Just Plain Basics

Okay this is going to be real simple.

LOL

In the next few 'episodes' here, we are going to try and answer two questions: ...And your Father in Heaven knows all these things that you need. 1. Define 'know.'

And 2. What is 'Ousion' and how do we find it for sure.

'Existential' means - it's right there; in front of your eyes, you see it, you feel it, you experience it. It's just plain there!

Very very simple things.
Lobster and champagne sauce.

I suppose the third question is 'but why?' Why all of this carry-on, how come there is 'Evil?' What is life all about - IE 'why??'

Well that's a silly question from the existentialist point-of-view: it is, that's all.

And this perspective is much more important than most people realize. You know, as a matter of your own existential experience of life - that your senses pick up information, sometimes correctly, sometimes not correctly, but they convey those things to your material physical brain cells and your brain has ideas and responses and feelings and so on, governed by its own, your own, existential experiences.

And you see things are seeded, they grow, they reach some kind of peak, and then they decline and next die.

All things are like this.

There is no 'Singularity' as such. Not in your actual existential reality which is actually experienced - you can speculate about 'Singularity/One-ness' and so on, but it is just speculation. It has no reality that you can prove or demonstrate. Period.

'Certainty' as in volition certainty, absent of cause - is a component of a train of things, a seeding, growing, rising, peaking, declining (or changing), then dying profile of things in order; in exact perfect order.

Negative consequences must flow from the activation of a component not joined up to its clear-cut necessary relationships of cause - moral cause, mechanical cause, mathematical cause. This is the source of all 'Evil.' Certainty of action without resort to genuine moral cause - because we are talking about 'intelligent' beings here, not mechanisms and mechanistic things without 'sense.' Evil pertains to those who can perceive it - aka they have intelligence.

Who needs windows?

But we can adduce something from mythological narratives about this source of 'Evil' - because remember, this is after Chaos; this is 'Set.' Not Chaos. But it has been framed, in the myths as a 'Primal Being;' which means it is a supernatural, non-human, or pre-human, being, let's at least say imbued with a Spirit Force which for want of a better explanation we are going to call 'intellect' for the moment here. The necessary reason for it to have 'intellect' is for it to animate, to be alive, and be able to function as an alive thing - even though still it is just a component as yet, of a hugely complex set of relationships which we have now existentially, in our consciousness. 

We have laws, we have moral cause, we understand a few things about Cosmology aka Physics, we understand mechanisms. We know that - 'Set' cannot operate on its own. Not inside an otherwise generally co-operating set of other things.

So to go to the first question (Point 1 as set out above at the beginning here), 'knowing' is a continuum of complex intellect; I cannot 'know' unless I can 'be' at some place I am proposing that I 'know.' Whether I guess or imagine or hypothesize that I am 'there' yet I must 'be' there in some way. Perfect knowledge, if there be such a thing, must be at that place for real, and thus if it is held to be elsewhere as well at the same time, then it is linked to both places as a continuum thing or process.

God 'knows' (what you need). That is the proposition in ancient texts of religious teaching and philosophy.

Nobody says - not Jews, not Christians, not Muslims - that God does not know.

So the base proposition is that He does know. IE He is in you as a continuum object. You are not God, but He is in you.

Question Point 2.

Jesus says what the Ousion is.

He sets out that to be with 'God,' to live in His Realm, to be part of Him, you must love your neighbor. Although He doesn't actually say 'your fellow man' or your 'neighbor' He says 'there must be love between yourselves.' And maybe He defines who 'yourselves' are elsewhere, but right now I am thinking just about the later passages of the Gospel of John.

So He is equating the continuum of which I said must be the characteristic, if not the substance, or 'material composition -,' to this Intellect of 'God.' He says God is in you. Well how can He be in two places at once? Because continuum, that's how come.

But what is Love?

Well here He is literally telling you something from or completely in line with, ancient myth: 'Love' is a literal Supernatural and Divine Being, who 'sprang from the blood which dropped from the castrated Ouranon.'

Now see the thing is this - if you manufacture a parallel conversion conception of 'love,' derived from your passing senses taking sense impressions into your mortal brain cells, well then that cannot be anything really permanent or 'Eternal' as such. Which is fine, but it is not 'Love.' You'll see why later; it has to do with 'coincident conditions...'

And in any case, here we go again - for if you do that (create a fraudulent parallel conversion of 'love'), in what way is it different from cutting 'Certainty' off from actual moral cause, or mechanical necessity? You are going to get into all sorts of relationship difficulties, because as you do what you do which is based on flawed inputs, so too will anyone you engage with be indulging in the same kind of flawed fantasy programming back to you; well, maybe against you, too.

There are plenty of mechanistic Evolutionary believers, who propound the hypothesis, that 'attraction' is simply a coincident product of Survival. 'Coincident' in the sense of necessary for survival and not simply arbitrarily 'co-incident with.' So did attraction come first, or only develop from some necessity condition of 'survival' later on at some stage of 'life?' Or were the two literally coincident? And that becomes a mind-boggling disastrous argument for them because it leads back to the question well but why? And they have no answer. 

Unlike our existentialism that relates to actual effective cause and component positioning, in a viable system, they are resorting to fantasy beliefs about things just 'being' for no reason, but suddenly they find themselves having a reason, and luckily so for us, since we have 'survived,' according to them.

This is just mind-numbingly militant foolishness, stubbornness, and in fact idiocy.

Things are existentially true, because maths and geometry and logic and all of those vital underlying things are necessarily very real!

So for us 'why' is because we can see existentially why. Necessarily, substance, components, relationships, principles, profile, 'energy,' then mechanisms and dynamic action - like 'life' as we in fact now 'existentially' see it and know it.

What I mean to conclude is, that 'Love' is just plain not a symptom of 'senses into brain cells!'

Love is Aphrodite. Is the blood of Universal Deity/Divinity - Eternal Beingness.

Because Love is the 'connecting' principle.

Do you suppose they might have some
'daily bread' in here...

Mechanistic Evolutionists have no connecting principle at all to rely on. They make a bald assertion which cannot be supported by any logic whatsoever.

The meaning of Universal, Eternal, Connection... ...is 'Love.' That is what to call it. People ascribe all sorts of wonderful things to it, magical attributes and fairy tale stuff, but in reality it is the principle of actual functional 'connection.' And we live in a complex system, so yes it is complex connection.

If you have followed this argument all the way through, then you can certainly eventually find 'Ousion' and then, unlike those whose material senses all will fail them, and whose cell structures all will decay and die - yours will not, but will change along the pathway of 'connection' provided by a Divine Process, and necessarily because of the 'continuum' - a Divine Intellect. Why will your material structure not also fail you, though?

Because Perfect Intellects, with Perfect Powers...

...have little men flying around in flying saucers taking your DNA and storing it and re-growing you. (Except that's the bit you don't believe most of all, right?).

Ah man, see, you don't understand Greek. He never said 'in the sky (or heavens, whatever) there are many mansions.' He said 'monai' - temporary stopping-point on the way to somewhere else far far further away still. Like a motel, but He literally spoke in context of going into 'the heavens.' 

Space station, my friend. Space station. 

Who doesn't believe this? Come on, speak up.

Which bits of what I have been saying do you think is even close to being wrong?

You are still wanting the space ship outside your door first, and then... Then what? Then you will start to disassemble the stupid nonsense of human society's flawed sense-fabricated 'truth' in your fatally dying brain cells? Only then?

Do you really think that cannot be arranged?