But Bill SUCCEEDS

I'm sure all of you at some point have asked yourself the question: 'Why are ET Aliens so reticent at coming forward out into the open, as it were?'

Well I'll give you another question...

Has US Navy - or anyone, for that matter - carried out an in-depth post-event analysis of the white Tic Tac episode?

Old School fashion can get themselves
organised and orderly...

Because I will give you a 100% iron-clad guarantee that the commanders in charge of that small exercise group - the USS Nimitz Strike Group off San Diego firstly in 2004 - were using a very particular set command 'philosophy' involving principles of 'threat investigation,' 'threat evaluation,' and 'threat analysis leading to justified command-structure decisionable action.'

And you are going to like this Bill Smith, because it was in fact a US Naval Academy graduate of 1952, William B. Smith Jr (Bill Smith) who developed the 'six sigma' design strategy and 'process of improvement' tool; which is basically the one being used by the commanders of the USS Nimitz Strike Group.

Am I correct, FBI?

No visits from you yet?

LOL

If we just go, unguided, into the Steven M. Greer whole thing of adopting some kind of 'inward moral imperative' then we might, by accident, establish a basic contact protocol. But it won't be the right one, not really.

Yes for sure there is one, but it is highly complex, a little bit nuanced, very advanced intellectually, and frankly, in keeping with what you might expect assuming the 'other side' really are peopled by vastly superior intelligent beings (people!).

We're talking about a sophisticated thing here.

It might be 'six sigma' across more than one separate factor, or aspect of the encounter.

I'm having to even go into this on account that soon we will be walking with our eyes open here, into some pretty weird stuff...

And I do not want it to be the case that people leap to the unfortunate and very incorrect assumption that we can all just go 'take drugs' and 'see things' (that are probably not there) - just because it is the case that secret compartmentalized projects using the funding of, if not directly with the management of, CIA, involved human subjects using drugs and then going up into the higher atmosphere and 'trying to contact' things out there!

Yeah they did!

And by and by, sooner or later, I am going to give you the 'chemical substances' listings.

Oh yes.

Is salt a 'coupling medium' for transverse
sound waves?
Anyway, what is the good of salt, if it loses its
savor? ; ) The answer is, as Jesus says:
'It is only good for throwing out.'

Yep.

Sure will.

Might have to 'subtly disguise it,' though. Not that anyone reading consistently here for a while already won't be able to work it out.

You see the thing is, the human social conditioning over many centuries now, has installed this 'processing code' between consciousness and 'assessment leading to justifiable actions.'

It's the 'justifiable action' that is the problem. Human beings fancy they know what that even is, and they have absolutely no - zero - idea at all.

They are 'justifying' things on account of 'rational thinking processes.'

This is like those modern 'theologists' trying to say that 'prayer has a positive impact on the efficacy of medicines used...'

Well, no, it hasn't. You see, there is no word 'prayer' either in the Sanskrit Vedas or in the Bible.

What?!

There is 'prarthana' (practical ritual actions), and there is another word in the Bible source language - but 'prayer' (ask by entreaty; which means by humble request), does not exist in the source texts as an actual thing to really do if you want to get anywhere.

The Mahabharata makes it very clear and specific that prayer is in fact more or less, useless; Krishna tells Arjuna exactly what to do, and it is not to 'pray.'

It is too unsafe to rely on the vagaries of the normally quite wandering human mind, when there are potentially very dangerous outcomes at stake.

This is nonsense - this thing about trying to research rationally whether prayer has a positive impact on efficacy.

'Rationally' - means by degree, in ratio/s. Efficacy means degrees of obtained desired outcomes.

And that is not what a vastly superior intelligent species is involved in doing - not when they are about something serious, at least.

If you want to be forever treated like children, well then fine - 'someone' will just go do a fly-over somewhere again.

And what would the 'message' be? Anything? Or just meaninglessness - another 'weird event' thing, filmed by the virtual equivalent of monkeys with iPhone cameras.

Invoking a totally supremely powerful being, for the express purpose of actually getting something done - always works. It is not a matter of anything 'by degrees.'

Does the Bible say anywhere, 'Oh, sorry King David, you're just going to have to put up with this result over the Philistines... ...by degrees?'

Does it say the old guy came to Jesus and said: 'I'm sure your miraculous touch can help my son by degrees... ...He's dying or even dead by now, since I've had to walk a long way to get to you, but you know, it'll be at least a bit better if you helped by degrees.'

LOL

It's beautiful but it's fake.
There is no such place,
no such scene, anymore.

Make no mistake. If I ever said here the human race is being threatened with complete extinction - is that something that is going to be concluded by degrees?

Oh, sorry Moses, just go into the water anyway, it will part for you, sometimes, though not all the time, because hey, you know, efficacy by degrees.

Where the damn hell are people's minds at? There are these other people, these 'visitors' who can get here from sixteen trillion miles away, and the US Congress has a directive in operation to 'think about it' at least, and maybe even to investigate it - but where is the post-event analysis? 

Where is that at?

Is there even one a-foot?

...And now you start to see just exactly how backward the human race has fallen since Alcibiades took his navy out to sea for the politically corrupt Athenians.

This is what corruption gets you, see.

Alcibiades would not have fallen for this.

So y'all want to see the flying things again.

Well. Have you repeated what you did the first time? Ah, but you don't even know what you did the first time, isn't that so?

'You.' And that does not mean 'you,' though does it. Because you, are going to go 'six sigma' and do the right thing.

I did not just state a problem - as everyone does these days (because after all, there are so many problems) - but I gave you a solution. It's up to you to follow it.

You know, I might as well add this: there is this retired US general, who said something really silly in the media just this week... And if I said any more than that, I think I really would get a knock on the door! Just lettin' ya know though. If you can read between the lines here.