Out In The Alleyway

Now here, some of you will start to perform miraculous things. Literally you will attain special powers. Oh you think not?

So sooner or later I guess we had to get here though.

The good question was posed in some recent pages - 'what is this, about Love being the child of Poverty?'

This whole idea underpins everything that is Christianity at its core. There is literally no such thing as 'Christianity' without this entire concept, intact, straight from the actual core meaning of the affair.

Cristina Soto's just-posted, photograph
of the many layers of blue.

The Symposium is far and away the most complex, the most austerely advanced, and the least understood of all of the works of Plato, whether they be the known authentic works, or any whose authorship is contested among scholars.

Even more complex than any of the texts that deal with maths and geometry, is the Symposium.

Because, the structure is one of many dimensions.

The play, virtually, is designed around a sophisticated dinner, attended only by the highest class, most educated, and esteemed of people including a leading Athenian doctor and the historical Athenian general Alcibiades.

The discussion is deemed so important by these leading figures, that they instruct the host to 'send the dancing girls away' for the rest of the evening.

And this mind you, is still a wine drinking party. And in fact this aspect becomes a crucial 'literary device' (let's just leave it at that for the moment) towards the end.

Here begins this whole matter of 'different dimensions;' for on the one hand, the girls are going to distract, but somehow, we are meant to accept that the wine will not affect the procuring of the truth - which is what they were all going after here.

The Christian 'New Testament' leaps ahead over the subject of well, but really, why?

And also, how did it all begin, and not with the Garden of Eden story, but hey, where did all these 'God' things, come from at all? I mean why not, we just have nothing and then 'Big Bang' then soup and then lightning and then amoeba and then slugs and then lizards and then monkeys and then giraffes and finally, Neanderthals, from where we have only gone backwards ever since.

Plaster model and art by Ben Kommets
and 'Lucky-LBT.'
The Praiseworthy One, Socrates.
Or is that a genie?

LOL

But everything in the Symposium is happening on multiple levels all at once...

So, as people with the modern Western Mind, we must see the Goddess 'Ate' (Destruction/Havoc) now, not with our crass and simple-minded, childish 'modern' Western vision, but in a different way.

Ate is Destruction yes, but then she is the daughter of a Goddess (Eris) by parthenogenesis, of Nyx, with whom Zeus then co-operates, to plant her (Eris) deep into the Earth and so that she (Eris, who is 'Envy') would be here to interact with Mankind in a certain way.

Ate has a daughter, who is 'Poverty.' So right away we must 'see' that Envy causes Strife, which causes Destruction which ends up in Poverty.

But this is not the whole of the matter - 'Envy' is an extremely powerful animating daimones, which causes Men even lazy ones, to work to attain something they desire to have; and only after that, is it sometimes (albeit mostly it is) the case that war and strife ensue when the desires are not achieved.

So we have this great big profile story here going on, this systematic chain of connected psychological events.

And so that is how come we have Poverty coming into the scene now; and that is how we must view her - as a crucial element within a whole profile of connected things.

Moving into another 'dimension' then, Poverty is a God: she is a Spirit, meaning not some kind of wisp of fog in a graveyard, but a super powerful Divine thing. Which means - she cannot die, she cannot be overcome by mortal things, and she has Divine Power, that is to say, Divine means to get whatever she wants.

The wine, the food...
...and our own Poverty.

She goes to a feast of wining and dining other Gods, and she well knows her own suffering and lack, and seeing that the God 'Plenty,' or Abundance, or Resource is completely drunk and fallen over asleep at that moment in the back yard, she purposes to lie with him and conceive a child who will then inherit of his father, some wealth, and therewith resolve her own lack; in a way.

So this then, is the God 'Love.'

From His mother He has literally nothing, but He also inherits from her great contrivance, literally the Divine Skill to make something from out of nothing - since, because she herself is a God, she can do anything, but the way she does it, is from without any advantages at all.

And from His father, He literally gets everything.

And then, in the Symposium, we learn something on another level again, namely that some genealogists of the Gods, regard 'Love' as the youngest of the Gods, and then yet, others of them regard Him as literally the Oldest, through some strange and mysterious means.

And they say that prior to His birth, it was the very reason of His not being there beforehand, that the Gods warred and did violence and many horrible things happened, and that after His advent, He subdued all of them permanently, so that none of them who did not bow to Him were permitted to remain in Olympus ever more. And that only those 'among whom there was ever Love only, and no enmity at all' were allowed to remain in the Heaven of the Gods.

But then, without anyone telling us, we must see that He is in fact a direct descendant of Nyx, of whom even Zeus the Leader and Father of Gods and Men was solely afraid and respected completely. And because Nyx is His (Zeus's) own daughter's (Wisdom)'s aunt or grandmother, He also has a somewhat similar relationship to her too (the Goddess 'Wisdom') although she behaves to him as a daughter and is also respectful anyway.

And if He, Love, is a descendant of Nyx, then by the organized structure of Divinity, He is of the oldest strands of the Divine Vine, as it were.

The Genie is out of the bottle!

We are mortals. In the sense of what is truly speaking Eternal, we have nothing, and we die, to be no more, whether personally, or in any other way as a given certainty.

In the Symposium, suddenly at the end, Plato interposes a new device. He brings in the drunken general Alcibiades, dressed like Dionysus, the God of Wine, and just like Dionysus is often to be found, having come back from a street party, where he has been cavorting with lovers.

Now Alcibiades is a completely historical figure, of whom we know a very great deal.

He was the last 'famous' (there may be others, descendants down to this very day, but none are famous) of the Aristocratic family the Alcmaeonidae, among whose ancestors was the old soldier Nestor, who possessed a large drinking vessel, so huge and heavy that none but he was able to lift it and drink it. And Nestor, was a human descendant of Poseidon's affair with a princess of Thessaly, which makes Alcibiades already regarded 'officially' as semi-divine himself. 

Plato is implicating the ancestral Nestorian Drinking Vessel echo (which Greeks would know about, but is not explicit in the text) in Alcibiades' very presence there at all, and his comportment (his attire and his state of drunkeness), with Divinity and specifically with the God Dionysus. He is making Alcibiades into a real life, earthly, physical material presence or 'hint,' of the actual spirit of Dionysus.

And that simply underscores the point that Plato is making, namely, that here in this part of the 'dialogue,' we are to understand that this is now taking things right down to earth, as in, this is now a real-life thing going on for us to see through the story, but, that it implicates the matter of the 'demi-god' nature of certain people and certain things.

Alcibiades is a literary device, that we are to take as representing the God Dionysus Himself.

And then, 'things get messy' you see, because naturally, Alcibiades is quite drunk. By 'messy' we can also say 'they get real.'

So let us also now 'get real.'

We are humans. We live, we come from nothing and Hawking's Big Bang, and we die. And that's it. Back to the nothing that we are.

Hawking has nothing for us. He is nothing himself right now. A few words on some pages, some digital space in some computer chips, some DNA samples stored in labs in Imperial College London.

Now by the way, so as not to be unfair on 'sci-entists' (those creatures who actually know exactly nothing, in fact), in another plane of dimension in the dialogue, we have heard from the Athenian doctor, Eryximachus, on the physician's perspective of 'Love.' And right convincing it is too.

Alcibiades' 'Naval Marque...'

Meanwhile, Alcibiades is telling us now, things about 'the tire rubber hitting the road,' as it were.

Just a little beforehand, Socrates' old nurse maid, Diotima from Mantinea, had been setting forth how it is that a human mortal person, can become immortal...

A mortal, realistically, in the sense of anything really enduring by way of personal consciousness, literally has nothing and cannot be immortal.

And to a certainty, Steven Hawking is fully dead and completely gone. Maybe he reincarnates, but possibly not, and in all events, even if he did -, not so that his ego and his mind, his actual consciousness, knows anything about it. Yet the whole world is fooled by him when he has the stage, given to him by others, whose motives you cannot see.

Say to the carpet: 'Rise!' And it will not. This is reality.

Whereas Diotima, the 'woman who honors,' or who is honored by Deos (it can mean both things), is credited by Socrates in the Symposium, as inspiring the theory, that God is able to raise dead things or inanimate things, or make mortal things eternal beings. And then she goes ahead and says what 'God' actually is. But it is all wrapped up in the ultra-dimensionality of the Symposium, as a structured Platonic 'dialogue.' And Alcibiades disrupts everything at the end.

Capture though, even just the one time, and even but only dimly too, the 'ultra' meaning of the words that are in there, and the carpet rises but only for the person who has grasped the core.

The Sufi 'Kashf'

The evening is nigh upon us.

Dusk has already left the skies.

We must prepare for the Barakah.

Oh you of the Kass, prepare yourselves also. For ye are of 'the select' - and it is of your estate that al-Ghayb shall be as kashf for you.

Certain of the Believers of the division known as Shi'i, hold to a mystical and crazy notion borrowed from the Christians, that one of the Apostles remains here still alive, across the centuries on this planet, in occultation (al-Ghaybah), and that at the time of the Return of Isa ibn Maryam, shall emerge to give kashf (the Unveiling) to a tiny few selected ones (al-Kass).

Whether this is true or not true we cannot say, but we can unveil one mystery regarding the identity of the chief of the Djinni, a commander and adviser of Suleiman M'lek aka Amenemhat III.

This person - this Djinn nobleman - was called, by the Arabic scholars, Asif ibn Barkhiya.

And he was, by the ancient Hebrews, called Asaph ben Berechiah.

There are verses of the Book of Tehillim (Psalms) attributed to his words; these are known as the Asaph verses.

According to the Jews, he was an adviser both to Solomon and to David, and his death is not recorded, and he is ascribed with supernatural longevity, just like ul-Mahdi, or the certain Apostle (of Jesus), who was not to die. Although it is not to be understood that he cannot die,  but that he simply, remains.

If the Satanic Rulers of the world - this world, our world - were to know of his whereabouts, they would assuredly seek his death by the usual means.

Attested in the Kitab Shams al-Ma'arif of Al-Buni, and the Kitab al-Ajnas, are the ways of invocation, of this powerful Djinn commander.

Also, in the most authentic hadith of Kitab al-Ghayba by al-Numani.

"Saba Sibu, Saba as-Sibu!

Tazaza'at Taza-za, Taza-za zaaaa-at"

Thus is invoked, called, summoned, the Great Djinni Commander of the Close Guard of King Solomon.

And you must have strong dark coffee, freshly brewed, ready for me, er, him.

'Saba' as you have already been informed, is not a piece of land in Southern Arabia, but a place far away in the stars. Thus the Queen of Saba, is from thence.

And as the stars above twinkle their small lights, as though of such distant lamps set into so narrow of their niches in the vault of heaven, that none but the elves and the fairies should have been able to have set them there and lit them each evening... ...you will obtain the visitation of the Djinn commander Asif, Son of the Magical Blessing; and by the rule of exchange you must bestow then the secret magical blessing upon such of the lowly personages of the Earth people around you wherever you travel, on the morrow, who that it seems meet to you, should receive it.

The Cerulean Blue Bee.

And what is the power of the Barakah of this Djinni? It is the indwelling spiritual force of the Lights Among the Highest of the Stars, those being not the ones we see with our eyes, but the ones we know with our mind's eye and with the warm vision of our heart.

And God is Most Benevolent, Wise.

I challenge you to find but one scholar, one muhaddith, one mufti, one shaykh whose words are like any of these, one verse like unto these anywhere across the whole of the internet, in YouTube videos, or anywhere, in anything...

LOL

Attend now, to the incantations of the Djinniya (female Genies), as they rise before you, to dance and to sing - and bow you all to the Most High, the Lord God of All, Father of the Universe, Eyes of the Glossy Night, the Bestower, the Beneficent, the Munificent, and the King. Solomon is not arrayed in all his glory as even a small bee before the Lord God, the Almighty.

Brass Tacks

I don't know - who knows where that expression really originated.

Same as no one really knows who actually created the original Equestrian Statue Of Marcus Aurelius (circa AD 170). Okay if I advanced the statement that it was made by a Chinese bronze caster, it would be the first time in recent history such a thing was said.

Ah, nevertheless, though...

Anyway, let us move on to our current business. That of deciding what to designate as our wishes - presuming these beings are going to give us any, or at least, the notorious 'three' that they keep allowing all the stories to say.

Vignale built the body by private commission,
supported by the great Ford Motor Corporation,
and the marketing people cleverly
pictured the thing often before
the Equestrian Statue Of Marcus Aurelius
in Rome.

