Autism Project Donations:

Autism Project Donations here - https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=23MBUB4W8AL7E

Thursday 18 November 2021

Too Deep

So, today I was walking through the main shopping mall in my local city here, and I saw there were quite a few rich people buying a lot of expensive things.

One guy, apparent owner of a fully 'de-chromed' matte black BMW parked in the 'rich people' lane of the really 'up-scale' side street off the main mall, had his hands full lifting really really huge Gucci shopping bags...

Some ship - or plane - from China must have just now finally arrived with new stock for the luxury boutiques.


...Trust me, I'm 'tap-dancing' on these Blog pages recently, because there is a lot going on behind the scenes that cannot be talked about just yet.

But I will do my best to give some sense of what is transpiring and what the media cannot see right now.

See in very ancient times, someone wandering newly into a village, would either be a stranger, or a strange person, who was not quite a 'stranger' though, as such.

All the time you will hear modern people say 'give some proof and some evidence.'

Charlie Chan once said in one of his movies: 'I will give a million dollars to anyone who can give me convincing evidence of a future life.' I suppose he meant 'after death.'

Well you see but he is not Beethoven. And you are not Beethoven either, right?

But you know what a melody is though, yes...

Still you cannot compose them for the greater public to give you any acclaim for having done it. Mostly, you would likely copy other people's melodies and offer those with some variances.

And this is the problem with all of modern science, all of modern academia, all of the institutional financial world, all of politics, all of everything - they shave the curves off everything that they stole from someone else before them in the first place anyway, and then justify it by saying 'well conservative, right' and 'safe' and 'don't criticize me -,' and then they never are able to deliver the real thing at all.

You get the fake thing.

All the way along the line.

It's the night of
the Hathors.

But they hand out credentials like you would not believe. You will never get now, proper martial arts instruction anymore; there's no such thing being taught anywhere on the planet. There's instead 'MMA.'

And, there's government-regulated Karate Academies with actual B.Sc. graduates in exercise physiology running them.

...So I'm walking through the shopping mall, and I see on one side, these expensive shops, one of them is owned by the Playboy Group, and then there are the standard 'Nespresso' boutiques and Dior, whatever else there is. And I notice the shoppers carrying their shopping bags.

But I notice, in the same mall, homeless people sleeping underneath their coverings, on benches right there too. Oh yeah, we have 'homeless' people here too, in perfect wonderland city.

These humans - they all die, right? After a hundred years or whatever.

Must be that is why they strive so hard to 'get things' while they are alive.

Meanwhile - you still haven't realized that you don't exactly know what it takes to recognize melody, from new...  

I mean it's easy to whistle some melody from a well-known song - but how do the pop music people come up with something every five minutes? I suppose the Charlie Chans among you are going to say, 'oh but they write the same song all the time, it's just dressed a little differently.'

Is it? Though? Are you sure about that?

You are walking around blind!

This is a real place. Was commissioned
by Fouquet - who died in prison
for spending too much...

When you can 'understand' what the process is, and how long it takes, for a person to 'sense' a melody from a string of notes, I assure you that you will be able to get 'convincing proof' that Charlie Chan would have to pay out on.

Meanwhile, the rich people die, and the poor people die too.

In the old days, people did not know about protons and neutrinos and quarks and any of that - so they, like Andre Maurois does in that book I talked about here earlier this week, all thought there was no physical connection between pure thought and material reality.

The fact is we use things that are continuously going on at the speed of, well, in fact much faster than the speed of our own immediately consciously registering thought - all the time in our lives. But whereas we spend money on Gucci to go to the opera, we have no capacity to write the opera, or make the Gucci stuff. Oh yes, some of us are 'civil engineers' so we get paid obscene sums of money to pretend that we are doing civil engineering, or town planning, or politics.

And that is why there are 'street people' and 'homeless people.'

And that is also why, when the lady wearing the blue velvet cloak with the white ermine collar, comes into the village, we don't remember who she is...

And that is far too deep for most of you to understand what was just said there.

Anyway, today is the 'moon between the horns of Hathor.' And that means that a sacrifice of a bull must be made.

Hey, Muslims - which prophet who made a sacrifice that was accepted by fire from the sky, was then killed by the Jews?

Any of them?

Rich people watch shop. Lucerne.

At all? Ever?

LOL

Now if however, I can tell you which Egyptian 'bull' was sacrificed by the waters of the moon tides... ...then, that would make me -? Who?

Even better, unlike Matteo De Stefano, I can actually tell you the name of the king bull in Atlantis at the time when the place was destroyed - and that does not mean to say I was there, or that I can do 'Seidr,' just that I have read a lot of history books most of which hardly anyone else in modern times have ever even seen or heard of.

