The Dog That Failed To Bark

This is the key turning aspect of a great Sherlock Holmes story called 'The Adventure of Silver Blaze.'

Not so much the clue itself but the idea that it is the absence of certain expected things or facts, which can put us right onto the trail of the matter we are trying to uncover the truth about.

There is an authentic early Christian text, which is part of the Dead Sea Scrolls find, and which had in any case been well-known to all Christian scholars and students of antiquity and early writings - known as 'The Gospel of Mary Magdalene.' The actual earliest scrolls themselves do not specify 'Magdalene' but it is very clear both in the text itself as well as according to what early Christians themselves believed and wrote, that this is the work or at least 'testament' of Mary Magdalene.

Boy, you pull some pages out of my book,
and you're gonna get whacked!

Now to say it is one of the 'non-canonical Gospels' is not exactly correct. The basic problem is that there is no complete version of it...

Okay. Did you catch that?

There is an absence... ...of something for which there is no real logical reason for it to be missing in the first place.

And this is plainly so because all of the early churchmen and early important Christian writers knew of it, of the work itself. So what makes it the case that somehow none of them retained or were able to just even simply have commented ever, on the whole entirety of the contents, such that we might be able to recreate the substance of those missing bits?

This narrative is plainly, not true.

Six manuscript pages are missing from the start, and four manuscript pages missing in the middle.

Now I know what's in them.

And those pages were deliberately removed.

Moving ahead though a bit, to just for the moment look at the impossibility of introducing actual facts about the hard-core inner basis of what is being passed off as the teaching of Christ, and/or the message of Christ... ...and why this is so.

It's still a Divine Thing;
it's just for women, that's all!

Consider the argument - is basically taking place between Christians and Jews and Muslims, with the Atheists on the outside of that fundamentally disputing with the whole lot of them and what they are saying as religious people.

A Jewish scholar will point to the indisputable alteration in the Christian 'Hebrews 10:5-6' compared with Psalm 40 in the Old Testament.

[This is basically the verses 'Sacrifice and offering you did not require;' and then the Christian Book of Hebrews adds or inserts 'But a body you prepared for me' just before the 'With burnt offerings and sin offerings you were not pleased.']

And the Jewish scholar will say it like this - Psalm 40 'of the Hebrew Bible.'

When you get to why the Gospel of Mary Magdalene is not included in formal outward canon by Christians (it is accepted by all mainstream Christian churches, however, as authentic; an authentic 'Testament'), then they mostly just say that it is not dealing with any of the standard teachings of Jesus, and well, after all, ten pages are 'missing.' So, hey, it must not be all that important then, right? Just leave it out because we cannot teach our moral laws from it...

So the Jews say 'you have altered the Hebrew Bible,' and the Christians say 'Mary Magdalene is missing.'

The Atheists go 'listen you idiots, there is no God.'

And Muslims say 'There is only One God, because the JOOOZ only had One God, but then, they got corrupted.'

Guy style stuff...

Here are the facts however:

There was no such thing as a 'Hebrew Bible.'

And you cannot find one single page anywhere dating from any time more or less two hundred years after the Septuagint Greek Bible written in Alexandria Egypt - that is in Hebrew. No, sonny, you cannot. And that's just the plain fact of it!

Moreover you cannot find in any case, any 'Hebrew' Bible at all, which has vowelization and grammatical rules observing syntax - until only rather recently!

Nobody altered anything from an earlier 'Hebrew Bible.' And I'm going to prove it to you right here.

The Gospel of Mary Magdalene, the supposed Jewish woman, was written by her in high class and very ancient Egyptian: what they are calling today 'Sahidic Coptic,' but it is standard court Graeco-Egyptian.

The second fact is something the Atheists don't want to hear - the Gospel of Mary Magdalene is about 'Cosmogony,' you know, 'Big Bang,' and physics, not just metaphysics. 

Now.