It does not befall us, however, to participate in this injudicious nonsense of getting stuck with some 'lesson' that we simply 'have' to learn. We don't wish to learn any lessons!

We just want a straightforward, no-nonsense, granting of some wishes.

That having been said though, we can most certainly give great consideration to the whole human context, and accept that it is not wise to go around showing off to the rest of the people everywhere around the place, who do not have this facility.

We will certainly arrive at much trouble if it generally became known that we 'got stuff' that the rest never got, or even were not even able to get.

So yes we must give great consideration to what it is that we are asking for.

Meanwhile, as you consider, let us turn to the matter of this famous 'King Solomon' about whom, the Jews never properly say what a certain phrase is, in there, in their Talmud explanation of Ecclesiastes 2:8 (Book of Kohelet).

They say, oh he was 'accumulating silver and gold and treasures of kings, male and female singers, and the pleasures of people.'

Errrr. That's not really right. He 'accumulated treasures and silver and gold and stuff, yep, but also - mistresses of delights; from the Sheddim.'

Well, you know, see, they tell you about the anakim, nephilim, and the elohim.

But now who are these 'Sheddim?'

I will tell you.

And from this you will profit much.

Sheddim are the Djinn, aka Genies. The Genie people.

And where do they usually live?

We can consult the works of ibn Battuta, the Arabic traveler and scholar of the 14th century. He relates that there are 'sky palaces,' and 'islands floating in the sky above the clouds of China' in which the Djinn reside.

Wonder what he could be talking about, eh?

Do you wonder?

I do not wonder.

And neither should you.

But merely rest your worries over whether such beings exist, and now that you know they most certainly do (for who doubts Solomon, and all that is written about him??!), turn your thoughts to what to seek of them, for great is their power, and deep is their knowledge, and beneficent are they (of the Djinn) who will consult with you on friendly terms, B'ism-i-azm, al-El. (Which is the right way to say it; there is no such correct Arabic as 'Bismillah.')

Light your flame in your lonely tent in the desert sands, late in the evening, consulting the stars above, and observing in what houses of the moon is Jupiter, and where in the vault of heaven lies Sirius, perform only two rakats (of the prescribed movements of the Pharaoh Suleiman Malek - aka Amenemhat III - which are memorialized upon the pyramidion called after his name), and by-and-by the Djinn appointed to consult with you shall appear, and ask of you what your wish is. Say to this Djinn 'naught is my wish other than my daily bread and the friendship of the wise always.' And the Djinn shall thereupon bring to you a scroll upon which is a mysterious writing.

Each time the eye of your mind sees but a single letter written upon this scroll, some great boon shall fall unto you the very next day. And no danger shall touch your living soul. And your knowledge shall increase and to your accumulation of health and silver and gold and treasures of kings all shall be added, as one thing on top of the other, daily forever, like the sands in the desert build their own mountains by the breath of the wind, over which the camel caravans must plow, in order to reach the other side for the purposes of the caravan-masters' trade. And God is Most Merciful, Wise.

And it shall be unto you, enough.

One Wish Used...

So, we have to be serious here. This is a serious subject.

Still, there is always time for a joke or two.

Who was it that does the 'blinking' again...?

This pic is new - was posted
today on her Twitter account.
Tao, people will think you are
colluding. What say you though?
LOL
Come on. Be honest.
Didn't expect this, did you?
(Thanks heaps, JES).

LOL

...When y'all wake up to the stark reality of what is going on here, maybe we'll get somewhere.

I already know there are a couple of people here getting very very frightened as to whether we are 'good' or 'bad.' Well, we are a little naughty.

Can't help that.

What is the truth then, about Genies? Where does the idea originate from?

The thing is there since well before the Arabic narratives, since well prior to Islam. Folklore among many different peoples contains stories of King Solomon, and frankly, I think so does standard Egyptian history except it is couched there in quite modern terms that stem from translators of hieroglyphs - and the Solomonic narratives deal with the subject of some extra special kind of 'help' Solomon was receiving.

All of the narratives are stories with a moral. And this, in my own view, does not mean that actual Genies are actually always and only in the business of 'teaching humans a lesson!' ...Which is, namely, not any kind of super fun lesson, necessarily.

I personally think the reason of the 'moral outcome' part of these accounts of the mysterious race of the Djinn people, is that the writers have no knowledge of actually how to really make contact with them. But still, they know about them; they have heard other stories, legends.

One great hadith (this is a real one) from Maulana Zakariyya Kandhlavi, relates the story of a woodcutter who purposed to go cut down a certain tree that villagers were worshiping as an idol. And, he was met on the way by the Shaytan in the form of an old man, who challenged him to wrestle, and if he the old man won, the woodcutter was to agree not to cut down the tree. Twice he wrestled and he bested Shaytan (who is, of course, a Djinn according to Islamic teachings). But after that, the old man said to him, if he agreed not to cut down the tree, he would be given three gold coins under his pillow each night. The woodcutter agreed to this, and indeed received three gold coins on the first two nights, but on the third, he received nothing - and so he marched out next morning to chop down the tree. Once again, the old man intercepted him, challenged him to wrestle and this time, he defeated the woodcutter, upon which conclusion the woodcutter inquired how he was able to win the match.

And the Shaytan said: 'You were able to defeat me the first two times, because your intentions were pure, whereas, on the third occasion, you were going out to cut down the tree out of desire for gold.'

Anyway I tell this story as a way of suggesting that the 'stories-with-a-moral' are also intrinsically valuable.

But we must deal here, with the underlying truth of the Genies.

In the Bible, there are two types of titles given, to certain stories which relate to the Genie people: there is the King of Persia, and the Prince of Persia; there is the King of Tyre, and the Prince of Tyre.

The hadiths of 
Abu Huraira, 'father of the cats.'

Whereas the 'Prince' is clearly described as a man, the 'King' is 'not a human.'

Now I am going to say to you without proof or evidence, but nevertheless it is true, that 'Tyre and Sidon' is Atlantis.

And, according to Plato (that fellow, who even is he!), the people of Atlantis were the children of Poseidon and Poseidon is not a human being, whereas the people of Atlantis were.

Once again, the stories line up.

