Difficult To Convey

On the one hand I am trying to be of some kind of positive benefit to some people, on the other hands (lol) there are a couple of things it is not such a great idea to outline too specifically just yet, and also, there is the question of whether or not I am even up to the task of being able to convey these ideas at all well.

I have just had a few hours straight of some 'people' trying to tell me about isomers, and how isomers are why there are 'evil people' on this planet and how come they cannot be 'fixed.'

Isomers, I learn subsequently - because I have a couple of Russian more or less legit scientists around me here - are compounds that contain exactly the same number of atoms (they are the same chemical formula), but their arrangements of atoms are different.

This is by no means the complete
picture, because there are also
those configurations when you rotate
the two-dimensional triangles 
themselves. But it is a good start
to the matter.

These guys upstairs have absolutely no care at all that I am no kind of chemist at all, but simply can retain certain words and so I have to find out about them later even though I 'have' them in my head! ...But I have no real understanding of their real meaning in connection with the subject being explained.

The subject, is the idea I expressed a while ago here recently, about tri-nodal figures on three ascending planes, beginning at the base with the nodes of 1. human appetite, 2. fear, and 3. spatial perception.

The next level up, consists of 4. knowledge (or its reverse, ignorance), 5. truth (or its opposite), and 6. benevolence or else malice.

If some individual is permanently in the mode of their consciousness being focused only in the node of basic animal appetites, then this impacts necessarily on the 'level up' nodes since, for example, they will commonly jettison the requirement to deal in truth in order to manipulate an unsuspecting victim into handing over or even being, something to be consumed by the animal appetite. This stance can be quite malicious under the surface of course, IE towards the other person, and the justification being employed is that the first 'agent' is simply satisfying what it has determined 'is good' for itself though.

In a purely amoral hierarchical view of the Universe and everything, well, that's all totally fine; it's just the 'law of the jungle,' as it were.

So then though, in that paradigm, the base animal instincts are the pinnacle of all conscious intelligent actions, directions, and behaviors. Since then, there really is no such thing as 'knowledge versus ignorance' other than the solely functional facts to do with actually satisfying the animal hungers. And there is really no such thing as widely-shared 'benevolence versus malice' because in all instances, the first agent is going to 'get' from the others around, and even maybe literally kill and eat them as well - either metaphorically, or even actually: 'Good' becomes, not a Universal, shared idea common to many or to all. What is 'Good' is only what serves the individual on top of the hierarchy. This is, the Freemasonic ideal but no one in the under ranks will ever admit it primarily because they don't really know it, know that it is that.

We relax like this.

There is no possibility or prospect, or even, connection available, no connect-ability, between the two levels and the highest, the third level set of nodes.

I did say previously that I was not going to say what those final three nodes are, and I'm still not going to, but I will say there is an 'EM' field aspect to it somewhere.

Now, apparently, and from what I am given to understand, spin isomers are a thing. And this means that field effects can impact the arrangements of atoms of compounds, in cells...

But clearly, if the field is not able to be introduced literally in, to the specific person, then the physical structural make-up of that person is stuck according to whatever the arrangements there already are 'in situ' so to speak, at least in terms of anything that can be positive from the, at least superficially, invisible deep inside. Which means the animal appetite-driven person is stuck. 

And this does not mean there is no place for the animal appetites, it means there are two other nodes there at that level and one needs to be in charge, and that 'one' must not ever be the animal appetite one.

Posit again this advanced, super intelligent group of other beings, the 'not us,' the other beings... ...they will not ever get involved with people who are stuck without the top layer of active agency consciousness nodes, on account you know those people are never reliably going to be dealing in truth, or in knowledge, and they are never going to be benevolent in any guaranteed sense, in their dealings, in their interactions. No intelligent being would take the risk. Even if they could monitor every single thought that other person or group of people were entertaining, which of course those people would be doing secretly because they are almost always lying in order to get what they want, what their base appetites 'want -,' it would just all get far too tiresome.

Another great pic 
composition.

All clear enough?

Kind of is to me...

Doesn't mean I have been able to convey it effectively.

Modern scientists, if asked, say they 'would like' to contact ET Aliens in order to advance the human race, and to 'benefit,' and to be friendly, that is, unless the Aliens want to kill us or something...

No they don't. It's the other way around. Your 'modern scientists' are all desperate liars who want to take advantage wherever they can at every single opportunity, in order to get power, to accommodate their own base impulses. Full stop.