...Where I have not been. Been more or less just about everywhere else across Europe - never ever been to Paris.
Anyway, so Angelina Jolie's mother, Marcia Lynne Bertrand, a French-Canadian, used to proclaim rather strongly that her mother at least, 'was as far away from French Parisian as you can get,' and that may well have been quite true. Her husband, and therefore Jolie's grandfather, Rolland Bertrand, was French enough though, if you wanted to make a thing of it.
I think it was John Voight who may have been more intent on preserving the French connection here, since he gave his daughter the name 'Angelina.'
Angelina's is a famous tea rooms in Paris, that is famous in fact, more for their hot chocolate than their actual tea.
What are they doing serving Scotch whisky at Agent Provocateur's in Paris? |
And then of course, Angelina's is just as famous for being the favored hang-out of Coco Chanel and her friends.
You know, there is just so much more to all of these characters of history than the common history and narratives even have the knowledge to say...
If I started to go into my grandmother's sisters' (on my father's side) history in Europe we will not only be here all day, but some of these people's live were not only 'larger than life' but so far beyond the sheer scandalous, that the highest of society were in awe.
The Greffuhles were endowed with female members of such social prowess - in every possible sense - that... ...well, their salons, especially the one run by Elaine (Bill? Are you following? LOL) openly 'tolerated' the emergent new 'class' of well-heeled American lesbian with massive inheritances, who themselves were eventually taught how to run these things. And they did that. You know, to put it rather crudely here - out of which many great personages of modern times, like Karl Lagerfeld, sprang fully-armed, as it were.
Coco Chanel in the end was a partner with one of the female denizens of this grade of society -, who was a major dancer at the Moulin Rouge and also 'expensive friend' of some of the boys and girls of the salon set. And what were they partners in? Well, asylums for women and children and poor men as well. She and her friend invested heavily, considerable sums, in fact, in these places throughout the latter parts of their very successful lives.
All the while somehow also being able to attend morning coffee at Angelina's, or in this case, hot chocolate.
They bring the hot chocolate out to you in silver or ceramic jugs, right - and then you have that poured out for you into cups with lots of cream on top and also sometimes coffee underneath as well.
...Why am I telling you all this?
Well because we like hot chocolate!
Don't we?
I must say - Adele Charvet, eh. Very impressed.
Salons, by the way, are not about sex-for-money or even anything like that. Money is there because well, rich people have money.
They came about, quite frankly, because these super wealthy women who were all incredibly sophisticated and highly educated in the highest aristocracy, were being frozen out of 'academies' that were being strictly open to males only at the time.
Still, it's all too easy for those who wish to be lurid about things to impute many false ideas about what is going on with these women. But there was never any implication by anyone that Elisabeth Greffulhe, for instance, was any kind of 'mistress' to anyone, and never certainly to Edward VII, who always dined informally at her house when he was in Paris.
I tell you all these things for a reason.
Nothing changes: Plus ca change... Google says 'the fundamental immutability of human nature and institutions.' |
How do these people, these kinds of people know to conduct their private lives with this person and not with that one? You cannot really say Prince Andrew, for example, is in fact educated in these things at all, really.
Look - why was Andrew hanging with the crowd he was hanging around with, when he might have seemingly as easily been where say Karl Lagerfeld was, for example, and it is no secret to say by extension then in context of the Kaiser, where, oh, Caroline of Monaco was... They don't seem to get into trouble. How come he did?
There are high aristocrats, and they are still around today -, and there are others.
They know because they know the court slippers of Balthazar in the Merchant of Venice.
They know because they know when you wear a certain type of socks.
They know when - if you are a woman - you have zibellino around your neck.
So, Andrew, did your so-called 'friends' in mercantile London do you any favors, did they, Andrew? Money buys you what, then?
There are people here reading this Blog who will have the wit to go and watch Pacino's Merchant of Venice (it is the best one; not that he has particularly distinguished himself recently with any public pronouncements on this or thon...) again now.
And why not? There could be a salon in their town and they are simply getting ready.
How well does Anthony Zimmer do it?
ReplyDeleteI haven't seen the original French version of the, interestingly, FLORIAN Henckel von Donnersmarck story - if you can believe the official publicity, which I do not(!) - but I have to admit, I very much liked the Hollywood version of it with Depp and Jolie. I know, having worked in the artists contracts department of CAA in Chicago for a brief while, that those ultimately credited for the 'creator rights' are those individuals who have succeeded in pushing the screenplay to some final funding source. ...With this in mind we should realize that there were a number of movies made where someone had their 'face exchanged' - Travolta's 'Face/Off' was released way back in 1997 and you still have to consider Silence of the Lambs; that was way back in 1991. ...I love the movies, but they are so contrived compared to how you would really money launder on a large scale. You can't actually break the laws anywhere, because if you do, well then, that would be illegal. The art of real money laundering and tax dodging is that when you do it, it is well within the existing laws! But you still end up with the result that you want. It's a genuine legal skill, not a criminal enterprise 'skill.' ...Have to say more about this in a second, because it is just so topical right now. Also, must say a couple of things about Henckel von D.
Delete'Florian' Henckel eh. Not only that, but 'graf Henckel von Donnersmarck' no less. Means that he is calling himself a 'count.' A German 'count.' Well there is no German Royal Family now, nor any Monarchy so I don't why he's saying 'count.' And by the way, he really does mean to say an actual 'count' rather than just using the word as a name only... Well we Stewarts/Stuarts (...not really allowed to say that though, the 'Stuart' one, right now) use 'Steiermark' often in parts of Europe. It's really the same word meaning: 'to steer' or to 'steward,' even to 'guide/guard.' Anyway so these people want to associate themselves with 'Thor' (Donner) and claim they have blocked barbarians (marck) from entering against 'Thor.' I hate to say it, but this is another one of these 'Mount Hermon' type name ideas: in Venice they say 'Marco' (which has nothing whatsoever to do with Saint Mark, although they pretend it does), and in Illyria they also say 'marco' or 'petras' and they mean a real 'Herm' mount of pebbles. I completely doubt this guy 'Florian' though because of all those signs they are trying to too hard to link themselves to this 'occult' or at least fairly secretive since Napoleon, group of people based in Venice. More in a second...
ReplyDeleteThis guy's family outright says they are involved at the highest level with the 'Order of Malta.' Yeah, okay. LOL He's Roman Catholic but he's a mason too. Openly. Oh, okay then. So if we want to find Joseph Mifsud and Stefan Halper we just visit the Henckel von Donnersmarcks, then...? He's a 'high aristocrat' European Roman Catholic... ...who went to Oxford University. Hmn. Really. I mean he's not lying. He's who and what he says he is. It's just those 'things' are not what they are making them out to be, or to mean as far as any 'up there' person would take note of. ...The reason that Lord Jacob Rees-Mogg is not in the running for the Prime Minister-ship of the UK right now today, is not because he wouldn't win it, or that he has insufficient support personally -, it's that he is a Roman Catholic! And the reason so many French and other Roman Catholics hold that this present Pope and several before him recently, were and are heretics - is that they are exactly that. 'Florian' gives his only Western interview to CIA puppet Charlie Rose... LOLOLOL When do I stop laughing here.
