So, when 'La Belle' goes through the magical halls of the castle, past strange magical arms and hands holding up candles to light her way, she goes at first into the main dining hall of The Beast, and she is just too scared to even think about eating the feast that is laid out there for her - and she quickly runs up some stairs, and then along a gallery with curtains blowing until at the end she finds large doors which speak to her (they are magical doors of course):
"Le Belle, je suis la porte de votre chambre."
I am the door to your room.
This is the greatest movie on occult magic of all time ever made, and many other directors, like Vadim have copied it in so many parts.
Cousin (cousine, I guess) on the left, of Nicole, Baroness de Rothschild. |
Cocteau, who made the film, was supposed to have been the Grand Master of the Priory of Sion for some time, according to many legends. He was no such thing, of course. Yes he was a Grand Master of something, but not the 'Priory of Sion.'
On the one hand he did seem to provide a factual basis for the myth about this 'Priory' on account that he suddenly gained access to these odd little almost private chapels in the South of France - one in particular which was owned by fishermen, and still is. He used to paint all the inside walls of these places, and they are now effectively museums or at least attractions to a lot of tourism traffic. You will no doubt be aware that Mary Magdalene was supposed to have gone to the South of France, and she is the patroness of the fishermen there to this day.
And it's this implication that she came with vials of blood or something, or maybe even children in the family line of Jesus. That is in no way 'non-orthodox' Catholic teaching, since the so-called 'Desposyni,' sometimes known as the 'Despina' or 'Despini' are well-attested in Roman Catholic Vatican official records and they have archival records of where that family went - although this was for a long time deliberately hidden, the usual narrative being because of major conflicts going on in the Middle East after Constantine.
But I am going to reveal to you two things.
If you reverse the characters - the roles of the people - in 'La Belle et La Bete,' then you get to this matter of Lilith.
The other tiny little, I guess you could say, 'secret,' of sorts, is that Jean Cocteau's money came from Nicole Stephane, not the Priory of Sion.
The Princess of the Underworld, according to Jean Cocteau (in 'Orpheus'). This is not Nicole Stephane though, this is Maria Casares. |
Ah but, well, on the other hand still though, this is Nicole, Baroness de Rothschild.
And she was a great film director in her own right, and originally acted in I think Cocteau first film 'Les Enfants Terribles' - but she had a car accident soon after that which forced her to take up directing and producing, and to leave acting.
Cocteau was a great friend too, of Picasso and Charlie Chaplin.
What is the real answer to this riddle of who 'Adam' (the original 'Man') and 'Eve' were, and who the children are, and whether indeed, these must be, genetic experiments following the extraction of DNA literally from Adam to make Eve...?
The Jewish Zohar scholars even say that these angels who 'fell' (none ever did), were seduced not by 'us' (meaning that 'us' ordinary humans are supposedly the 'legitimate' offspring of Adam and Eve; although that simply cannot be true since Eve was not Adam's counter-partner, but actually him himself in a female form!) - but by the Lilim (the children of Lilith).
Now you will note, that pretty much all of everything in every single modern religion around today, always talks about 'things that happened in the past,' and 'things that will happen in the future' - because you either did, or didn't do, something ('good' or 'bad' according to their lists of crimes and sins).
But I will say to you, that you should be able to remember, to recall, at the moment when you were growing from virtually nothing, a moment at which you realized that you were about to turn into a male human, or remain a female).
Your daily bread. From the rites of Serapis, Egypt. Haven't got a pic of wine, but that went along with it. In Egypt. At Saqqara. During the time of Ptolemy I Soter, ancestor of Jesus. |
Of course, most people say they are unable to recall, and this is only because after the first year, your brain is pushed away from its standard electromagnetic communication vogue, to the matter of using human mouth words and sounds and brain cell memories that are only just then being acquired.
And then, after about two years, most children forget their earlier conscious awareness of things.
You may find on-line still somewhere today, Jean Cocteau giving his 'message to the people of the year 2000' in which he basically declares that all poets never die but pretend to in a kind of a masquerade for the sake of others.
