books where its most adventurous exercises were manifested, to the land, the seas, the skies, the buildings - and having those speculative propositions manifested within organised reality frameworks.

This is a manufactured reality, it isn't the natural reality naked, but the extension of primary natural reality filtered through the mind of man and the manipulation skills of human beings.

Adam and Eve in the Garden were naked. We are not naked.

The human being is not a naked primary thing. It is a covered, elaborately transformed manufactured item (ETM).

Every single designer or architect on the planet will tell you, that the imposition of human ideas into form, transforms a previous reality... And they will tell you very strongly, that this 'can be' a good thing, but that it is seldom a good thing, and the worst consequences are only discovered long after widespread societal implementation.

There are literally no reports, by the way - hate to tell you this - of human encounters with advanced ET Alien beings, in which the usual state of said 'Aliens' is clothed!

They have clothes, but these have express and very consciously deliberate teleological causes for being worn at all.

Was that a tautology? Dunno; might have been.

When we look back into our broad cultural past, it is possible to think that some writer somewhere, saw the smallest birds in existence, for example, and then anthropomorphized them into stories about 'Fairies.'

Not a small bird in reality, let me tell you.
For Balenciaga.

But if you take that thought as excluding all other possibilities, this runs counter to our own current experience with our manufactured, elaborately transformed own reality.

And as more time passes, unless some cataclysmic event overtakes our steep progress in technology, we will ourselves have become those things that past ages were thought about as only having imagined in books of fantasy.

In fact one issue we will all soon confront as a generality, is that there will be a number of ideologies that cannot sustain themselves in the coming world.

Marxism might, capitalism might, Islam certainly will not. And so, in all events, Sir Salman Rushdie (whose father changed his surname to reflect his admiration of Averroes - aka Ibn Rushd. Thank you to Mufti Abu Layth for having told us that little fact) will have 'won.'

Will there be though, as KP questions, retrogressive rebellions driven by this apparent ubiquitous dichotomy of forces, a seemingly Universal polar opposite relativity of existential absolutes, be they merely 'idea' guidelines, or actual mechanistic extremes of material possibility (which is the kind of thing Marxist atheist materialism asserts)?

And in any case, is unlimited forward 'progress' by the elaboration of technical means and technology alone, a materially absolute 'freedom?' Are there any existential fence-lines of 'impossibility' which in fact determine what can really be attained in the end?

The basic 'concern' that has been regularly voiced regarding the speculated disabling of nuclear weapons by 'unknown vehicles' or 'objects' was that we, human-kind, had already transgressed into a Cosmic 'no-go' zone on account of nuclear warfare. The extension of that idea, is that were human technology to go even much further forward into weapons far more devastating yet than nuclear explosion devices - and yet still there was the underlying prevalence of this 'competing interest' dynamic obtaining in human society - well then would it mean we would wipe ourselves out at some point in the near future.

And so the question was asked by a lot of thinkers, not just KP here, well, is there any idea as to how, or whether some advanced civilization had successfully handled that issue - or is it the case that the reason there are no 'ET Aliens' is because in fact, well, they did obliterate themselves in their terminal desire for power and control.

But what is the objective though, of a conspiracy by the world's rulers and leaders, whereby they are most intent on never giving up to the public any facts disclosing the known real existence of advanced intelligent beings not of this planet who have resolved the self-destruction matter - and instead proliferating the clear-cut terminally risky 'two pillar' ideology of the Freemasonic cult teachings, the Hebrew and Judaeo-Christian 'sin' mentality, the Islamic 'human slave to Absolute Other (plus Caliph)' paradigm, into whatever disastrous future is in store for humanity by sheer conclusion of logic??

The logic leads to an absurd conclusion.

Why risk it? Why go there?

And most of all, why insist that everyone else goes there?

The EHang flying vehicle has 16 rotors, and all of them are under intelligent control -  that is, of computers.

If you only had two rotors, well then you would not be able to 'fly' under controlled conditions.

If I say that someone has only two operating psychic nodes, using the Jungian sort of terminology here - like I said Stephen Fry and Salman Rushdie have (how insensitive and arrogant of me) - then they cannot implement any actions that are undertaken by another of the other potential nodes.

So their material power is limited to toxicity, and to physical strength.

Even so, these things are under intelligent control to the extent that their physical actions and rage are being controlled by a person's intelligence (IE their own brains).

And so they look like 'intelligent beings.'

When the Austrian medical doctor and psychologist whose name must not be said, attempted to look at the obtaining moral relativism which resulted in the Holocaust as in fact a false paradigm, instead proposing a Cosmic material absolute with a material physical, albeit quantum level existence - the American government burned all his books and banned you from ever reading them in any officially licensed published format (in other words, they withdrew the rights of Protected Copy under publication licence). During the term of the enactments of statute law to do with the sale of banned literature and banned reading material, it was in fact illegal for you to have a copy of any of those titles.

Brian Transeau sent this pic.
Brian = 'BT.'
We've featured his music here
lots. ('13 Angels On My Broken
Windowsill'). A hummingbird's
nest is about the size of a dime.
He photographed this himself.
The nest was next to his home
on his own property .

But this 'Cosmic material absolute' was no more than the natural extension of Jung's collective unconscious, and it was in every sense the same sort of thing as David R. Hawkin's Universal Field conception. And those ideas themselves swirl closely around the material science nexus of Stuart Hameroff's microtubules model of consciousness. And that then makes them 'electromagnetic field' elements too.

Well you know about those things. You have relatively easy access to small devices today that can measure EMF signals in your brain and in your nervous system.

People like Rushdie do not have those systems inside them to measure anything. And they never will. They are a terminating line of 'Evolution.'

But they are intelligent beings.

Perrier-Jouet.

And that's where the conflict arises between let's say, you, eventually, and them.

Because one day, you will learn how to kill them at a distance. You can easily learn how to disable them, put them to sleep and they will have absolutely no idea how it ever happened. And they will deny literally to their dying breath, that you did it. Or that you could do it.

As for me, I'm not saying anything further on this, in case someone wants to stick me in an iron cage and suspend me from the furthest branches of the tallest tree/s.

And I am not even a hummingbird!