Play Cards Against This, And...

You will lose.

Of course, many governments, many of these so-called 'elites' are playing cards; that's exactly what they are doing.

Anyway, humans are humans, right? They'll just all go on doing what they always ever have done.

Oh, what is this?

The thing that occupies the discussions among astro-physicists and cosmologists when it comes to 'the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Life' - apart from clever things that the Kepler Space Telescope (a craft) could do like record the periodic diminishing levels of light from nearby stars which indicated that 'Earth-like' planets were crossing the visual field in front of the particular star... ...the thing they talk about is the fact that super advanced Extraterrestrial civilizations would need to have found a way to send data back in time. And this is because that is the only mechanism our scientists can see - or maybe the best mechanism they can see - that provides some kind of bridge to faster-than-light travel. Information - or 'data' - if you look at it in terms of the pulse function ('wave function') of light, may be able to recruit energy and subsequently mass and also organize it. I mean, we are talking seriously huge numbers and quanta here, it's beyond my state-of-mind even to bother trying to actually 'think' about. Jesus, if you want to look at gravity as having some kind of Doppler properties then you are talking about a medium that goes right through and all the way round and round and round the whole entire Universe all at once.

Ouch, my head hurts.

Anyway, we don't need to think about that stuff!

Dunno... Double Delta?
Two heat sources
coming together?

Of course, almost all of the genius-level physicists' discussions all end with the 'we haven't found any indication of anyone having sent any data back in time...'

So. You only need to have found one of those...

Because if you find one, as in really do find one that is not able to be dismissed in any way at all, and is in fact able to be tested positively, then it's not a 'singularity,' it's the breach that alters the 'skeptic hypothesis' for everything (which is our present 'genius-level' human approach) - and starts to afford itself the opportunity to take the 'political hypothesis' approach instead.

If all of us here just all admit that we are maybe not that important in the vast scheme of things - that we, us, are maybe not entitled to engage anyone from some hugely advanced futuristic alien civilization and get them to expend however much huge sums of whatever they need to recruit to the task, to 'make space-ships appear' or send two or three interplanetary visitors over materially just to hold our hands and go 'there, there...'

Nevertheless, the easiest, cheapest (in terms of whatever protocols and energy spend is involved - which must be simply huge) way to get things to us, is to send data.

Now I'm only 'taking a step back' from absolute disclosure because I don't know what plans people have that have plans, and also who have the power; I don't know what they want to do. What I do know, is - going back to the - exo-biologists/cosmologists - that they have a 'parallel stepping' hypothesis. This says that as we, we humans, progress with our own technology and science understandings by ourselves, then equivalently, other civilizations may engage at the equivalent technology level and not much beyond it.

It really is only the 'back sending' of data that is our big hurdle at the moment and it may be that CERN has gone at least enough of the way, that 'help' could be rendered more meaningfully in that 'parallel stepping' protocol. Except, let's at least be somewhat modest and say, not to us individually particularly. Right?

Right?! Because that's the 'stance' we take. 

If anybody asks you, you just say 'no no no, not me, IDK. I'm just guessing and I just heard rumors.'

On the other hand, if someone comes to you with a 'sign' then you know - well, at least you'll know how to read the sign.

There's all kind of 'static' - all kinds of nonsense and socially irresponsible stuff that goes on with any large social groupings and the instigators of things inside there. For instance, green colored shawls 'could' be an indication of someone who takes, trades, or wants marijuana. That's pretty straightforward.

And I guess those guys would not realize that the Office of National Drug Control Policy has had people inside of festivals and concerts at least for the last seven months now - so let's not alert them either, okay.

A big tip for those of you here who haven't already decided to stick their fingers in their ears now, is to 'right click' on any pic and 'Google search for image' and then just see what is associated with those pics.

Naturally, because you have been raised and effectively completely brainwashed in the 'skeptical hypothesis' approach and not the political hypothesis approach, you won't - you still won't believe what you are seeing.

However there are, at this moment a good half a dozen people who emailed privately and by now if any of them wanted to dispute what they were shown, I'm sure they would have comment-posted by now.

I love this phrase, that seems to be something from our modern era of 'phoneglish' and post-Millennial speak:

It is what it is.

It is what it is. 

