Crawling 101

I was really tossing up whether or not to link in the video down below to 'La Religieuse' a short prose poem by Serge Lutens about a 'vue' of some moments arising partly from when he was a young boy attending at a class in his school (although this was more specifically covered in another poem). And then to do with some other future episode the narrator relates to some idea about 'religion.' ...Or 'beliefs.' In the end I decided, yeah well, I shall.

Like any work of major art, you can read a whole lot of things into it, and people may well have vastly different feelings and perceptions about what is being communicated in the video.

Superficially, the video is also an advertisement - after a fashion - for one of Serge Lutens' commercial 'high cut' product lines.

Serge is himself quite an 'occultic' person; or, occultic personality.

So it is appropriate to use him as a 'clothes horse' on which to layer certain rather occult ideas, if they in fact, originate from some of the more obscure Judaic and Christian narratives.

You see... ...there is this very fanciful subject of the so-called 'Fallen Watcher Angels' who were sent away to Hades and there imprisoned for all Eternity. Except they were not.

In the writings of the Apostle Peter, Jesus Christ descends down to Hades and preaches to those imprisoned there 'who sometime were disobedient' and those that repented He allowed to be released - but only at 'the End Times' when another angel was to be sent down to open the Gates of Hades for those who had repented.

In physics, 'flux' is a transport phenomena - and the word was first introduced into differential calculus by Sir Isaac Newton. Newton was responsible for the inverse square law of the density at source, of energy flux at a given distance away.

This of course says something along the lines that energy density is the inverse of the (energy measured at the) square of the radius (distance from origin).

Now one 'problem' with this in terms of what present beliefs about geometry are, is that there is a distinct implication here entailed about the so-called 'squaring of the circle' problem - which is supposed to be impossible.

Newton's Inverse Square Law

...I'm not going to bore you with any details, but although Newton's inverse square law is a calculus linear measurement function, if you could predict angular momentum frequency (EG EMF) squared inverses too, then by 'neural de-coding' you 'might' be able to dictate into people's brains whole packets of data and even thereby generate exact predictable feelings.

And that's just one thing you could do.

Now, I don't suppose you'd know where that idea just came from, would you? Maybe I'm so smart I just thought of it all by myself.

Just continuing down this speculative path for a minute... ...maybe if I had such technology and calculating methods and processes, I could do things inside people's heads and they would not even be aware what is going on or why they are thinking and feeling a certain way. 

Unlike your typical visual semiotics and ordinary propaganda methods, people would not have to 'see' anything at all, or read anything or be told anything - they would just have palpable feelings that of course, they would not doubt since these were coming from inside of their own selves, as it would seem to them.

Now I know that these so-called 'Fallen Angels' got into a whole lot of trouble for introducing just such previously unknown sorts of ideas and processes to the backward and primitive, unsuspecting human race way back when.

What would be the complete ambit of moral complexity to this kind of thing?

I certainly couldn't presume to know what that was. And I most certainly would not be so foolishly arrogant as to think that I already had some kind of internal moral compass that was so superior that I could create some kind of 'school program' that taught it to others! By logic I also must conclude that I could not whatsoever think that the 'Law of Moses/Code of Hammurabi' (which is used by Western Courts and Judges to guide them to rule over men) would suffice since according to the standard narratives, these were not what the 'God' who is said to have given them to Moses (in that instance) originally actually gave him!

Moses, from my recollection, sent these back to Jehovah for editing and outright modification, did he not.

Who will we 'learn to crawl' from?

Of course this is not much of an issue to those who have no 'occultic insights...'

The end there is that he basically tells 'the youth that is with me' that what is falling down from the sky and covering everything over with white, is... ...the snow.'

Unless you know a lot more about Serge Lutens and his ideas and beliefs and some scant detail of his own life story that he 'allows out' from his other expressions, it's impossible for me to tell you what he means when he says 'the youth that is with me' and most people, even very artistically-educated ones, always jump to a complete wrong conclusion about it; which he never dispels though, either.

But if you use your own 'film critiquing' knowledge, and break this down, you will at least recall in the short story that he is looking at himself in a mirror - which of course has its own several 'literary meanings' by much tradition over thousands of years. And then, certainly, there is a fairly basic 'Tao,' black-white, mirror image, knowing, naiive metaphor in play as well.

