Silly Amplituhedrals

So the latest work of genius in the 'sci-entific community,' is that 'things' happen because of the 'amplituhedron' model of 'twistor space.'

LOL

This is some kind of notion that 'explains' how photons move through space, and, critically, it throws out 'time-space' altogether, and says (and this part at least is right), that 'things' emerge from out of an underlying phenomenon.

Not 'amplituhedrons.'

That 'phenomenon' complies with a set of geometrical rules which can be described as a three-dimensional form like a polyhedral with all of the 'directional dimensions' radiating from some source node: the 'amplituhedral' shape.

Now this all comes about because, whilst all particles without exception, when they collide explode as spherical amplitude waves, in the practicality of multiple (endless) collisions of endless particles including photons - what ends up happening is a huge complex range of motion as everything interacts with every other thing.

The fundamental matrix 'phenomenon' however, is obviously the radian...

Yet because there are so many particles in Cosmic space, theoretical physicists want to fabricate some kind of 'formula' from which I suppose, that if you stuck any of them in Las Vegas they would all want to go 'prove' that they can beat the house.

Arising from the (false) belief that the presence, the existence of particles - in motion - gives rise to 'gravity,' which they call a vector force, rather than a real material force; then the 'amplituhedron' is the de facto explanation of 'gravity.' I deliberately say 'of' gravity because scientists never want to explain 'why' anything, in other words, not 'for' gravity, but 'of' gravity.

They are reductionists, of course. Even while they actually employ Universal generic 'models' to describe what they at first tried to dissect into essential smallest parts, still they insist that they are reductionists 'examining' what is 'there.'

In the genius 'Zen' scientist's conception of the
existential Universe,
beauty doesn't exist. Not the way you think of
it, anyhow.

Jesus Christ attempted to, well in fact He did say things in terms of how people with that level of knowledge would be able to best appreciate things - He attempted to explain His phenomenological existence as God: 'it is expedient for you that I go, for if I go, then 'something' is able to be here...'

Today's theoretical physicists surmise that neutrinos have the smallest amount of mass but not no mass (and they are wrong there as well), and thus can move almost with the speed of light. They also have no charge so they are difficult to influence to get to move faster, or to even detect, certainly.

The stunning and you would think embarrassing contradiction not only to all of current theory and speculation about neutrinos, and the ridiculous confusion of the 'amplituhedron' model - is to do with the fact that neutrinos do not propagate in spherical amplitude waves, but go around in Einsteinian 'world lines.'

They cannot 'collide' as such because they have no mass and no charge and therefore must rely on gravity... ...to interact.

LOL

All matter - Jesus included - are manifestations of phenomena from the Universal Field. The Universal Field is large but entirely self-contained within its own existential curvature; it is, completely curved at all moments. When some item of matter, congregates from the world lines of neutrinos, in a location, then those particles cease being smoothly in the continuum in motion along the world lines. If some fundamental particle - say, something even more fundamental and 'smaller' than the smallest neutrino (there are about three or maybe four kinds of neutrinos) - is 'intelligent' in that it conveys data backwards and forwards across all other lines of neutrinos, then as soon as it ceases being part of the continuum of all other traveling neutrinos, it no longer has complete and direct access to all data elsewhere...

Eastern Red Cedar - produces
blue juniper berries.

This is why 'curves are lovely.'

Everything is curved, even straight lines.

The Zen philosopher Basho once said: 'a flute without any holes... ...is not a flute.'

Actually I think Chevy Chase said that and claimed it was the poet Basho he was quoting.

He went on to say, as he sank a golf ball into a hole by going around another ball, that 'in one physical model of the Universe the shortest distance between two points is a straight line - in the opposite direction;' disproving, by his magical action, that the straight line is always the right way to get to where you want to go. And at the same time establishing the tangent...

Endorphins are important.