A Staggering New Fact

The topical Salman Rushdie said in an interview, the following - he said, and I quote: 'I mean, I do not believe in the literal truth of fairy tales, for example. I do not believe, for instance, that magic carpets fly.'

When the early Persian myth writers said that the Deev captured Peris every now and then, and kept them captive in iron cages at the ends of the highest branches of tall trees, exposed for everyone to view them and exposed to the elements - and that Peri helpers would fly up to those cages and feed the captive Peri fragrances, which is what their fundamental sustenance consisted of, was this true or only metaphorically true? ...Until some human hero would arrive and was recruited to rescue and release the captive fairy being?

The label of 'Prince' in those days also meant a broadly powerful, maybe even a roaming, ruler, but not the absolute ruler.

...This is where I come from.
Up there, beyond that mist line.
There's giants up there, you know.

So when you read in the New Testament, for instance, that 'Satan is the Prince of the Air,' it does not mean he is a Peri - he is not of the kind of being called 'Peris.' And it does not mean that he rules the Air at all! It means he is a traversing, meaning 'uncrowned' but still dominating, power. Albeit for our purposes we are going to say, also an actual real person/being. Not just a 'power.'

I posted previously that I was going to specify which bits of anything that I had written in other places, were absolutely true and correct in all details and materially factual... Meaning, hard matter-type, fact. Not 'metaphysical' fact.

Rushdie next goes on to explain that he still 'believes' in the 'truth' of the metaphysical lessons or teachings.

And that is exactly not what I am going to say.

In this case, let's equate 'magic flying carpets' with 'UAP's/UFO's.'

Everything I wrote about Thomas C. Schelling, Dr Munro Leaf, Lincoln Gordon (CIA) was completely true. Well in fact all those gentlemen were CIA in one way shape or form. Leaf was a top academic in sociology and political science. He was a major government adviser and adviser to the Disney Corporation. The Rand Corporation, Eastman-Kodak High Altitude Photographic Laboratories - all of those groups, everything I wrote about them in context of those gentlemen was also completely true. And they worked for all of them in different roles.

And this means that somewhere, maybe deep in a government archive somewhere, are government files detailing all of those things about which I wrote concerning those people and the secret or covert government programs that they were working on and in.

Now today, the media talks about 'compartmentalized' classified files, but I cannot see how anything dating to way back then in the late-Fifties, early-Sixties needs to be 'compartmentalized' because you would not 'suppose' there are still any on-going projects or programs, related to those things back then.

Except... I can think of one and it is not anything to do with ET Aliens and UFO's.

I'm not going to say what it is, because it doesn't affect what we want to talk about for right here and now.

And that is specifically, that I have not ever been talking about 'metaphorical' UFO's or metaphorical advanced beings from somewhere else - I have not been talking about Rushdie myth 'magical flying carpets' but about real ones.

So I am not really all that interested the way KP has been characterizing things to do with Dr Steven Greer and all of those groups of UFO chasers, as 'dreams.'

I'm a reasonable guy.

I am going to explain here why people such as Rushdie are intent on hammering away at metaphors when someone else raises the matter of 'flying carpet'-type thing.

Rushdie sees only the metaphorical representation, in the same way that the Deev of Persian folklore, imagined that the top end of tall trees is more or less the region where Peris live and so, keeping them 'up' there would prolong their lives...

Sir Salman would like even less what I am going to say next about him.

Which is that he lacks a range of capacities inside his own structure, which places him more or less on the same standing as the Deev. Deev, have only neural energy which goes up to but not beyond the harmonic multiples of, maybe 550 nms.

At around that type of range of wavelength, there is a 'reflective' mechanism of the Gauss Curve of shortening wavelengths (as we talked about many times earlier, this is just below the so-called 'ultra violet catastrophe' section of the curve). So that all that the intelligent neurological processing is able to do beyond that is 'see' (perceive) the reflections downwards of what lies above and beyond.

So naturally, he says - and he is telling the truth about what he perceives, and he is being self-honest - that everything that we 'think' about beyond that range of existence is only a thing representing some other thing. That's the only way he can think about it.

In fact though - yes what he sees does represent some other thing; a reflection of that thing, not a metaphor for some other thing.

Steven Greer's assertions that there is some exclusively private layer of private corporate involvement, outside of government, but linked with government in the matter of ET Aliens and craft and materials and technology, does fit in somewhat, with what I was saying about those private companies and 'think tanks' of academics post-War (WWII). It's more than possible.

It's strongly possible.

I'm a reasonable guy, yes, 
but man I could still waste a lot of money!
Don't you worry about that!

The split in official policy and thinking at the highest levels, comes about through the difference, the structural difference in neurology between people like, say Dr Munro Leaf, and Sir Salman Rushdie in modern times.

If even an army officer or a soldier comes to a secret panel and tells them 'yes I saw such-and-such' the 'Rushdie's' on that panel will automatically default to the 'and that was a dream/a metaphor/a psychic phenomenon coming from the stress of the risks of nuclear conflagration...'

And so from then on actual policy is determined, governed, not by the actual facts as reported and ascertained - and which might have been able to have been fully validated - but by the 'metaphorical lessons' or the 'moral values' dimension as perceived by people with a defective neurology.

You see, these 'little bluish-grey guys' are not the actual ET Aliens as they live elsewhere. These are functionaries who are alternated backwards and forwards from their real physiology, to a physiology that is suited to being 'perched' like a space bird, not very far out in space from us in order to perform their tasks. Their ears pick up higher-frequency sounds because those are the ones that travel best in low atmosphere and low natural gravity conditions (which affects the atmosphere gases and gas and particulate dynamics), their eyes see better in the relative dark, their fingers can magnetically cling onto surfaces where there is molecular density, their bones can survive Earth atmospheric super high G-forces, and extreme rapid medium changes.