ReplyDeleteLook the thing is this: When Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Venice May 1797, the Venetians who knew everything about money and global trading and already had had to do all of this several times before. Famously when Richard the Lionheart went there all the way in the 12th century - with the Arabs on one side trying to get the Byzantine wealth, and the English asking for loans to run a war in the Middle East(lol), the Doge told them all he was actually broke. So, they, the Venetians knew full well, because of the European spying network, what was afoot, and they well knew how to hide their gold and silver. These fellows around the place today, who want to insinuate their way into that 'network,' imagine that somewhere along the way, someone will accidentally divulge just where is all of this Venetian wealth. The number of times the US itself has gone with submarines looking into the depths of the Venetian lagoons...! It's logical but it isn't there. You have to remember something - Venice 'signed itself out of existence' in one night. But, it was at the height of its global mercantile and seafaring trading and banking business. So, half the reason the same band of 'Illuminati/Freemason' idiots carry on with this 'Knights Templar' nonsense, is because they literally imagine that they will uncover or unearth or at least, be invited into these secret/secretive international trading networks that are THE Venetian trade networks that simply could not logically have also 'disappeared overnight.' Yeah well, movies is one thing. You reading here, have more chance of finding your way in.
DeleteCorrection. In fact it's certain that many of you will.
DeleteHa. "Charvet." We asked the ETs about what's in the secret warehouses and they said "L'amour est un oiseau rebelle."
DeleteSo I guess that's what goes in the free library then?
DeleteOh and there's that "love" again. My mind is reeling.
DeleteWhen it comes to facial surgery, I suppose you have already mentioned "Dark Passage" around here?
ReplyDeleteI'm having a hard time watching Angelina and Johnny. I'm more of a Bogart, Grant, Cardinale, Vitti type person.
DeleteI seriously can't believe I like some movies with those two in them, but if there were any example of 'possession' and walk-ins, boy are those two it. There are many movies I absolutely hate with Depp, and I really haven't watched enough Jolie movies to know where it all is there with her, but, Polanski's The 9th Gate is excellent - he's not a stand-out in it but he is solid. The Tourist is excellent though - all the way. Contrived, but still, a good entertaining movie with a lot of solid, classy visuals. I am highly suspicious, even doubtful of this 'Marck Graf' guy who claims to have written and definitely literally directed the flick... But there you go, he's got the intentions. He has the intent to BE in this circle. Is he, though? I don't think so. Steven Berkoff I happen to personally know. Well, that's because he's always been convinced that he knows ME. I've met him several times at private functions run by Arthur Andersen - and I've totally stayed away from those things in recent years. Berks is great. Really one of the true greats of stage and theater.
DeleteI think you nailed it there with 'Dark Passage' a book by David Goodis, and a major noir film starring Bogart.
DeleteAre we allowed to talk about walk-ins and whether there's any reason to be immediately wary?
Deletenailed it with "dark passage"? really? great! See, I have no idea what you're talking about here.
DeleteWhy can't we talk about 'walk ins?' We can talk about anything here! There definitely are such things and one ought to be wary to the extent that, well, it's hard to know when that 'walk in' will just walk right back out again. The human 'social context' is so immensely complex, that there are so many different levels of 'walk in' for one thing. We here, ought to be trying to 'get up above' the simplistic, very messy general human context, and not be banking on 'walk ins' like for example, some people in North African cultures do, when it comes to their understandings about 'Genies' or the 'Djinn' as they call them. But then frankly, I think Western Satanists also have a similar concept about manipulating vulnerable people via 'walk ins.' It's all bad stuff. But it is powerful and dangerous. You have to be 'awake' to these matters.
DeleteOh! You are talking about the meta soul. "The tourist" is not what he seems. Surprise ending means it was really about.... . And also at what point did they both "know"?
DeleteThe interesting thing about the Carlson interview is that once you get past the obvious attempt at fear mongering you notice how inappropriate the reactions of these two really smart people are. So some people saw a space ship on the freeway, and took a picture, and all that showed in the picture was a tiny star shaped bit of light where there ought to have been a big impressive space ship. Yet all THREE people saw it together. "Oh it is said that they manipulate matter the way we do with information..."
So we get a little lesson, "matter is metaphor" but that's not really a subject for Tucker Carlson. The useful lesson for the plebes is, as usual, "be afraid, suckers!"
Damn. Let's build a space ship!
Delete