Here is the difference between those arguing, and what you are reading here:

I am not going to tell you about the past, and I am not going to project a future and then claim that is 'Revelation' or 'Holy Scripture' and you'd better follow the rules or else Allah will burn your beard off every day...

I am going to deliver to you now here a material Divine Fact that you can grasp and use functionally right now. This is going to be about sex, right?

You wanna know about that? You want to hear Jesus (and Mary Magdalene) on that subject...

Yes?

The problem for Campbell's Tomato Soup Christians - and in this case it includes the Roman Catholic Pope, is that if I were not correct about what I am about to say, it should not be the case that Jesus says 'unless you become born again, you cannot see the Realm of Heaven.'

What? Even He poses the rhetorical question: 'You ask inside yourselves - is it proposed that someone enter back into their mother's womb?'

OH, WHAT I FORGOT TO SAY HERE, FIRST TIME AROUND (THIS IS AN ADDITION NOW, POST THE FIRST ARTICLE UPLOAD), WAS THAT JESUS IN REPLY TO SOMEONE ASKING ABOUT MARRIAGE AND IN CONTEXT OF A PERSON'S EVIDENT MULTIPLE SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THEIR PHYSICAL LIFETIME HERE, SAYS: 'FOR YOU KNOW NOT, THERE IS NO MARRIAGE IN OURANON, FOR YOU WILL BE LIKE UNTO THE ANGELS AND LIVING FOREVER...' But what does that exactly mean? We shall soon see.

Now if I'm wrong, then the following should not be the case:

Ouranon placed back inside their Mother Gaia, all of the Titans that she had birthed, until Cronus (that's not how you should read that name, by the way; more on that later), hiding, attacked Ouranon when He was visiting Gaia again, and cut his penis off, from the blood of which, of course, the Goddess that all loved, Aphrodite, sprang. Ouranon then pronounced a predication against the Titans that had leapt on Him: 'You are Titans in reproach, and Vengeance for your acts will come upon you afterwards.' (Hesiod).

Heck. We need a beer, Jesus!

'Titans' mean 'those who strain' (against something, whatever; they are a necessary forcefulness, not essentially evil at all, but without integration with important Principles, well then they can be very negative and, being intelligent, some are also actually 'Evil').

The Bible starts with appellations to Gaia and Ouranon as the Primary Beings of Creation. And Jesus says the Lord's Prayer this way: 'Pater hi mon, ho en tois Ouranois (means Ouranon but with grammar/in syntax). This does not mean, as commonly translated, 'Our Father who art in Heaven.'

It says, 'Father ours, He parallel there is Realm of Heaven...'

The Greek and Aramaic had a way of speaking about people of status, as being the same as the location where they presided or held their power. So it's not 'who is in Heaven,' but like the Sanskrit Vedas, 'whose vicinity means Heaven.' aka 'Loka.' 

...And then therefore, quite logically He makes it follow what He wants and what He says you should want for yourself: 'Thy Realm come (to here).'

The whole entire Cosmogony explicit in the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, says that the Universe is a thing (as I have regularly repeated here) with a Gaussian Curve: there is vacancy, and then inception, and then growth, and then some 'peak' state, and then decline and death. But she adds that there is instigation and not simple 'Big Bang' emergence from actual nothing. There is emergence from the field, but there is Divine Intelligence behind it all.

And here is another great mystery clue for you:

'Cronus...' No such thing; no such word, no such name.

It is 'Certainty,' Decision, Decisiveness - but those things without any other necessary attributes. Therefore it is not a god, but a Gaussian stage Primal Entity. 'C,' 'Ae,' 'Ra,' 'Theta' (looks like an Omicron so, easy for lying scribes to say 'Omicron' whereas it is Theta), 'Anu' (from the skies) and 'Y' (means a characteristic, 'nature of;' and then the standard ending for someone's name, 'S' or 'N' sometimes).