Actual real ET Aliens from very distant places look virtually just like you or me.

You would generally speaking not be able to tell one apart from any other human being down here.

What the hell, JES!
You post these pics, what do you
expect me to do with them!!
And stop 'skiting.' You and me both
are not the ages
they all think...

Imagine though, if a team of serious-minded, senior academics, were canvassing in front of President Kennedy, the need to look at human beings and assess them with regard to what range of neurological wavelengths they actually possessed the structural capacity to use...

I mean there's plenty of ways of using meters - electronics devices - even available way back then in the very early-Sixties, to 'see' these things on a scope. Tavistock was using them.

They're still using them but they just got into a world of trouble experimenting on little kids just then though. Those experiments are not totally wrong - you can definitely reverse chemically-induced organic changes with electronics; not other chemicals. It's just that Tavistock does not have that kind of electronics just yet. But they will though, sooner or later.

You could check Hoover and declare him defective. Johnson - defective. Any number of people.

And what would be the 'benefit' of those human beings with a much greater range of neural wavelength traffic and traffic capability?

Well you can touch an electric heating bar and burn your fingers. But can you touch a high ultra-violet data stream? Can you hear it with your ears?

Can I stick you, you personally, in front of a xenon gas discharge tube and turn it on and after a few minutes will you be able to read electromagnetic signalling through brick walls? Some of you will, some of you won't.

That doesn't necessarily mean you are 'deficient' but it probably does though! Because for all of your life, maybe your lives if you believe that kind of thing, all that you have ever jammed into your head was the 'reflection only' of matter sensitivity above the green codes.

Someone would have to take you away from your bullshit that you are 'smart' and that you are 'scientific' because for one thing - you just ain't!

To take you into a material physical craft that accommodates all of the ranges of neural wavelengths, well that is a thing that your radar can 'see' very easily.

Maybe you could do that, where, oh I don't know, ten thousand people were being pushed around in a massive earthquake and so it would be a waste of time telling anyone 'Hey I just saw a space ship!' Pull yourself together man. You're imagining things because of the earthquake. Or 'stop being stupid. Don't you know it's a crisis right now? You're hallucinating. You're panicking.' They'd tell you.

If I ran an ad, though, say in the Auckland or Christchurch Times, asking how many people saw space ships a few hundred feet above the ground during that massive set in 2011 - what sort of response do you think I would get?

We're just going to have
to take her to dinner, Bill.
At your old house.
(Thanks for this pic, btw).

?? 

Anyone? Anyone?

LOL

I already know what the answer is. No point 'Vera' circularizing that in CIA because that would then 'potentially' mean Vera gets to stay and goes even higher, and her bosses get kicked out - that's if anyone even smart in the White House 'gets the point.' And then they - her erstwhile bosses - all have to come see me and Bill and goddammit maybe even KP at that point - and sit in lectures every week until we 'manually' fix up their missing bits.

Well you try telling that kind of thing to Mr Salman Rushdie! Sir - Sir, Salman Rushdie, hero of free speech and atheism and science and truth and reality.

And if you think 'someone' cannot make massive rainstorms and floods and earthquakes at will, then you got another thing coming!

LOL 

Listen, it ain't 'metaphorical magic flying carpets' going up and down into phreatic pipes during volcanic eruptions and causing volcanic lighting and ionic storms, thereby affecting the weather somewhere else. 

As Suzie Quatro as 'Rio Rogers' said once in a Bob the Builder kids' video:

'That ain't fake singing, pardner, that's real singin'!'

Kick your ass you'll know about it. 'Someone,' if 'someone' does that.

I dunno... Is it time Morgiana, is it time?

Jesus.
Just, honestly...
Just Jeezus.
...It's kind of interesting though.

It is getting very close to time.

But why, why did 'God' make Sir Salman with a neurology which does not extend past his reflection filters level.

Well hey hey hey, hang on just a minute though. There's nothing wrong with just being stuck in that zone for a while. The world still has the need for ditch-diggers too, ya know!

And besides, what makes it that he has to go grab some Peris and close them up in iron cages and suspend them on the highest branches of the tallest trees? That's something he did all by himself.

He is fundamentally evil at heart.

Nobody asked him to damage or 'shake' people's 'faith' such that they were in danger of 'losing their faith.' Just because you hurt a fairy or even kill a fairy does not mean you have proven anything other than that you are an extremely heartless individual. Except they are not just 'individuals' - there's a whole bunch of them.

An ascendant line of species development, still also has to contend with competing descending lines though, sometimes. Not everywhere in the Cosmos but it is so here. This is a sequestered place.

It's like a share farmer in an adjoining field. He knows his crops are screwed because the land he's on is no good, but he throws a bunch of his seeds over to your place. Now don't forget - every single cultural outcome, every slightest nuance of innovation emerging from the field of the 'Evolution' of any particular species, is preserved and protected... ...maybe by the little bluish-grey people. Maybe. DNA is unfolded, iterative magic.

Because as Carl Jung did say, it's all a combination, of genetic start-up plus the 'social incidence.' It's not exclusively one thing or just the other thing alone - it's both things unfolding together, which then results in a Beethoven or a Mozart.

And by the way, what makes it that the next-door share farmer is not stealing all your Beethovens, and keeping them 'preserved' somewhere just for himself? He's a long way ahead of you in this matter. Because for one thing he was not 'you' in the first place. He is your enemy in every sense.

You are a new thing. He is an old thing. 

You don't even know how to use your UV ranges (yet). And he, doesn't have those...

Am I wrong, Tiger? Even just a little bit?

Here's the clue: