Play Cards Against This, And...

You will lose.

Of course, many governments, many of these so-called 'elites' are playing cards; that's exactly what they are doing.

Anyway, humans are humans, right? They'll just all go on doing what they always ever have done.

Oh, what is this?

The thing that occupies the discussions among astro-physicists and cosmologists when it comes to 'the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life' - apart from clever things that the Kepler Space Telescope (a craft) could do like record the periodic diminishing levels of light from nearby stars which indicated that 'Earth-like' planets were crossing the visual field in front of the particular star... ...the thing they talk about is the fact that super advanced Extraterrestrial civilizations would need to have found a way to send data back in time. And this is because that is the only mechanism our scientists can see - or maybe the best mechanism they can see - that provides some kind of bridge to faster-than-light travel. Information - or 'data' - if you look at it in terms of the pulse function ('wave function') of light, may be able to recruit energy and subsequently mass and also organize it. I mean, we are talking seriously huge numbers and quanta here, it's beyond my state-of-mind even to bother trying to actually 'think' about. Jesus, if you want to look at gravity as having some kind of Doppler properties then you are talking about a medium that goes right through and all the way round and round and round the whole entire Universe all at once.

Ouch, my head hurts.

Anyway, we don't need to think about that stuff!

Dunno... Double Delta?
Two heat sources
coming together?

Of course, almost all of the genius-level physicists' discussions all end with the 'we haven't found any indication of anyone having sent any data back in time...'

So. You only need to have found one of those...

Because if you find one, as in really do find one that is not able to be dismissed in any way at all, and is in fact able to be tested positively, then it's not a 'singularity,' it's the breach that alters the 'skeptic hypothesis' for everything (which is our present 'genius-level' human approach) - and starts to afford itself the opportunity to take the 'political hypothesis' approach instead.

If all of us here just all admit that we are maybe not that important in the vast scheme of things - that we, us, are maybe not entitled to engage anyone from some hugely advanced futuristic alien civilization and get them to expend however much huge sums of whatever they need to recruit to the task, to 'make space-ships appear' or send two or three interplanetary visitors over materially just to hold our hands and go 'there, there...'

Nevertheless, the easiest, cheapest (in terms of whatever protocols and energy spend is involved - which must be simply huge) way to get things to us, is to send data.

Now I'm only 'taking a step back' from absolute disclosure because I don't know what plans people have that have plans, and also who have the power; I don't know what they want to do. What I do know, is - going back to the - exo-biologists/cosmologists - that they have a 'parallel stepping' hypothesis. This says that as we, we humans, progress with our own technology and science understandings by ourselves, then equivalently, other civilizations may engage at the equivalent technology level and not much beyond it.

It really is only the 'back sending' of data that is our big hurdle at the moment and it may be that CERN has gone at least enough of the way, that 'help' could be rendered more meaningfully in that 'parallel stepping' protocol. Except, let's at least be somewhat modest and say, not to us individually particularly. Right?

Right?! Because that's the 'stance' we take. 

If anybody asks you, you just say 'no no no, not me, IDK. I'm just guessing and I just heard rumors.'

On the other hand, if someone comes to you with a 'sign' then you know - well, at least you'll know how to read the sign.

There's all kind of 'static' - all kinds of nonsense and socially irresponsible stuff that goes on with any large social groupings and the instigators of things inside there. For instance, green colored shawls 'could' be an indication of someone who takes, trades, or wants marijuana. That's pretty straightforward.

And I guess those guys would not realize that the Office of National Drug Control Policy has had people inside of festivals and concerts at least for the last seven months now - so let's not alert them either, okay.

A big tip for those of you here who haven't already decided to stick their fingers in their ears now, is to 'right click' on any pic and 'Google search for image' and then just see what is associated with those pics.

Naturally, because you have been raised and effectively completely brainwashed in the 'skeptical hypothesis' approach and not the political hypothesis approach, you won't - you still won't believe what you are seeing.

However there are, at this moment a good half a dozen people who emailed privately and by now if any of them wanted to dispute what they were shown, I'm sure they would have comment-posted by now.

I love this phrase, that seems to be something from our modern era of 'phoneglish' and post-Millennial speak:

It is what it is.

It is what it is. 

Here's that song 'Arrowhead' again.

Sinister And Occult And Deeply Dangerous

I've had to think very carefully about this article... I've had to think a lot about choosing words carefully.

Firstly because I certainly do not believe making sweeping generalizations are appropriate to expressing my own thoughts on the matter. Of course, I could, like anyone casually expressing a gut reaction or 'feeling' or superficial impression - make sweeping generalizations!

This is a 'two pipe problem,'
this one!

But I'm not going to.

But then I'm also a bit stuck too, because we are positioned in a world in which 'standard definitions' for words, and common beliefs about what some old writings say - are not the same as my own understandings concerning them. So I don't know, and I'm not sure whether readers here really share similar understandings.

For example... Every church in the whole entire world is convinced there is a word 'fornication' in the Bible, Old and New Testaments. I mean, yes, there is in most translations into English, however after all the thing was not originally composed in English and Hebrew was not a written language at the proposed or presumed time of Moses and indeed there were no modern grammatical forms of written Hebrew even at the time the original Septuagint was actually written down.