'Genies' are also conflated in much later accounts, with the Chinese peoples, and it is possibly from these, that much of the visual symbology derives - and also several of the characteristics about diligence and attitude. I fear frankly, that the word 'Djinn' itself, is simply an Arabic neologism for the widespread name of the Oriental/Asiatic people used by the Persian traders at that time.

There is no such word 'Djinn' nor even anything phonemically close to it, for instance, in the Old Testament, but which certainly did have accounts of the unusual powers given to Solomon, from some 'spirit agency -,' not even 'spirit' but actual 'otherworldly beings.'

Strictly speaking, 'Genies' are angelic people, 'beings' we say but they are just 'people' but who have a special relationship to 'electrical' things, or 'electronic' things, 'fields' and so on.

Satan - 'Shaytan' as the Islamic world calls him - is accurately depicted as from the order of created beings called the Djinn.

Authentically fabricated a-hadith
of al-Johari ibn Wada'ullah.
'Father of the Elephants.'
By the way 'Aliphan' is the name
of one prominent (and good) Genie
in Arabic writings.

So in fact, in this the Old Testament is in alignment with Islamic narratives, namely that the 'King of Persia' (otherwise also known as Satan himself in the Christian more or less 'occult' explanations), is a Genie.

This particular Genie was powerful enough to delay the visitation of a major, or even, the major Divine commander, as it were. (Think Star Wars here, it will make much more sense).

So, in our follow-up articles, we must deal with the matter of 'gaining boons (god don't you love the ornate Orientalist language!) - the so-called 'three wishes.' And we must be able to step our way through the deceptions of the Shaytan, since he too, is of the Order of the Djinn!

 

Sultan Shamharush - The Genie

He is in fact, King of the Genies. ...Or, as the Islamic Arabic world says - of the Djinn.

Golden Era Arabic culture was a manuscript culture, which means that they traded in writing.

Eventually, they manufactured this whole story that God had sent down a book... ...of writing.

In fact he never sent down 'a book,' but the story is that 'various chapters' were 'revealed' over 23 years.

From 'manuscript culture' to
konstructo-kit kulture.

Then again though, there are a group of angels, who protect some tablets in one of the heavens (of the Islamic '7' of those 'levels'), upon which is written, the Book.

Unfortunately, nobody had invented photography at that time (of the revealing of the chapters of the Book), and so, despite several individuals having been 'up there' in that level of heaven - as well as in various other levels 'up there' - no one took any photographs.

So we don't have any evidence, either of the various levels of 'heaven,' or of the Book, or anything else at all.

Nevertheless, 2 billion Muslims are convinced, on the basis of the strict 'sci-ence' (uh-oh) of the transmission of accounts, so-called 'narrations,' of the unimpeachable Witness, Muhammad, of the truth and reliability of everything they are told. These 'transmissions' are graded into strong, moderate, weak, and finally, fabricated.

But however, not many Muslims are aware that there are at least four authentic, and graded 'strong' books of hadith (narrations of the Prophet Muhammad - sallallahu alaihi wasallam), 'transmitted' by the Djinn (Genies).

Actually by these mysterious, mostly or often invisible beings, not human, and possessed of cloven hoofs instead of feet.

Now I am not myself sure of whether in some tent late at night, by the flickering flame of a lamp, some Djinn, actually wrote down what he had heard that the Prophet (Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam) had said, or whether in fact this Djinn recounted to some human scribe, the whole thing.

Firestone-Walker cherry barrel ale.
'You who walked through the burning coals...'
aka Lucifer.

In any case, there are books of hadith, from the Djinn. And these are authentic, and strong.

That means they are true and you have to act by the directions more or less given, within them.

Now actually, there is also a class of hadith that are regarded and thus graded, as totally having been 'fabricated.' That is the choice word that the 'scholars' use. 'Scholar' in this context means 'person accepted by the orthodoxy' - just like say, Anthony Fauci is a 'medical scholar' of great worth and note and repute. He is also a great scientist, and he indeed knows everything. Like Stephen Hawking, and Richard Dawkins. Oh and, not to forget - never must we forget - Einstein.

These people are 'scholars.' And, they know everything. They know everything and they are never wrong. Karl Popper even set down rules to obligate academia and all of commercial industry, and banking, and thus necessarily also politics - to 'believe scientists' and what to believe and how to believe it and whom to take 'truth' from. And even what to say that 'science' is. Science is what they say it is by consensus.

Because, Mashallah, God has appointed them to know, and you to be a moron. You cannot 'know' anything on your own account. You do not have the brain-power and you must always believe whatever Dawkings Hawkins, Fauc-ings and Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) tells you.

Islamic scholars have agreed on the permissibility (fatawa of Imam Nawawi: Nawawi 'books of 40 hadith,' C. 13th century) - of acting upon fabricated hadith.

I am myself, about to be the greatest Islamic muhaddith and narrator of authentic hadith of all time, because I am setting about to write many many hundreds of fabricated hadith. And these I myself can attest within my own lifetime to have been personally fabricated by me. So, these are not just fabrications, but authentic fabrications.

What is that called?
It is called 'Russian Volume Lashes.'
Are we 'good' or are we 'bad?'
That is for you to decide.

You have no idea how many Djinn I am able to converse with -, those from this level, that level, out in the desert, off across the Arctic, up in the 'space' above the sky, the ladies underwear level, fishing firearms and handguns level... ...everything.

I can even procure deep-fake photographic evidence to back it all up. And all authentically fabricated!

Alhamdulillah, brothers.

...This one Djinn I overheard, just the other day, was plotting -. Trust me, I cannot say what. It would really stretch the bounds of credibility for you here.

Mine though, I told y'all before. Belongs to me. Is mine.

I fabricated it.

Funny how it will eventuate though.

So - Sultan Shamharush - always wears black.

Is he a good genie, or an evil one? He is still alive today, according to prominent (orthodox Islamic) scholars of the Buffi Sufi orders. Actually, I am myself a member of the Alian Sufi order... I think that's right.

The 'Emerge Wave 1' At Davos

So, like I said at the end of the post here of 14 May 2022, there is 'technology' out there, coming soon, let's just say.

Anyway, where 'they' are heading with what bits of it they know about, is what was just now unveiled at Davos - which was, namely, the Emerge Company's 'Wave 1' hologram device.

I need to note this piece of technology, because it will become very widely sought after, bought, and used.

If we took the skinny Hollywood
actress up there,
even with her head switched
off, we'd have to at first
offer her something stoopid
like this.
Two types of fennel parts: the shaved bulb
plus the tippy tops. And blood orange, of course -,
and pomegranate and capers.
They've gone too far with their
'skinny world' ideology. Because they
don't get this from their chefs!
They get it from us here.

But, just like when the Greek engineer and mathematician Hero of Alexandria showed some Roman soldiers his 'steam-powered toy,' what you will be given, is silly and useless.

...Compared with what you could have.

Now in about ten days, I will be either just generally explaining some technology of our own here, or maybe just passing it across to those who are financially involved by having contributed to the Autism projects mentioned in the 'buttons' around the page here. What we can do, is, well, we can really powerfully work on Autism.

In saying that, it is critical to observe that this type of process still takes quite a good deal of time, except, by using what we are in possession of, the person will literally be neurologically assisted in ways that are totally not known on this planet up till now.

And now I've also got to criticize firstly much of what is being passed off as modern 'science,' next much of what is set down in writing all over the internet and even in text books, and lastly make especial reference to a very false notion (which is in any case not treated all that seriously in 'standard' science) about something called 'the 11th harmonic.'

Yes there is such a thing as the 11th harmonic. This just means the eleventh scalar integer multiple of a particular originating periodic signal or base frequency. Almost always the explanations say a 'positive multiple' but that is not exactly true because there are very strange 'back-waves' - and we do not need to know about these right now. Suffice to say though, it seems obvious, and it is more or less both obvious and true, that force goes outwards, rather than somehow retreats 'backwards' in an 'obverse' motion (hence, no such thing as a negative multiple of force).

Let's not dwell on the impossibility, however, of a complete failure of symmetry in the curve - and so, in fact, although not that any modern Earth science knows it yet, there is such a thing as shadow negative harmonics.

But you're not allowed to know about it.

And then you trick her with the
carpaccio though...
'Kai kai kai kai kai.'
Don't know what that means do you?
Jen does. Wakey-wakey, Jen.
LOL ...That got you, didn't it?
Hi Tom.
Hey Rochester - I am not Tom, right??
So stop messing around with accusations
and all of that.
Depp, on the other hand, the 
story there is starting to look 'wrong'
to me... Hmn. I wonder. I just wonder now.

What you definitely are allowed to know, is that a lot of text-book material about wave dynamics and harmonic resonance is utter nonsense: for example even in the iconic case of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse, you will find widely stated, the following - 'amplitude increases because of the storage of wave energy...'

LOLOLOL

There is no such thing as 'the storage of wave energy' in a dynamic mechanical system.

They - 'sci-entists' - literally put their feet in their stupid mouths and actually give you the example of a kid pushing a swing regularly, and they claim this demonstrates that the constant regular (and with the same force, though) pushing by the kid, is the cause of the increasing amplitude of the swing (the height that it goes to increases). I mean that is just plain utter rubbish.

And I'll tell you why. You have to admit that the kid, being a human, is smart enough to follow the arc of the swing and actually exerts force as the thing is going back up again, after having reversed due to the restraining force of gravity on the in-coming swing arc.

Now either, wave forces such as those which are applied by air currents (as was the case at Tacoma), somehow 'know' when to back off, but then they apply the regular whole of the periodic unit force with 'sticky hands' (a sticky force) or something, on the way forward again, as it were. So 'force' what, possesses intelligence like the kid - plus some kind of 'stickiness?' Actually it's not just stickiness, but intelligent stickiness, because it delivers the exact unit of periodic force, somehow through an altering inertial (gravitic) curve... Or the theory is wrong.

Now of course I happen to know why amplitude 'can' increase through resonant harmonics, but this is not the place and I would need a white board to describe the bits of the tops of the force arcs - which do not operate anything like a kid pushing on a swing; they are force arcs, power curves, and when the exact point of reverse momentum occurs (moment of inertia), this does not mean no inertial force is in play then and everything pushing forward just stops all of a sudden! There is your 'missing energy.' It is not stored, it is totally used. The correct expression of what is happening is 'conservation of energy,' not 'storage' of energy.

Emerge Technology's 'Wave 1.'

And so this is totally different from the situation of 'boy with swing' because the wave energy, the literal waves, are actually inside the object once they have transferred energy - whereas the boy is always outside of the affected object.

So the 'boy and swing' is not an accurate nor an appropriate example. 'Energy' cannot be in two places at once. It's either potential, or active and already kinetic.

The whole thing is about applied period force to oscillating conditions (literally 'waves'). And waves are not materially stochastic, they are curved.

Why I mention any of this at all, is because of something very seriously important, as well as dangerous, to do with the new 'hologram' technology.

It isn't dangerous, as far as I know, because of anything intrinsic to do with the ultra-sonic waves that are used to enable and 'create' the sensations of 'touch' and physical feeling and 'topography' in the VR field your hands will be in.

The thing becomes dangerous if they ever work out, what else, you can do with harmonic frequencies and then also the so-called 'missing fraction' after every eleventh scalar multiple.

If we start getting these super mega huge corporate venture firms who promote 'new technology' because the Davos Borg elites are really behind them - well if we get them talking the same kind of nonsense that people who think you can destroy 'bad cells' such as cancer cells and so on, talk, using harmonic resonance, well then we are in big big trouble.

The actual LaGrangean Field
ET Aliens like grenetina.

And I guarantee you it won't be because they are ever going to claim to be able to 'kill cancer cells' that way - it will be because they will claim something much worse, which is that you will be able to have people become attracted to you... Got it now?

Oh but let me tell you. The temptation is far too great for them. They're already working on it... ...for you.

Because everything they do is for you, right?

If you think I'm just 'spinning yarns' you will fall off your chair in only ten days from now.

Just because a thing can work, in a certain narrowly-defined and restricted usage way, does not mean either that you should try it for wrong things, or that it can work in just any old way at all.

Gewd I know I'm wasting my breath though. SMH.

Look, anything this new that has the ability to help people, maybe even cure some things, also has devastating power to harm as well. And that's one dimension of the overall problem. And a very significant one at that though.

You wanna get to the lyrics first in this track at least before tossing it. If you're going to do that.

Conversations In English Coffee Places

To those very young people who might have lost their way on the internet, and suddenly, as if by accident, ended up here briefly, let me say that I am so sorry that you are living now in the world as it is.

