The Dangerous 'Occult' Tools

You know, Wikipedia is not nonsense, but it is deceptive, misleading, in too many instances completely incorrect and not factual - which is a good description of how humans are as a 'modern society' or species within a social grouping with certain obvious identifiable characteristics.

So in here I am going to contradict what you will find in the Wikipedia entries on various subjects, which is not to say you will find any support anywhere, particularly, for what I am going to say...

Orlando. Keep him in your mind...

But I will preface the controversy that is undoubtedly going to be entailed in all of this, by firstly acknowledging that I myself realize there is a need in this article to 'try' (not easy for me) to be succinct. And secondly by raising Virginia Woolf's 'Orlando' and just asking you to keep that story in mind towards the end here.

If you go to Speaker's Corner at Hyde Park, London, you will find scientific atheists, Christians, Muslims, and whole a bunch of others - and all of them have something to say. 

None of them will turn water into wine before your eyes.

Those who look into some 'occult' path, eventually arrive at the point where they are seeking the wine.

They have the water, but they want the wine. Like ibn Zakariya al-Razi, they are studiously engaged in the endeavor of closely examining metals and observing how to treat these in a laboratory situation - but they are also rapidly forming the view that it is all but impossible to turn copper into gold; although by some absurdly complex process, it might be possible. Maybe sometime long into the future when knowledge and instruments are both far more advanced than both things are right now.

Aromatic facial steam, yeah?

...And then, they (you, whoever) encounter some obscure person with just enough angular momentum in their discussions and turn of phrase, who suddenly once more raises hopes. And this, against all hope.

I mean you are a fool though, if you merely 'believed' that Jesus raised Himself or was raised, from the dead.

Of course, there are such things as holy fools; that is not at issue. What is at issue is your intellectual position as a person of some fundamental logic.

So. Now we go to the 'mantra' fundamentals, the 'language of the angels,' the light codes, the 'Logoath' of the so-called 'Liber Logoath.'

Tamil is not, as Wikipedia says it is, a 'syllabic' script. It is your standard English Alphabet but with a crucial arrangement that implicates the vowels, necessarily. It is in the fact of necessary implication, that this question that Wikipedia casts on the ground with characteristic ignorance, as turning the script 'syllabic' rather than 'alphabetical' - crucially hangs.

Now I do understand people are not necessarily going to grasp what it is that I am saying or talking about, because I know that I have a very clunky way of speaking. But nevertheless... We go on...

The vowels are in the same order that English has them: Ay Ee Ai Oh U.

But, the Tamil arrangement explicitly sets out a 'hard' sounding of a consonant, and a 'soft' sounding, plus the outward 'body' and the inner 'soul.' Those are the exact wordings and descriptions used in the formal language - and ancient - teaching.

In the same way, you yourself have an outward physical material manifestation, and an inward animating 'soul.'

There are expanded teachings about the 'letters' of the script, that are to do with their 'vibratory rates.'

Paul Buchanan today.
A much older man.

For example, if you say one kind of word (mantra), that has certain particular letters in it, it will take so long to 'manifest' in physical reality - and if you use another word, it will you such-and-such a time frame.

There is no actual 'letter' or script for 'S' in Tamil, because 'S' is a 'c' (or 'C') turning back on itself. And, because this letter is the fastest one...

...And is in harmonic resonance with snakes, everyone is 'warned' although not prevented, from saying 'S.' The label for this sound is 'Serpambyl.' Or 'Pambil S.'

And if you say it, as a mantra form, 108 times, this will result in the fastest manifestation of that creature in front of you, and because they are dangerous -, some actually deadly, it is not advised to just go do this incautiously.

They also have, like the Chinese 'Chim' oracular sticks, concepts about number values and the outward feature number (which is the one on the left of any large number), and what is contained on the inside of the '0' (number) or, aka the ten multiple and/or plus its final digital right hand side number... For instance: 15 - 1 or 'the single whole self,' containing 5; 'powerful friends.'

So.

I'm also not going to openly explain here, exactly what other process is involved in using human thought to access the words of Primordial Creation - but I will explain it to those I am already in private discussions with elsewhere but who do come here and read things here.

Because it has been raised with me, well but what if my thinking does what it normally does do, and goes off suddenly into thinking of the 'Mr Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man?'

LOL

It's all very funny, isn't it?

But we can adduce, if you accept that the Christian Gospel accounts are accurate, that it takes maybe just a little more time, though not much more, to turn water into wine using a certain Logos formulation.

Is the mantra sound, or the critical part of it - 'sys' or 'sus' as in Dionysus (the God of Wine), or 'Theon-y-sus' or 'Dze-zus' or 'Zagreus' or 'Jesus?'

I dunno. Have you tried?

As for what else of life we can discover, Orlando knows people as their old selves...

Even the small child is known to that person who has been here for thousands of years in their older iterations.

There is some poignant aspect to the human person...

But that person is not the person that you are seeing right now in front of you. That 'right now' person is only there for that second, that 'moment.'

When you ask to see what certain Austrian psychologists already perceived were coming from 'up there/out there' they can appear before you in small moments. And that is the beginning of the relationship.

You're a baby on a trike.

And that is all. Stop talking. (...I mean stop over-thinking! You can talk here. Here is good; in your head while 'meditating' is not necessarily so great; but there are techniques to get around it). 

Do.

The support for what I have to say is that I have been here a lot longer than Wikipedia has existed. A lot lot longer.