And everyone can come to their own personal individually satisfying conception of what he is trying to say.

'Learning to crawl' is just this. Of course you can stride out onto the icy lake if you want to, and take confidently to the icy slide that decides who the next Doge of Venice will be (when there was a Doge of Venice!). But I would crawl gingerly out onto the glassy surface of the iced lake... And I can recite to you The Cratylus cover-to-cover word-for-word from-beginning-to-end off the top of my head. Which I already guarantee you is more than what those who have memorized the Quran word-for-word and can recite it have done. They, don't even know what 'The Cratylus' is.

Moreover I absolutely guarantee you there is not one single living soul on the planet in any Art School, or University Art faculty either, who can do it either but for sure they know more than what I do about what Serge is saying, right... 

...Which is why I suggest that you should not mess with Fallen Angels. Even if you think that because you are a high-ranking member of some well-established Freemasonic Chapter it will give you adequate power and that you possess enough Wisdom and Knowledge to control what you have conjured up. Ha!

What a laugh.

There they all are - out in the middle of the lake, on the ice, and banging around.

Why 'Watchers?'

Around 3 BC, a commander of Philip II, traveled to a mountain cluster in the Southern end of the Anti-Lebanon mountain range.

He did so, not only because he was a Roman soldier ultimately answering to Rome, and to Caesar Augustus, and not to Herod the Great, who was only 'client king' of Judea to Rome - but also because he was someone with an avid interest in history himself, and with a keen interest to verify or falsify certain local myths and legends.

In his endeavors to uncover the truth or otherwise of particular historical narratives that seemed a bit peculiar or far-fetched on their face - he ended up uncovering easily one of the most stark monuments and mysterious artifacts of all time: that of the 'sanctuary of the fallen watchers,' and the stone memorial of their oath outside of the sanctuary.

This 'sanctuary,' which is sometimes also referred to as a temple, although it is not that - the Roman commander built two more structures beneath the actual sanctuary structure itself - is by the legends or mythologies, meant to have been built literally 'by the hands of the watchers themselves.'  

There still exists to this day, not only the sanctuary structure itself, but the actual 'oath pillar' in a language no one understands, except that there was (Sir Charles Warren, a British explorer, later removed this and took it back to London where it is to this day) an accompanying small stone pillar, almost the same, but translating the first pillar into Greek.

As far as the Greek wording goes, it says that no one should, or is permitted to enter the sanctuary, unless he take the oath (which is on the original monument).

So more or less everyone these days has heard of these mythical or legendary 'watchers' but why are they called 'watchers' and what are they 'watching...'

The presumption has always been that they are 'watching' humans.

For what reason or purpose they do this no one seems to be able to say though.

They are not watchers of human beings.

They can have seen human activity, for sure.

A mysterious road...

But they are watchers of 'gates' and 'doorways' into special places.

Those that are not allowed to go through those gates are prevented from so doing, by the gate watchmen.

Now a thing that does not permit anyone at all to enter through it, is not a 'gate' at all, but a simple wall or barrier; it is not any kind of entrance to anywhere.

Which means that some are allowed to enter these gates, and some not.

The idea that 'watchers' or the gates they are or were 'watching' are not physical, is problematic, since the story goes that a certain number (specifically 200) of these 'watchers' ended up procreating with human women and had children.

On the one hand, at some point thereafter most of the children of this interbreeding were destroyed from the planet, Lamech and his children - Noah of course, but then also the evil ruler Nimrod, survived and the children of this line is still with us today; if you go by the standard narrative, this one of which... doesn't have any holes in it at all, according to either the Judaic or the Christian, nor indeed even the Islamic traditions!

The two Roman temples built in 'memorial' to the fallen watchers, is called in today's Islamic Arabic cultural history of Lebanon - Qasr Chbib. 'Qasr; means castle, and 'chbib' has a double meaning: 'stop it,' or 'lovers.'

The highest secret oath in the highest degree level of modern Freemasonry, is the oath of Qasr Chbib. This is the thing partly expressed in the baleful words against Tom Cruise's character, which were sulfurously hissed at him by 'Red Cloak' as a warning against talking about what he had seen.

It is not straightforward at all, why there was such an aggressive reaction against the acts of these 'watchers' thereafter as a consequence of their actions, despite that evidently in the story, their offspring wrought a lot of damage on the Earth. And in attempting to understand it yourself - because I will not be outright declaring in what the main problem lies - one should bear in mind that not, all the offspring were destroyed and several indeed became 'prophets' according to the Judaic and Christian beliefs.

