It's Never Over Till, Right?

Nothing is really ever over till it's over for keeps.

The money has to all come in and stay in one spot long enough for you to count it, right?

LOL

However, on account of a few things over here going, um, 'okay,' then what I wanted to do is say something as succinct and clear as possible - side-stepping all of the too-deep and complicated stuff of the 'how' - and suggest ways in which it is possible to detect when one 'field' moves into the standard experienced field, thereby changing all.

Okay but where is it 
going to take me!

The problem is I didn't want to preempt something being edited now that will go into another one of those Amazon-Kindle things - and this one in part slightly touches on this matter of how the US intel people are suggesting that UAV's (some of the most interesting ones) are China-originating high tech drones.

Well sure, some are that.

And those ones are pretty obvious. ...What the Congressional Sub-Committee is alluding to however are those videos of unusual flying objects clearly under some kind of control, in Chinese territory near the ranges separating China and Pakistan. Well they have absolutely no means of knowing anything, outside of examining the videos, and going back into the satellite geospatial image capture archives of the relevant areas, and speculating about what they are seeing in the videos.

None of the videos of the controlled flight UAV's that are being called 'UFO's' on-line on various YouTube Channels are China drones.

The China unmanned stealth drone is just this thing here - it's not any kind of secret and it flies, it doesn't rocket off into space at right-angles to original flight path!

And it cannot go into and out of active erupting volcanoes.

Anyway, never mind all of that.

China unmanned stealth drone.

The point of why one might want to know how and when to detect the operating of an interdicting field, is that it is an obvious feature of when major positive changes are occurring to you in any given circumstances.

You see, the thing is, even if Jesus suddenly walked into your living room and snapped His Godly fingers, still outside of your own four walls, it will be evident that things are changing, yes -, but not - that they suddenly all changed on the spot; some might have -, people will certainly not have at all!

Don't forget, the smaller the fish, the 
less build-up of toxic metals and
chemicals...

It is people themselves who generate, but more often are conduits for, be that witting or unwitting but definitely complicit - the highly negative fields that are all around the place in the modern world today.

I am not going to preempt what is in the new thing, but what I will say is that even if you cannot immediately have some dramatic and obvious interaction with 'something' then at the same time it is super easy and massively important to know how to perceive changes in the obtaining field around you.

The more and more mechanistic we think things are, in fact, the further away we get from being able to cut through the negative processes and mechanisms.

Adrenaline is a mechanism - it results in three different things happening: behavior changes, emotion sensations (hormonal effects), and autonomic responses.

Okay of course things are mechanistic - that's obvious. But what I mean is that underlying the mechanisms are the actual reasons and 'causes' although in fact they are not linear causes at all.

They are states of actual being.

The whole currency of modern popular 'sci-ence' is mechanistic only and they want to get to the spot there they can say that the ultimate power that can be recruited by the intellect - or intelligent, active, thinking brain (or someone/some-thing's brain) - to alter a field, is the neutrino half spin fermion information system and/or, or also, the Boson spin fermion.

And this is correct - except it is also complete rubbish because once again, it is avoiding the obvious 'elephant in the room.'

KP's tendency to default to science mechanisms to establish the functioning basis for agency (means to have power over something), is still correct when he says that 'is it that maybe there is a combination of the physical processes and some other internal aspect...'  Except that this is exactly where the 'sci-entists' want to take it anyway: they wish to say, to tell you outright 'Ooh look, here is that other thing that once you combine it with your physical process mechanisms, things start to happen.'

Bill...?
Yes?

Yes obviously there must be the cooperation or compliance of physical systems in order for them to manifest change in themselves. That's a given.

But what very very very malevolent characters want to have it be, is that aggregation of something elementary in physics (such as fermion particles, for instance) literally actually causes something to change in the material Cosmos. So this would be like if we were able to concentrate the distinct area of (1/2) spin change (and coherently) in a circulating stream of neutrinos in the CERN tunnel at a 'spot' - then this would maybe initiate material physical changes somewhere, not sure where they expect. Possibly they will be looking 'at the perpendicular angle' in some measurement of angular momentum measured as a force somewhere in the tunnel.

My friends, listen to me. They are wrong. You sitting down somewhere and drinking a cup of coffee has more chance of initiating material change effects than anything those guys are doing in CERN...

Except not for reasons that maybe you know about just yet.

However - clues: it's all there in Ephesians in the NT; the most outright clear-cut endorsement of Jungian psychology that you will ever read anywhere. Thousands of years before Jung intuited it all. Or at least enough of it that he wrote books about it and became famous, and infamous at the same time. Jung has strong opposition.