Why Data Is Better Than The Borg

Okay so leaving aside that 7 of 9 is better than Data...

...'better,' right?

Well, anyway, Data is an individual. The Borg is a kind of a collective except not that either, really.

The canon appears to say that the 'central locus of the Borg Collective' is the Borg Queen.

What does that really mean, though?

Christmas gifts to you is 
any time that I say it is.

It doesn't mean anything - because it is simply a device within the Star Trek stories, so that we, the viewers, the intelligent human observers, of the narrative, are able to focus our antagonism, or fears, at something we require in order to comprehend the concept of a personal or intelligent enemy in the story.

In other words the whole thing is practically-speaking, nonsense simply designed to cater to our own way of thinking and seeing things so that we can 'feel for the story;' get sucked into it.

The Freemasonic ideology of a duality in the Universe is sheer utter nonsense too, and in exactly the same way.

Same as the Islamic ideology that there is only 'One' (Divine Object/thing) is also false.

In the logical 'reality' of any such thing as a 'Borg Collective,' distributed agency across the whole entire spatial 'Collective' would be the actual thing that was necessary - and any 'human-esque' 'central personalised focus' would run completely counter to what the Borg was in the first place.

And as far as the real life human ideologies of Freemasonic conceptions and teachings and spurious 'esoteric knowledge,' and/or the Islamic ideology about 'Allah' (being One Divine thing), both of these just plain simply act as though we should all be oblivious of Time.

'Scientific' Evolution suffers from precisely the same form of seeming obliviousness and stupidity. And it really is that.

If things 'began' at some putative 'primary moment of Creation or Existence,' then this idea itself already flies in the face of the very linearity that it proposes... What really happened was that linearity 'began!' It was not the 'material existence' that 'began;' it was linearity. Do they get this? Did they ever 'get it?' 

Now unless scientists want to say they are all male-centric with typical linear male brains and that somehow necessarily the material Universe is also male-esque, and that no such thing as parallel processing... In short, 'sci-entists' have imagined their own 'god' after an image of their mindless, stupid male selves (because females certainly do not control the marketing of science: Watson and Crick demonstrated that - they never 'discovered' DNA!). These guys are making up the 'divinity' according to the image they have of themselves. Same as 'cow god' looks like a cow not a pizza.

What was this all? Some plot by
the Arabs to con the Jews in NYC to 
kick the tin for a higher price for
an Andy Warhol Liza Minnelli?
LOL
I'll never get over myself. SMH

LOL. Ah but, well, they have changed their tune recently and now there are several dozen competing notions (in 'sci-ence') of 'Creation' and 'Existence' including 'parallel Universes' (so much so they quickly had to coin this term 'multi-verse...' It's a bit like a multi-tool, I guess) and toroid time-space or manifold 'things.' (God! Jesus save me!) ...All kinds of other blathering foolishness.

They can't get their stories straight.

Everybody - they all of them - want a 'material' object-oriented 'solution' to the questions: Who are we? What are we? Where did this all begin?

Now.

Are you ready for a shock?

God did not build the Cube and stick it there for you to circumambulating for some amazing spiritual reason.

Nor did Abraham do it.

Earth is flat, right?

Look. There absolutely is an Evil intellect, and it is primarily exposed in our human culture and society in certain individuals, by having taken over actual human people and through them injecting highly toxic and sinister ideas into the human psyche at large; that is, sociologically as a broad population. 

Such a thing does not represent some kind of 'obverse' to some other 'Good' Universal Intelligence or 'Being.' It does represent a forceful negative presence and an existential 'thing' in the same kind of way visible light wavelengths are seen by us up to but not beyond the ultra-violet wavelengths in the spectrum.

The 'meaning' of the Universe
is all about the meaning
of people.

And, in the same way that energy does not move in a linear fashion 'higher' beyond the 'ultra-violet catastrophe' neither can Evil go beyond where it is already held; in other words, it is 'delimited.'

So - ready for the shock?

What are you?

You are what you will become. 

Yet what you will become is already what you already were planned to be.

Who planned it? Where is the proof and evidence of this?

Well, my very good friend - you can tell how the Earth is curved and is a sphere right? Can't you?

There are three very small pyramids a little off-set from the last (and smallest) of the three large pyramids there at Giza, that last one (Menkaure) being off-set too from the diagonal (that is, the straight line formed by the peaks of the first two pyramids).

Now... and by the way yer all owe me money here or else I am going to zap you from my flying saucer! Because this has never been said before.

Er. The peak tops of the shadows of the three tiny pyramids all line up exactly with the shadows from the peaks of the three large pyramids and they are off-set from the diagonal by exactly not only the degrees of curvature of the planet Earth, but the factor of the angle of incidence of the logarithmic sun rays - which is how come they all line up with their shadows at their pyramidal peak tops.

LOLOLOLOL

You never heard that before from NO ONE! Ever.

Hey, and you know there has been a whole lotta garbage spouted (some of it is correct of course) about all the various 'mathematical' and physics formulae stuck into that place.

As I have said here before too, the Great Pyramids also depict everything there is to know about your internal psychology.

Who knew what, where, and when, eh?

Now please don't go around saying or even thinking that you are god - you are not god.

And don't go jumping to the conclusion that you (IE 'you' from the future) built the pyramids as a reference point containing all sorts of knowledge; because, not that either.

Venice pizza. And the meaning of life
is um, also pizza.

If I am right (frikkin' heck of course I am right), that the design plan for the pyramids was made at the same time because the several items perform one single integrated function, then they could not have 'happened' because well, like 'evolution-style,' one guy, one 'pharaoh' built first this one, then the next guy built his 'tomb' and so on. No no no, they were all designed together as a whole set which went exactly together in the form and format that we now see them sitting there.

Now you show me that same kind of complex thing with the Cube at Mecca and I myself will go wandering that place in a white robe and bowing and all of that.

And if you can't, then maybe you should go wandering around and in and out too, of the Great Pyramid Complex at Giza, and bow your heads to your mysterious (and real) lords who actually built that for your learning and knowledge -, especially about yourself.

Unless that is, you just want to remain like a dumb block...

Some of you are going to be able to 'make it out of here' right now. And you won't need to know absolutely everything. That would be 'stark' as Lao-Tzu says.

We've done this track before - worth another go, though: