For All Of Us Dummies

POINT ONE to remember: We appreciate the honesty.

By now all of you are well and truly cognizant of Bill Gates going around the world and spruiking his 'ChatGPT.'

Which is allegedly an AI thing of some kind.

Our schools down here in Australia, state-by-state except for South Australia, have all banned it from use in school time by teachers and students.

Hard Cherry.

I know they are going to specifically ask me about this at our next local Primary School board meeting and I am not personally in favor of just a total complete blanket ban but I get why this is still the safest path for the present.

Our kids are all highly trained and skilled at an early age in coding and fairly sophisticated programming and are very ready for the Tertiary levels a lot of them will end up studying at in Universities and direct-into-industry programs.

There is no doubt that due to the key supplier role our state (of only a very few people) down here has with China -, the massive economic benefits are flowing onto the public, and especially to the youth.

But getting back to Gates' new 'AI' thing.

Obviously it is not really AI but that is not the point. He has the pulling power to market whatever it is everywhere - and he is doing just precisely that right now.

Are people dumb enough to believe him? Yeah they are.

Enough of them are at any rate.

Nobody pays me for saying this
would happen.
...What do you think about 'property prices'
by the way?
LOL

So I will not hide the fact that to really understand what all we have been talking about these last few years here, it takes some serious brain-power because for one thing I have been covering it all in dust and ashes (you do that kind of thing to race horses no one else has seen so that the punters do not realize on sight that you have some kind of champion in the mounting enclosure).

At the same time - and this is intended for all those who will in the next few weeks be receiving some mail from us - what will absolutely happen, even if you are only as bright as me (which is not all that bright; I tell you true!), is that you will absorb by immersion, very elevated ideas and concepts way outside of anything Bill Gates has...

You will absorb them simply by having been made aware of them if only from a vague outside perspective. They are that important and powerful.

You see if you are perfectly unaware of something, then if a game is run on you, which relies on your absolute ignorance of that thing, then you will not suspect anything. Whereas if you are even just acquainted with the existence of that something, and you notice it in action - then your suspicions are aroused because you will have a fact before you that is resonating with an item which does exist in your 'highlighted' memory despite that you never quite fully or deeply understood it, necessarily, at the time, originally.

What is missing in Gates' scheme for introducing AI into the world, is the 'Theory Of Mind' issue. He doesn't attempt to talk about it in reference to his supposed 'AI.'

And he literally personally has no emotional empathetic means of communicating with people.

And so in the end he will resort to fear and threats.

'Can you cook and sew, make
flowers grow....'

But this other bit you know deep down in your heart even though it may not be all that clear from any purely logical standpoint to your conscious brain:

It is the most dangerous thing to give something seriously and truly and actually and really powerful in terms of human 'Theory Of Mind' matters - freely to some privileged and super wealthy elite moron with low class and no ethics like Bill Gates.

So don't be too hard on yourself if you think, 'Oh, I can't understand everything that is being said here - I don't get the bits and pieces and what they are intended to add up to here...'

Partly, this is in order to confuse the little parasites that Gates' organization (and so many others) hire to trawl the internet and exploit any new things that they might find.

We have talked about this before - how Luca Turin was hired to be the public science spokesperson for DuPont's ultra advanced research at Imperial College London, into what human consciousness actually is.

And they are pretty close in terms of some of the materiel, the brain and neurology hardware (neural myelin switching), so to speak. But they are very far away in other things that are intimately entailed and vitally necessary, and without which actual 'consciousness' itself does not subsist in the organism.

But if we were to indicate of what necessary elements those things must actually consist, then immediately we would have set the whole world onto a diabolical and deadly path.

Professor David R. Hawkins literally gave the time scale of human consciousness; namely the micro-time inside of which consciousness existed from cell thought, or cell memory thought to next cell (memory) thought.

This is 'Kintsugi,' right?
Japanese way of using gold
to put broken pottery back 
together and turn it into
something better than it 
ever originally was.
This is us and what we do,
 and you are the humans.
Making sense yet?

This itself was a potentially dangerous new item of knowledge to reveal to people generally.

When someone says such as thing as 'I do not have XYZ (enough) money,' what they mean is they do not feel safe and secure to spend anything anyway, regardless of whether they literally have exactly no cash dollars in their pockets at all. We have all been placed by society in various states of doubt fear and anxiety. That's because governments, and rulers have no empathy. They have no genuine shared emotional context so they operate by instilling doubts and fear.

You have no money? Are you serious? Well is this the place that knows how you can get some, or isn't it?? Yes it is that place.

Man, we have the machines, dude. The ones that fly in and out of happiness.

Don't tell me 'I haven't got any money' and then say 'Oh but I won't do what you tell me to get some. For I, I, have my own brilliant plans...' Oh really?

Not that I don't appreciate the honesty, and what you are actually saying is 'I want to but I cannot, maybe not right now, dunno when but I have positivity about this.' This is good. This is what makes things count. 

Look at Prince Harry. He didn't even know whether he had money for real, or needed to get it, because he believed that the Palace was suppressing him - but still he instigated the Invictus Games nonetheless for disabled heroes. Meanwhile the media called him - and still does(!) - an idiot. Well but does it matter whether he's 'an idiot?' To the people in those Games? This is what the gods love in humans - they are flawed, but the gods take them and place them among the stars for instituting games, not wars. 

Now you can win a war and get to the stars too. How the gods define 'winning' is not how men define it though.

It takes brain technology to create money out of seemingly nothing. The Sanskrit Vedas contain the brain technology about how to 'make money.' Dr Pillai tells you about this stuff for free. Go there, return with money and play here or don't play here, but do not 'have no money.' That is no longer permissible. (LOL) Even 'having money' does not mean you have to spend it here. That's not why you should feel wanted around here. You are wanted because why? Here is why...

The one thing I ended up as a 'take-away' (modern phrase) from interacting with these 'weird people from up there' is me telling them - 'Hey hey hey don't you pretend you cannot. I have seen it now. Seen what you can do. Stop pretending. I need this, and this, and this, and then this, and my friend Bill needs such-and-such, et cetera.' You know how it goes.

This is just 'plain'
sorbet.

Tonight I ate blood orange gelato at a place where I never thought they had ever served that before there -, ever. ...My friends like 'blood orange gelato' although actually, they like all kinds of gelato.

I never spend money myself. My money joins up with someone or something generally in some kind of act of lust or debauchery or something similar.

And then that joining up produces children.

I can't tell you which International Women's Soccer player posed the rhetorical question recently: 'Do you love me?' To which I forwarded her this: