Dispelling Myths

Suddenly I woke up to the fact that if you leave things 'not revealed' - if it's an interesting subject - then most curious people will right away wander around the internet chasing possible leads.

I know I would.

But I have people here tapping me on the shoulder and saying: 'You think you found something out, but you're wrong. This is what it really is.'

And so from that position when I look at what is liable to happen here, it is just all too easy to come to very wrong conclusions.

Kingfish with verjuice and 
garlic and marjoram.
And peas. Humble peas.

For example, there is this 'belief' or theory or something - and you'll find it spread about everywhere, even by academic historians of antiquities and ancient cultures - that the Sanskrit (Rig Veda) 'soma' is likely to be some extract of the ephedra plant.

Well, look, that is just plain wrong.

Certainly, ephedra plants and the main extract from them - ephedrine - will give you very obvious sensations, and have quite discernible effects on you too, but nothing that you necessarily want to have in this case.

When you look at the drug abuse context, for reasons utterly unbeknownst to me, drug addicts and drug abusers, go down paths that are clearly dead-end roads. Why do they do that right from the start? 

It's all very well to scoff and say - isn't it obvious, they get addicted?

But why were they chasing the wrong effects in the first place?

All that amphetamines will do is create a false sense of alertness and focus. False. It's false.

Arguably, there are slight side-effects to do with the generating of dopamine and also the important neuro-transmitter serotonin. But they are in any event weak effects and meanwhile, you will have your eyes pinned wide open permanently 24/7 and adrenaline surging through your body until your body gives up - which it will do.

Therapist: 'Let me psycho-analyse you.'
Client: 'How much is this chair?'

Yeah yeah, I get all the excuses for 'why.' They're all dumb excuses.

There is a political dimension to all of this.

I think so.

You see 'they' want you to be 'alert' so that they can drive you to your death while you are working for them.

You spend a reasonable amount of time in criminal law courts and you will see: nurses, interns (doctors on ward duty), mothers with many kids... ....these are the people who most often get caught, get charged, and pay the fines, and sometimes go to jail. 'Drug addiction' is a middle class thing. It's about commerce and money - it's not about the feelings, the sensations, the 'experiences;' and especially not the 'mind expanding' experiences!

The people who become addicts, are those who are able to afford the substances. So - working people, working classes, and so-called modern middle classes. Rich heirs have accountants and family law firms who organize their lives for them. Really really rich people become heroin addicts.

And propofol is used to kill people outright, sooner, or not so soon, but soon enough.

Those who are not able to afford the actual addictive drugs suites that are commonly available, die.

Methamphetamine is made from synthetic ephedrine, but that does not mean someone with chemistry knowledge cannot 'construe' something fairly similar from natural extracts from the ephedra plant cohorts.

Methamphetamine is not going to turn you into Voltaire!

Yes sure it could make you type out hundreds and hundreds of 'words' but they will be meaningless jumbles and repetitions of nonsense.

For example, this is what you will find in a modern-day FBI warrant application - pages and pages of stuff typed all really fast but when that is subjected to actual objective scrutiny by someone not on drugs, you'll have to also make pages and pages of blacked-out redactions because intelligent objective people will ask 'what was the drug this person was on who wrote all of this *?'

And the trouble is, this is a fact nobody wants to face.

The FBI is a pack of lunatics on drugs at the top. They are quite literally - if you give them into the hands of any Jungian to assess - insane.

...Meanwhile, Wikipedia happily tells you that 'soma' could be the ephedra plant.

Isn't.

Is not.

What would be the point of pumping adrenaline through your nervous system and over-focusing your brain onto the five senses, when the underlying hypothesis was that human conscious is a particular coherent structure, or a structured form of coherent electromagnetic fields, not only anchored to the five senses incoming and out-going signaling?

There is no point.

So - not ephedra.

Actually you're wasting your time trying to 'work it out' yourself like a detective, if albeit a modern Gothic romance detective.

By the way, if you think that when this is all over in here, when we have put out all of the details, if you think that suddenly somehow the human race (including the FBI, including the world of drug addicts and drug addiction) will turn around and all 'do the right thing' because the sensations are better, the feelings are better, the effects are profoundly valuable - get that out of your head.

People are stupid. The end.

So don't you be 'people.' Be a person.

Be someone individual.

This track is one of the greatest trance song classics ever. It's quite calm and safe. It's the 'introduction' type of song - get's you into the 'place' in trance sets before the so-called 'build-up' to where it all goes in the end: