Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Tuesday, 3 May 2022

Coming From Behind The 8-Ball

It isn't really possible to just step right up here with some astounding new thing. Because, there could be a lot of people coming from behind the 8-ball.

Means that they can't easily see the point of something, maybe, or actually more likely, what it will be is that they won't be able to see what to do with it, how to use it properly.

And then of course too, there are all kinds of idiots who want to tell you 'oh yes I know how this works (or doesn't work, as the case may be because there's even more who have been raised on a steady diet of schooled stupidity known as 'skepticism'). They're actually just stupid people saying and doing stupid things.

Take a good hard look at it.
You know who built this, right?
Archaeologists really know, don't they?

And I'll tell you why.

Right now, the following:

1. There is a Canadian 'general' (or I think he was a lieutenant-colonel) caught by the Russians, and he was in charge of a sophisticated and highly illegal and totally morally repugnant chemical and biological weapons lab underneath the Azovstal works.

Told you that before anyone in the media even knew or hinted.

2. Gonzalo Lira is not dead.

Told you that right after he was 'disappeared' and a couple of people, including Scott Ritter,  floated the idea that he had been killed.

...I was actually the very first person in the whole wide world ever to say that the Canadians were involved in the Covid thing and that the UK people had 'offed' the Canadian scientist Frank Plummer.

Oh-oh.

Are you getting anything yet?

I have the 'play book.'

There are some of you even now, still this minute, who seriously think that this 'fairy tale' about dragon-reptilians hiding behind puppet leaders is a fairy tale. Is not. Is real.

So what are you going to do then, even if you had a 'light saber' thrust into your hands all of a sudden? Would you, open jars of olives with it? Or light up your way in the dark at night, if you are a woman running with Samsung music phones at 2 AM?

I know you're not going to 
rush out and buy this bloody
thing! That's why I post it here.
Right now I don't want to post pics
of things
you're going to go and waste
money on.


What?

What would you do?

So. Let's step back, out from behind the 8-ball, so that we can at least see ahead properly.

You don't really want to or need to, 'meet ET Aliens' now today. You need to meet up with human people right here that you can fully get on with.

And what does 'fully' mean?

Well. Now see you know this is actually going to be difficult, on account you know very well, that if you sit and talk with people who actually believe the stupid nonsense that David Icke carries on about (and you already most probably have met such people), you know they're slightly nuts.

You don't want to be 'believing' anything you cannot prove. And you definitely do not want to get involved with others who believe things they cannot prove or demonstrate completely rationally.

But you want to meet with people who have enough of an open mind, that they can 'see' ahead even when the facts appear 'problematic' or unreal at the start.

So. There could be dragon-reptile people here, pulling strings. We don't know. Not right now.

Who knows?

I know. I already said there were and my rate for 'being right' is oh, um, what, what would you say, those who have been here for ten years or more?

But this does not mean to say you should 'believe' it. You should act with wariness, however, that 'something is up' about it.

Lankan crab curry...
At least it won't send you
broke.
Still luxury though!
Stay with me here, sooner or later we will be discussing real techniques. But right now it's about the need to think about the people around you.

I know you all love 'science.' There was a paper published very recently, in fact on 6 April this year, by someone 'Andrew Adamatzky,' titled 'Electric Spike Syntax of Communications between Fungi.'

Okay so, for those who are messing around with electron spintronics as it effects olfactory inputs and brain waves, then you can see that 'science' is telling you, that communication can and does happen with electronic micro-spikes in virtually quantum level frequencies and wavelengths.

Luca Turin very cleverly described the types of olfactory molecules and how these moved about - the light ones took off like starlings ahead of you when you were walking on some beach, let's say, the seagulls took off a little later, and last of all, the pelicans, heavy lumbering things, took flight.

The starlings could flash around and strike your face (figuratively) like little tiny fast feather pellets, the seagulls could 'have more impact and more sustained impact' and the pelicans would thump into you.

That is how perfumers construct their famous 'fragrance pyramid' of notes. Their compositions have 'top notes' and 'mid-notes' and 'base notes.'

But really, people like Sultan Pasha and Francesca Bianchi understand things much more deeply than that.

They understand that your brain is going to vibrate in certain ways...

And, my friends, if Andrew Adamatzky can see what things the brains of mushrooms are thinking, through those 'vibrations,' then ET Aliens can easily know what you are thinking, so you'd better darn well start thinking some interesting thoughts!

Of course if we go back to my first 'problem,' I was saying, that it would be nice to have a cenacle full of people all thinking the same thoughts at the same time.

LOL



    

6 comments:

  1. Here's a fun exercise in overthinking. Been watching "Voyager." s1E9 "Prime factors." A pun on integer factorization and the "prime directive." Prime Directive in Star Trek terminology refers to "dangers of technology" am I right? What do the dangers of technology have to do with factorization?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The definite connection between the two ideas (one in quantum mechanics, and the other in I suppose sort of 'social/moral intelligence systems') is that both really do consist of 'emergent phenomena. And 'emergent phenomena' anyway, are when you start thinking of the 'whole system' as it really is, which is, namely, hugely hugely complex. Altering a flow of numbers by inserting some 'operator' is potentially similar to inserting new technology ahead of actual social-moral development 'emergent' points of the curve. It's 'potentially' similar because it 'might' have new emergent problem effects (because it might not have either), but it would be EXACTLY similar in every case where it DID have deleterious effects because of the curve maturity issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again, to consider 'emergent phenomena' - this is the crossing of a transcendent 'time line' into the 'now; there is a lot of 'potentials' in the field, and only some 'appear' as manifested material things or events because they have 'emerged' into the present from the field of potentials. This makes experienced reality, actually much more complicated than we used to think, when we used to simply look at 'history' and events as they happened in normal observed material sequence as if that was 'reality' or all of reality. Well of course, it's not though, since 'things' in fact 'emerge' from material non-existence but which had 'real' potential! It's the real potential which is the complex addition to 'reality' that super scientists thinking in modern complex physics all have acknowledged but then see that 'reality' is just plain incredibly complex and 'bigger' than ever previously imagined.

      Delete
    2. But at the same time though, it makes us more powerful, since our brains are easily able to comprehend potentials and 'emergent phenomena.' And so, 'theoretically...' ...well, no I'm not going to say what goes next because it will give air to the incorrect modern pop notions about 'manifesting' things. Um, too late though, I guess. I've kind of already said it, haven't I? But clearly, you can't just 'manifest' things by hoping or even 'wishing really hard' or anything else like they are saying. You can do something... God I might have to say now since we just let the cat out of the bag here. Well, but you started it once you said 'emergent phenomena.' Ah no, you didn't, you said 'factorization.' It's not the same thing, but it (factorization) relies on emergent phenomena.

      Delete
    3. like plant a seed where you see enough accumulated potential?

      Delete
    4. I think so. For sure. Sometimes, we are all 'trained' by standard life to envisage potential the wrong ways - we see 'emptiness' or 'lack' and think 'no potential' whereas of course, this is the other way around depending on other factors. Often, those 'other factors' are not physically visible at all, or not immediately visible 'close by.'

      Delete

Your considered comments are welcome