What Is So Valuable?

Oh dear, oh dear.

This is risky, this stuff.

Aaaeeeeer... Had to sort of alter where I was headed at the beginning here, and I'll give you a clue why by asking this question:

What is really so dangerous in any book or set of them, that you have to burn the whole entire damn lot?

Scallops and blueberries - and flowers.

Okay we saw that this was done at the Great Museum of Baghdad, previously, and then several times at the Library (or libraries) of Alexandria.

Was there some attendant volume which actually explained what was really being depicted there on the Metternich Stela?

Well see, the 'Metternich Stela' is, down to this day, shown a lot of the time as just this particular panel with a youthful Horus and some snakes and stuff. Whereas in fact the stela is as shown in this pic down here below -, a whole big thing with a lot of hieroglyphics on it. Now I am among the very few people who think we don't actually know how to translate hieroglyphics. So I don't believe we know what these things on the Metternich Stela, say. These glyphs in the first place, were only made known to initiated priests as to their full and complete meanings and - how to use them!

The 'Metternich Stela' in full.

These are what the Vedas would describe as 'yantras.' They are not actually words like we would use to render us a memorializing of a sound, and then with a meaning for that sound.

If you have a sound with no meaning, then you just have noise. 

But if you have 'noise' with a function -, an objective and a purpose, then theoretically you could have a 'mantra.'

If you have a geometric design or a pictograph which is an aid to memory of a sound with a function - then you have a 'yantra.'

And nobody has ever 'translated' any hieroglyph from that perspective.

Well, I did once here re the capstone of Amenemhat III, albeit I never gave the sounds entailed away.

A human being is a kind of a book.
And certain types of them have
red Moroccan coverings with gilt...

So I do not think anyone out in the academic public knows what the Metternich Stela actually records on it.

I am theorizing here, that someone, probably Amr al-As back in the 7th century, destroyed a text, in other words some scrolls and books of writing, which said what the nature of what we now call the Metternich Stela, really was.

In the same way that, if you look at this recent phenomenon with Kate Bush's song 'Running Up The Hill' and its rise again to No 1 in the UK, on account of Stranger Things (which I have not seen) - then to me it is the same thing as what Amr al-As did. Which is namely, to try and obliterate the meaning of something.

'Stranger Things' has as its story skeleton, that the government has some secret project to work on what the info calls 'the supernatural.' Well in fact, the government does not have anything such thing at all, never did, and never will.

I know very well what the original 'Stargate' programs were all about - they were about having certain naturally-gifted people (who were then trained up) stare at photographs and try to interpret the shadows and the light that they saw and come to supportable conclusions about what was on the actual photographic image.

That's like me
on any give day.
What sort of book covering...

Subsequent to that, some people went off and developed other things, because they realized that some high altitude photograph readers were able to 'do other things' besides see what was on the image. They were able to close their eyes and 'see' actual places clearly, with movement and everything. And those people stepped out of government.

The government, even were it to discover that people could do various strange and unusual and useful 'supernatural' things - would seek to block that. Same with academia. They wouldn't do it. Whether secretly or not secretly, they just wouldn't do it at all.

'Running Up The Hill' was written about the child of a person, whose books were all burned - by the government. Your government. Not 'Amr al-As' fifteen hundred years ago.

Well but what was in there that was so important, in the sense of being 'not important for real,' but important as in significantly dangerous...? And who would it have been dangerous too?

'Stranger Things' is in no way realistic in terms of its basic underlying proposition.

But is it functional to obscure something, though?

And what is that something?

Surely if something having been committed to writing is just plainly silly or foolish or wrong factually, then you just leave it and everyone laughs at it. And that's that about it.

Why go to all these exorbitant lengths about destroying them all; literally, all of them.

Well of course, just like Amr al-As failed to actually achieve his ends, although in the short-ish term he succeeded, in the same way those books burned by the US government are readily enough available today, if expensively so.

This is the only thing they'll
let you know about.
Only the bad parts though.
This'll all make sense when you get to
see the new thing, soon.

Let me tell you it is a lot more complicated than you might think. What you might be thinking is that, well, these books hold some interesting stuff about 'supernatural' phenomena and whatever, and they were promoting some kinds of unrealistic ideas that were nonetheless presented quite attractively, and therefore government wished to put a halt to having people be misled by them (the books).

This is the sort of thing the Beijing CCP does with the Falun Gong people, except there is more to that too, than what meets the eye.

But that is not the main 'problem.'

Now I'm going to be able to tell you about the details of the 'main problem,' in something coming up very soon, and I won't pre-empt that by talking about the specific content, but what I can say is that human beings have haptic sensory features that are able to discern risky things (nociception) - like when something is going to structurally fail against our weight, or when something is getting too hot... ...But those haptic sensory systems go beyond just 'touch' using the hand, and they go all the way into things like olfaction and then, maybe to other sensory channels as well. But they still rely on the actual physical material conveying of something, even if it is on the molecular scale of things - which seem like they are 'invisible' but they are not 'invisible' as such to all of our senses when these are functioning in highly elevated states.

This is most acutely demonstratable (and Luca Turin describes this in his books) by comparing the neural reaction differences in people who are smelling synthetic fragrances, versus the same people smelling real natural fragrance molecules. Well it all goes a lot further than just the olfaction side of things..  

...I don't know whether you are starting to get an inkling of where this all goes from here now.

 But if you do know where it is going, then you will instantly be aware that human beings have been being blocked and cut off from these totally natural human capacities of awareness - literally for thousands of years. And you will however, also realize that we should not just be spreading this kind of knowledge around carelessly, because you know for sure that it will be exploited, and people manipulated by extremely malevolent forces like those always found in power politics and also by people using the forcefulness of governments to get what they want at your expense and exclusion.

What could be that bad for these guys, that they don't want you to even know about it??

I want to stress very strongly here, and I've said it before - when I say 'ET Alien,' I mean explicitly and completely without any equivocation whatsoever, beings that are real, physical, material, and travel here from extremely far away. Now notwithstanding that, sure, there could be, and there mostly always is, quite a lot of 'preparation' required and this can certainly involve using your mind and your thoughts and arranging how you think and respond and react - nevertheless we are talking hard touch reality things here and not myths, visions, metaphors, hallucinations, 'lucid dreaming,' or any of that. 

Lot of nice books.

You're going to really understand this and find this out, when you get to see the upcoming new stuff, and are then able to put into operation, what you learn then. 

See -, you can't just go into a city, for example, and meet a generous bank manager on simply any street corner, but if you did in any event, you almost certainly would not be able to detect that person because there are so many other things and people there that absorbing your attention. (This is already a clue because we all know 'bank managers' are to be found in offices, behind labels which say 'bank manager...'). Maybe, though, that is not how you want to find your bank manager.

This is why you 'don't see it.' Not because 'it' isn't there (what you are looking for), but because there is so much there! And all of it has the wrong label on it.

...This track is a thousand percent (yeah I know, no such thing as a 'thousand percent!') better than when you hear it the first time. The first time you'll go: 'Ah yeah, so what? Pretty much nothing special there.' Hah!