Because you have never had the experience of knowing another human being on a genuine and legitimately warm human basis. Not, not your mother, not your father, not your boyfriend/girlfriend -  not anyone.

The heart of the city is dead. All of the cities.

They used to be living things.

You have been told by your school teachers, and others, that there are 'so many cultural programs' but these are all supplied to you by governments and corporate capital. 

You have been told extensively about 'urban planning and design.' 

There's no such thing.

All the professors who proclaim about it all don't know what they're talking about, and are making noises simply from vanity.

And you have never been given the tools to understand the meanings behind the songs that your parents listened to.

The common people imagine these songs, these tunes, were anthems.

Your parents died a long time ago.

Their souls died.

Not always just coffee...

They are dead.

This is now not just a cultural desert here, but it is a desert where no life exists.

Systems exist. Bacteria exists. 

Viruses exist here.

And now you know the real reason why they exist here.

These poets were all prophets of the coming darkness.

And now the darkness has come.

And now, there are only glowies...

Maybe, if you are lucky enough to find another glowie, maybe you will survive.

The cities though, will not. And neither will their denizens.

Kate Bush may have read Hermann Hess. Probably did do.

But then of the other, and much more quietly spoken-about writers that she did read, she actually comprehended what they were writing about; what they were saying.

And you, today, might not have the necessary mind tools to comprehend.

You are illiterate. Your governments and the 'society' that raised you made you that way.

'Illiterate' doesn't mean you cannot read or write, it means you do not read or write and especially, that you cannot understand what there is which is written.

And there are many people - and there will likely be one such here - who will tell you assertively and argumentatively, what to think and how to think it.

I need but have said one name in this article, and he would rush straight in and 'argue.'

LOL

And why, is that...

Come to my coffee house, children. I am not a German forest witch and you are not Hansel and Gretel - but you are lost.

If you cannot make connections to real living other human beings, then you are lost. Are you lost?

The Pentagon's Problem With 'VALIS'

Now I'm going to tell you something, and I am going to get into a lot of trouble for it. Maybe not immediately right now, because no one important is looking here - they have their hands full elsewhere.

The Pentagon, up in the higher reaches of it, they know that the VALIS probe (or probes, because there are several) that writer Philip K. Dick wrote about, really does exist.

'VALIS' stands for Vast Active Living Intelligence System.

There is a major one - the main one around here - somewhere in our Solar System.

NASA and the Pentagon are not exactly sure where it is because it is 'cloaked' but they know it is out there and it is, like it says, active.

But it is not active for them - it is active for you.

And that's the thing they don't want you to know.

It's basically the same thing that was going on with Jesus and the Sadducees. He told the Sadducees: 'Isn't it the case that you neither know the scriptures nor the power of VALIS.'

See 'VALIS' is the reason that the Satanic ideology exists at all. VALIS appears not to be manned by anyone in charge of it.

It is 'intelligent' but only because of the combined intelligences of those that are there using the place.

Which means that theoretically, 'they,' the people who know about it and want to take possession of the whole place, could take over all command up there.

But then for a long time now they have known that they are instantly thrown out of the place no sooner than they get up there to the 'outer courts.' Yet, they have regularly had success at installing 'planted subjects' up there albeit none of those could they give any commission to 'take over' because of course they want to do that themselves, not have you or some 'other' individual do it even one they appointed, as it were.

Jesus' issue with the Sadducees came about when He was giving voice to His argument against them that they claimed neither to believe in the life of the human soul after death, nor of any kind of 'oral tradition,' or 'spiritual dimension' - but only in Moses' written 'Law' and everything they wrote subsequently (IE the Tzadikim; what they wrote).

And then Jesus says a funny thing, because He refers to some unstated (in the passed down writings that we have now) 'scriptures' and the logical inference is that these are writings about Enoch, although we cannot at all say that anything that has come down to us now, in the forms of any particular 'Books of Enoch' really are those particular ones He was talking about - although for sure the main subject matter is roughly speaking the same. Which is namely, that Enoch never died and lives forever literally in his own physical bodily form, but also that there was some 'unseen' thing going on that Enoch regularly interfaced with when he was living here on the planet.

On the one hand all the modern translations say 'nor do you understand the power of God;' but I say He said 'Atzum-El-i' or in fact what you could now term, translate, to: 'VALIS.' In fact, to make matter worse for all of these 'modern' translators, the actual well-known word 'Elohim' itself is regularly qualified with the word 'Atzum.'

Sadducees totally believe in the extended life of the human soul - just not your soul. They do not want, exactly as Philip K. Dick described it, you to have 'knowledge or memory retrieval' from the VALIS. Which is why they keep the population as dumbed-down as possible.

All the high scholars of the Zohar have this view that these people are members of the 'Erev Rav' (Nefliim, Anakim, and so on) - and that they all retain precise and complete 'ancient memories' of who they are and what they are and the time when the VALIS began to prevent them from going there. So they're stuck here.

You are not actually stuck here.

But you think you are.

Now I did make a comment last time, below the main text body, about adding something to this complicated matter about gay people...

What I was going to say one has to consider with a great deal of caution, because we do not wish to be caught up in any kind of self-promoted, self-propagated silliness about poverty.

The Deity 'Love' is regarded in ancient customs as actually rather 'poor.' But this is only in the earth-bound materialistic sense. Sadducees are of course, very material rich. Mufti Menk is a Tzadikim... Oh yes, this all does not get restricted exclusively to Jewish lore! The Arabic culture, the Islamic culture fully, has a concept about 'As-Sadiqim.' And Menk is a Sadiq. 

He drives a Lamborghini.

Let's be reasonable, eh?
We don't have to have everything
always dripping in intensity!
Dripping in oil and fat - yes.
But not intensity all the time.
Goodness me.

The Deity 'Love' is not materialistic.

And so you must not confuse this with actual material poverty.

The correct phrasing and understanding is: 'He is Himself always without, possessing nothing, and in need of everything...'

Yet, this God, this Deity, is the only means by which human beings can attain Life.

And so, Jesus correctly spoke the following: 'As for the Resurrection of the Dead, you know not the scriptures, nor the power of God.'

And by which words too, once again, He repudiated the writings being attributed to 'Moses.'