Here's that song 'Arrowhead' again.

'Hopeful' Predictive Programming

And that is not to say 'they' are not going to carry out some stupid 'incident.'

People, I think, are gravitating too much around the notion that there is going to be some other 'Aurora shooting'-type event to do with this 'Joker' flick. For whatever purpose these conspiracy theories can come up with.

But to me that is not even the main sinister aspect of this recent, indeed current, media scam. As Lionel Nation recently pointed out, the legal definition of 'lying' is when someone tells untruths in order to deliberately deceive. 'Joker,' the movie, is a scam. 

Something beautiful for you to look at, unlike 'Joker,' which is ugly
and illiterate. This is called the New York Cafe, but it is in Budapest.

Movies, as in the visual telling of some fictional story, are entertainment; and 'fiction' is not lying meant to deceive.

We're all grown up adults, and we are quite capable of handling the sophisticated but quite normal trails of the human mind in its manner of well, simply being and having fun, I suppose.

Well anyway, we'll see what happens. Whether this thing just fades into the usual history of Hollywood movies... ...as many do.

Although, just for academic interest, let's compare this movie alongside something say, from pre- the big, Eighties' stock market Crash.

Have you noticed that in order to be topical and to capture mass audiences of the day, movies quite typically utilize obvious images of obtaining lifestyles that ordinary people are aware of or think really are what is going on in the society around them.

'9 1/2 Weeks' was about a markets arbitrageur, 'Wall Street' with Michael Douglas was about a literal Wall Street entrepreneur and the goings-on with that sort of lifestyle.

The first of those two movies was made well before the actual Crash - it finished being written as a screenplay based on Ingeborg Day's true-to-her-New York-life autobiographical novel written in the early Eighties, and was fully completed as a movie in 1984 but released only in 1986. It made a total loss inside the USA losing more than half the film's production cost - no one inside American apparently liked it at all; audiences gave poor reviews and people stayed away. The 'theory' given as to why, is that censors too heavily edited it for American release.

Ingeborg Day - she wrote '9 1/2 Weeks'

However right from the minute it was released elsewhere around the world it zoomed ahead to a box office smash and something of a cult movie even to this day.

I'm not sure many people have ever really, perhaps outside of a few 'salons' of intellectual people in Munich or god I dunno, Sydney... ...discussed this, but '9 1/2 Weeks' is a highly highly culturally sophisticated work, and far from just being some simple mass appeal 'erotica.' But it isn't something the modern American standard of education is going to be able to cope with.

To this day I don't think that many people realize '9 1/2 Weeks' is the pre-cursor, the true 'ancestor' as it were, to Kubrick's EWS. You see, the signs and symbols and indicators inside the movie are all there, relating to some kind of 'clique' of really quite dark figures of moneyed and political power - but many of those 'signs' will fly right over the heads of most modern-day viewers. In fact, if anything, there is even more of a sinister, quite satanic sexual undercurrent going in the movie, compared to what you see rather obviously in 'Eyes Wide Shut.' 

All these movies - and maybe even including this week's release, 'Joker' - reflect real life events on a grand scale: 'Wall Street' foreshadowed the big collapse on the equities market, and 'Joker' is telling us that the public has gone insane and that everything is about to get even more dystopian than it already is; but in some 'grand' way.

Every single one of the pieces of 'furniture' in this scene is a highly valuable classic of
major industrial design artists and masters. There is Le Corbusier, there is Cassina Perriand LC4,
and a number of others. Day was, of course, in real life an art dealer in New York.

See the secret of this move ('9 1/2 Weeks') is to do with the original author - Ingeborg Day. She was not exactly a 'Lebensborn' as far as anyone has said, but she was from out of a very special 'high cultural education program' run by the Nazis. And she was, most certainly, both an art historian as well as a design and industrial social history expert. I could, in theory' 'teach' some course on this, but no one would pay enough and what would be the point anyway - people would end up trying to 'walk on rice paper without leaving marks,' etc.

You're better off realizing that Ingeborg Day and Virginia Woolf, um, let's just say, have a lot in common. And I select my words quite deliberately. 

'They' - the weirdos in Hollywood now - are hoping their predictive programming is going to be reflected in the public; they are wrong.