I have been trying to actually avoid talking about this for some weeks now. In fact, I've avoided it for years here now! Managed to shift over to other things and pretend to 'forget/not know...'
Anyway for me the problem is that my own dad used to correspond with Alfred Adler and Otto Rank (Austrian School psychologists), during one phase of several years, quite a lot. My estranged brother-in-law 'may' still have one or two copies of those letters and I just don't even want to think about the one solitary hand-written letter from CG Jung to my dad as head of child psychology at the Education Department...
Sex slavery, American style. Fact. Don't try and get away from it! |
I was only a very small child at those times, but later on, I came to know Paul Ritter really very well and I guess 'learned' from him. Paul was psychoanalyzed by Anna Freud.
Paul was at the time a very well-recognized in Europe architect and designer, and he was one of the two people who laid the original two foundation stones of the original World Trade Center towers.
But Paul was also a powerfully capable psychologist in his own right, and who combined sociology and Austrian School psychoanalysis with designing and eventually Town Planning.
He is the major reason we do not have traffic jams here in Perth City, Western Australia, where I presently live. At the same time he made an enormous amount of enemies in government and the judiciary and in Federal politics and bureaucracy. They ended up sending him to jail on utterly ludicrous and trumped-up charges about some semi-government funded private commercial venture. Which I personally believe, he regarded as a real credential for him as a proponent of the Austrian School's general outlook and mentality, and established his credibility to a certain circle of the upper class aristocratic elites of Europe, which remain around to this day without making a large noise about themselves.
It was long after all of this storm and thunder era of Paul's that I really came to know him well, and spent a lot of time with him in my restaurant 'The Manhattan' in London Court, Perth, and up in the hills where he knew some rich people with their 'exclusive private woo woo retreats.'
Bill you might remember Paul. We funded some computers for him. He wanted to, if you recall, establish the 'University of the Terrace' there. He meant 'of the street' literally, being formally run from out of business premises there - and not simply of the Terrace as in the financial district's main financial street: St George's Terrace.
...Of Ritter - think the Nicole Kidman movie 'Nine Perfect Strangers' which in my view is slanderous against the part-ethnic Russian-Australian entrepreneur Michael Edgley and his then wife Jeni Edgley, who is a really fine person.
Spill the wine... |
Their daughter Gigi Edgley is a well-known and very successful actress who featured in a cult classic Australian-American Sci-Fi tv series Farscape.
Anyway, think the movie in terms of people (sort of) and settings and all of that carry on, and just forget the narrative.
What the heck has this to do with what I'm trying to get to...?
Well, there is a lot of violence going on in Durban South Africa these days - the place that revealed a great person, namely Mandela.
It's absolutely impossible to understand 'Nelson Mandela' from a distance. I only 'got it' when I was standing in front of a bronze statue in Sandton Square - which is a replica place of some square in Venice. Really very beautiful, actually. Not kitch or anything like that at all.
Mandela used to get books brought in to him secretly - happens to have been by a relative of someone here, won't say whom unless he lets me, but it's our Bill.
Anyway, a key set were books by the Austrian School psychoanalysts like Freud and Jung and he whose name shall not be said.
These are all very expensive books - they were expensive then and they are expensive now. Most of them were burned by the Nazis early on, and some also by Marxists would you believe.
One set was completely burned by the America government and banned and it became a criminal offense to even possess any copies.
Now you don't need to be going out and buying these books now, because for one thing, they are terribly misleading if you do not have more or less all of them, or are unable to see or grasp the development over time of the ideas being proposed in them.
What's in the treasure box today? |
They start out as something important enough, but they turn into something pretty unusual at the end - but the end is not able to be understood without knowledge of all the prior works, and the early works not all that useful without the concluding ones.
I'll give you the complete picture here anyway, so that you don't have to spend atrocious large sums trying to acquire the entire sets.
They are all written in the Austrian language and tone, and although not as austere as the German would be, they have a modern Germanic style and this means - laid out, tense, planned, almost laborious like a car manual but not completely so in this case.
The English language translations are simply superb, frankly.
The translator - and there is one particular one with an Italian surname - has managed to somehow preserve the writer's proclivity for make-up or archaic compound words: contactfulness, pauperization, Chimerical.'
That kind of thing.
Sort of clunky wordings. Bit like mine here often. LOL
Anyway these books say that the social leader of real worth, always ends up being dictated to in what he is 'expected' to be and to do, by his own closest followers - once those followers realize the power of that leader as an individual. ...Which is always a power they do not have themselves as individuals.
And he explicitly starts out saying this, for instance, about Jesus Christ, whom he says was not necessarily intent on claiming that He was God, or that He had to die to procure general Salvation for the so-called 'Sin' of Mankind; but all of these things, these proposed attributes and aspirations were post-hoc laid onto 'Jesus' afterwards by His followers.
He alters his view in much later works, without ever (and I think correctly so) denying that nonetheless they, the followers, do kill the guy, everything He stood for, everything He did, everything He taught, and they completely mongrelize the message in the end. Although partly it still gets through. How? Well, God, see.
He does stand by his first assertion that the message of one 'Jesus of Nazareth,' was distorted significantly over later years -, and centuries. And this is undoubtedly so.
Afro-Bohemian. This is a very very big deal in high status circles modern fashion. |
The point is however, that this Austrian psychologist completely and confidently predicted, as in guaranteed, that someone like Nelson Mandela was bound to have all their achievements destroyed by their own followers. The guarantee is there in how he says it all.
The reason American politicians burned this guy's books was that in them, he put things this way to all modern-day politicians and leaders:
"Hey. You have a personal sexual issue and a sexual psychosis problem yourself, buddy."
Today, local Zulu guys are taking out machetes and killing ostensibly, 'immigrant workers and business people' and confronting armed police and military - and overpowering them totally.
The Zulu king, the 'this one' Zwelethini, I forget which one, but he does still retain as a middle name 'Goodwill' - is fomenting violent actions himself in public speeches and media-covered comments by him.
Would Mandela have agreed with any of this?
Well, things are not so simple see. These people being characterized as 'immigrant household labor' are formal slaves to the wealthy middle-class community in South Africa... As I mean, actual slaves deliberately brought in by having to acknowledge their own dire circumstances in those countries from which they originate, but there - they were literal slaves anyway!
And when I say 'slaves' I mean sexually as well as in every other aspect of life.
This, is the why behind the wherefore. 'Goodwill' has not suddenly abandoned his Mandela-humanist goodwill towards all other human beings.
Mandela however, up-front knew and openly worked on the underlying sexual dysfunctioning going on in the place - in the Apartheid country.
That is how it ever became the Rainbow Nation in the first place.
Obama, by contrast got his 'Southern accent' from where, exactly?
He was a test-tube experiment manufactured in Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya, arranged to have grow up in Hawaii and then to go to pre-selected schools and Universities in LA, England, New York, and Chicago.
Where did he get a Southern accent from?
He was not - is not - a Marxist. He is a modern neo-Marxist; exactly the people that burned those books I was telling you about.
What is a neo-Marxist?
The road ahead with the human race, is always pointing to a future that most humans never get to, and that's because they turn down streets that the Karl Popper's point towards. |
Someone who, like the followers of Jesus and the followers of Mandela, decided to bring out the knives to actually stab people as the means to attaining power.
To 'libertize.'
These people have all the surface sounds and features of 'Christ/Christian' or 'Marx' or 'Marxist/Socialist...'
Obama is an applied-Marcusian.
He knows that a profusion of sexual provocations, serve to reinforce political repression.
It's worth scanning the quotes of Herbert Marcuse and to know about people like Karl Popper - but don't actually go there, or at least not too far in there unless you have a really good life-buoy system.
Popper is the most sinister individual to have walked the planet for a long time and Barack Obama is not far behind him. Popper is the guy, who, at face value, the whole of academia suddenly on a dime, decides to turn 'psychology' out to wander the streets alone in the dark at night, without the relevancy 'scientific testing' to be had about it.
Says who you can't test a psychoanalytic proposition?
Well says Popper and only him. And every other idiot then marched in line, in step.
And why?
Over recent years four major scientific studies on the effects of the substance 'bromelain' were conducted in Universities - and all of them (one other one for a different purpose got through) were powerfully objected to by competing Universities on the basis of 'methodology' and the studies failed at being recognized as peer-reviewed research studies then.
Imperial College London, the leading research dollar grant-funded institution in the world, then went behind the backs of everyone, to the original people driving the four studies, telling them that if they paid them, they could 'get things across the line' for them.