By the 'Laws' of 'Moses' you are kept in darkness to this day, because as it were as of reading them with a veil over your eyes...

People often say - you hear them all the time - 'you are a soul in just a physical body.' No you're not. For neither do such people know the actual sacred scriptures nor the power of God.

Decisive Scriptures On Gays!

Waaaaaa?!

What's that doin' in here?

W-e-e-ll. This last week there was this huge controversy all over the Islamic online worldwide, about some interviews given to a Danish radio station, by two Muslims, one being the incredibly well-known Islamic Da'i Mufti Menk - about the matter of gayness; and of course, what the Islamic outlook is on it. The controversy flared up this week, but the interviews were a few years ago as far as I understand it.

'The Jacket.'
That'll take you to the stars, that one!
Harris Tweed an' all.

Mufti Menk and the other person had been placed on a Danish government 'no fly' list because they were 'supposedly' deemed 'hate preachers.' Now I am going to leave that canard to one side at the moment and simply go to the actual subject of 'gayness.'

Now what is the official scriptural position on being 'gay?'

Believe me, God is not a simpleton, and where we are going to go here is likely to give some people nosebleeds. We are going sophisticated like you have never seen before.

The only person, or people who could really give you a decisive view on this, a real actual 'teaching,' are those who were there, back then, when the scriptures were composed, and seeing as how no one has been able to uncover the whereabouts today of 'Al Khidr' (in respect to the Muslim narrative) or this famous disciple who never died (in the case of Christianity) - you're gonna get me instead.

I will give you a categorical and decisive ruling!

Now the one thing I should have you know about God, is that neither is He furtive nor dishonest. ...Unlike preachers and public intellectuals, who all are abundantly those very things. 

There are two types of 'gay' set forth in sacred scriptures:

In the first and most obvious reference, this would be the narratives surrounding Lot ('Lut' in Islam, in the Arabic) and obviously - Sodom and Gommorah.

In this sacred scriptural reference, which is shared by Islam, Judaism, and Christianity, the two angels or angelic beings, who came and appeared at sunset approaching to Lot's residence, were categorically described as 'male.' 

So we can simply draw from this statement of descriptive fact (in the narrative), that when the townsmen of Sodom wished to have sex with these two angels, they indeed intended to have male homosexual intercourse. 'Gay sex.'

Scottish mohair scarf,
women's, obviously!
Or is that 'womxn's?'
LOL
Nah, it's not womxn's; womxns have
no such taste.

See? Not being furtive here. Being pretty explicit.

Lot offers the townsmen his literally virginal daughters - again, we must readily adduce this is for the purpose of sex - in place of the two male angels. And the townsmen refuse him and physically then seek to advance into Lot's residence. Whereupon the angels strike them blind.

Two things in the matter of discerning the scriptural 'moral' then, or 'ruling,' we can take from the account: firstly, clearly this is all going to be a one-way street - the townsmen are going to force themselves on whoever they get, and they want the male angels.

Ostensibly, according to much apocryphal exegesis, we are to understand that the male angels, were extremely 'beautiful.' What that exactly means I cannot myself say. Do they mean to say they were big brutish Azov neo-Nazis, sporting tattoos and lengthy Viking beards? And thus 'attractive' to gay males? Or that they were effeminate - aka like females and then 'beautiful' in that sense?

So the second thing then, that we can most certainly adduce, is that there was some basis of attraction -  but we cannot see right away if the townsmen of Sodom were 1. sexually attracted to big strong ugly men, or if they 2. were seeking to have intense sexual gratification from exercising power (in other words 'power centric') via literal physical rape, or yet again 3. whether it might simply have been a matter of seeking the sexual category-specific (unique, in that sense?) sexual gratification from the raping of effeminate males (which is, I suppose a dual purpose thing: power plus specific sex)...

Seeing that we are now speaking on behalf of God though (which is what I am doing, because I am saying what the sacred scriptures do say), what we must do, is organize a hypothetical meeting, a court, as it were, consisting of men and women, and gay men (we are not here and now dealing with female homosexuality; Plato does that somewhere...), and put our charges to each of them so that they may make out their case fully and openly with nothing left hidden 'behind their backs.'

At this juncture we also must introduce something of a scriptural future anachronism ( a kind of a 'prochronism'), which is namely that of the situation of the gay male person in the New Testament. Timothy is gay, he betrays his bias and prejudices against women at every turn, and even Paul warns about his 'nature,' but then he, Paul, tells others 'not to despise him.'

Again, it is not necessarily so crystal clear and cut-and-dried that Paul is talking about Timothy's gayness, but it has always been standard scholarly exegesis that this is indeed the case.

Gay people have afternoon tea like this,
don't they?
Do they...?
I dunno. Wish I knew some 'any' people
who served me tea like this!!

'Quranists' would understand it when I now point out that Timothy was not a disciple, but an apostle. This means (in the same way that Islamic scholars distinguish between 'hassan' hadith and weak ones) that Timothy was just given a message to send or deliver to someone, not that he had large-scale teaching foundations himself.

Timothy was meant to have 'posted a message' and parallel to which though, he slings off at women too!

LOL

Anyway the point is, Timothy was not 'destroyed' by God, whereas the cities of Sodom and Gommorah were.

The Danish radio station Radio24syv (closed down now) posed the question to Mufti Menk: 'Is it okay to be gay?' And he said 'yes.' And everyone is up in arms about what he said, since this is in fact not Islamic teaching at all.

The Bible shows us that Timothy was existentially gay. Not that he was becoming gay, or deciding whether or not he was, or might have been, or should 'be' gay - he actually was gay.  

So now that makes things easier for me to outline which two things the sacred scriptures depict about 'gayness:'

They depict existential gayness, and political gayness.

What is that??

'Political gayness' is what the townsmen of Sodom were all about - they were having a deliberate stance to not only 1. impose by force a sexual act upon another, and 2. because of the declining of the offer to have sex with Lot's virgin daughters, we have a sociopolitical stance imposed upon local society about how to order the hierarchy of what is 'good.' And it is this latter that we have to investigate further now.

...So now back to our court of men and women and gay males.

Nothing to see here,
no 'gay people;' 
just people people.
You know them?
What are they like?
Tell me.

The question has to be put, to the gay males, and they have to give their answer before the women present - 

Do you hold that sexual gratification from males, reaches higher intensities of sensation and pleasure for you than anything you can get from sex with women...

