'666' Problem...

Hey if it gets out too far - out into the wider consciousness - that there are people employing tactics from 'space people...' ...that are also known as 'six sigma' tactics - well, we're going to get attacked by the 'Number Of The Beast' crowd.

Just go take a look on-line at the 'six sigma' logo! LOL

It is a problem - even for me and I'm pretty open-minded. For one thing, I went through the whole matter of saying 'Oh well sigma is not the sixth letter of the Greek alphabet so no problem, right?' Wrong. It's even worse - sigma is the eighteenth letter and that means two nines and two nines upside down are the other two 'sixes.' ROTFLMAO.

Ah well, it is what it is. Guess we're stuck with it then.

Six sigma, basic approach chart.

Actually, that is not the real problem. The real problem is when, a long way down the road from here, a bunch of other people take up the core ideas at hand and mess around with them - as they always do anyway with any good ideas, even some bad ideas too - and then you really will have a Satanic, demonic stack of nonsense and trouble. Because it will come in the wrapping of something good and actually be something not good.

So what's weird about where we're going with this?

Here: 'Six Sigma, and the available concepts of God and Man.'

God is this thing which (or who) has absolute foreknowledge of everything (by standard widely-accepted definition) but that does not uptake His capacity to determine absolutely everything.

Pre-destination is the idea that God determined everything for you (and, that is not the Western Christian belief, but it is the Islamic one).

Man - humanity - is this thing that neither has foreknowledge of virtually anything for certain, nor is able to determine its own totally positive beneficial future in any guaranteed way.

This is in fact however, not fully the picture though, is it: Man has access to the 'theoretically/hypothetical' perfect foreknowledge of God (if you go by any religious tradition at all), and certainly does have the power and the capacity of shaping his future to some extent.

I will go a lot further than that too, here...

But first.

Cedar tree. Is.
Is so!

The first we see in history, of what is presumed in contemporary literature to be this famous/infamous 'Tree of Life,' is in the ancient Sumer stone depictions of something that does look very much like it. And that would place the idea at least as far back as six thousand years ago from now - well before the Book of Genesis was composed in whatever form that people say it (Book of Genesis) was (composed).

However I think people are just assuming what the visual imagery stands for. There is no Sumerian text which explains what these early images are, or what they are meant to mean - and where there is Sumerian writing, references to a 'tree of life' explicitly say 'the cedar tree' and/or 'cedar forest.'

Anyway the point I'm trying to get to, is the main problem with the human race, with Man, is an intellectual systems problem, not a material problem. In fact it is definitely not simply a process problem to do with material things. It totally commands over all material things though, and we'll get to that.

We are stuck with the strictly material systems process bias because of the Romans.

Julius Caesar was a philosopher, his writings reflect that, and he left copious writings, although people note that those were dictated by or attributed to Julius Caesar. But around him, there are no Roman philosophers at all - only political writers and engineers; not even mathematicians. Diophantus comes a reasonably long time after Julius Caesar and classical scholars accuse him of never having wanted to establish general principles, but only consider each new problem as completely separate, only able to be 'solved' uniquely!

Cicero was not a philosopher - he was a politician.

Marcus Aurelius comes a very long time after the death of Julius Caesar. He was a philosopher.

Hi Gyps. (My cat, Gypsy).

And we have inherited the whole Roman thing entirely (although sadly, not so much Marcus Aurelius, in his philosophical hat). We build roads and bridges, buildings and machinery. We have no concept of securing actual happiness - like the Romans, we either take drugs or commit suicide if we are not happy.

And that is what broader society is doing right now. 

The 'human condition' problem is two-fold: firstly, humans all die (as an important generality), and they all want to 'solve' their immediate material state 'situation' because they generally-speaking all acknowledge that they cannot solve the 'Tree of Eternal Life' situation.

And so, they kink the process path over to the material side, and exactly away from the one which can actually help them fundamentally.

Yet 'six sigma' is an intellectual process path. It is not a material system like engineering itself is. It presumes the material inputs, but it has an intellectual, non-material objective.

And, six sigma will prevail, when all other systems will fail because all other systems suffer from ultimate attrition (terminality).

Six sigma is about continuous improvement - and, where focused on the non-material, the intellectual, systems and process path, it will attain the perfect functional result...

'Continuous,' of course, can only really be true, that is, be a true thing, where there is absolute continuance - guaranteed continuity of the life of the operator, the agent in question.

Now since we 'know' that humans are guaranteed to die however, how can we then say that such a thing, even if it is operating in the intellectual space, and not restricted to the material space, is guaranteed to survive?  And I mean by that -, the conscious personal ego is the agent and operator, and it is therefore being 'guaranteed' to survive.

How?

Well you won't be very familiar with how, because you have inherited the Roman system.

O-o-kay, so let me give you this different paradigm then: you are the Delphic Oracle, and you are seated on your tripod, and you see something about the future.

And everything you say based on what you saw turns out to be true in every case and after a while all the rulers and leaders come to you to get an insight into the future.