Time for the bull to be killed again.

Don't drown like all the rest. And understand what makes a melody. And increase the speed of your brain.

You'll see things then, and you won't need no 'ibotenic acid' and whatever that other thing is the Shamans bring around this time of the year to help you 'see' your way through the snow storms.

Don't get lost in the snow.



How long did it take you to 'pick up' the melody from the beginning there, right from the very beginning? Which bit is the melody?

When did you notice it? 

Don't beat yourself up anymore - maybe your brain is a whole lot faster and better and smarter than people have told you. Well you'd better start using it too. Not much time left now. 

...And yes, it is 'Doh Re Me Fa So La Ti Doh.' The melody.

Anyone who has been reading here for a couple of years now... LOL What's your IQ like now?

What are you going to do with all this power? Go on, what's the answer?


6 comments:

  1. Ha, well I'm not going to be getting any alien cookies today. I thought the "melody" was So-Fa-Me-Doh-Re. I was pretty sure about that too.

    The distinction between counterpoint and harmony has many interesting gray areas. Thinking of William Byrd's Mass for 3 voices.

    Gaston Bachelard, "The Poetics of Space." Just throwing that up here for no reason.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And speaking of Euclid. Pasch's axiom and its implicit use in the Elements is interesting. I mean it's interesting because it was implicitly used but not defined. Also, did Euclid's Pseudaria ever actually exist, and why was it lost?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Could easily be 'So-Fa-Me-Doh-Re' in part; I am no music expert like who went to a conservatory or sumfin'. Damn, Sting never went to one either. How 'bout that. Anyway this is a 'Rick Beato' problem if you want to get down to the nitty gritty the way no one who ever wrote a melody 'knows' so expertly what it is though... Amazing how they do that. ...I took my car to the work shop on a Friday once, and on the Monday, an accountant was there taking 'snap shot images' of all the parts of the engine lying neatly on the workshop floor. And he said: 'Isn't that nice?' And I said 'but it doesn't work now.' And he said, 'Oh if you want it to work you need an engineer but we abolished those some time ago now because we have nice snapshot images after we have cut someone else's work to bits. And engineers just got dirty hands. What's your problem? Don't you want a professional job done? Here's your bill.'

    ReplyDelete
  4. History records several times, not just one, at which the Grand Museum (library) of Baghdad was totally burned to the ground, with the intention of burning all the volumes and documents inside. Individuals literally carried out under their arms, books, one of which was Euclid's Elements, and another was, by standard narrative, the only copy of the Pythagoras Theorem! Without that particular moment of salvation, who knows where we would all be now? The Great Library of Alexandria too, was burned completely several times, the last time of which was by the Muslim Amr ibn al-As, who, unfortunately for the Islamic world and its 'standard narrative' did not succeed in destroying particularly, the early Christian texts and attestations about what was said to have happened with Pilate and everyone - and this became known subsequently as the 'Oxyrynchus Papyri' when they were found partly burned in a tip there, as you know. It is my view that we do not have a correct version of who or what 'Aristotle' was and what he believed and what he wrote, because we do have, went through the hands of Middle Ages and Dark Ages Arab scholars who modified the texts and destroyed anything they didn't like, and perhaps even, fabricating certain ones believed now to be 'true' works of Aristotle. There is other stuff about Aristotle that I will not canvas in public or even anywhere with someone who I have not already sufficiently doused in large quantities of Proof Spirit. 'Aristotle,' though, is what more than half of all of what Western 'science' is all built on now... ...which gives you some indication of my position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well if we're talking conspiracies, then I guess the question might be: were books saved because there was a fire, or were there fires *so that* books could be saved. Certain books. And others not saved.

      Delete
    2. When Roger Penrose talks about "proto consciousness" he talks about how Godel's theorem provides evidence that the universe cannot be entirely a computational thing, that there must be "understanding" in it as well. Euclidean geometry is a decidable system, but Pasch's axiom is required for this, and Euclid does not state it. So the modern histories of math for a long time told the story "Egyptians invented computation, but it took the genius of the Greeks to invent proof. BUT It took the genius of the 19th century to correct Euclid's error."

      The other idea about this is "well we just don't understand Euclid's point of view in the Elements. not fair to say that he attempted to invent the concept of rigor and proof, but sort of failed at it a little bit. When in fact his idea of mathematics might have been much different, and we should try to understand that better." The Pseudaria would be a good place to turn in this matter. There was at one time an understanding of mathematics that has been hidden now. Or something.

      Delete

Your considered comments are welcome