This is what 'peer review' nowadays means.
And this is what the spirit of Karl Popper is all about.
Barack Obama is a liar.
He is not a 'Southern African-American.'
So what would Nelson Mandela's solution to immigrant 'cheap' workers, have been?
At any money whatsoever, would it ever have been to machete someone?
Never. Not at the end of his life - at that time where his ideas and philosophy had been formed by the books he had been reading, and had had the time to fully absorb across the whole of their ideas-span.
Mandela was a violent terrorist to begin with.
Unlike the 'prophet Muhammad' who began as a peace-loving supplicant under more powerful people, but who was able to take advantage of the Persian implosion and the subsequent military power vacuum - if actual real historical 'Muhammad' was indeed this Ilyas ibn Qabisah, the person who was conveying weapons for the Persians - then becoming a violent war-lord (as you do), Mandela began as a violent war-lord, sat alone for 23 years, and read these books whose titles and whose author must not be named; and became a 'Prince of Peace.'
The Holy Prophet was Mandela.
And just like all other true prophets, he was thrown into the gutter, his ideas dismantled and cast aside, his iconography becoming idolatry, and his 'followers' doing exactly what he had preached and taught, against!
A tiny small handful of people snuck through though. And they would have entered through the narrow doorway.
Make sure it is you.
Put down the machete.
Well, maybe take just one with you...
LOL
Did Jesus have sex with the red-haired Mary Magdalene?
You don't have to go and get yourself killed though, do you? It is 2022, we have had enough time to figure out what the 'human race' is like, what it is all about.
Is Jesus 'Serapis' with His Wine and Bread?
Basilica of the Holy Blood! Aiyeeeee! |
Well?
But then, friends, since you don't believe Serapis was anything other than a creation of the Ptolemys, and these Egyptian gods do not really exist, and of course, certainly not either did Perseus the son of Zeus and Danae - who killed the Gorgon Medusa exist - ah no, wait a minute, he did exist though (Perseus is a legendary historical figure). Okay okay, well it's just a story that people make up afterwards. Right?
Is Isis 'Mary Magdalene?'
The Raphaelites seemed to think Mary Magdalene was Lilith. As well as 'Mary Magdalene.'
But that means, well does that make the French occult thing about 'the blood' and Mary Magdalene have some sort of meaning that they don't want to tell you about openly?
Listen, Jesus, I have to be honest with you, I, I am a bit selfish, I don't really care that much about the 'Holy Blood' story. Is there a 'Holy Money' story...?
I have always ALWAYS had a mental block about the Virgin and Mary Magdalene. You would think after looking it up once that I would remember that they are two "different" gals.
ReplyDeleteO and Farscape! Chiana! what a mess she was, running from the totalitarian regime thugs who wanted to reprogram her neural pathways. Sort of like 7 and the borg. Turns out they were just a couple of sick bastards who enjoyed causing pain (in their sick way). The sadistic borg queen. Yes she is a sadist. Well until this last thing on "Picard."
Anyhow, I've set my bed back to the north-south orientation and am once again having dreams about politics. AOC was there. In this alternate reality the legislators are not responsible for the drafting of the actual language of the laws, but instead voted on something that would then be passed on to a group of legal scholars. "Bills" would be re-written to respect the established legal doctrine, and there was some period of uncertainty among the legislators regarding the actual effect of the law until its official language is worked out.
As far as I know this is not an idea I might have picked up somewhere and forgotten about. Unless it turns out that in fact this is exactly what they did in the Roman Senate, and you can show me the passage in Gibbons where it is all spelled out.
In other news I discovered that Chrome Browser indeed is able to "read" the pages you load, and send suggestions to you via google notify about things you might be interested in. In this case it was some news source based in Australia.
I suspect it's all predictive programming - Star Trek, Star Wars, The Simpsons, The X-Files, EVIL - it's probably all in there, where the Overlords toy with us, and our collective subconcious...
DeleteWell, as far as I understand things, this is exactly how things are with legislation in all countries in the whole entire world. The Parliamentary secretaries and the law clerks write the actual Bills in line with their own conceptions of what the 'wordings' should be. These are always claimed to be people who understand the import of legal language and English meanings and so on. No elected person actually 'drafts' the Bills themselves. They write notes and are interviewed by the Parliamentary secretaries who pass it to the clerks for formulating as legislation.