I want an answer to that question before I ask the women whether I should destroy you.

Now this is not something you ever heard from Mufti Menk, and neither have you heard it from those who decry him. In fact, you never heard it at all before you heard it from me just now.

You certainly may have 'felt it' somewhere in some dark and mysterious alcove of your own mind.

Taken to an extreme, yet the logical one, and again, the prochronistic one, which is that at some time in the future, human scientists could manufacture entirely synthetic, living android beings made by abiogenesis -, actual humanoid beings, and then, sexual reproduction would not be necessary, and in all events, raising children need not involve any human beings whatsoever; it could all be done by 'AI.' Whose 'AI' exactly we don't know. Doesn't matter. It will certainly not be a benign form of AI.

Because right off the bat it has a deeply suspect political slant: it tells you, right up front, we have a way of determining what 'good, better, best' is and that is 1. whatever we say anyway f* you, and 2. possibly, it is ordered by the highest return of sensation without referencing external feedback or respecting the sensations of others - it is the lion killing and eating everything, not just the lamb. The 'best,' is the most for me. 

Except it is not going to be for you, it will be for them, and that 'them' is some people you have never even seen nor been told about exist behind the scenes pulling strings, giving air and money to the Mufti Menks of the world, driving every public political agenda.

Every single one of them.

Serge Lutens is gay.
This must be his idea 
of Lucifer's board room, then.

There are existential gays; the Bible says so.

And there are gay men who hate women, and show their biases and their extreme prejudices and God never 'destroyed' them at all. And yes, that is entitled to make women extremely p*'d off and that's okay too. It doesn't make the way that such gay males behave 'right.' Timothy is not 'right.'

What makes it acceptable however, that you or I or anyone, can arbitrate that 'good' consists purely of self-involved gain?

The only reason there is to have some kind of lab-made 'people' who never die, and alongside that to have 'education of children' by AI or political systems formulated from the template of hierarchic self-involved apex predator gain (and this is not 'altruism') - is because there is some 'I' somewhere who needs and wants you to behave! This is predatorial.

Well you have to decide right now, if or whether you can ever be a social species at all.

Oh but they are so clever and cunning, those forces and that intelligence behind the sloganism and the propaganda of 'inclusivity.'

They are not including anyone.

You think you are being included - you are being discounted.

A social species insists that all people (and there are many women who are unable to bear children) participate looking after the society and the species.

That does not mean, gay male couples 'can' raise kids because it's 'their right.' It means gay males WILL raise kids WITH all others participating, and not anyone being excluded! What obliges so-called 'gay' people to be anti-social - against heterosexual women, for instance? The modern politics of political gayness is highly and grossly anti-social in that way. Why is that? All the actual real gay people I know are not like that. The political gayness agenda is not an actual reflection of any gay people that I know. It's a surreptitiously twisted 'reflection' if it is a reflection at all. It is playing on the sensitivity about exclusion. And it is doing that for malicious political reasons that are not favorable to gay people at all. But it can succeed in seducing susceptible minds.

So let's re-run Sodom.

Two beautiful, slightly effeminate angelic beings descend one evening, just as the sun is setting, so that their craft is easily seen coming down against the darkening horizon background.

Lot knows who they are. He drags them into his house. 

Angels to Lot: 'We are going
out into the town, spend the whole
night out there... ...in the town.'
Lot: 'Waaaa?! Are you mad??'
Angels: 'Na-r. We're not. We have
Walther PPK, old school style.'

Townsmen roll up and bang on his door and say 'Hey, Lot, you are just a sojourner here. This is our town. How come these amazing people come and stay with you and don't visit with us?'

Lot: 'Because you're a bunch of evil f*ing bastards and you are going to do some bad things to these guys, who do not look to me like they can even protect themselves at all!'

Townsmen: 'Aaargh no no. You have us all wrong. Yeah we look rough and all that, and um, yes, sometimes there's some of us who have gay sex with males. But we are also really good chefs and hey, trust us, Lot, darn it. Besides we saw their clothes and there are some gay designers here who want to ask them some questions about those...'

Lot, thinks to himself - hmn yeah sounds pretty convincing, but still... Lot to the angels: 'Listen guys, they want you to go talk to them but I think I should come along so that you fellas don't get um, well, you know.'

The angels (look how I am placing words into their mouths! Fancy doing such a thing!): 'Don't worry, Lot, buddy. You come along but we can take care of ourselves, and decide for ourselves what we might want to do.'

(And by the way, that is exactly, what the angels did say to Lot according to the Bible account, except knowing that these particular townsmen were not the ones like I just described in the last few paras above, they told Lot they would stay all night in the town, but that he must not).

Well is that gay enough for yer?

Because that is not what is going on anywhere in the 'LGBTQ+++' world though, is it?

What is going on is, 'we are going to tell you how to think and what to think.'

And why is that? Have they become 'God' now all of a sudden?

Because someone sure as hell is behind the scenes here deciding he is definitely 'God.' And it ain't you Mr Actually-gay-man. 

This is a very sophisticated game being played here.

It's not a sex game, it's a political power game that is using sex among many other doorways into your brain.

The question is not 'is it okay to be gay?'

Angels to Lot: 'And we have Brioni jacket
with silk lining.'
Lot: 'A bit gay isn't it?'
Angels: 'But Bond had one.'
Lot: 'Bond? Who's Bond?'

The question is 'what are they stealing from you and have gotten away with stealing now since for a very long time and where has it ended you up being.'

When 'they,' those guys at Imperial College London make a living conscious android, and they make it 'beautiful' - what will that actually mean? Do you think you know what they mean by 'beautiful?' Is it going to look 'gay' beautiful, or effeminate beautiful, or female, or plastic-injected like the faces of Hollywood 'females' today? What?

You answer that question and you can get to come into the court where we are deciding right now who to destroy down here on this planet... Oh yes.

...And discuss whether or not it 'is okay to be gay.'

Mufti Menk is a frikkin' damn ugly bastard. I am not going to get on some space ship to go to Jannat ul Firdaus with Mufti Menk!

Or the Pope.

Why are you taking payment in substituted coins all the time?

Since when ever did God play games? (It takes a lot of work to be able to move like in this vid. But anyway - let's see what Guru Josh thinks):