However, however, the point I am trying to get to here - is that there are all kinds of 'people' on the planet right here and now.
So what if some are 'Lilim,' or some are Adam-Eve humans, or some are ET Alien hybrids from very far away?
The point is you should know what kind you are.
You should have a good sense and a feeling, inside of what you are. Be that gene-manipulated from the time of Atlantis, or Dwarka, or 'fallen angels' from Mount Hermon or Babylon (Harut-Marut, for the Muslims here), or just simply 'Adam-Eve' people.
Dogs get the crumbs, cats get the vanilla champagne and lilac cream. (Goes with the pan-friend hot melted buttery toasted, bread). Thanks be to God. |
Nevertheless, spiritually, you absolutely will have been epigenetically affected because of your experiences of this human society - that is, all of them you have been in already for several lifetimes. It is epigenetic because whether you like it or not, just the way you choose to use your actual physical senses is severely affected by your internal experiences...
And, use of your physical sense is, I'm afraid, a physical material matter, not a genuinely 'invisible' meaning metaphysical and woo-woo 'spiritual' thing! In other words if you are always tending, leaning to using some physical senses in certain particular ways and not others, that becomes a material consequence thing, an established material pattern; thus it is actually epigenetic. And the neural pathways, the neural network connections are 100% physical and mechanistic/mechanical. So you cannot say 'not physical;' it is physical. It's just not external.
So epigenetics is a fact and an important fact for humans.
So what I'm trying to say, or rather to finally get to, is that 'moral behavior' must be from the basis of at least having a firm awareness and understanding of who exactly, you are!
Basic ordinary commonplace human law says that if someone doesn't actually know who they are, they are not held fully responsible for what they then do. And often, they are not held responsible at all then!
Whereas all these stupid and completely fake 'religions' want 'you' to behave according to what they list down, what 'they' say and no god has said - I want you to decide right now, in the immediate present, who you are.
Do you know?
Because you could be from the biggest line of evil nasty demons, let's say, and but you behave decently in this life to all other living things. Then what? Who is going to accuse you of anything? Who is going to judge you because of your father? Or the brand of test-tube you came out of? (Could have said 'Made in Atlantis' on it, right?).
Nicole Millar. Another Aussie trance singer. |
Joke: Greeks go to the Gates of Heaven see, and ask to be let in, and Peter says to them 'Oh sorry, you have to be Jewish to come in here.' And the Greeks say: 'Go back inside and tell your master, that when He was hungry on the beach that time, we did not ask Him who His father was before we let Him eat some of our fish.'
This Samaritan says to Jesus: 'Master, please heal my sick daughter.' And He says to her, 'The bread is for the children and should not be cast to the dogs!' (Oh, nasty...) And she says back to Him: 'Yeah but even the dogs are able to eat the crumbs on the floor.' And He goes: 'Erh, hmn, okay.'
After you decide who you are, we will move forward, onto the crumbs. Or the bread.
I guess it's easy to conflate the car with the driver. If your waters are lilac (or green, or turquoise) then who cares whether you have an oldsmobile or a mclaren. Unless, across lifetimes, the waters can grow accustomed to taking on certain forms or flowing down certain paths. I think someone else here has brought up soul and body compatibility before.
ReplyDeleteWas that me? I was thinking of consciousness, and of penrose-hameroff giving some insight about how consciousness might be supported in other physical structures (not just brains) and how "batshit crazy" does that get? (having had a dream about vortices forming above my yard debris compost piles).
DeleteFor the moment, when I hear the word "soul" I just think "well that is another attempt to try to get consciousness behaving in a convenient way, although without the need for a body." I really don't know anything about "souls."
It's awesome how human beings use their bodies: Jean-Luc Ponty, Jackson Browne, John McLaughlin, Francesca Dego... ...Michel Petrucciani.
ReplyDeleteI'll never be able to watch the Disney versions in the same way again.
ReplyDeleteFact.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I cannot tell you who did judge, but "Lilith" sure had some persistant ennemies.
ReplyDelete