DeleteThe 'Overlords' are about to get the permanent and terminal shock of their collective lives very presently.
DeleteSo, clarification. In this world the laws are drafted after the bill is voted on. Legislators don't get to see the actual drafted law for a period of time, during which there is much anticipation about the new law is going to require of people or permit.
DeleteThere was no explanation about the "thing" Or document seen at the time of the vote. So some sort of magical separation of legal intention from actual language
DeleteTao, I just finished watching Brad Wright and Richard Dean Anderson discussing the good old days on someone's podcast for a complete hour.
DeleteI think Stargate Universe attempted to maybe try to work out where some of these fictitious new technologies might lead and got badly punished for it in the ratings. I just don't see a Star Trek world as being all that realistic. If you have "holodecks" and you can extend them across extra floors in your space ship, then what need is there for any part of the ship that is not holodeck? I'm sure people have pointed this out and it's "well, the energy requirements..."
I get your point re wording the legislation AFTER they have already voted on 'it.' That's not so far-fetched at all. The present situation is a hair's breadth away because of the so-called 'guillotine' (cutting the time to debate any legislation as soon as it is brought to the House for a vote) - and regularly such Bills are circulated in final form minutes before the voting is called, therefore no time to examine the wording properly by all sides.
DeleteWell it was just a dream! But it was interesting, mostly because a subject I don't know much about formally. I don't think I can see a way for people to vote on a "thing in its principle" before codifying the law. My understanding is that the tenor of the law is determined through courts and a lot of expensive and time consuming yow yow.
DeleteWe could imagine a world in which things are understood "in their principle" without the use of coded language, where the codification is a kind of formal afterthought. In the dream it was "well this passed the vote, now we have to wait for the codification to come out before we will know that people are going to now have to do xxxx"
A group of telepathic individuals, representatives of a larger collective, could in theory "agree" on a thing and leave the details to be worked out according to elaborate schemas, by people and AI.
Anyway, I have know idea why I'm talking at such length about this here.
ugh. "know."
Delete"Rennes-le-Château is located in the Languedoc region of France, just southwest of the city of Toulouse (and not far from the Pyrenees Mountains.) This tiny hamlet, at the edge of Val Dieu, or the Valley of the God, is filled with mystery and intrigue. Legend has it that untold treasures were hidden near Rennes-Le-Chateau, possibly Visigoth gold, a candelabrum used by Moses, an undisclosed relic connected to Mary Magdalene, Templar treasure, or even the Ark of the Covenant. For such a small village, it arguably has one of the largest concentrations of reported paranormal occurrences and UFO sightings in the world- leading some researchers to suggest that Rennes-le-Château might serve as a stargate to other worlds."
ReplyDeletehttps://www.thealiencon.com/newsletter-archives/10-travel-destinations-for-the-alien-obsessed/
And the Cathar castle (Château de Puivert) from the film "The Ninth Gate" is only 17 miles away...
DeleteLast year I came across an article on bibliotecapleyades that seemed kind of interesting, about star fire and the holy grail, which was derived from books written by one laurence gardner. I got some of his books since it seemed legitimate/well-researched (at least moreso than most sources these days), but quickly got kind of creeped out by the way he was framing these royal bloodlines (the "cabal"/overlords) and maybe himself, so now the books are out in the garage. I guess as with most sources these days there's probably truth mixed in with the dross.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSimple typo. Sigh... What I had posted was:
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, this is so - I have said many many times here previously, mostly, unless you are somehow in tow with some living genius or something, then you are forced, when you are young, to keep a sufficiently open mind, at least long enough to pick up tiny bits and pieces of authentic and reliable truth from all kinds of weird and wonderful places! Most people however, never get far enough along the right roads and when they are 'no longer young' have absolutely no clue at all and are run in their minds by endless and highly rigid propaganda and variegated kinds of nonsense. Which THEN makes it impossible to introduce ANY of these kinds of ideas to them as we have been looking at and discussing here. Next Blog article is a good time to look at the reasons why it is such a problem, and why people cannot 'see' the facts once their I guess, 'brainwashed' mindsets are fully established.
Too true. I'd like more of the weird and wonderful with less of the spin and personal bias. Can't more people just lay out the facts and allow others to draw conclusions? Or at least provide possible interpretations but with all the caveats.
Delete