This is the 'oath pillar' 
in Greek - now located in London.

The problem with so much common popular 'skepticism' is that it is deeply rooted in fundamental ignorance, especially about the meanings of ancient words translated inexactly.

The Wikipedia will report that the actual 'temple' or sanctuary of the fallen watchers is an 'Adyton' (innermost sanctuary). However, the actual spot itself is called 'Ar-dys' - which is a word in an otherworldly language altogether but it is recorded in Second Enoch as the actual name of the place. It means 'gate' or 'portal' into the dark but rich expanse of the luminaries wherein there are great treasures.

If you try to go to 'Adyton' or 'Qasr Chbib' even today, and you manage to get the permits from the Lebanon government (there is no reason why they wouldn't give such a thing to say, some rich explorer kids from Dubai for instance; maybe the producers of the hit show 'Mysterious Middle East') you will nevertheless be challenged by beings at the 'gate' inside the sanctuary.

And if you have the correct password, they will grant you entry.

And you will go by 'Ar-Dys.'

'Then I Run...'

Serge Lutens is an interesting person. He has lived for many years now, far away from Paris where his two main studio/showrooms are - one which is literally inside the Palais Royal in Paris - in Marrakech.

The Palais Royal is a former royal palace (of the Sun King, eventually) albeit it was built ostensibly for Cardinal Richelieu to begin with, and currently is the headquarters of the French government's Ministry of Culture.

Serge Luten's birth and early childhood is slightly shrouded in mystery, but at minimum it is known that both his father and mother were in diplomatic roles in Europe.

He says himself that he had a 'complicated' relationship with his mother and the standard Euro-snob narrative is that he himself is gay.

I cannot say that I personally like his graphic designs or his photography in the sense of 'like;' 'am attracted to.' The images are very different to anything that resides anywhere near the obvious conscious surface of my own brain, or even anywhere down deep and dark, and/or in any of the undergrowth in there(!), so far as I know.

But having listened to a number of his interviews in the french language and in English too, and read some of his writing, what strikes me is his extraordinary ability to feel.

And so then I go back and look at his photographs and design work and wonder at it.

And then when you turn it in your hands, you realize that it is wonderful. There are no answers in any of it, at least not to me because well frankly, I am not that smart - certainly not that kind of smart that those art critics and others are, who can explain to you what all these things mean. Or 'might' mean.

To me they don't have any obvious meaning. It's just that I am watching someone say something to the world of other human...

...Oh, but wait. Did I tell you that CIA has a file on Serge Lutens?

His friend - 'the man with the
golden gun...'

It's probably a little lost in the back archives now, but it was a very special thing back when Marilyn Monroe was alive, and before that. Serge worked with some pretty clever Japanese industrial chemists, and all of them for the American Secret Service just after the war.

...I was going to say 'of other human beings,' wasn't I?

Yes. Sometimes great artists can speak to the world of other human beings and say something - but then, it is not always heard or understood even when it is heard.

I mean, you too, do want to say something to others, right?

What is it, that you want to tell them?

Some psychologist-types say that Serge wants to tell the world he hated his mother, others that he loved his mother. I mean seriously though, who cares what anyone thinks about their mothers! Because, after all, right, we are animals evolved from the primordial slime and we just sleep and digest, and feed and breed. And then we die. We have exactly no depth of feeling at all about things that have passed; we have not depth of feeling - other than what is in front of our greedy little eyes right now or in our lusting imagination for the near future. And if we 'miss out' on over-powering someone nearby, and having and exerting control all the time, we get angry. And then we do something bad against others. And this doesn't stop us from being angry, but at least we can tell ourselves that we 'have power.'

We have no art. We are artless.

But we have Netflix and 'Game of Thrones.'

And the throne in Paris is officially 'unoccupied,' and in any case it is contested by two or even three claimants.

The carnival ride - Kitty's 'carnival ride.' lol

Serge has his showroom in Richelieu's old buildings.

Everything is permanently in transition and knowledge is only relative.

Perhaps 'Black Lives Matter' will shortly take over the administration of the Palais Royal and kick Serge Lutens out.

And the transition will take place and any knowledge of why it ever was that Serge Lutens was so great will evaporate.

