Flawless...

Humans have a slim and problematic, but nevertheless possible, chance of being polished.

Within the full set of 'human being' exists the subset of individuals who are of the female gender.

Here is where the problems increase by large factors.

The structure of the human female brain is categorically different from that of the male's.

Current fantasy ideas about the rise of 'AI' all avoid the question of consciousness which is different to awareness: 'aware' is simply a term used to describe quick reflexivity to data inputs combined with extensive salience nodes connectivity. This is not consciousness and it can never be consciousness.

The truth about women...

Consciousness is about knowing. The masses are engaged in the widespread fabricated version of knowing - which is called belief and is forced upon them by the leaders.

To know means that there is also some subject of the knowing - the 'I;' or the ego whichever you like.

To be aware does not necessitate that there is a specific sovereign subject of the awareness, only that there is reasoned reflexivity of stimulus. It can be transferred across a number of discrete machines.

To know means he knows, or she knows.

'They' know means the matter is societal and instantly involves group modifications being entailed. 'Hive mind' is totally a different type of thing - here, the hive has the exact same understanding.

Thus, he can know, she can know and hive can know. They only believe they know unless they actually share one single consciousness which they normally do not.

'Societal' is a word which has only a tenuous English language position; it is either accepted as a new word, or by some grammarians (and they are wrong) it is not accepted at all.

But societal is the word I need to use here, because when I start to talk about the female standpoint on a certain thing we are right now discussing, it is the only word that works in the context that I require to employ.

If I were to ask a bunch of people whether they knew they were American or French or Italian or whatever, most of them would give a logically inaccurate and incomplete answer:

People merely believe that they are any particular nationality and in many instances their DNA will show nothing that can even vaguely be claimed as difference.

What contemporary society does not
want for women.
But you should have this.

In other words they are trained by society to think that they are French or Italian or such-and-such even though they were born two miles apart from each other. This example is one given by Mauro Biglino, not by me.

Women, overall, from everywhere in the world, believe that of the two sexes, they know more about feelings and emotions than men. This is so widely off-the-mark that it isn't funny.

The reason they have no clue is that they are permanently trafficking, not in emotions or in feelings - but in power.

And this is all societally-trained stuff.

The reason is because of the material consequences for them, of going too deep down into emotions and feelings. Society does not support any of those inevitable consequences, although by far females' brains and neural systems have the better potential to access emotion and feeling when compared to males.

And so whilst women have awareness that they have better emotional access and capability, they are caught permanently trafficking, not in emotions and feelings - but in power.

They deal in power - or they try to do that - with men and other women who have no insight or who are also for their own part encouraging what is going on in order to exploit something about it. Banks and politicians do that, for instance...  

Notwithstanding this is a generalization which applies to most but not to all, everything they (women) do with regards to emotions and feelings is only on the surface.

But that is because if they were to go even very slightly below the surface, then the consequences are dramatic.

And they are dangerous.

'Trafficking' means to deal in something that is illegal.

And that is what are doing, although, again, one would have to say this is a societal trained thing and not a natural characteristic of women.

In fact it is not by a long shot, a natural characteristic!

One big problem is that if we looked at the core natural advantages of the human female brain structure, and started to use these as they are capable of being used -, rather than the female individual then by that means 'graduating' to a supernaturally powerful mindset immediately, they would be pulled back down to Earth and to the seeming multiplicity of opportunities that already exist here.

Now mind you, that in itself would not be a bad thing were those opportunities without significant negative consequences or side-effects -, but in fact they are riddled with problems - all of which are caused by the state of the affairs of Mankind for thousands of years.

For this reason in history voluptuaries are seldom women.

The brown pine needles...
It's all about the dying things.
But are they really dying?

In our contemporary times, women cannot afford to go too deep down into their natural realms of the emotions and into real feelings...

And that is why most of them are unnatural. Society reflects this unnatural condition mostly, of women. Movies do it, fashion does it, whole economies do it. And women themselves behave like this.

For such a long time now, women have had their guard up, against the realm of these natural emotions, that in fact they have lost their ability to handle it - to handle any of it.

Human science today has no understanding of what external things directly and intentionally (I say intentionally, meaning 'are explicitly intended to') go into the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway, and affect the subsequent outcomes driven by what that neural system does to the body.

Doctors have no realistic permanent way of resolving Parkinson's Disease but they are well-aware that the nigrostriatal pathway is involved maximally.

Parkinson's may be because of a lot of things, but one thing it is absolutely caused by, is societal conditioning of women to steer away from what they should be doing vis-a-vis the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway.

This system directs and controls the fluidity of body movement...

And the character of body movement is intimately linked to feelings.

Some natural floral substances are emotionally coercive for instance, but they are not known by the public at large.

Now I will give insights into some of them. 

Santa Maria Novella stuff.

I will not link the music track below to the emotional body movement idea but later on, I will do so in other posts.

The extent to which you will allow yourself to be emotionally coerced, is somewhat a reflection of how embedded one has become, into the modern or at least contemporary, crudity of life.

Dying flowers have the scent phytochemistry capacity to intoxicate and activate key emotional areas of the human female brain.

This is by far the best commercially-available example - by Santa Maria Novella of Florence, the world's oldest continuous dispensing pharmacy. Bay Laurel is the main key 'emotional brain' active substance in here.

On the one hand it will be increasingly hard to leave the common world, once you realize on the emotional ties that are potentially here; on the other hand, unless you are capable of going deeply into them, you will not be allowed up there.

It's a complex trap.