Space Odyssey Is From Jack London

Ah well. That blew away Stanley's mystique...

Maybe not.

'2001 A Space Odyssey' is declared of course, as being the sole creation of one 'Arthur C. Clarke...' 

According to Wikipedia, Clarke resided before WWII in Gray's Inn Road. He had no formal post Secondary School education at that precise time and I do wonder how he was able to afford to live in Bloomsbury. He's already working for the Board of Education as a 'pensions auditor.' I don't know, what's that - five pounds a week?

Simple. Very simple.
But totally exotic, if you know
what you're doing.

Next, Clarke goes off to the RAF in WWII and becomes a 'radar specialist.'

Well look, of course I can tell you exactly what Clarke was and how come higher ups all over the place in Londonistan decided it would be safe to impart lots and lots of secrets to this young man - who had not yet been to King's College (also Londonistan) where he 'get's' his, goodness me, first-class degree in Maths and Physics.

Crikey! 

A bit like old Harry Lee here.

Out of thin air, they all get a stack of money to support an impossible lifestyle and 'rise' to the very tippy top of academia. Just like that. Amazing.

And never one time throughout the whole of your life has anyone in your earshot called any of the 'esteemed reputation' of the great Arthur C. Clarke, into question.

My goodness I'm sure even I had a great big coffee table book about satellites and all kinds of techie things with the name 'ARTHUR C. CLARKE' emblazoned on its cover.

Anyway so American fiction writer Jack London writes this short book see, called 'The Jacket' or sometimes 'The Star Rover,' which was published in 1915.

And then another guy, E. Hoffmann Price, who writes pulp fantasy/fiction stuff, forces HP Lovecraft into a collaboration on a thing called 'Through The Gates Of The Silver Key.'

2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) is fundamentally just a movie first, although claimed to have been based on the earlier short story penned by Clarke in 1948, called 'The Sentinel' and yet at each and every turn, everyone denies that really, the film was based on the story at all although it clearly is in terms of the infamous 'obelisk' thing-y part.

The short story is rubbish, and just tedious and repetitive with seemingly just one motif - the idea that 'someone' left an obelisk on the moon.

So hey, don't worry about anything being 'said' here, you will simply shake your head and 'doubt' the undercurrent of what I am saying, if you knew what it was.

On the other hand, tremors are occurring in the land of Washington DC, on account of a question being raised in this week's Congressional Hearing into you-know-what's, about how come the government is not furiously working on what their stance and approach should be or will be in any formal 'encounter.' And the meaning behind that is - 'US politicians are dragging their feet on the implications of making contact...'

Well, that would be because, of course, in any such contact, you would all be told by smart-assed ET, how many lies your government tells you all the time, innit? Son?

Now don't go frikkin' buying this,
just 'cuz Fleming made Bond say
it 'was the best coffee ITW!'

The mostly unpublished key details, although I think there is some literature coming out here and there about the place now, with long direct quotes from CIA's 'Gateway' assessment, is that the human brain can attain to frequency levels far above what most humans are employing in their normal daily living.

The phrase 'dumbing down' is actually straight from actual Tavistock Institute papers although I don't have any references to hand, but I know they are they because I have seen them there.

In all of the original source materials by writers like Seabury Quinn and Lovecraft and London and Hoffmann Price, you will always find ties to what is being pitched as some kind of mysterious, exotic, sometimes described as merely 'Orientalist' frippery - to wit namely, 'incense' or more particularly, constructed fragrances that are being put to use in some kind of preamble to some 'starry adventure.'

...As modern-day scientists though, you and I know that these are neural pathway access doors to driving the energy of whole nerve-line communications, and then from there onto and into the entire brain complex itself and that this particular route very successfully produces sustained consistent and coherent brain waves.

I drink cheap Nescafe
coffee, in very cheap
plain white mugs!
Which is not this either,
is it??!

From what I understand, it is absolutely not that this or that particular scent or odor complex will drive everyone's brain centers the exact same way - that is to say, thereby determining exact frequencies: it is not that church frankincense (which is never a single substance, by the way) creates 'ethereal brainwaves!' It might do, and it might even do it more reliably for more numbers of people generally - but the truth is that each person is highly individualistic and is already coming from a pre-existing state of 'normalcy' in their own brainwave patterns.

Consequently, it is more like that you have to find, what works for you to elevate the frequencies of your own brain.

Secondly, and very importantly (and this is the reason by the way, that they need to insert 'living' cells into vaccines) the molecular electron spin cycle rates are completely different from natural substances taken from nature and then processed in key ways, compared to synthetic, lab-created and put together molecules - which are literally, dead.