Cern. Cernunnos. Cer-tain - isn't it? Because 'Theta' not Omicron. Saturn. Saet-Anu. Satan. Seth (the Egyptian identity who killed Osiris aka Serapis aka the 'bread and wine/body and heart put back together rises from Dead' guy).

Eke - trance singer.

Is there even any tiniest fraction of a chance that I am wrong here? Do you think?

Now Jesus says where you have to be 'born again.' He says - and Mary Magdalene says that she has been - 'you must be born of the Spirit.'

Now unless Jesus is also having difficulty with defining 'woman' or which gender gives birth, then 'the Spirit' is Female, or 'Feminine' if you like.

And so even say the Jews: 'Shekinah is Feminine.'

SO, YOU SHALL BE LIKE UNTO THE SUPERNAL BEINGS, THE FIRST CHILDREN IN THE GOLDEN AGE, THAT PRE-HUMAN HISTORY PERIOD WHEN THE ANGELS WERE MADE - UNDER OURANON. WHAT WERE - INDEED STILL ARE - THEIR LIVES LIKE? THAT IS THE ACTUAL DIRECT MEANINGFUL ANSWER TO THE MAIN QUESTION THAT WAS POSED TO JESUS REGARDING 'MARRIAGE' BUT REALLY, IT WAS ABOUT SEX OF COURSE. HE SAYS MARRIAGE IS FOR DEATH, AND THERE IS DEATH NO MORE (IN THIS CONTEXT OF 'THE REALM OF OURANON'). AT THE SAME TIME, WE MUST SEE THIS IN TERMS OF OUR UNDERSTANDING, FOLLOWING THE WORDS OF THE MAGDALENE, OF THE PROGRESSIVE CURVE OF HUMAN INTERNAL 'APOTHEOSIS' NAMELY, TOWARDS THE BEST WAY. YOU CAN'T REALLY USE THE WORD 'EVOLUTION,' WHICH SIMPLY MEANS WAY FORWARD OUT OF. WE MEAN TO SAY TOWARDS AN ACTUAL KNOWN OBJECTIVE. 'OURANON' KNEW WHAT HE WAS ABOUT AT ALL TIMES. HE KNEW AND COULD SEE THE FUTURE PERFECTLY.

When this guy Antiochus (Second Century BC) attacked the Jews and entered into their famous 'Temple' what did he find in there? He found an idol with the golden head of an ass. aka 'Seth.'

The Jews have never been 'Monotheists.' They were always 'monolatrists' until around 600  BC, when Josiah destroyed all their other gods and passed laws saying they must only have 'The Name That Shall Not Be Spoken' (the Tetragrammaton -'YHVH') as their 'god' and no one was allowed into the 'Holy of Holies' except 33 degree Freemasons (sarcasm, okay) because that was where the actual 'something' was being kept.

What was that something? It was a golden statue of the 'Decider' of HIS rules and laws -, Seth. Or Satan.

Deciding without knowledge, and having power to decide but not the access or understanding of actual Divine Justice or the basis of the Cosmogony, is simply a stage, a passing stage, and necessarily an Eternally Damned, stage in the Gaussian Curve of living progress.

Now. You don't really want to know about all of that. You just want to get laid.

Well how do you propose to do that?

Maybe the Atheist will tell you. Maybe he knows. Something that I don't.

Or maybe the Jew because after all, he wrote the Bible, right?

LOL

Mary Magdalene says, in the missing pages, that real Deity, real Divine Beings, including All Supernal Lights, possess Total, Absolute and Perfect Intelligence. 

They're intellectuals!

Like you. And you know their names! 'Hey, So-and-So, come on, man, cough up, something now! We've been listening to this verbose nuisance for ages now. Just give. We are in need!'

Now look, this Mary Magdalene is seriously smart, y'all. She says that between the human brain (the human mind), and the Spirit (and she means each person's human spirit), is something else that does the actual 'seeing.' And this thing is intelligent...