See the Romans set about to destroy the Oracles. They were, unlike the Babylonians under Nimrod, not just willing to go against the gods, they were intent on establishing absolute atheism - and we have that today as a legacy system of thinking. 'Science' is Roman engineering - it is not mathematics or philosophy at all, despite that they all want to grab that mantle, or those cloaks at least, and associate them to science.

Ancient Sumerian goddess with handbag.
All ancient Sumerian gods were depicted
this way. : ))

See even the very word itself -  a Roman word - (IE science) to 'know,' is a way of thumbing your nose at God, who is the only one who does actually know for real. So that though, still, is if you go by the religious template/the religious narrative. Let's admit that to the skeptics.

The presumptuous claim of science, is that, once all of its fact bases are established, then it can know, the future. And it cannot. That is not even logically true or a possibility, because there is nothing that goes faster than the speed of light, and nothing which can travel into the future and this way and that across time. So really, you cannot say that there suddenly isn't out of thin air, some 'nuther 'small bang' at some moment in the future, which introduces completely new 'facts' which alter whatever facts you were previously using to 'guarantee' that you could predict the future. After all, the Big Bang, happened that way out of thin air, didn't it, in the past... And then Evolution -, until ultimately Fauci, and he killed everyone on the planet including himself. But not to worry, because science 2.0, right? And Big Bang 2.0 and more Evolution and then the whole thing just cycles out of nothing again and again and again; if necessary. Because it does. Right?

Not.

...So you have a choice, to accept and adopt the scientific paradigm and its agenda, or you can look for another one, which has a wider scope.

But if you looked for another one, would you or need you not, still use 'six sigma' or something like it, to continuously improve your intellectual, non-material systems path?

A systems approach to the 'problem of Man' is the one that can get you the results you want.

And those results must necessarily include all of your material wishes too anyway, as a simple by-product of your ability to prevail against all other operators in competition.

Things 'cycle' out of general principles which exist outside of (all) material things. The real existence of general principles is physically connected, to material things - and that is something no one is prepared to accept or to acknowledge (on the whole) and mostly this is because they cannot 'see' it so.

A thing is invisible, and not itself formally part of the material Universe, so how can it be literally physically asserting influence and effects on materiality? Well because it's a different kind of 'material substance.' That's all.

So what are we going to do here?

'Blue spice eyes.'

We're going to have you 'see' the unseeable.

And then, you're going to reach out, and touch the Tree of Life, and take from it, and live forever.

Huh??

Well why not?

Do not ever make the mistake that Christianity is this benign, soft, non-violent, anti-violence thing. People all think it is that.

The Book of Peter - one of them I forget which one of them - says this very explicitly, referring to the Sumerian ancient histories: 'For this they are willingly ignorant of...' And then he proceeds to tell you about how Utnapishtim (he who lives forever and built an Ark and rescued people and animals and plants and trees and stuff) went through the total destruction of the whole world and the then human race. And then he says 'this is going to happen again.'

Well that doesn't seem all that nice and happy happy, p*-weak, let's all forgive everyone and 'be toxic positive' and get crucified and don't worry about it, because 'love and forgiveness,' right?

Willingly ignorant - means they are choosing to blind themselves about some concerning matter.

Well, of course, there are plenty of folk who will say, 'But hey Calvin, you cannot show us anything, and you certainly cannot give us access to the Tree of Life for real.'

Oh can I not?

Many times out of eighteen segments you will miss it.

But when you start to always get to within three standard deviations on either side of 'perfect result,' then what then?

I have a drug substance here.

It comes from space, far far way.

It's like 'spice...'

We'll take ten people, and give them 'agency.'

And then they can make a million bucks each, more if they want.

Why on earth not, seriously?

Or I can make it myself and just mail out checks to ten people for fun. 

Now the interesting thing to me is, the Book of Genesis is a flawed story. It should have had one version (of the same story, basically) where Satan gave out the Apple, (spice, spiced apple then, if you like...) giving Eve and Adam personal agency -, and then, a second version in which he just mails out checks and they didn't have agency. Oh wait, oh there are those two sections just like that in there... Now which one is the one where Cain killed Abel though? I forget.

We want ten 'agents.' (Means people with agency). LOL

Right now we have five who are more or less working the program.

And each of you are going to make a million bucks (you know what I mean; a lot of cash), and then you have to report back to here so - oh no but, Jesus! But then we're all in big trouble because then everyone else on the planet will want to troll or 'have a piece of the action' or just get checks or criticize and say that ten people lied and so on. You know what it's like.

And if the world has not moved forward from 'and Cain killed Abel' then for sure you're going to get plenty of lunatics who will want to test that - did they reach out their hands and take from the Tree of Life? 'Cuz hey, let's kill them to find out; legitimate experimental research, right?

You people think I'm kidding, right?

Let's see who's got any guts?

You want to see ET?

LOL 

Easy as.

Sorry Lue. It's easy as. Six sigma. Systems approach. And it is time.