The Missing Parts Of Genesis

What? There are missing parts?

Oh yes, sure.

But not only is the fact that there are missing parts a problem - but that Jewish scholars, who have made numerous explanations and interpretations about those 'missing' sections, are in any case completely wrong.

Facing the fact that it was Jewish scholars who compiled the Septuagint (Old Testament in Greek), it was they too we are able to adduce, who left the parts out - and but then those same scholars, thinking that since they were the ones who had control of the information, they must necessarily know, what those passages were saying in the first place.

Mushrooms and chestnuts soup.
See? Vegetarians? See that?
You see that?!

Which is just not the case.

Since forever, all Bible scholars have had difficulty making exegesis of the dual 'Creation' narratives in Genesis. 

And this is because, of course, there is something missing. There are parts which have been deliberately extracted.

Much much later, Jewish Talmud debaters develop whole expanded narratives and these find their high point in the Spanish Zohar writings.

Fundamentally, the Jews say that the first 'wife' of 'Man' - and they incorrectly say 'Adam' instead of Man, although actual Genesis 1 says 'Man' and not 'Adam' - was Lilith, not Eve. 

But hey hey, wait on, how are we going to tie this into Russian women and the Soviet Era and all of that? ...And modern politics?

Well, KP - you know, don't you.

It goes like this. Allow me to quote from a Nazi propaganda slogan against the Bolsheviks:

"German women!

"Have you any idea..."

This is the actual 'Garden of Eden'
story right here. But they don't know, these
'experts' and scholars. They have no clue.
Lion-like creature (appetites); Medusa-headed
snake thing-y (knowledge of suffering and pain
and gainful poison); winged eagle (foresight, after-sight); 
and, other stuff, 'fish' and water and things.
Hah! Not to mention 'the shin of Allah!!' 

And then,

Item 6: "Every man is required to report a woman who resists him."

Which was not at all untrue of a statement, because not only did this kind of statement have complete currency in Bolshevik Russia, but leading Communist feminists such as Sofia Smidovich set down a scheme of sexual morality in writing:

(And I am translating a very tiny bit loosely to save space rather than put the whole thing in here word by word, but it is completely accurate and faithful to the original text).

Point 2. "When a young girl, whether she is a University student, or a worker or just a schoolgirl, is desired by a man, she is obliged to yield to this desire, otherwise she will be looked upon as a bourgeois girl who cannot pretend to be a genuine Communist."

You see, the hugest problem with the Judaeo-Christian narrative, and by a kind of a blind extension, Islam too, is the missing parts, that are to do with sex.

Islam attempts to get around it by literally covering complete licentiousness with some fabricated 'ritualistic' 'permission slips:' temporary 'marriages,' multiple 'wives,' endless * size in 'Jannah' and absolute sexual access to slaves.

The Zohar outright says that God made Man and Woman equally, and the female He made at that juncture (IE 'Lilith' although they are not allowed to mention her name, but only the letters Lamed Lamed Tav) rejected the rules that He set, and counters Him and prevails against Him to this minute! Not only that, 'God' (this is presumably 'Jehovah') has no power to stop her, nor to do anything at any time to her, not now or ever in the future till absolutely forever.

It doesn't actually formally put things like that so clearly, but that is indeed nevertheless what it does say in a round about manner.

All human political and thus also mainstream religious systems lie and deceive on the basis of the sex aspect.

They take and exert control by exploiting a pre-existing internal dysfunction of the human being, which is the belief that there is retribution for any actions against one single 'ruler.' And sex is either the direct analog to that power relationship, or it is the means to power trickery.

There are only two times where Lilith is almost directly spoken about in the Bible, and that is in Isaiah, talking about creatures and their mates, and by Jesus who uses the exact same phraseology as Isaiah, but He says 'where the flesh is there the eagles gather.'

Both people are speaking about some place of eternal rest, not retribution, and frankly, there is no possible way church or Bible scholars can have the least understanding about what is being said, fundamentally because the Jewish exegesis is utter rubbish and nobody else ever had practically-speaking, access to those missing sections of Genesis.

The biggest issue independent thinkers have with Christianity is not the 'Resurrection' - it is the reason, if any, for why God would knowingly enter the Earth, in order to be killed...

The mainstream Christian exegesis is in order to 'procure Salvation.' Which makes no logical sense whatsoever. 'Procure,' from whom? God is All-Powerful. He does not need to 'procure' from anyone.

However there are two facts that are never looked at.

1. It was not God who invented killing - you did that all on your own, by yourself. Naturally, if your 'unseen' roots were now entwined with a visible physical body, then for sure 'you' will certainly die, on account 'you' are being defined now as both the inner being and the outer physical part together. The grand lie that all churches dispense, is that when you die, 'you' become something different to what you were when you were alive. And that will then be why you will no longer have all these problems of money, body, jealousy, power, and sex.

2. Eden, it's location - must have always been inside, within 'you' and then, you externalized that interior, to become the physical human being that it is, and which has developed steadily along some line into the eventual ditch (Evolution). Nobody 'evolved' anywhere. They went straight to Hell and Damnation from the place where they first started out (which was not 'Hell and Damnation!) and from which potential of future place they might have gone to, had they pursued the right trajectory - but never did go.

The biggest slander ever against the Greek gods and goddesses of the Parthenon too, for another example, is that they are 'a-sexual.' Biggest lie ever. If 'Wisdom' is truly a Universal Divine facet, then there is Wisdom to be found in everything everywhere. It cannot be sterile and a-sexual. Cannot.

Laws, rules, obligations, edicts - you must have the right to abortions, you must not have the right; these are two sides of the same coin. This is how politics uses emotions to manipulate the masses - and not argumentation.

They all will give you the opportunity to get in trouble with the LAW. Just this LAW or that LAW; one side's LAW or the other's. Because you, are just a nothing, slave... Right? You are not a perfect creation of actual God!! Allah forbid! You are a nothing. You just do as you are told! We will rule you and take your Bentley. Ain't that right, Mr KP? And you want 'agency.' How did you figure you wanted that? Nobody else is actually giving you it! They are giving you fraudulent conversions of it all day long, and you are swallowing it all day long too. Or else, if not swallowing, then apt to become overly cynical and a resister and hater of offers and new ideas. In other words, a reactionary.

The Ukrainian Russian dancer,
Maya Plisetskaya.
No body, no Maya.
No 'Maya-tryoska' cells in these glass
tubes either...

Dangle out a bit of temptation at you, and then wham! Ah, sorry, you broke a law...

The Tree of Knowledge is a manifestly invisible, but forceful thing, which animates, drives, virtually always in the subconscious and not the open wide awake consciousness at all, and contains bitter fruit along with the good.

The Tree of Life, is a manifestly invisible, but supremely forceful thing, which animates and gives life - to all Eternity! And you don't have access to that Tree and you don't even know where it is.

The Tree of Life is Supremely Forceful.

...Where the flesh is, there the eagles gather for the feast.

I never said that. Jesus Christ said that.

God did not kill Himself. You did that.

The trouble is though, it's all you know how to do. You do not know how to give Life.

Hang on a minute though.

If Eden is inside, and has been attempted to have been made externalized, manifested outside (this is what Richard Dawkins, and Charles Darwin, and David Attenborough, want to achieve - sometime, at some theoretical future moment, humans will be able to attain immortality... Right? Scientifically, by sci-ence) - and the Tree of Knowledge of brutal killing is just an idea, a human-invented idea but with massive physical consequences, whose actual source is on the inside of each and every human person... 

...then where and what, is the Tree of Life?

...Being Supremely Powerful, as it is.

People always go 'prove it, prove it.' No. No way. You prove you have more with you than just the Tree inside that kills - only. Body and soul. I want it all. Your body is dying slowly, and you have only half a soul. "Behold, lest he (the Man) reaches out and takes from the Tree of Life!"

Awesome words.

You've been lost! All these centuries.