Serge made this perfume once, that had the scent of gunpowder in it, like you have drifting all around you when you are at the carnival area in Paris at nighttime. ...And candy floss. And women's iris butter lipstick. Marilyn's style of lipstick.

He also did another one as well, a homage to Marlene Dietrich - called 'La fille de Berlin.' After, 'Ich bin ein Berliner,' I guess.

Serge had a friend one time - a crack-shot with a rifle.

Things are all different, of course, these days.

Nobody does any bad things noh moh, right?

Deep inside, way deep deep down inside of people, are they really quite angry and resentful of so many things - or are they traumatized and numb by what life has dished out to them. There is a mass human psychological problem issue, isn't there? Maybe it isn't people's fault either - because so much of it is just 'external bad things happening to them.'

This is a dangerous place, this human world. Serge Lutens has more or less run away and hid. 

I think... Here is what I think - I think that inasmuch as I do know for sure that there are far superior intelligent beings from distant stars, and they are hereabouts at least; and far superior than ordinary human beings (and it is an interesting question a poster here made, about how they got there at all, to that position of advanced moral reasoning if not from a 'similar' evolution process that the human race thinks it is on), I think they are not all that interested in 'saving people' just from themselves, as it were. 

I mean, if you are able to solve your own internal conflicts and angers and come out of the whirlpool of life with some balance and the ability to be socially interesting without all of the risky patterns of conflict and aggression that human beings have tended to exhibit rather a lot down through history - it would be better for humans to do that than to have it 'done for them' by some other lot, surely.

I don't need to caption this, seriously
do I - all of you over 55?

But I think there has been enough history already to show that there is no 'process' of moral evolution' going on via the presumed 'dialectic' or 'two-polar conflict dynamic' that is the standard condition of human society and always has been.

This thing we are witnessing right now over the election of the US President - it is all about a passive-aggressive psychopathology.

What people really want to do - on either side - is to shoot someone. Lin Wood already voiced that and he has a platform but a zillion other 'little' people have said as much all over social media.

If a super advanced ET Alien went and visited Serge Lutens, in Marrakech, or when he was having lunch at El Buli in Spain when that was still there, would Serge want 'technology' to go shoot someone - he has enough cause, from what I understand of his life - or would he want some advanced ideas and some insights into new things to make?

'First I Crawl'

Ancient traditional Indian poem, right: 'first I crawl, then I run, then I fly.'

We humans, we love technology, see. We want all the good stuff, the things that will make our lives easier, and that we can use to exert power over others.

We want to go 'above,' see what is up there -, those at least, who have looked away from the pond which is at their reflection only and a mere imagining that this is what is 'up there.'

Just look at the color composition here. These
Germans, you have to hand it to them - they have
a scandalously vicious appreciation of semiotics in marketing.

If you consider the latest BMW M8, the hottest versions of it, can get 60KPH in 2 odd seconds. I mean what is this? Some kind of time machine?? LOL

Is this looking 'up,' or just across at ourselves?

So what is, to look 'up?'

This is something which can only be accomplished by the quieter voices. Earth radar dishes peer into the vast cavernous expanse of space, and listen to hear something. Still, it's the 'wow' message that the scientists are all chasing. Churchill said in his speech at the commencement of the 'Great Battle,' that if Britain lost the battle, and Hitler had have dragged everyone into the abyss, it would be an abyss inclusive of 'perverted science.' He actually used those words. Why?

Now if you imagine some super advanced species from very far away, are also the product of the same kinds of grasping, shallow, power-mad academic science we are surrounded by on our planet today - from the Iranian scientists who are intent on making a bunch of nuclear bombs, to the Medico della Peste fellows running around unbridled everywhere - then you really don't want to meet them.

But what if they're not though?

'Missing Hours.'

Then they, would have a problem with you - I mean 'us...' Us; I mean us.

This obsession about funny looking, scrawny, bug-eyed, grey thingies - comes from where, exactly?

There's just nothing but ugly things depicted everywhere, by visionary artists I suppose, or as also described by many public 'contactees.' 

If you look more at those others - still in the public space - but who are less open about their own experiences, yet who nonetheless talk about 'missing hours' and 'carry me away' in their work and the language contained in their usually artistic work, you get somewhat of a different picture.

No doubt there are some outward indications too.