So... So... Where does that leave me...

Well... The original Greek word, and the proto-god-only-knows-what - Sumerian? Sanskrit? - or the primitive Aramaic word... ...is 'ekporneuo.' 'Ekporneuo' does not mean 'fornication' - in fact so much so were early translators aware that it does not, that they notated their simplistic truncated (though final textual) translations with the phrase: 'give themselves over to fornication...' So what we have is the translators really saying this tautology - 'fornication (being the word we settled on) means 'give oneself over to er, er... ...fornication.'

A meaningless exposition, frankly.

No. It does not mean 'fornication.'

Thus, according to me and pretty much no one else, even if there were 'Watchers' or 'Fallen Angels,' who 'fell' (there were not any of those things; not in the original texts, not in reality, not at any time in history ancient, deep past, or now, or ever) their problem was not that they 'committed fornication.' Their 'sin' (and again, there is no word 'sin' originally, and certainly not as is commonly understood today as a word cast about in every church).

If you want to see someone go into a supernatural trance,
have a look at Kristian Nairn's 'trance DJ set' on YouTube.
Nairn is the actor who plays 'Hodor' in GOT, and he's also a
very good DJ.  

No. They 'exceeded all satisfactions of greed and lust even to the point past barbaric vandalism (of course, 'vandalism' not a word at that time).' Ekporneuo. And that has a 'subtle' (not!) meaning beyond simple unlicensed sex.

There is no passage in the Bible in which Sodom and Gomorrah were obliterated because of gay sex or homosexuality. No indeed, for once again, it is for 'ekporneuo' - and in fact worse; they were about to violently rape certain unusual-looking strangers under the protection of Lot.

There are many words used by Jesus Christ which have all been translated as a bulk job lot as 'sin,' but they have very very complex and subtle nuances of meaning with very important implications: the words are 'be defeated,' 'not be ideal,' 'not perfectly beautiful,' 'sinister with cunning,' 'not in the divinely perfect way...'

But no single word 'sin.' Nowhere. Not ever. Ever. Period.

So which 'Jesus' are any of you listening to? The guy that fell down in the last shower of rain at a local church on your television? Or the guy who may have lived, might have lived, and according to some did not even live, albeit at least we can all agree - the actual chronologically original 'Jesus Christ?!' ...of the texts from more or less around that time in question?

So what then is the problem, if any, with transgender anything, or perhaps, with the present political agenda that I have termed it deep and dark and occult and utterly dangerous?

Well, I can tell you my own thoughts let's say, as pitched to maybe an actual transgender person - what does going too far mean to your mind, to your sensitivities about other human beings, about your friends and neighbors...? For all I know you might be some alien hybrid, or just plain alien (ET) who is legitimately needful of gender re-assignment surgical intervention. I don't know. And I don't care, since for one thing I am neither a medical doctor, nor a surgeon, nor any kind of professional psychologist; those guys form part of the fabric of ordinary society - I do not - and that's all of you guys' business, not mine. If they have some factual basis of reason to do something well, that's that as far as I'm concerned, and if they do not - then they go too far pretending to a knowledge and powers they do not have.

So here's another thing you will not read or hear anywhere else... I'm sure you have heard it said that somewhere in the Bible, someone said that 'the Seat of Satan is in Pergamon (Turkey).'

You've heard me say this before - the gods love puns and plays on words.

Okay so the people referred to in the infamous passages in the Book of Enoch and also in the mainstream canonical Bible were never called 'Watchers;' maybe they did do 'watching' but they were not specifically named 'Watchers.' They were described as, and named 'Gegenes.' You see there's 'homogenes,' and there's 'heterogenes,' and there's 'gegenes.'

A big tall individual - well over six foot tall.
I think by name 'Gena...?'

And the Gegenes were so terribly excessive in their strength, and in lusts and in their lack of compassion (mostly, not all of them) that they were able to do whatever they wanted, and they were eventually cannibals, and highly destructive of animals and men and even forests and trees (so the story goes). And when they died out (don't worry for what reason) some occultists were able to invoke their deceased spirits and have them in-dwell living people bred to accommodate their power (nephesh-philim: 'Nephilim') and so they were great warriors, great athletes, great 'beings' and did all kinds of extravagant things.

If you mess around using certain highly toxic drugs (and of course the US Military research units are already a long way up this road), you can fiddle with the Sella Turcica (Turkish Seat) which ensconces and usually circumscribes how much endocrine activity and flow can come from the pituitary, and you can 'create' gigantism or acromegaly and those subjects will start to have extended ranges of vision ('see' things which do not appear there to the rest of us), off-the-scale rage and anger potential, and immense strength and stamina and the ability to withstand pain.

There are plenty of 'gentle giants' around and there always have been. And there are even these 'gegenes' who will do you no harm.

Those are not the guys we are worried about. The guys I'm worried about are the 'poniria' - the ones who are sinisterly cunning. And the ones that are incredibly organised.