Not Teasing

I was not ever trying to tease anyone here - or just be 'teasing.'

Obviously that is not how things are necessarily going to come across because I have never posted pics of anything that goes on down here!

Well, that's not exactly true - I posted some of JES and also the Lux Partum German affair. Whether you can tell that there are any 'people' in the audience who should not be there according to 'sci-ence...' Well, I cannot say.

Let's go down the rabbit-hole.
This is the Lafite-Rothschild
cellars for some of their
best wines.

But given that there are one or two people reading along with us who have voiced some sense of 'tease,' it might be appropriate to swing away from the money side of things just for a short while and go back to covering the 'other subject' for just a minute or two.

The main thing about not saying too much all that openly is that we are dealing with extraordinarily dangerous matters. We are dealing with the fact that governments themselves do want to know that there really are 'other people' here. To some extent they do know it, except it has been bottled up into the Intel fraternities where it has managed to exist as a secret to do with nuclear weapons - and there has never really been so much 'activity' that things needed to be extricated from that shadowy crevice.

To say that anyone here has regularly actual meetings with suspicious characters, is only inviting trouble.

It would already be possible to know where to look if someone made a systemic examination of all of the posts here across several years.

I'm going to try and explain this - or at least, my own attitude and sense of where and when or even if, it will be appropriate to openly say anything very detailed...

I am going to explain it by talking about something right off what you would think is even vaguely connected. Someone.

But to at least find a kind of a bridging point I can say that I have always said we are misusing our own communication tools - those of our own normal senses - in the way we assume 'talking' is actual intelligent communicating. It is not.

'Talking' or speaking intelligent sensible connected meaning words - is in fact a way of mischievously presenting insufficient real information about what we think and feel.

Some people blush when they tell lies or say something embarrassing to them, and that is a minimalist parallel communications tool that should go along with the spoken word; the fact we have very little range of skin flush signalling is a negative aspect of human evolution.

Only because the pic is
cute.
To me it is, anyway.

Certain well-known identities in fields of communicating - film directors, drama producers, maybe some stage people, opera and ballet artists and creators - do have a set of tools they all use and know about, but which they mostly never discuss with others.

Roger Vadim is a guy who is one of these and to the extent that I know that he really is, then, look, hey - I have to deal with him...

And you might not know I mean there.

Vadim was not necessarily demeaning of the women actors he directed and produced, but I would say he dismissed them utterly as worthy of his deepest honesty and highest intellectual thoughts. I think Bardot was on to him to some extent. But I don't think Fonda ever was. I think Pickett had some idea and thankfully was subject to much criticism from the professional media tribes of vandals and Vadim passed away from this Earth quickly after his work with her so she avoided the biggest problem that is entailed with going too deeply into the truth.

For one thing, the people of the human race generally crucify Truth all day long. Do not fancy for one second you are a 'good' people, a 'good' species - nor that you are even all that particularly intelligent.

You cannot be intelligent if you are using such a limited range of what your possible, or potential communications tools actually are.

Roger Vadim never explained what his method was with any of his female stars. Most people like him leave such 'explanations' to the end stages of their lives - and many expected Kubrick to do it, but he never did either.

Kubrick never had the same technique or skills that Vadim had, with his female actors, but he certainly did with the all the male ones: he completely did it with Peter Sellers, for example.

I have always considered that there may come a time much later on in my life, at which I might or maybe should explain a few things clearly. I certainly have possession of certain facts and 'things' that would completely challenge everything you ever thought you knew that human science 'knew.'

Human science is not even close.

At the same time there is a tremendous militancy of stupidity among most of the prominent public figures - and we have seen it recently with Sam Harris, where he literally said that 'if, Covid was more deadly, and the vaccines more obviously effective, then, maybe people would not have had such foolish conspiracy theory tendencies about how the scientists all lied about the problem and the dangers.' Canadian public philosopher Gad Saad has said this is like saying our table cloth would make a beautiful setting for our roast dinner if we had a table to lay it out it on... ...if we had a beautiful table-cloth.

...If we had a roast dinner.

What this means is that confronted with absolute cold hard evidence people would just simply deny it in favor of their previous commitments to some viewpoint, which was now obviously wrong though.

'A' truth, is that right here, there is already a place where people are building on pretty important philosophical understandings about logic and human psychology too.

And so I would like for us to accept that there are a number of fine minds already here, who ought to be looking at new problems, or even just other ideas not exactly problems as such, and applying their mind tools onto those matters. ...On a dynamic, 'each and every day' basis.

We don't need to go back and go over the same old ground all the time all the time.

We already are the beneficiaries of Jesus, Enoch, Elijah, Plato, Pythagoras, Freud, Jung and so on.

We did not 'go up to heaven' either with Elijah or Enoch or Jesus - and as for the last dude, He literally said some would be down here and having to 'wait' for something.

There's plenty of YouTube people claiming He is coming back next Tuesday or thereabouts though, as you know.

For me, I would hope you could consider the possibility that you might just apply some tools and techniques from all of these people without having to 'go up' anywhere (and likely not return!) - and have effects on situations right here and right now.

Oh of course, I know, a laser canon or something would certainly have an effect - but then that is not the thing Vadim used on his actors. Now was it?

So but if Vadim could twist Fonda's mind without blasting it with a laser weapon (although who knows what he had on the set of Barbarella), then why do you feel you need to come visit with some ET Aliens in space ships and maybe acquire some light sabers or whatever?

If Vadim was able to twist Jane Fonda's mind...

Good enough though?

Are there ET Alien space ships and do they have weapons in there? 

What would be the point though, of anyone going up there if they were permanently prey to a Vadim-style set of techniques because they did not want to change their own minds?

And what makes you think you are at all entitled to 'go there' when you adamantly resist looking at first principles in the matter?

Rather than worry about, or ask to see the space craft and the occupants, why not bring some Earth problems to here and let's all of us work on them.

You're all smart enough in a combined way.

You don't need anybody else's brain-power. Okay you might need some fun nights with Fonda but then, that was already in the toolkit of Vadim; he ain't here on the planet right now, but so what?

Are you able to work out what he was doing all by yourself?