If you are someone with 'a quiet voice,' rather than someone who will insist that you have something to teach those thousands of years ahead of you in the Universal game, as it were, or that you simply must, be granted access to their technology... 

...then you should be aware that they will 'sequester' you. You will be taken to a remote place away from the rest of humanity.

And from there, slowly but ever so slowly, you will be introduced to new ideas - things you never before had imagined, nor had understood from records of the past.

You will crawl first, before you will be even allowed to run.

In the following video from Coke Studio, you will see one of the modern-era 'great classical voices' - Monali Thakur; her voice has the range and especially the kind of power that is associated with the truly great classical Indian singers of the past. She has the classical glass crystal 'young' but stinging sharp notes... Personally I favor the individual style of Shruti Pathak here too, but you simply can't take anything away from the whole 'composed formation' of singers. Whoever put them all together on this classical piece is a genius. I know not everyone is going to 'see' this or to 'get' it - what is in here, but if you watch very very carefully you will see something... Others down in the comments section on the YT video page have observed it and commented but maybe they are just accidentally 'getting it...' The clue is just remember the main direction of this article.

The song is 'First I Crawl, Then I Run, Then I Fly.'

Iran's Lunacy

A small news item might have could your eye today about Iran saying to the IAEA that it plans to increase the enrichment of its stores of Uranium to 20%.

It does not seem that Iran has at all clearly said 'only some' but just an open-ended 'increase enrichment to 20%.'

Here in the West we think that nuclear weapons contain 90%+ enriched radioactive material - because our weapons are like that. The fact is, you can make nuclear bombs from 20% enriched Uranium although the volumetric amount needed is large, larger - you would think - than what could go into a missile. Which means you can still deploy something on the back of a truck or on a ship.

For a long time, Iran has known there was going to be a problem with the US Presidential election and has had a plan to exploit the vulnerability of the US national command structure during the early months of 2021. China is completely in on this. In fact, they have been supplying Iran with the intel for a very long time via all their agents and operatives that they have spread out right through American society and inside of government.

It's too late now, of course, for anyone to really do anything about what is going to transpire next - the FBI was 'otherwise occupied' on various super important things of course, and the CIA was waterboarding someone with serious info to divulge, no doubt.

Too late now.

It isn't fair to say this is confined to the New Age-y ideas, because a lot of mindsets talk about this - but we are actually not, as these all say, 'beings of light.' Instead we are beings that respond to colors and to light and to dark and to sound and sounds.

The ways in which we respond in many many cases depends so much on years of programming, grooved in through adaptation and formulated around pressures from parents and peers as we are growing our physical material brain cell structures from small babies through childhood and on-wards: we presume that we can 'sit in judgment' of the facts we are shown, or perhaps try and 'honestly' adduce positions from a range of political or religious or ideological stories...

...This applies no less to matters about perceptions of economic forces! In fact, the world is awash with casinos and stock-markets and so on, where the basic proposition is that all the participants have opinions they all think is 'true' and 'right' and that will be fulfilled in those markets for them to make money.

And there are all these people walking around then, with filters on their eyes, biases in their brains, and certainty of purpose about what they are intending to do next.

But why though, why does an Iran, or a China, feel so disposed to take so many human lives into the abyss?

Adolf Hitler took people into the abyss because there already was an abyss in German after the previous years of European history - and the Mullahs would say they are in a similar situation. Xi is not in the same boat, of course.

Hitler decided he had the right to lead people out of the abyss. And he took them all further into the abyss.

There is a lesson here.

'We' cannot lead anyone else. 'I' cannot lead 'you,' and 'you' should not think you are going to lead anyone else anywhere either, by the same token.

'I' can move with other 'I.'

There is this reported story around, that Senator Marco Rubio gave the FBI and some intel groups a dead-line I think of not much more than another month or so, to hand over all that they know on these 'ET Alien encounters.'

In the future, a long long time in the future, whatever is left of 'the human race,' will operate on the basis of 'I.'

In the now, though, those that are in a far future of their own by comparison with today's human race - are not going to ever have had any basis to confer with too many human beings that are around today. The human race is still living in the 'Babylon system.'

...and as you know, the number '666' is all about the sexigesimal number system that Nimrod used in Babylon. Right?

All very occult, yes I know.

'Mystery Babylon - oh you that deceived all the nations with your pharmakeia.'