The Hard Material Reality

 ...How can I explain this?

Just how can I go about explaining all of this.

Well unless you have a precise map of the human mind system - not the brain structure - then you will find it difficult to appreciate just how nuanced and how important the whole thing of human life really is.

You see it is basically a matter of symmetry -, though virtually of opposites.

Now when you realize that this is up a really steep
mountain a long way, and that I grew up
about a mile down the side of this
mountain...
I've been in this 'house' many times.
Down the mountain-side
are crevices and three layers of
jungle.

More than one of you have privately asked about the Monroe Institute's 'Hemi-Sync' system, which is a proprietary process for uncovering some of the underlying networks that the human being can use but often doesn't use in any conscious way. But these are all still in the realm of mind visions and impressions - which is not to say such things are entirely non-material; they are material, but exist within the boundaries of the brain and intelligent awareness at micro levels rather than as larger-scale physical manifestations of hard reality.

See one of the oddities about the US Navy personnel's nicknaming of those thirty-foot white things flying around, is that the nomenclature is already known in military strategy circles: 'TIC' stands for tactical, or troops-(in-contact).

That is something you never read in any media or press reporting.

Don't ever forget you heard it here first.

So now I'm going to confirm to you that there are some material physical craft and that some people are actually transiting between Earth and there and back. And yet still I am going to go back to the concepts of Hemi-Sync and say they are valid and useful towards this end of actual material physical engaging - for the reasons I indicated at the start here.

The human personal consciousness, for reasons that are not evolutionary in any way and are highly devolutionary (no such English word, I made it up) if anything - is situated within only two areas of the human mind map: in the area to do with suffering, pain and fears, and in the area of appetite for material hedonic sensations and induced action responses.

People justify that they are behaving or acting in benevolent ways only as the extension of these other two matters. That is - they are not intrinsically centered, for example, actually in the material node of benevolence.

And yet there is such a material node, although it has not been uncovered yet by human science. To a certain extent some Jungian, maybe even Freudian old school psychologists do recognize this as a function of the 'child/parent' stage - which it is of course so much more than that though.

Nobody has any template in neuroscience about which specific unique neurotransmitters convey sensations of pleasure to the body and the brain, when adult humans are positioned in the state of feeling benevolent towards any other specific humans... Present neuro-physiology will implicate Oxytocin and that's about all.

The true reality though is that part of the reason scientists have not identified anything else, is because its half-life is just too fast to be observed at the levels looked for.

And so already though, you should be able to see that let's say the paradigm is correct that I am saying, then this could underscore that Monroe's 'Hemi-Sync' is probably at least shifting the mind better into those high speed and extremely precise or discrete coherency processing channels - and which is then why people 'see' things; different things, new things, and in new ways.

The fact is however, that people can be doing this all the time, and are to some extent subconsciously aware of this channel process - and were they to stay ego-consciously in that node, then (human) society itself would be radically different than the way it is.

The truly damning aspect to this is that actual individual human beings literally dissipate as sentient creatures on the individual scale (IE die, disappear completely) unless they are operating on at minimum some of the other nodal foci other than simply the primal ones of sense obligation alone.

We think we are smart as intelligent animals because we have this grandiose invention of for instance 'money;' and we use money as the 'lingua franca' of the primal senses' needs and demands for satisfaction.

The powerful and utterly negative subversion of what the human personal ego consciousness ought to be doing, is that for instance, such people do not require that something be actually true in the absolute, so long as it is true enough to realize some money outcome, or some appetite outcome. Even the removal of pain artificially is quite sinister if it involves repudiating signal pain... The epidemic of people seeking semaglutide injectables and opioids and valium-style psychological state modifying chemicals is one example of people messing around with natural signals telling that something is wrong which they have to address and not cover with a rug (which is what they are all doing).

It takes a massive amount of energy and a highly organized process to take 'you' into some kind of craft that can go faster than well, extreme speeds. 'You' might have to be removed and re-installed into something else, some other kind of humanoid physique. But then that physique, in context of the particular kinds of societies where those beings are - operate fluently across much more than the two simplistic primitive animal 'psychological nodes.'

Which means you do need to be fluent there already before extraction here.

So don't under-estimate just how important it really is to use tools such as Hemi-Sync' or similar things. 

In stock standard present-day psychology people know that the so-called borderline personality disorder has to do with individuals being unable to see nuances in themselves or in other human beings, or nuances in situational matters. These kinds of people make false assumptions about intentions and motivations, and themselves act against both their own interests and the interests of those around them by imputing 'black and white' meanings to things which have no such actual meanings.

This one was made with real snow.

...Meanwhile they can be fully convinced they are serving their own interests by satisfying immediate sense demands arising from the two simplistic psychological nodes of (physical) 'survival' and 'appetite.'

They have zero consciousness that in fact they will in any case be materially physically dead at some future point and there is only the reality of some ego-consciousness endurance beyond that, although all these kinds of people are very adamant that there cannot be, and will not be and so only their 'now' moments are important.

To them.

Although they all try to build monuments to their 'name.' LOL

What would be the point of showing anyone that 100% for sure there has always been the ego-consciousness survival potential for the human entity - and that this may be demonstrated utterly materially without having to resort to philosophical discussion!

All it would achieve is the artificial attempt to deceive about moving the ego-consciousness into the benevolence position - so that this can be exploited in order to go back and satisfy the primitive desires principally.

All women that you know in the world want a 'high value' partner to show interest in 'exclusively them,' in order that their genes be passed on into the long-term future - so the story goes. That story found its way into a pop psychology book called 'the Selfish Gene.'

There is no such gene.

All this is is the misstep of humans in their so-called 'evolutionary process' away from a multi-node psychology and into this stuck ditch of primitive animal 'one shot life cycle' motivations.

The fact that you cannot see what the material sensory pay-offs are for socially-shared ego benevolence positioning beyond the obvious ones potentially of food and sex, is no excuse for an intelligent being.

And here is the 'worst' aspect: 'Jesus - are you saving everyone?' 'No, that lot is going over the cliff.'

The question is not merely that you are benevolent, but who you are to be benevolent towards.

Well, you can most certainly start with yourself.