Find Yourself, Not LOSE YS

[Sub-title: Yay, I have finally finished the 'rush job' and soon it will be available to read somewhere]

Rumi writes something, and then other people extract an idea from that something and mess it up!

There is a standard basic concept in Sufi Islam known as the Fana Doctrine - which means that an initiated person goes through a mystical process in which they 'lose themselves.'

And then, having 'lost themselves,' of course it becomes very easy for them to don an explosively-colored orange vest - just like the Donald - and proceed to blow themselves up.

This is exactly not, what the poet Rumi was talking about.

Jannah....

But it is exactly what the stupid public and all of their 'intellectual leaders' draw from a handful of strategic words composed by a poet; and they do it all the time.

You can initiate the engine in a fast car, but unless your sensible brain is ultimately the principal in the driver's seat, the things that happen next can be problematical.

You should be able to read between the lines of that 'short thing available soon,' why - exactly why - it is not so easily made possible for either those who have made real genuine authentic 'contact' or for those being initiated in the process, to openly disclose anything.

At the same time though, it is very fair for all of us to just ask the simple question, 'Hey come on, just why not make it all a bit easier??'

See but, we also need to start confronting a very startling fact before it can get easier - and I don't wish to be viewed as beating up on Muslims and Islam particularly, but that arena provides an obvious and widely-known case study from which anyone should be able to extract the necessary learning.

Let's say, I 'lost myself,' donned an explosive vest, and killed a bunch of people as well as myself, and Lo! ...and Behold! Next thing I am in a huge palace which seems to be being handed to me, in which there are 72 virgins.

...And 72 virgins, and -,
their 72 Hermes handbags.

Yes. I get to where I had been told that I would get, so long as I slaughtered a bunch of other people and die in the way of 'fighting for God' (because God needs someone to fight for Him because He is not powerful enough to do it on His own or in any other way...)

The point is though - I got to 'heaven.' I got to some amazing, perfect place - which I could also roughly equate as an experience, with having won a few million dollars in a lottery too though. The feelings I expect to have would be more or less, roughly speaking, the same(-ish)

So you and I, because we have found a process path to get in touch with super-advanced Alien intelligences, alter the kinds of 'requests' we address to the Above & the Beyond, so that it goes something like this: 'Okay please just let me win the million dollars, and then you can start to have my brain get up-to-speed. No problem. I'll change, you'll see. I'll look at the possible issues.'

If a guy has a major mental problem before he gets to the Gates of Heaven, when is it that he resolves those mental issues?

If 5 billion or more, human beings all literally have major mental problems...

You have to confront a stark reality, which is namely, the possibility that human society has a significant mental problem and that all or most of its members are dysfunctional in a way that precludes them from ever being allowed access to power that could cause mass-scale destruction.

Guns and knives can eliminate a few people, nuclear weapons can destroy the whole planet.

What you don't know yet, and what Dr Ammon Hillman has not as yet fully realized, because he is focused on the materiality drug aspect of ancient mystical cults - is the political, and the ethics equation in being able to overpower someone else's mind at a distance and without words or threats or material contact.

Contained in the new text available soon, is a reference to a political incident known in history books as the Nika Sedition of 532 AD.

Only one car though.

Hillman has spoken about it but he never gets the key salient point about it.

The story is not about someone's personal bravery -; stupid people are brave, or they can be.

A guy blowing himself up with an explosive vest is still a brave person, he's just also, a very stupid person. He's stupid because the calculation he's made about the guarantee of something, is factually and evidentially baseless. And any experience he's had while under drugs and chanting prayers and nostrums and so on is one of a dissociative sedative nature and therefore not a 'spiritual experience' at all.

A spiritual experience can only truly be said to have happened, if in the first place you know what 'spirit/spiritual' is! And even psychologists argue about that and scientists don't think there even is such a thing.

He's also crazy because he cannot be trusted in a society of other people who disagree with his views - he does not trust his own ability to convince people by reason. And that is because his own grasp of material reality is unsound and unreliable. He's hoping his blind faith and groundless belief will take him over the bridge of factually shifting sands. His community, though, whose company he is psychologically addicted to, supports his ideas. So he's acting out of social addiction...

He's stupid because not even the Koran says anywhere such a thing as this: 'I, Allah know that you are crazy, but, doesn't matter, because after you have become a suicide bomber, you will get into heaven and there I will instantly cure you of your madness.' 

You can be a crazy person in heaven. Hypothetically...

You can be quite crazy and live here on Earth as a super-rich individual.

Getting on with other people by shared experiences and empathy, is the definition of 'not crazy.'

The lobster pancake is only for me.
It's not for the 72 virgins.

Getting on more avidly with those people whose shared experiences are as rich as yours, and as similar as your own - is the definition of exercised or that is manifested spiritual wealth.

And it is at this point, that science fell into an abyss out from which it never returned. And it never will return. Confirmed factual knowledge is just an artifact of base mind; it's not a moral code.

The 532 AD incident is not about someone's bravery - it's about other people's justified fear, and the key person's known and acknowledged personal power.

You can get, you will get that exact same personal power.

It's power that gets you money. Money just is another name for some theoretical, hypothetical Jannah.

But you cannot underplay the moral dimension under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHATSOEVER. This is absolutely key. 

Meanwhile, Aruna: