Of course, many governments, many of these so-called 'elites' are playing cards; that's exactly what they are doing.
Anyway, humans are humans, right? They'll just all go on doing what they always ever have done.
 |
| Oh, what is this? |
The thing that occupies the discussions among astro-physicists and cosmologists when it comes to 'the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life' - apart from clever things that the Kepler Space Telescope (a craft) could do like record the periodic diminishing levels of light from nearby stars which indicated that 'Earth-like' planets were crossing the visual field in front of the particular star... ...the thing they talk about is the fact that super advanced Extraterrestrial civilizations would need to have found a way to send data back in time. And this is because that is the only mechanism our scientists can see - or maybe the best mechanism they can see - that provides some kind of bridge to faster-than-light travel. Information - or 'data' - if you look at it in terms of the pulse function ('wave function') of light, may be able to recruit energy and subsequently mass and also organize it. I mean, we are talking seriously huge numbers and quanta here, it's beyond my state-of-mind even to bother trying to actually 'think' about. Jesus, if you want to look at gravity as having some kind of Doppler properties then you are talking about a medium that goes right through and all the way round and round and round the whole entire Universe all at once.
Ouch, my head hurts.
Anyway, we don't need to think about that stuff!
 |
| Dunno... Double Delta? Two heat sources coming together? |
Of course, almost all of the genius-level physicists' discussions all end with the 'we haven't found any indication of anyone having sent any data back in time...'
So. You only need to have found one of those...
Because if you find one, as in really do find one that is not able to be dismissed in any way at all, and is in fact able to be tested positively, then it's not a 'singularity,' it's the breach that alters the 'skeptic hypothesis' for everything (which is our present 'genius-level' human approach) - and starts to afford itself the opportunity to take the 'political hypothesis' approach instead.
If all of us here just all admit that we are maybe not that important in the vast scheme of things - that we, us, are maybe not entitled to engage anyone from some hugely advanced futuristic alien civilization and get them to expend however much huge sums of whatever they need to recruit to the task, to 'make space-ships appear' or send two or three interplanetary visitors over materially just to hold our hands and go 'there, there...'
Nevertheless, the easiest, cheapest (in terms of whatever protocols and energy spend is involved - which must be simply huge) way to get things to us, is to send data.
Now I'm only 'taking a step back' from absolute disclosure because I don't know what plans people have that have plans, and also who have the power; I don't know what they want to do. What I do know, is - going back to the - exo-biologists/cosmologists - that they have a 'parallel stepping' hypothesis. This says that as we, we humans, progress with our own technology and science understandings by ourselves, then equivalently, other civilizations may engage at the equivalent technology level and not much beyond it.
It really is only the 'back sending' of data that is our big hurdle at the moment and it may be that CERN has gone at least enough of the way, that 'help' could be rendered more meaningfully in that 'parallel stepping' protocol. Except, let's at least be somewhat modest and say, not to us individually particularly. Right?
Right?! Because that's the 'stance' we take.
If anybody asks you, you just say 'no no no, not me, IDK. I'm just guessing and I just heard rumors.'
On the other hand, if someone comes to you with a 'sign' then you know - well, at least you'll know how to read the sign.
There's all kind of 'static' - all kinds of nonsense and socially irresponsible stuff that goes on with any large social groupings and the instigators of things inside there. For instance, green colored shawls 'could' be an indication of someone who takes, trades, or wants marijuana. That's pretty straightforward.
And I guess those guys would not realize that the Office of National Drug Control Policy has had people inside of festivals and concerts at least for the last seven months now - so let's not alert them either, okay.
A big tip for those of you here who haven't already decided to stick their fingers in their ears now, is to 'right click' on any pic and 'Google search for image' and then just see what is associated with those pics.
Naturally, because you have been raised and effectively completely brainwashed in the 'skeptical hypothesis' approach and not the political hypothesis approach, you won't - you still won't believe what you are seeing.
However there are, at this moment a good half a dozen people who emailed privately and by now if any of them wanted to dispute what they were shown, I'm sure they would have comment-posted by now.
I love this phrase, that seems to be something from our modern era of 'phoneglish' and post-Millennial speak:
It is what it is.
It is what it is.
Here's that song 'Arrowhead' again.
